Effingham school adding mobile classrooms, looking for other additions with potential $55 million bond
Jessica Reeder, the principal at South Side Elementary, said one of the reasons for the expansion is because the district has grown over the years. For the last 14 years, second graders have been split between classrooms at South Side and classrooms at Central Grade School.
Spaces like the mobile classrooms will change that.
'Our art classes will be housed out there, our music classes, our ELL classes and one special education classroom,' Reeder said.
All students will be in the new, separate classrooms three days of each week.
'Now we're all here together. We're able to solve problems together but also maximize all of our resources,' Reeder added.
Mahomet-Seymour rejects school district bond proposal
But, growth isn't the only reason for the temporary expansion. In November's election, a referendum for a potential sales tax increase failed.
Andrew Johnson, the district's superintendent, said the mobile classrooms were part of their 'backup plan' if the referendum failed. Now, the district is using $750,000 – $1 million from various funds to pay for the rented mobile classrooms.
'I'm a firm believer in investing in our future at the highest level. Our children are our future,' Johnson said.
The school board also recently passed a $55 million bond resolution to possibly fund other projects, including a new building for students in kindergarten, first grade and second grade. Johnson said that the project itself would cost about $45 million, but keep students in one area instead of three separate buildings.
Sarah Bush Lincoln to build new facility in Effingham
Right now, the district is in a 'petition period,' Johnson explained. He expects to hear an answer about the bonds moving forward or not within the next 30 days.
If they do, he said, people in Effingham could see an 8-13% property tax increase within the next year. It depends on how much the Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) goes up in the Effingham area. If it doesn't move forward, he said it'll be a ballot question on ballots in the spring of 2026.
As construction continues outside of South Side, educators like Johnson and Reeder are staying positive as they look forward to welcoming students back in the new spaces starting in the fall.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
a day ago
- Chicago Tribune
Mayor Brandon Johnson pledges no push for property tax hike after CFO recently called one ‘likely'
Mayor Brandon Johnson is now ruling out seeking a property tax hike in his upcoming budget proposal, an apparent shift in course for his administration after a top city official said earlier in the week that they probably would do so. On Friday, Johnson said he will instead try again to tax the city's wealthiest residents and corporations. He added that he has 'a number' of ideas for progressive revenue, but did not answer when asked to share them. 'The ultra-rich in this city and this state have an opportunity to do a better job in investing in our infrastructure, investing in community safety,' he said. Johnson told the Tribune that 'nothing has changed' when asked about the apparent abrupt switch-up during a news conference. The mayor's attempts to raise property taxes to balance this year's budget were roundly rejected by aldermen. But he said he isn't turning away from property taxes to close the 2026 budget hole because he's worried he doesn't have the votes. 'We've always made it very clear from the very beginning that we are going to invest in people and use progressive revenue to ensure that we build the safest, most affordable big city in America,' he said. Just Tuesday, Chicago's Chief Financial Officer Jill Jaworski said 'it is likely that that will be part of the package' when asked about the mayor calling for a 2026 property tax increase. But the mayor delivered a clear rejection of the idea Thursday. 'I will not be proposing a property tax increase in my budget. I'm going to continue to work hard to find progressive revenue,' he told ABC-7 Chicago. The mayor similarly did not specify Thursday to ABC-7 what new taxes and other revenue-raisers he hopes to rely on to balance the city's budget. He also said it was too early to discuss potential furloughs and layoffs, adding 'our workforce is what makes our city strong.' The 2026 budget fight will begin in earnest after Labor Day. Johnson, who campaigned promising to not raise property taxes, proposed last year that the city raise them by $300 million to help close a budget gap near $1 billion. Aldermen rejected the plan in an unprecedented 50-0 vote. The mayor's administration then tried to negotiate several smaller property tax hikes with aldermen, but was rejected each time. The City Council's decision, alongside Johnson's opposition to city service and workforce cuts, resulted in a compromise to balance the budget with a fleet of smaller taxes and fees. The largest was a roughly $130 million hike to the personal property lease tax on cloud computing services, a move that affected software services, including many that businesses rely upon. Johnson notably failed in an earlier effort to tax the rich in 2023 when the 'Bring Chicago Home' plan lost in a citywide referendum. The proposal would have hiked taxes on real estate transfers over $1 million to raise money to pay for homelessness services. Many aldermen fear the sort of kitchen-sink approach they used to land the budget last year will be harder to use this year. Several easier-to-tap options have been exhausted, and the city's fiscal challenges have only grown as federal funding cuts threaten the city's already precarious financial position. Johnson's top budget officials have long described property taxes as an effective way to bring in predictable, long-term revenue and stabilize the city's budget. But in ruling out property taxes as part of the package this fall, the mayor may very well have sensed a trial balloon had popped after several aldermen quickly criticized the idea this week.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Is in a Tailspin
