Al-Qaeda-Linked Group Launches Coordinated Attacks in Mali Vantage with Palki Sharma
Al-Qaeda-Linked Group Launches Coordinated Attacks in Mali | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G
Mali is facing one of its most intense security crises in recent years. Islamist militants linked to al-Qaeda, the group JNIM, launched coordinated attacks on multiple military bases across seven towns. The Malian army says it has neutralised at least 80 fighters. Three military bases were reportedly seized, marking the third major assault in just over a month. As the junta struggles to maintain control, fears grow over the broader destabilisation of the Sahel and the potential expansion of terror networks toward the West African coast.
See More
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Pakistan spy' Jyoti Malhotra visited Kerala on govt invitation, reveals RTI; state tourism min reacts
Jyoti Malhotra, a 33-year-old vlogger from Haryana recently arrested on charges of espionage for Pakistan, had earlier visited Kerala on an official invitation from the state government, said an RTI (Right to Information) reply that has now surfaced. Malhotra was part of a tourism promotion campaign organised by the Kerala Tourism Department, which funded a group of social media influencers to enhance the state's digital visibility as a travel destination, ANI reported. The RTI response confirms that Malhotra's travel, stay, and itinerary expenses were fully covered by the department during her visit, according to a report by ANI. As per official records, Jyoti Malhotra toured Kannur, Kozhikode, Kochi, Alappuzha, and Munnar between 2024 and 2025 under the government's influencer collaboration initiative. Her participation was listed alongside several other digital creators active between January 2024 and May 2025. Investigations have since revealed that Malhotra had travelled to Pakistan multiple times and had established contacts with officials from Pakistani intelligence agencies, including personnel from the Pakistan High Commission. One such official was later expelled by India after their association came to light, ANI reported. Kerala Tourism Minister P A Mohammed Riyas on Sunday said that the Left government in the state and its ministers would never "knowingly" invite spies here and provide them with all facilities. Riyas remarked in response to reporters' queries regarding BJP leader K Surendran's allegation that social media influencer Jyoti Malhotra, who was arrested in May on suspicion of spying for Pakistan, was invited to Kerala to promote tourism in the state. Surendran, in a post on social media platform 'X', also referred to an RTI reply confirming such an invitation to Malhotra and questioned why 'a Pak-linked spy's trip' was sponsored by Kerala Tourism. One of her earlier viral clips shows her dressed in a traditional Kerala sari while attending a Theyyam performance in Kannur, highlighting her role in cultural and tourism-focused content creation. Malhotra is among 12 individuals arrested in a coordinated crackdown across Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh, targeting a suspected spy network accused of using Indian social media influencers to gather intelligence. The Left government in the state and its ministers would never 'knowingly' invite spies here. Her YouTube channel, Travel with Jo, features 487 videos, including travel content from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Thailand. Key Takeaways Government initiatives can unintentionally invite scrutiny when involving individuals with controversial backgrounds. The importance of thorough vetting in influencer collaborations for public campaigns. Understanding the implications of social media influencers in national security contexts.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bilawal Bhutto's offer to extradite Hafiz Saeed to India ignites internal conflict in Pakistan
Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) founder Hafiz Saeed 's son, Talha Saeed , has strongly criticised former Pakistani foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto 's recent remarks about possible extradition of wanted terrorists to India . In a video statement released on Sunday, Talha described Bhutto's offer as 'irresponsible' and 'unacceptable,' saying it had brought shame to Pakistan internationally. Bhutto had made the comments during an interview with Al Jazeera on Friday. When asked about the possibility of handing over figures like Hafiz Saeed and Jaish-e-Mohammed leader Masood Azhar , Bhutto said, 'We have no objection to such steps as a confidence-building measure,' provided India cooperates. LeT-linked political groups reject Bhutto's position Responding to Bhutto's statement, Talha Saeed said, 'We and our community' would never accept the idea of handing over his father to India, calling India a hostile country. He also accused Bhutto of promoting narratives influenced by the West and India. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 착용했을 때, 더 뿌듯한 팔찌 유니세프 지금 기부하기 Undo The Pakistan Markazi Muslim League, associated with LeT and Jamaat-ud-Dawa, issued a statement rejecting Bhutto's views. It blamed India for spreading terrorism in Pakistan and neighbouring regions. No official backing for Bhutto's remarks Although Bhutto's remarks gained attention, they carry no official weight. He currently holds no position in Pakistan's government. Many observers see his statement as political messaging without real intent or authority. Live Events "Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has no locus standi. He is not in the cabinet, he is not part of the armed forces. Yes, his father is the president of Pakistan (Asif Ali Zardari), and that's about all," said Major Gaurav Arya (Retd) in an interview with TOI. Arya said that the Pakistani establishment often uses figures like Bhutto to send diplomatic signals without committing officially. "Because the Indus Waters Treaty has been held in abeyance by India, they want to give out an olive branch to India as a token of peace or a white flag. But tomorrow, if public backlash is a little too much... at that point in time, Pakistan can say Bilawal is not part of the government," he said. India unlikely to respond without institutional clarity Indian defence experts believe the offer lacks credibility. Without official support from Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs or clear institutional steps, analysts see little reason for India to engage. Major Arya said that Bhutto's statement is likely a distraction. He added that Islamabad may be trying to manage its international image while domestic pressures continue to grow. 'The extradition offer lacks credibility because it came from someone without governing authority,' Arya said. Unless Pakistan backs such statements with policy action and transparency in dealing with terror groups, diplomatic engagement with India is expected to remain on hold.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Sheikh Hasina's trial needs neutral observers, not partisan judges
