
Government spends nearly £30m of taxpayers' cash on fringe research projects including gay porn studies and recording Syrian harvesting songs
UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) has been given the staggering amount of funding for a number of overseas projects, which appear to have no clear benefit to British taxpayers.
The funding includes £850,000 for Birmingham City University to delve into the circulation of gay male porn and porn magazines at the end of the Second World War, a T elegraph investigation revealed.
The University of Oxford received more than £350,000 in a bid to preserve the threatened language of Enggano, spoken by just 1,500 people on Enggano Island, in Sumatra, Indonesia.
Meanwhile, £784,000 was given to the University of Exeter to build a historical account of the development of child soldiering in Africa.
It also received £307,000 of funding to revive ancestral territories, including the language and cultures of the K'omox, Pentlatch, and E'iksan in Vancouver Island, Canada, and the Maori of New Zealand.
Edinburgh University were given £123,000 to record 'harvesting songs of displaced Syrian refugees living in Middle Eastern countries', while the University of Warwick received almost £800,000 to study 'invisible women in Italian cinema'.
Joanna Marchong, investigations campaign manager of the TaxPayers' Alliance, believes taxpayers will be 'livid' after learning how 'ridiculous some of these research projects have become'.
However, UKRI said that funding will only be given to projects that show value for money for British taxpayers and have a societal benefit.
Ms Marchong said: 'UKRI have a proven track record of wasting taxpayers' cash on research projects that are no more than virtue-signalling nonsense that don't stand to benefit the people paying for them.
'Ministers need to remember why UKRI was created and return to investing in research that will make a difference to hard-working Brits.'
Another project includes a joint study between the University of Roehampton and Stellenbosch University in South Africa, which was given £2.8million in funding to research how music could help the mental health of expectant mothers in Africa.
When asked whether the study would also be used to help British mothers, the Stellenbosch University project team did not respond.
They did say that 'group music-making has been shown to boost mood and foster social connections' and early research shows that listening to specially composed music during pregnancy 'reduces anxiety symptoms.'
Roehampton University also received £805,000 to recreate a performance of the 16th-century play Galatea by John Lyly centred around 'female, trans, queer, disabled and migrants'.
While, the University of London received £323,000 to make a film-making union to assist the Mursi agro-pastoralists of the Lower Omo Valley of Ethiopia.
Other projects that were given funding included a look into housing rights for marginalised citizens of Lagos and São Paulo. University of Manchester received nearly £250,000 for the study.
Around £300,000 was given to Birmingham University to 'promote reproductive justice' for the Pankararu and Xukuru communities in north-east Brazil.
The University of Cambridge was awarded a similar amount for the 'restoration of traditional justice in the Sa'th Tama Kiwe Territory in Caldono, Cauca, Colombia'.
The majority of projects funded were awarded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, part of UKRI. While, a handful fell under the National Institute for Health and Care Research.
A UKRI spokesman said: 'International research collaboration is vital to help us tackle global challenges in a complex and interconnected world, improving security and prosperity in the UK and internationally.
'Several of the projects highlighted were funded through Official Development Assistance, where the main benefit is required to be in the developing country involved.
'Projects are prioritised for funding through independent expert peer review, as set out in the Higher Education and Research Act.
'UKRI supports a diverse portfolio of investments including curiosity-driven research and strategic initiatives, which drives the creation and exploitation of new knowledge, and develops skilled and talented people for a wide range of jobs improving lives and livelihoods across the UK.
'On average, every £1 of public R&D investment generates at least £7 of net benefit to the UK through the development of new and better goods, services and processes.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Billions needed for failing flood defences on Lincolnshire coast
Flood defences protecting the Lincolnshire coast will be "ineffective" by 2040 unless billions of pounds are invested, the Environment Agency (EA) has to projections, a breach in the defences could leave the town of Mablethorpe under about 4ft (1.3m) of water and Ingoldmells, near Skegness, under about 5ft (1.6m).A meeting of the county council's environment committee on Friday heard urgent action was 90% of defences on a 30-mile stretch of coastline between Saltfleet, north of Mablethorpe, and Gibraltar Point, south of Skegness, were expected to fail within the next 20 years, councillors were told. Deborah Higton, flood risk manager for the EA, told the committee it would take "billions" to replace all of the Lincolnshire coast defences."There is real urgency, even though 2040 feels like a long way in the future," she area, which was below sea level, was "completely reliant on flood defences" to protect 20,000 homes and 38,000 static caravans, she added. Councillor Tom Ashton (Conservative) told the committee local holiday resorts faced "stagnation and decline" without investment."If we don't get investment to secure our long-term security, that decline begins relatively quickly."Councillors would also be forced to consider a "managed retreat" if funding could not be secured, a report compiled for the meeting EA currently replenishes thousands of tonnes of sand along the Lincolnshire coast annually at a cost of between £10m and £ Ms Higton said: "We are facing a future where the old ways of protecting the land will no longer be enough."The agency, along with partners, said it hoped to draw up a masterplan by 2028, and secure funding and contracts by after the meeting, Councillor Danny Brookes, the executive member for the environment at the Reform-led authority, told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: "It's worrying, but I'm glad to hear we're taking action."We're trying to get this into the council's corporate plan, and we will make sure this does get done."It comes after Reform abolished the authority's flooding committee following its victory in May's local elections, despite