When House Speaker Mike Johnson addressed the press on Tuesday, you would have had no idea that, two weeks earlier, he had notched the biggest legislative accomplishment of his career. There was little talk of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a mammoth tax cut for the rich that will eliminate health care for millions of Americans. Instead, a visibly beleaguered Johnson said he was shutting down Congress for the summer, all but admitting that it was because Democrats kept calling votes to release files related to the late pedophilic financier Jeffrey Epstein—files that mention Donald Trump among many others, according to a Wednesday report from The Wall Street Journal. 'We want maximum transparency,' Johnson claimed. But then, in a lengthy, mealy-mouthed statement, he instead insisted he was delaying the release of the Epstein files to 'protect victims' and pledged that he would not 'play politics' over the issue, as his Democratic colleagues were. This is more than a bit rich. For years, Johnson's Republican colleagues have been ignoring the humanity of those victims as they have spun elaborate, fanciful conspiracy theories about Epstein and his clients—many of whom were rumored to be powerful Democrats, including Bill Clinton, and Democrat-aligned figures. Now that the leader of the GOP was implicated, Johnson himself was playing politics by trying to shut down a story that in two short weeks has upended the ruling party. The Epstein story is now bigger than the files—at least until we know everything that's in them. It's grinding Republican governance on Capitol Hill to a halt, and it's dragging down the Trump administration. His approval rating is tanking, which is due to a combination of factors—including the backlash to the big budget bill, ICE's immigration crackdown, and Trump's tariff chaos—but the Epstein affair is playing a key role. There are signs, in opinion polls but also in the MAGA swamps online, that Trump's hold on his base is slipping, which could have disastrous consequences for the GOP in the midterm elections. Trump could well be in a moment analogous to the one Joe Biden faced after the disastrous military withdrawal from Afghanistan—the start of a tailspin that he may never recover from. The fault for Trump's precipitous decline is his alone. It is Trump who ordered masked thugs into American cities and towns to hunt for any undocumented immigrant they could lay their hands on. It was Trump who forced Johnson to push through a flawed, deeply damaging bill that will have a catastrophic impact on health care and the economy. It was Trump whose moronic belief in the power of tariffs is currently causing the dollar to collapse and prices to skyrocket. And it was Trump who forced Johnson to shut down Congress so that Republicans wouldn't have to vote on any more Democratic amendments that put them on the spot about releasing the Epstein files. As I argued last week, there's no way out for Trump now that he has declared the story a 'hoax' and a witch hunt on par with 'Russiagate.' He can continue to stonewall the release of the files, making himself look guiltier by the second—which is the approach that he has taken. Or he can release the files and cross his fingers. Even if the files reveal the bare minimum—i.e., what we already know, which is that Trump had a decade-plus friendship with Epstein, which included the period of time that Epstein was allegedly trafficking and raping dozens of young girls—there would be questions that Trump has refused to answer. Most importantly: What did he know about his good friend's activities? The result is a cancer of a scandal, one that will continue to metastasize throughout his administration, the Republican Congress, and even his MAGA base. It is also a gift to the Democrats, who are powerless in the minority and abject at messaging. They have thus far struggled to harness popular anger over the administration's immigration policies, ruinous legislation, gutting of the federal government, and more. But the party has effectively weaponized Epstein, aided by popular interest and the fact that, well, the president certainly seems to be up to something shady. House Democrats' push to release the files was so successful that it caused Johnson to literally run away. He will presumably spend the summer recess thinking about how to respond to Democratic efforts to divide his caucus and push for the full release of the files, but it's not clear that there is anything short of 'full transparency' that can do that. He's caught in a bind. At the same time, investigative efforts—particularly the House's plan to subpoena the Department of Justice for its Epstein documents, and perhaps Senator Ron Wyden's suggestion that the DOJ 'follow the money' with Epstein—may very well be fruitful. The House Oversight Committee's subpoena of Epstein's former girlfriend and co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell may or may not be as fruitful, depending on what deals she makes before her testimony. (Regardless, it will continue to fuel interest in the story, even if it's a dud—because if she doesn't reveal anything it will be assumed that Trump's allies at the DOJ got to her.) In any case, this is a huge story that will likely ensnare several powerful people and hold the public's attention—and, in doing so, will serve as a continual reminder that the president of the United States was close friends with the twenty-first century's most notorious pedophile. For Democrats, the Epstein story does pose risks, as well, many of which should be familiar to anyone who remembers the long investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Here, as was true then, the most likely result is something that is damning but far less salacious than what is rumored. In 2016, it turned out that Trump was openly encouraging and attempting to benefit from Russian efforts to interfere in the election—but not that he was a compromised, blackmailed puppet of Vladimir Putin (or, for that matter, that he had paid Russian sex workers to pee on a bed Barack Obama had slept in). What we know about Trump is damning enough—being friends with Epstein is bad, and reporting suggests that he and others in Epstein's orbit had a good enough understanding of what he was up to—even if no evidence emerges that he was one of his 'clients,' which is not a revelation that Democrats should hold their breath for. This story may resemble Russiagate in another way: It likely won't end Trump's presidency, and Democrats would be foolish to suggest that it will. But a precious gift has fallen in their lap: a scandal that's very easy for voters to understand and extremely hard for Trump and the Republicans to make go away. May it undermine this fascist administration for years to come.
