Bathing restrictions at Dublin Bay's main beach in Dollymount follow suspected sewage discharge after heavy rainfall
Dollymount strand in Dublin Bay
after a 'suspected discharge' of sewage following heavy rainfall.
The restriction at the popular designated bathing area on
North Bull Island
will continue over the coming days.
Deputy Lord Mayor of Dublin Donna Cooney
criticised the way the alert was issued and
Uisce Éireann
for failing to indicate the source of the discharge.
'This is disgraceful at the start of the bathing season,' she said.
READ MORE
She said alerts about bathing restrictions needed to be more widely disseminated, as she had found people swimming on the beach despite the measure being in place.
Cllr Cooney, a member of the Green Party, said she received an alert to confirm water quality at the beach was 'excellent' on May 26th, but got no notice about the recent restriction.
She said the utility company should have indicated where the discharge happened, given that real-time monitoring is supposed to be taking place at its Ringsend wastewater treatment plant.
Ms Cooney is a regular swimmer at Dollymount and at the Bull Wall Ladies Shelter.
She said she was concerned the discharge would lead to algal blooms as seawater warmed in the coming weeks, which would affect swimmers, water sports activities and marine life in the bay.
Discharges have occurred intermittently from the plant, which has been operating at excess capacity for many years.
Uisce Éireann said the discharge arose due to overflows from storm tanks at the Ringsend plant.
'There is online monitoring of these storm tanks and Dublin City Council, who are responsible for monitoring of bathing water quality, are notified of any overflows during the bathing season,' said a spokesman.
'Stormwater overflows are an essential part of any wastewater network that enable excess flows to be discharged into the sea, rivers or watercourses in a controlled and regulated manner ... Stormwater discharges normally do not have a lasting effect on bathing waters,' he added.
'The tide will wash out the spill and the salt water and sunlight acts to clean the water. Uisce Éireann apologises for any inconvenience caused and regrets the impact overflow incidents may have on beach users.'
Uisce Éireann is investing more than €500 million to upgrade the plant so it can serve a 2.4 million population equivalent by the end of 2025.
'The upgrade of Ringsend means the capacity will be increased and these incidents will be fewer in number, although in extreme weather conditions they could still occur,' said the spokesman.
The Environmental Protection Agency and the Health Service Executive have been informed, while the council, which erected notices at Dollymount, said it is awaiting laboratory results to determine whether the temporary prohibition can be lifted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
34 minutes ago
- Irish Times
TD calls for referendum on joining EU patent court to be held before next summer
The delayed referendum on Ireland joining the European Union's Unified Patent Court (UPC) should be held before next summer, according to Fianna Fáil TD Malcolm Byrne . He said Ireland's membership of Europe's unified patent system would 'make life easier' for Irish inventors, content creators and small businesses. The Irish Times reported on Monday that there have been tentative moves within Government to revive the referendum. The vote on Ireland joining the 18 other EU member states that have signed up to the UPC system was originally due to take place in June 2024. READ MORE Mr Byrne, a Wicklow-Wexford TD, was to be Fianna Fáil's director of elections for the referendum. However, the last government decided to defer the UPC vote in the aftermath of the defeat of the Family and Care referendums to allow more time for public engagement on the matter. In recent months the Department of Enterprise has contacted business organisations and Government departments, seeking feedback on the level of engagement taking place on the UPC issue and views on the appropriate timing of a rescheduled vote. The UPC is designed to provide a one-stop shop court for litigation on patents. The court's decisions will be binding on participating EU member states. Business groups have long called for Ireland to join the UPC. The Department of Enterprise said the Government is committed to holding the referendum, but 'the timing remains under consideration'. Mr Byrne urged the Government to commit to a referendum and an 'informed campaign' before next summer. He said: 'For someone who invents something in Ireland to protect that idea or product, they have to seek a patent in every jurisdiction in the European Union and the recognition of the creation is not always enforceable in a uniform way. 'Ireland joining the unified patent system will make that much easier and it will heavily reduce costs and the administrative burden on inventors.' [ Ireland fined €1.54m for delay in writing EU work-life balance directive into law Opens in new window ] Mr Byrne added: 'This is probably not the issue that most people are thinking about but for inventors and businesses it is really important.' Ireland has to vote on it because the Constitution requires a vote for joining such a European structure, he said. 'The decision will mean transferring some judicial sovereignty, but only in the area of patents, to the new court. It has only to do with patents.' In May, Mr Byrne asked Taoiseach Micheál Martin in the Dáil if he would consider holding the UPC referendum on the same day as the presidential election this year. Mr Martin said he did not anticipate that happening, but he indicated his support for Ireland joining the UPC. He added: 'We need to prepare properly for when we decide to have a referendum. We have to do the homework and be in a position to convince people of the merits of the case.' [ Ireland is exposed as Maga right attempts to take on Big Tech regulation Opens in new window ]
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Minister to appeal High Court decision blocking A5 upgrade
