
My child didn't want to put his shoes on
'Good afternoon, letting you know that your son has been defiant today and placed in isolation because he didn't want to put his shoes on after soft play.
'During this time, he soiled himself and smeared it everywhere. We wheeled him in a trolley to the showers and scrubbed him down. He was very upset and angry and had to be restrained by at least four members of staff.'
As the words trickled down the phone, I shook, sickened. My body knew before my mind caught up — my child had been violated, not supported.
My son – who was in the latter years of primary school – wasn't 'defiant', he was overwhelmed. Dysregulated. Frightened.
He needed co-regulation, not confrontation. He needed someone to sit beside him, not pin him down.
This incident — avoidable and unnecessary — was just one in a string of failures. But it was the one that broke something in me.
My son was born with Down's syndrome, then diagnosed autistic several years later. His speech was unique. Compulsive, with extreme sensory needs and avoidance of everyday tasks, he found the busy school environment with all the daily transitions extremely difficult.
In a class with 10 other children – all with profound multiple learning disabilities – he found ways of masking and said 'yes' to a lot of things he didn't understand, so people would leave him alone.
On top of that, he would vomit daily on the school minibus, so I would be called to pick him up. This is regardless of me explaining it wasn't a bug, but anxiety. The stress eventually caused him to lose all his hair.
He was soon labelled as naughty.
Children were regularly grabbed, held down, and isolated for behaviours that were actually cries for help
We asked for support. Instead, we were blamed. We were told his behaviours were our fault — that we were too soft, too emotional, too much. I became 'that Mum'.
We'd regularly be told, 'He needs to learn' and 'Your standards are too high', 'Stop worrying!' or 'No one else has a problem with it'.
Then the incident happened when I was called about my son being restrained. On that occasion, isolation areas were lockable and padded sections separate to class, but children could hear others' distress through the walls.
I had impressed on teachers many times how important it was never to leave him alone because of his anxiety, as it triggered his incontinence. He would have been naked, confused, and utterly terrified.
He wasn't maliciously violent, he just hadn't put his shoes on.
On other occasions, my boy would return home with unexplained hand-shaped bruises and scratches, but the school diary would simply state 'he has had a good day, all fine'. When challenged, teachers would say 'another child did it'.
I have since learnt that at that school, restraint was covertly routine. Children were regularly grabbed, held down, and isolated for behaviours that were actually cries for help.
ICARS supports children who have suffered restraint and seclusion abuse in schools. For more information, visit their website here.
The final straw came when I witnessed a child being carried kicking and shrieking up the corridor in the equivalent of a gigantic hold-all. The staff recoiled. I wasn't meant to see that.
It was dehumanising. It was treated as normal. I raised concerns, but was silenced each time. I look back now with regret.
His fear of school was palpable, but over time I was made to doubt my own sanity.
The guilt of sending him to this unsafe place engulfed me. So we removed him and were left to fend for ourselves, effectively off-rolled under the guise of an 'elective' choice for home education.
Forced out. The school would not admit they couldn't meet his needs.
It all had a nuclear impact. The whole experience destroyed his curiosity of learning new things. Only recently, through tears, he said: 'School cruel'.
The fact it took years for him to say this speaks volumes and shows the depth of the trauma. A sensitive, funny, and deep-thinking young person, but his complexity was interpreted as being deliberately disobedient.
Viewing recent footage of a 12-year-old child being restrained at a special school brings back the sheer horror we faced. Five members of staff were involved while he was held face-down on the floor in a prone restraint.
Another child, another family. The truth is this is not an exception, it seems to be a regular practice and happens not only in schools both mainstream and specialist, but also care homes and hospitals.
Now, as a young disabled adult, my son struggles — being manhandled and misunderstood has left scars that are still trying to heal. He has PTSD.
We're fighting to secure care support and nurturing education, while public services are stretched thinner than pizza dough. The future feels like a cliff edge.
A fundamental shift is needed in how we care for vulnerable, disabled, and neurodivergent people. Instead of convenience and compliance, the default must be connection. Trust, not threats. The goal is dignity and respect, not long-lasting damage. More Trending
Every one of us has a duty to speak up. To challenge abuse. To act when our gut tells us something is wrong. Because if we stay silent, we become complicit.
My son deserved safety. He deserved compassion. He deserved to be seen.
Every child does.
This article was originally published April 16, 2025
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing James.Besanvalle@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Dad, 24, took his own life after being arrested over newborn son's death
MORE: I went to give my ex head – then I vomited
MORE: Nadia Almada: I almost certainly wouldn't win Big Brother now as a trans woman

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ITV News
21 hours ago
- ITV News
Nottingham mum 'would probably still be alive today' if ambulance was sent
A mother, who was found dead alongside her disabled daughter at their home in Nottingham, would "probably still be alive today" if an ambulance had been sent to her, a coroner has concluded. The bodies of Alphonsine Djiako Leuga, 47, and Loraine Choulla, 18, were discovered last May at their council home in Radford. It's thought they could have been dead for months. The inquest heard that Ms Leuga had called an ambulance asking for help three months before the pair were found dead. An ambulance was never sent because they thought the call had been abandoned. East Midlands Ambulance Service 's head of patient safety, Susan Jevons, told the inquest there had been a "missed opportunity". Today, coroner Amanda Bewley said: "I am entirely satisfied that had East Midlands Ambulance Service sent an ambulance when she called, Loraine would not have died." She added that she can't say for sure whether Miss Choulla would have survived. Ms Leuga suffered from sickle cell anaemia and died from pneumonia. Miss Choulla had Down's syndrome and learning difficulties and was "entirely dependent" on her mother for food and hydration, Nottingham Coroner's Court was told.


