Portugal Reiterates It Will Meet Defense Spending Goal in 2025
Portugal is among countries that haven't met that existing NATO goal yet, with its defense spending reaching an estimated 1.55% of GDP in 2024. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte now wants countries in the alliance to back a new core defense spending target of 3.5% of national output, as well as an additional 1.5% of GDP for defense-related spending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
Republicans tear into Pentagon's Ukraine weapons freeze
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called out Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, a longtime proponent of shifting U.S. military resources away from Ukraine in order to beef up Taiwan's defenses. She argued the pause undermines Trump's commitments at NATO and urged Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is simultaneously serving as White House national security adviser, to enforce a strategy. 'The Trump administration's mixed messaging is undermining its own agenda to bring Putin to the negotiating table, and this move under Secretary Hegesth's leadership will only make a just and lasting peace harder to obtain,' Shaheen said in a statement. 'Now is not the time for rogue actors undermining our national security interests.' Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a senior Senate Armed Services Committee member, called the rationale behind the freeze 'fallacious and maybe even disingenuous.' He said he and colleagues in both parties were surprised by the news — and that Ukrainians will suffer. 'They're going to lose more lives, more people will be maimed and injured — more homes, hospitals, schools will be destroyed,' he said in an interview. 'The Russians … are not even making a pretense of going after military targets.' Other top Republicans were less troubled by reports of the stalled weapons shipments. Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), who chairs the panel that controls much of the Pentagon budget, said he still needed to examine what munitions Ukraine has in its inventory, but suggested supply concerns might be warranted. 'I think part of it is the supply. So we've been running through a lot of Standard Missiles, the whole Patriot system,' Calvert said. 'The other part of it is that the Europeans are beginning to pick up the slack. 'I don't know what they have in inventory right now, the Ukrainians. I'll find that out,' he said. House Armed Services Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) said he hadn't been informed of a pause on munitions shipments, but he noted the Trump administration has 'done it several times.'
Fox News
17 minutes ago
- Fox News
NATO chief reveals why he dubbed Trump 'Daddy' during Middle East peace talks
At the latest NATO summit in the Netherlands, President Donald Trump walked away with an unexpected nickname, "Daddy," given to him by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. Now, Rutte is explaining why he felt the U.S. Commander in Chief deserved the moniker. When Rutte initially made the comment, it came as a response to President Trump's heated remarks regarding the potential unraveling of the fragile Israel-Iran ceasefire. "Before President Trump went on the plane, the Israelis and Iranians had committed to a ceasefire," Rutte explained on "Fox & Friends" Wednesday. "Then that morning before he boarded that plane, they said, well, we might get at each other's throats again." Frustrated by the warring nations putting the ceasefire at risk, Trump made pointed remarks to both countries before leaving to attend the NATO summit. "We basically have two countries that have been fighting for so long and so hard that they don't know what the f--- they're doing," he told reporters shortly before departing for Europe. Trump discussed his disappointment with both Israel and Iran for resuming some level of fighting. The White House revealed he'd been in contact with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that morning. Later, during the NATO summit, Trump likened Israel and Iran to children brawling on a playground. Sitting beside him, Rutte chimed in with a now-viral phrase referring to Trump's disgruntled comments: "Then Daddy has to sometimes use strong language." Since those comments, the U.S.-brokered ceasefire has held. On his platform Truth Social, President Trump announced that Israel has since also agreed to a U.S.-led proposal for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, an effort that could lead to a larger peace in the region. Rutte defended Trump's hardline approach to peace in the Middle East. "History made you, President Trump, the leader of the U.S., the leader of the free world, to then basically say, 'Here's the red line. I don't accept it,'" Rutte said. The nickname didn't go unnoticed by White House staff, who later that day posted a social media montage of the president set to the Usher song "Daddy's Home." Rutte said he found the video amusing. "I was really taken by the after-movie the White House brought out," he said. "It was really funny."
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Trump should be euphoric about last 2 weeks, but will success endure?