Within a month of filing charges, the Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) has already sentenced Sheikh Hasina to six months in jail. The actual sentencing looks prima facie valid, coming on a charge of contempt of court. The case against her is based on an audio in which she allegedly said, 'There are 227 cases against me, so I now have a licence to kill 227 people.' As Hasina has fled to India, the trial is happening in absentia, but she has a state-appointed defence counsel to represent her. More than this particular instance, what deserves attention is the longer story of the ICT. The obvious point is that Hasina has gone from being the engineer of the ICT to a defendant in front of it. But this reversal cannot be dismissed as merely a poetic turn of justice. There is a change in the social meaning of the prosecution of international crimes in Bangladesh. The ICT was set up not just to deliver justice, but also to consolidate a form of national mythology of the founding of Bangladesh. Such international tribunals tend to enforce the 'victor's justice', a term coined by Richard Minear, referring to the Tokyo war crimes tribunal set up by the Allied Powers. Bangladesh's ICT follows this trend, and was widely criticised for its lack of due process. The faulty precedent is now being exploited by Hasina's opponents, whose victory has allowed them to implement an opposite version of justice and create an alternate national mythology. In the same week when the charges of crimes against humanity were filed against Sheikh Hasina, there was another notable news which illustrated this turn. The Bangladesh Supreme Court had ordered the release of ATM Azharul Islam, a Jamaat-e-Islami leader. He was previously convicted by the same International Crimes Tribunal that will now hear the case against Hasina. Azharul Islam had been deemed responsible for a massacre which claimed more than a thousand lives during the 1971 war, but the Supreme Court overturned both the ICT's judgment and its own previous decision. The ICT has been made to judge Hasina, taking a sharp U-turn from its intent of prosecuting Islamist opponents of Bangladesh's liberation war. The Law Adviser also attributed the release of Azharul Islam to the July uprising and painted him as an innocent victim of Hasina. It is painful to compare atrocities. But Azharul was held responsible for the loss of a similar number of lives as Sheikh Hasina is being accused of. Azharul's crime, though, happened in a single village. The ease with which such a case was overturned points to one of two possibilities: Either the initial case against Islam was weak, or the inroads made by the Jamaat-e-Islami into the highest levels of the judiciary made it easy. Reality is likely to be a mixture of the two — a deeper perusal by a neutral observer familiar with court proceedings would reveal more. In any case, the acquittal has solidified the legal foundation for what is known as 'accusation in a mirror'. This strategy is used by parties accused of grave crimes; they reaccuse and recriminate their opponents of similar crimes, often with little or no evidence, with the sole purpose of trivialising the crime itself. In psychology, the term DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) refers to a similar manoeuvre. Such a manoeuvre is not fully pre-planned. Over the past years, many of the opponents of Bangladesh's liberation war have used such tactics to try and trivialise the crimes related to it. One rather funny attempt to trivialise genocide was made by the present Ameer of Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh, Shafiqur Rahman, who suggested that holding elections without reforms would lead to an 'election genocide'. In this perspective, the ICT's verdict against Hasina is a foregone conclusion. The immediate byproduct of this process is the loss of the special status of the 1971 genocide in Bangladesh's official history, and a gradual exoneration of the pro-Pakistan leaders of Jamaat-e-Islami and the BNP from their position as the worst criminals in Bangladesh's history. The longer-term result will be that there will be no fair mechanism to prosecute future crimes against humanity. The prosecution of crimes against humanity has a short, flawed, but hopeful history. From the Nuremberg trials to the Tribunal set up over the Yugoslav wars, no process has been free of criticism. But the politicised use of the ICT, first by the Awami League to a lesser extent and now blatantly by a fluid group of anti-Awami League conspirators, marks a real disaster of this nascent field of legal theory. As the journalist David Bergman — a longtime observer of the ICT's workings in Bangladesh — has suggested before, the ICT and its reputation can be saved by internationalising it. While national prosecution of international crimes is a great idea, it is severely limited by cultural and social factors when it is put into practice. That judges and lawyers with little experience in prosecuting such cases have been appointed to the ICT is itself enough grounds to mistrust it. Only the presence of judges, lawyers and observers from other neutral countries, especially ones who specialise in international law and crimes against humanity, will make the process reliable and trustworthy. The question is which political actor can prioritise due judicial process over the immediate demands of the political climate — there is none. Mathew teaches politics and international relations at the School of Liberal Arts and Management Studies, P P Savani University, Surat. Ramachandran is a research scholar at the Department of Communication, University of Hyderabad
