Lululemon sues Costco for selling alleged dupes of its products
A lawsuit filed in a California court recently alleges Costco sells dupes of Lululemon's Scuba hoodies and sweatshirts, Define jackets and ABC pants.
Some of the alleged fakes Vancouver-based Lululemon identified are sold under Costco's private label Kirkland, but others are made by manufacturers Danskin, Jockey and Spyder.
"Some customers incorrectly believe these infringing products are authentic Lululemon apparel while still other customers specifically purchase the infringing products because they are difficult to distinguish from authentic Lululemon products, particularly for downstream purchasers or observers," the lawsuit says.
Lululemon alleges these scenarios take advantage of patents it holds, as well as the reputation and goodwill it has built with customers.
In its 49-page court filing, Lululemon says it tried to address the dupes by sending Costco cease and desist letters but is now asking a court to step in.
Lululemon has requested the matter be heard by a jury trial, which it wants to order Costco to cease manufacturing, importing, marketing and selling the alleged dupes.
It also wants the Washington-based retailer to remove any instances where it was advertising alleged dupes online or in print and is asking the court to require Costco to cover any lost profits Lululemon incurred from the products.
Costco did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It has yet to file a response to Lululemon's lawsuit.
Dupes have become incredibly popular in recent years as shoppers looked to cope with inflation and a global trade war by seeking products mimicking the originals made by name brands.
The phenomenon has gained traction online in particular, with social media accounts sharing the best dupes they've found.
While knock-off cosmetics are especially popular, Lululemon has also become a target because it sells its athletic wear at higher prices, which some customers find unattainable.
The lawsuit comes weeks after Lululemon said it would try to weather new and possibly incoming tariffs with price increases that will be "modest in nature" and applied only to a "small" portion of its products.
The brand has been working to bounce back from a lack of newness that disappointed consumers last year and earlier this year.
Newness — how fresh a brand's products and styles appear to consumers — is one of the key ways retailers draw in customers.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 29, 2025.
Companies in this story: (TSX:LULU)
Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
36 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
B.C. is easing rules on upfront costs for homebuilders to spur project construction
The British Columbia government is loosening the rules for payment of development fees in a bid to jump start home construction that has been hampered by upfront costs. Housing Minister Ravi Kahlon says among the biggest changes will be more flexible and extended payment timelines for homebuilders, so instead of paying development fees up front, they will pay 25 per cent at permit approval and 75 per cent when the building is occupied. Developers will also have four years, rather than two, to pay the charges, in rule changes that Kahlon says are needed because the current market conditions have stalled projects in the province. While some municipalities want letters of credit from a bank as a promise the work will be done, that can restrict a developer's access to credit, so the government will also change the regulations provincewide to allow for the financial guarantee of on-demand surety bonds. Kahlon says the rule changes could mean the difference between some housing projects moving ahead or not happening at all, due to high construction costs and interest rates that create financial burden for builders. Anne McMullin, president of the Urban Development Institute, says the requirement to pay development fees upfront has become increasingly onerous for builders, especially as fees rise and access to capital tightens. 'By shifting payment to occupancy, the provincial government is enabling more projects to move forward,' she told a news conference on Wednesday. In June, Vancouver-based Wesgroup Properties president Beau Jarvis said in a post on social media that the company had to lay off employees in what was a reflection of the broader realities facing the industry, with housing projects across the country being cancelled or delayed because they are no longer viable. Jarvis said they were also delivering homes that people couldn't afford to purchase. 'I will say it again — This is a cost-of-delivery crisis,' he said on LinkedIn. Kahlon said those were exactly the type of concerns for homebuilding that the B.C. government is trying to address. 'It means housing will be built faster and cheaper in our communities,' Kahlon said. 'And these kind of solutions sound maybe not as grand, but they are significant in the sense that they will make the difference between projects happening and projects not happening.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Carbon Credits What They Are, Who's Buying, And Why You Should Care
The concept of carbon credits. carbon credit trading etc. getty Carbon credits have become a buzzword in the fight against climate change but behind the jargon lies a multi-billion-dollar mechanism which is reshaping how companies, individuals and countries account for emissions. At its simplest, one carbon credit equals one metric ton of carbon dioxide that is either removed from the atmosphere or prevented from being emitted. Companies, especially those with net-zero targets often purchase these credits to offset emissions that they are unable to eliminate internally. When it comes to carbon credits, there are two main markets, the compliance market and the voluntary markets. Compliance markets are regulated systems where governments require companies to cap or offset their emissions. The most prominent example is the European Union's Emissions Trading System, the world's largest carbon market. While the United States does not have a national carbon credit system system, several state-level compliance markets exist, most notably California's Cap-and-Trade Program and the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which includes 11 northeastern states. These markets place legally binding limits on emissions and allow companies to trade allowances or buy approved carbon credits to stay