President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation alongside Vice President JD Vance (L), Secretary of State Marco Rubio (C) and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the White House in Washington on June 21 after U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Pool photo by Carlos Barria/UPI | License Photo July 2 (UPI) -- In political terms, President Donald Trump could declare last week as the equivalent of a World Series-winning grand slam home run or a last-second touchdown to clinch the Super Bowl. In foreign policy, according to Trump, 30y Navy Tomahawk cruise missiles and 14 blockbuster 30,000-pound bombs "obliterated" Iran's nuclear program and gained a cease-fire between the two belligerents -- Iran and Israel. And for the first time, Trump convinced 31 of 32 NATO members to increase overall defense spending to 5% of gross domestic product-- 3.5% for defense and 1.5% for building greater "resilience" in the event of conflict. Domestically, the stunning win for the New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and various Supreme Court decisions, one of which reduced the authority of district judges to issue nationwide injunctions, will be regarded as great political victories for the president. Whether the "hat trick" of three successes will occur before July Fourth with the passage of Trump's "beautiful big bill," will be determined soon. But any White House would be euphoric about the last two weeks unless or until a truly independent analysis determines the immediate and longer-term consequences of these events. America's Operation Midnight Hammer exploited the Israeli air and missile campaigns that neutralized Iran's defenses and greatly damaged its nuclear infrastructure. But without accurate bomb damage assessment that will take time to generate or boots on the ground to make a physical inspection of the extent of destruction, a rush to judgment such as the president made is likely to be premature. Questions about how much of Iran's highly enriched uranium survived, where it is stored and if Iran has enough centrifuges to continue enrichment need answers. Further, how long the cease-fire lasts and what the Iranian and Israeli exit strategies are remain far from clear. If Iran refuses to accept the existence of Israel with some form of recognition and agrees to forgo its nuclear weapons aspirations, either will be a deal breaker. And without any peace agreement by both parties, what would prevent Israel (or the United States) to reattack Iran in the future? At home, debate over the War Powers Act passed in 1973 to limit the president's authority to order the U.S. military into action will not resolve the inherent contradiction between Congress and its sole responsibility to declare war and the president's constitutional duty to serve as commander-in-chief. While virtually every issue in the United States has become politicized -- especially those with the greatest visibility -- to illustrate this cynicism, suppose Kamala Harris had been president and had ordered these strikes. How would Republicans have responded? A good guess is that the same criticisms and cries of anguish made by Democrats over Operation Midnight Hammer would be repeated by Republicans to deride the president. Indeed, it is unfortunate that what Harris might have done will not be raised. If it were, Democrats, like Republicans, would call this question too hypothetical to be answered. Worse, any objective evaluation of the impact of Operation Midnight Hammer almost certainly will be judged through a biased political lens as Iraqi weapons of mass destruction were in 2003. For NATO, even if an increase to 5% of GDP were achievable, what would this mean for the alliance? Currently, U.S. GDP is about $30 trillion. Five percent equates to $1.5 trillion, with about $1.05 trillion to defense and the remainder to resilience. The United States presently will spend just over $1 trillion for defense depending on what is in or out of the reconciliation bill, assuming it becomes law. Because of uncontrolled real annual cost growth of 5% to 7% (which is above the inflation rate) for all programs from people to precision weapons, this increase will not be sufficient to maintain the current U.S. force levels. The same math applies to all NATO members, and their politics suggest that the 5% goal will not be met. In domestic politics, Trump may indeed have benefitted. If Mamdani wins in New York City, Democratic politics will appear to have moved far more to the left. That trend cost Democrats the presidency in 2024. If it continues, that could hazard the 2026 midterm elections and potential control of Congress. And defining the extent of presidential powers will continue to be an unresolved and probably unresolvable quandary. So, is Trump in wonderland or wonderment? Has this week been a political grand slam? We will not know the answers right away. But we will know them sometime. That will truly be a real day of reckoning. Harlan Ullman is UPI's Arnaud de Borchgrave Distinguished Columnist; senior adviser at Washington's Atlantic Council, chairman of a private company and principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. His next book, co-written with Field Marshal The Lord David Richards, former U.K. chief of defense and due out next year, is Who Thinks Wins: Preventing Strategic Catastrophe. The writer can be reached on X @harlankullman.