ITV News
4 days ago
- ITV News
Mother found dead alongside disabled daughter in Nottingham refused help, inquest hears
An inquest has heard how a mother in Nottingham, found dead at home with her disabled daughter, repeatedly refused help from local services. The bodies of Alphonsine Djiako Leuga, 47, and Loraine Choulla, 18, were discovered last May at their council home in Radford. It's thought they could have been dead for months. Nottingham Coroner's Court heard how social workers, council officers and community nursing teams tried to engage with Ms Leuga, but that she would often cancel meetings or deny them access to the property. Ms Leuga and her daughter had moved into their council home in 2019. Miss Choulla had Down's syndrome and learning difficulties and was "entirely dependent" on her mother for food and hydration. She began attending a special educational needs school, but in Autumn 2021 Ms Leuga stopped sending her to school, the inquest heard. Attempts to carry out vital maintenance works on the property were stopped by Ms Leuga and the court heard how in April 2023 the gas supply was turned off after workers were denied access to the house to carry out an annual safety check. On another occasion, Ms Leuga told social workers she didn't trust them and she was concerned they would take her daughter away. Her last contact with the authorities was when she dialled 999 asking for help, but an ambulance was never sent. East Midlands Ambulance Service 's head of patient safety, Susan Jevons, said there had been "a missed opportunity for an ambulance to attend Alphonsine when she requested one". The inquest heard that Ms Leuga suffered from sickle cell anaemia and died from pneumonia. Miss Choulla's cause of death is as yet unknown. A statement by Ms Leuga's eldest daughter, Elvira Choulla, was also read out at the inquest. She said she had moved in with her mother and younger sister in 2019, but moved out to live independently three years later. The inquest heard she would often visit them, but that her relationship with her mother deteriorated to the point that the visits almost entirely stopped. The next time she heard any news about them was when police told her they had passed away, the inquest heard. Elvira Choulla described Loraine as a "friendly and bubbly girl". She added: 'She loved being around people and I never saw her sad. I loved her and she loved me back."

Leader Live
5 days ago
- Leader Live
Mother and daughter found dead months after 999 call ‘missed opportunity'
Nottingham Coroner's Court was told Alphonsine Djiako Leuga, 47, suffered from sickle cell anaemia and died from pneumonia, while her 18-year-old daughter Loraine Choulla had learning difficulties and Down's syndrome and relied on her mother for food and hydration. A inquest into the deaths, expected to last for five days, began on Monday with assistant coroner Amanda Bewley hearing that Ms Leuga called 999 three months before her body was found, telling a call hander she was cold and could not move. The hearing was told that during the call, made shortly after 1pm on February 2 last year, Ms Leuga groaned, requested an ambulance and said 'I need help to my daughter' and 'I'm in the bed, I feel cold and can't move' before cutting off the line. She also gave details of her address in Hartley Road, Radford, Nottingham, where her body and that of her daughter were found on May 21 last year. Giving evidence to the inquest, East Midlands Ambulance Service's head of patient safety, Susan Jevons said the call handler, an emergency medical adviser, should have referred the call to the control room despatch officers. Ms Jevons said attempts had been made to call Ms Leuga back, but she told the inquest: 'The call should have been left for an ambulance to attend once we had got the address, which we had. 'The ambulance didn't go to the address because the emergency medical adviser, thinking it was an abandoned call, closed the call down. 'So it wasn't visible to anybody within the emergency operations centre.' The coroner told Ms Jevons she would have to consider the possibility that sending an ambulance to the address 'might have been the difference between life or death' for Loraine. The inquest was told that Ms Leuga was admitted to hospital for a blood transfusion in late January last year as she was critically ill with very low iron levels, and was given a 'pragmatic' discharge linked to her daughter's care needs. The coroner asked Ms Jevons whether, if she found at the end of the inquest that Loraine had died after her mother, there had been a 'missed opportunity' in relation to the teenager's death. Ms Jevons responded: 'Yes, there was a missed opportunity for an ambulance to attend Alphonsine when she requested one.' Earlier, pathologist Dr Stuart Hamilton told the hearing by video-link that the mother and daughter were both likely to have been dead for 'weeks to months' before they were found, rather than for days or hours. Dr Hamilton said his initial cause of death following a post-mortem examination on Ms Leuga was pneumonia of uncertain cause, while her daughter's cause of death could not be established. Answering questions from the coroner, the pathologist said he could not rule out that Ms Leuga had died on the day of the 999 call. The body of Loraine, who the inquest was told was 'entirely dependent on her mother to meet her hydration and nutritional needs', showed no evidence of any third party involvement. Dr Hamilton said of the teenager: 'Unfortunately, based on the post-mortem examination and additional tests alone, it is my view that the cause of death is classed as unascertained – that is, I am not able to give a cause of death on the balance of probabilities.' Asked to comment on the possibility that Loraine's death may have been because of dehydration or malnutrition, Dr Hamilton answered: 'There is nothing in my findings that say any of that is incorrect.' Loraine was more likely to have died from dehydration than malnutrition, the witness said, if it was accepted that she 'wasn't able to make the decision to drink water' because of her difficulties. The inquest continues.