a day ago
What to know about Trump's golf business in Scotland and British Open bid amid overseas trip
President Donald Trump is making his fourth international trip of his second term this week, traveling to Scotland, where his mother was born, and where he plans to spend several days at his family's golf courses -- including one he's said should host the British Open. The Trump Organization currently has two golf resorts in Turnberry and Aberdeenshire, and is expected to cut the ribbon on another course opening at the latter in the coming weeks. Trump visited his golf resort in Turnberry as president once before, for a weekend on the way to a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Finland in 2018. In 2020, ABC News confirmed that Woody Johnson, then-U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom, told colleagues he was asked by Trump if he could persuade the British government to hold the British Open golf tournament at Turnberry. The British government later said Johnson never made a request to Scottish officials, and Trump denied asking Johnson to do so. The Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews, which organizes the Open, the world's oldest golf tournament, said in a statement shortly after the Jan. 6 Capitol attack that it had "no plans" to stage the Open at Turnberry and "will not do so in the foreseeable future." "We will not return until we are convinced that the focus will be on the championship, the players and the course itself and we do not believe that is achievable in the current circumstances," the chief executive of The R&A wrote in the statement at the time. In 2023, in an interview at Turnberry, Trump told British conservative politician and media personality Nigel Farage that "everyone" wants Turnberry to host the Open. "Everyone wants to see the Open Championship here. The players, it's their favorite course, number one rated in Europe. In some lists, it's the number one rated anywhere in the world, and they want to have the Open championship back here," he said. "I think they think I'm a little bit of a controversial figure," he said at another point in the interview. Recently, Mark Darbon, the new chair of the R&A, said there are "logistical challenges" to hosting the tournament at the club, which hosted the Open several times before Trump bought the property in 2014. Darbon also revealed his organization recently met with Eric Trump and other Trump Golf leaders a few months ago to discuss the possibility. ABC News has reached out to the Trump Organization for a statement. In May, Trump traveled to the Middle East for his first official overseas visit of his second term, visiting Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates in an effort to deepen economic and political ties with the Gulf kingdoms. The president's family has also expanded its business interests in the Middle East. The Trump Organization partnered with developers on new projects in Saudi Arabia, Doha and the United Arab Emirates, and is involved in a cryptocurrency venture connected to a fund with ties to the Emirati government. In his most recent financial disclosure, Trump reported hundreds of millions in income from his various properties, including golf clubs and his Mar-a-Lago estate and club. He has also earned millions from other business ventures, including trademarking merchandise like watches and fragrances. His Aberdeenshire resort lost 1.4 million pounds last year, according to the BBC, citing financial disclosures. Ethics experts have criticized some of Trump's travels and raised concerns that the president has exposed himself to potential conflicts of interest between his official activities and his family's business interests. "At this point, he's essentially using the White House as an extension of the Trump Organization and letting the taxpayers pick up the bill," Jordan Libowitz, the Vice President for Communications at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, told ABC News. The administration has called Trump's visit a "working trip," and Trump is expected to have a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Starmer and will likely hold a press conference while overseas. "President Trump's working trip to Scotland will include a bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Starmer to refine the historic US-UK trade deal. Donald J. Trump has built the best and most beautiful world-class golf courses anywhere in the world, which is why they continue to be used for prestigious tournaments and by the most elite players in the sport," White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said in a statement to ABC News.