A court ruling that a long-awaited upgrade to the A5 should not go ahead is to be appealed, the North's Minister for Infrastructure has said. Sinn Féin MLA Liz Kimmins said improving the road is a priority and she will 'ensure we get this road built, and get it built in the shortest possible time'. In June, the High Court ruled the proposed scheme breached elements of climate change legislation. The judge acknowledged the decision would bring 'fresh anguish' to bereaved families, but he said the project did not demonstrate how it would comply with Stormont's commitment to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 and therefore could not proceed. READ MORE The upgrade of the A5, which runs from Derry to the Border at Aughnacloy, Co Tyrone , and connects the north-west to Dublin, was first announced in 2007. It has been mired in delays and legal challenges. [ Appeal for prevention of more A5 road deaths following court order quashing upgrade Opens in new window ] Since then more than 50 people have lost their lives on the road. The £1.2 billion (€1.4 billion) upgrade was approved in October, but judicial review proceedings challenging the scheme were later brought against the Department for Infrastructure by applicants including residents, farmers and landowners. The judge acknowledged it was 'likely that delays in the progression of this scheme will coincide with the occurrence of further loss of life and serious injury on the existing road', but he said the decision to proceed 'must be taken in accordance with the law'. Campaigners, including the A5 Enough is Enough group, have warned that further delays will cost lives and have called for the project to proceed as soon as possible. Speaking to reporters in Ballygawley, Co Tyrone, Ms Kimmins said the judge's decision 'was the very first test of the [Climate Change] Act and officials are … looking at how we can rectify that. 'We are looking at everything here and an appeal is our first step.' In a statement, the DUP MLA Deborah Erskine said an appeal would 'inevitably take time' and it was 'unclear' how the appeal would address 'climate targets supported by Sinn Féin, the Alliance Party and the SDLP'. 'These targets were a key factor in the project being blocked by the court, and unless those parties act to resolve the consequences of their own policies, they risk holding up not just the A5 but a range of vital infrastructure projects.' She said the 'reality is that work on the A5 is not going to commence any time soon … and the Minister should also be looking urgently at what other steps can be taken now to make the A5 safer for all road users, and how to deal fairly with landowners". —Additional reporting PA.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tusla expects to be €68m over budget this year as demand for services rises
Tusla has warned it will breach its budget by nearly €68 million this year as it struggles to deal with huge demand for its services. The child and family agency warned in an update in May that it had already overspent by €8.9 million but this figure was likely to rise by the end of the year. Tusla said its expected overspend for 2025 was €67.8 million, which included €7.6 million for children in the international protection process and refugees from Ukraine. In a monthly briefing, the agency said demand for its services was growing, especially for residential care, fostering, legal bills, and caring for separated children seeking asylum . It said it is trying to cut costs by expanding residential provision to replace special emergency arrangements that were a 'significant cost driver.' Tusla said some savings had been made in this area in 2024 through a 'strict pricing arrangement' and that this would continue this year. However, the agency warned that costs remained 'unpredictable' due to the inflated cost of placements. [ Girl (16) 'exchanging sex for money' among three children for whom no secure beds available Opens in new window ] 'As the majority of Tusla's expenditure is on demand-led arrangements, it is not possible to reduce expenditure materially to meet the budget allocated without adversely impacting on services for vulnerable children and families,' the report said. It said there was likely to be an overspend of €38.8 million on placements for special care, fostering, and private residential arrangements. Tusla also detailed the high cost of 'out-of-state placements' which involves a small number of children brought to the United Kingdom when services are not available in Ireland. The briefing said: 'If the agency cannot place children into special care in the existing facilities in 2025, this has the potential to impact on this year's overspend.' It said costs for staff travel were also likely to be up by as much as €2.2 million despite curbs on expenses being introduced. [ Person pretending to be Tusla worker turned up at children's residential unit on night shift Opens in new window ] Tusla also detailed a sharp rise in the number of placements for separated children who had applied for international protection in Ireland. The overspend was predicted to be about €6.1 million on providing 343 residential placements for vulnerable asylum seekers without parents. Other areas of concern for Tusla were Guardian ad Litem (GAL) arrangements under which a person was appointed to represent the interests of a child in court. 'There is continued increased usage of GALs by the court and this also has an increased legal cost,' the document said. The child and family agency also predicted an overspend for child refugees fleeing the war in Ukraine, according to records released under Freedom of Information. Asked about the budget difficulties, a Tusla spokesman said: 'Throughout 2025, the agency has experienced unprecedented demand for services, which was unpredictable in nature, and we have worked to prioritise cost-saving initiatives around these contributing factors. 'Tusla has strong budget controls in place, however the projected overspend for 2025 is the result of demand-led pressures in the agency for the accommodation of children in the care of the State as well as costs for accommodating unaccompanied minors and associated legal and Guardian ad Litem costs.'