other parties calling for it to be the time, council leader Sean Matthews promised the new administration would work "longer and harder on flooding than ever before". Stark warning Analysis by Paul Murphy, Environment is a pretty stark warning from the specialists charged with defending Lincolnshire's coastal communities from the North recent years the Environment Agency has been revising a lot of its projections to take into account the impact of climate change and rising sea levels on our more the EA scrutinises existing flood defences, the more it is finding areas of of people in the county live at or below sea level, many of them in static caravans nestled behind flood of flood water up to 5ft deep in some places will be sobering for this population, many of whom are older and perhaps more vulnerable in an is mention too of "managed retreat" – the Whitehall euphemism for no longer defending against flooding and letting nature take its course. This could have a profound impact on the local storm surge of 1953 claimed 43 lives along the Lincolnshire coastline and led to the construction of existing defences. The risks are more than just government has already announced extra funding for Lincolnshire, including almost £11.3m to bolster defences between Saltfleet and Gibraltar Point. Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices

Finextra
10 minutes ago
- Finextra
Barclays follows HSBC out of the Net Zero Banking Alliance
Barclays has followed HSBC in withdrawing from the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), claiming that the departure of a host of other global lenders means the organisation "no longer has the membership to support our transition". 1 Founded in 2021, the UN-convened NZBA requires members to commit to "transition the operational and attributable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from their lending and investment portfolios to align with pathways to net-zero by 2050 or sooner". At its peak it had around 150 members, including most of the world's largest banks. However, that number has dwindled in the last few months. At the beginning of 2025, ahead of Donald Trump's return to the White House, a host of US banks, including JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo, pulled out of the global climate-focused alliance. The American banks quit amid attacks from Republicans on "woke" capitalism, with the House Judiciary Committee, led by Republican Jim Jordan, claiming that financial environmental alliances have created "a climate cartel". Now, UK-headquartered HSBC and Barclays have joined their US counterparts. Barclays says it is committed to its "ambition" to be a net zero bank by 2050. Says a statement: "Our targets to mobilise $1 trillion of Sustainable and Transition Financing and for financed emissions remain unchanged. We continue to work with our clients on their transition, finance the transition and scale climate tech, while helping to ensure energy security for our customers and clients." Earlier this week, the CEO of Standard Chartered, Bill Winters, hit out at banks that have rowed back on their climate commitments. 'People that said a lot of stuff, but [when] it was fashionable to say it, [and] who are saying either nothing or the opposite now: shame on them,' said Winters, according to the Guardian.


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Police impose conditions on London asylum hotel protest ‘to prevent serious disorder'
Police have imposed conditions on a protest against the use of a hotel to accommodate asylum seekers. The Metropolitan Police said there would be an 'increased police presence' for a protest and counter protest outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in Islington, north London, on Saturday. The force said the protest against the use of the Islington hotel was organised by local residents under the banner 'Thistle Barbican needs to go – locals say no'. A counter protest, organised by Stand Up To Racism and supported by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, as well as other groups including Finsbury Park Mosque and Islington Labour Party, will also take place. Police said the anti-asylum hotel protest had been 'endorsed by groups from outside the local community which is likely to increase the number of people attending'. Online groups that have voiced support for the protest include ' Patriots of Britain' and 'Together for the Children'. The Metropolitan Police said plans were in place to 'respond to any protest activity in the vicinity of other hotels in London being used to accommodate asylum seekers'. Conditions on the anti-asylum hotel protest include that anyone participating must remain within King Charles Square and that the assembly must not begin before 1pm and must conclude by 4pm. Police said conditions on the counter protest include that participants must remain in Lever Street, near the junction with Central Street, and that the assembly must not begin before 12pm and must conclude by 4pm. Chief Superintendent Clair Haynes, in charge of the policing operation, said: 'We have been in discussions with the organisers of both protests in recent days, building on the ongoing engagement between local officers, community groups and partners. 'We understand that there are strongly held views on all sides. 'Our officers will police without fear or favour, ensuring those exercising their right to protest can do so safely but intervening at the first sign of actions that cross the line into criminality. 'We have used our powers under the Public Order Act to put conditions in place to prevent serious disorder and to minimise serious disruption to the lives of people and businesses in the local community. 'Those conditions identify two distinct protest areas where the protests must take place, meaning the groups will be separated but still within sight and sound of each other.' A protest and counter protest will also take place in Newcastle outside The New Bridge Hotel on Saturday under the banner of 'for our children, for our future'. A 'stop the far right and fascists in Newcastle' counter protest has been organised by Stand Up To Racism at the nearby Laing Art Gallery. In a statement, the organisers of the counter protest said: 'Yet again far-right and fascist thugs are intent on bringing their message of hate to Newcastle. They aim to build on years of Islamophobia, anti-migrant sentiment and scapegoating. 'In Epping and elsewhere recently we have already seen intimidation and violence aimed at refugees, migrants and asylum seekers. 'Newcastle, like the rest of the North East, has a well-earned reputation for unity in the face of those who seek to divide us. Whatever problems we face, racism and division are not the answer.'