within regulatory thresholds. As it relates to voluntary carbon markets, they allow companies and individuals to buy carbon credits outside of legal requirements, often to meet net-zero goals or enhance ESG credentials. Unlike compliance markets, participation is optional, but interest is growing. Credits are issued by independent registries but the market has faced criticism for inconsistent standards, greenwashing, and questionable impact. Integrity is now the currency of trust. According to a 2023 report by Boston Consulting Group, the voluntary carbon market surged past $2 billion in 2021, four times its 2020 value, and could grow to $10 to $40 billion by 2030 as demand accelerates. A 2025 Carbon Market Watch report highlighted that, Shell was the largest buyer of carbon credits in 2024, a year when fossil fuel companies dominated the voluntary market. Among the top 10 buyers with disclosed data, eight came from high-emission industries such as energy, aviation and automotive, raising concerns that offsets are being used to project climate leadership while core operations remain unchanged. Carbon credits are generated from a range of climate projects, but not all deliver the same environmental value. Some remove carbon already in the atmosphere, while others aim to prevent new emissions. The effectiveness, permanence, and co-benefits of each project type can vary widely, which is why understanding the source of a credit is critical. Offsets may stem from: Renewable energy investments Reforestation and avoided deforestation Soil carbon and regenerative agriculture Methane capture from landfills or livestock Efficient cookstove distribution in developing regions Among these, projects like clean cookstove distribution, biochar, and mangrove restoration are increasingly recognized for their strong climate impact, verifiability, and co-benefits, while others such as certain large-scale forestry or legacy renewable projects require closer scrutiny. Registries such as Verra, Gold Standard, and the American Carbon Registry certify these projects, but the market has also faced criticism, particularly over phantom credits where some offsets do not deliver any real climate benefit. When it comes to the Caribbean, islands like Jamaica, must engage in this market strategically. With forestry potential and renewable energy expansion goals, the region stands to benefit both environmentally and economically if proper governance and community inclusion are prioritized. As the carbon credit market expands, so does the responsibility to ensure that climate action is both credible and effective. For companies, governments, the path forward requires transparency, strong verification, and a focus on projects that deliver measurable environmental and social value. Offsets alone will not solve the climate crisis, but when backed by integrity and paired with real emissions reductions, they can play a meaningful role. In the next article in this series, we will explore carbon capture and direct air removal, technologies that promise to remove emissions from the atmosphere. Are they the climate fix we need or just another form of delay?
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Costco's EV charging move signals major shift
Costco has always been a go-to destination for bulk groceries, electronics and even gas. Now, the retailer is making headlines by bringing fast, reliable EV charging to its parking lots. With electric vehicles becoming more popular and over a million new EVs registered in 2024 alone, the need for convenient charging options has never been greater. Costco EV charging stations are stepping up to meet this demand, offering a seamless way for drivers to power up while they shop. In a move that's turning heads, Costco partnered with Electric Era, a startup founded by former SpaceX engineers, to install ultra-fast charging stations at select locations. The North Port, Florida, warehouse was among the first to benefit, with six fast chargers installed in just 54 days-an impressive turnaround in an industry where installations can take months or even years. These chargers deliver up to 200 kWh, allowing most EVs to reach 80% charge in just 20 to 60 minutes. That's enough time to shop for groceries, grab a slice of pizza and return to a car ready for the road. Costco EV charging stations stand out for several reasons. They offer fast charging, which means less waiting and more time for shopping, and their battery-backed system minimizes the need for major grid upgrades, allowing installations to be completed more quickly and efficiently. These stations are also highly reliable, boasting over 98% uptime and more than 90% session reliability, so EV drivers can count on them to keep moving. The chargers themselves are user-friendly, equipped with both CCS and NACS connectors, 24/7 monitoring, automatic fault detection, over-the-air updates, and even integration with Costco's loyalty program. Large screens at the stations display promotions and store information, making the experience even more engaging. By strategically placing these chargers at popular warehouse locations, Costco not only offers greater convenience for drivers, but also encourages customers to spend more time in-store, benefiting both shoppers and the retailer. Costco isn't stopping with Electric Era. The retailer has also teamed up with Electrify America to roll out DC fast chargers at select locations in California, Colorado and Florida. These stations deliver up to 350 kW and are compatible with nearly all EV makes and models, making them a practical option for a wide range of drivers. With over 500 warehouses across the U.S., Costco has the potential to dramatically expand the nation's fast-charging infrastructure. If the North Port pilot proves successful, thousands of new charging stalls could pop up nationwide, making EV ownership easier and more appealing. Costco EV charging stations are more than just a convenience; they're a glimpse into the future of retail and transportation. By integrating fast, reliable charging with the everyday shopping experience, Costco is helping to drive America's transition to electric vehicles, one parking lot at a time. Is Costco quietly becoming one of the most powerful players in America's EV revolution, or should it be betting on other fuels instead? Let us know by writing to us at Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide - free when you join my Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.
