Two Vermont high school students from Nicaragua to be deported, Champlain Valley School District says
'These students are not political operatives,' the Champlain Valley School District said in a letter to families, faculty and staff. 'They are not criminals. They are not threats. They are young people who have found safety and meaning in our community.'
In March, the Department of Homeland Security announced it would revoke legal protections in place since October 2022 for 532,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans. They arrived with financial sponsors and were given two-year permits to live and work in the U.S.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said they will lose their legal status on April 24
The statement from the district, signed by Superintendent Adam Bunting and Board Chair Emily McLean, said the students came to the United States legally and 'have followed the rules as expected.'
'To deport these students is not only heartbreaking for those of us who know them personally. It also contradicts the very values Vermonters work to instill in our young people.
'While we may not be able to shift federal policy in the next two weeks, we can at least show all of our young people that we care — and that we hope to do better.'
The District said 'those who are compelled to take actions' should contact the school for additional resources.
'They've done what all teenagers do: tried to figure out who they are, where they belong, what they care about,' the letter said. 'And now, because of a shift in federal policy, their lives are being upended — again.'
The Associated Press contributed to this story.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
22 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Trump Gets ‘Ratioed' on Truth Social for First Time Amid Epstein Backlash
President Donald Trump's weekend post defending Attorney General Pam Bondi's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files has triggered an unprecedented backlash, marking the first time the Republican has been "ratioed" on his own social media platform, Truth Social. The term "ratioed" refers to when a social media post receives more replies than likes or shares, often signaling more disagreement or criticism than support. In his Saturday evening post, Trump lashed out at those criticizing Bondi, calling her performance "FANTASTIC" and dismissing the ongoing interest in Epstein as a waste of time. "We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening," the president wrote. "Let's not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about." The post—lengthy, defensive, and directed at his own base—appears to have backfired. According to public engagement data archived from Truth Social, the post has garnered more than 36,000 replies, compared with nearly 11,000 re-truths (the platform's term for shares) and 32,000 likes as of 10:45 a.m. ET Sunday. The backlash on Truth Social reflects growing internal division among MAGA supporters, many of whom have spent months anticipating revelations from the so-called "Epstein Files." Unlike mainstream social media platforms, Truth Social was designed as a haven for Trump and his supporters, where engagement overwhelmingly leans positive. The internal rift appears to stem from growing frustration over unfulfilled promises related to the Epstein case. Trump and several of his allies had long suggested that secret documents, including a so-called "client list," would be released under his administration. Bondi had previously claimed to possess such a list. But last week, the Justice Department announced that no list exists and reaffirmed that Epstein acted alone, dying by suicide in jail in 2019. The anticlimactic conclusion and the administration's refusal to release further files sparked fury from parts of Trump's base, especially activists and influencers who had built expectations around broader revelations. At the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit in Tampa this weekend, chants calling for Bondi's resignation could be heard. Trump's post defending her appeared to be a direct response to that dissent, but it only fueled it further. A user called Mother Rosie wrote: "This statement breaks my heart, Mr. President. I have four daughters, and live in Texas, where families lost little children. I can't even begin to comprehend the flipped narrative that 'it was so long ago' 'why are we still talking about this' and 'nobody should care.' These victims were some ones daughters, sisters, nieces, granddaughter. Someone's child. Please reconsider, sir. I voted for everything you are doing! Accountability was not something negotiable." Another woman, Crissy, who can be seen wearing a Trump-supporting beanie in her profile picture, said: "We want the ELITE PEDOS exposed! You promised us that. Pam promised us that. Kash promised us that. Now it's OUR fault bc we want that promise fulfilled and call Pam out every time she lies? What else has she lied to us about?" A third user, Dewayne Sykes, said: "This is going to cost you so many supporters. I being one of them." There will still some people speaking out in support of Trump in the comments, including from Navy veteran known as Robby F, who said: "We all want to know. But President Trump only has the evidence that these criminals left for him to find. If he gets his hands on anything that's useful, we will know." The data comes from an open-source GitHub repository which scrapes and stores all of Trump's Truth Social posts along with public metrics including reply count, like count, and re-truths. Using this dataset—which includes over 1,000 posts since 2022—Newsweek applied a filter to identify any posts where the number of replies exceeded both likes and shares. Only one post met that condition: the July 12, 2025 post defending Pam Bondi. Other posts in the archive occasionally drew large reply volumes, but in every case until now, likes or re-truths outnumbered them. This post represents the first—and so far only—time Trump was publicly rebuked by more of his own followers than supported him. FBI Director Kash Patel wrote on X on Saturday afternoon: "The conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been. It's an honor to serve the President of the United States @realDonaldTrump—and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me." Far-right political activist Laura Loomer on Saturday wrote on X: "President Trump says he thinks Blondi [sic] is 'doing a Fantastic job' as AG in a post he posted on Truth Social today...." Charlie Kirk, conservative founder and president of Turning Point USA, wrote on X: "President Trump on the Epstein Files, says he supports Pam Bondi at AG, the files are untrustworthy and created by Comey and Brennan. He wants his Justice Department focused on the voter fraud, the rigged election, ActBlue, and arresting thugs and criminals." While Trump used his Truth Social post to try shift focus away from the Epstein controversy, his followers seem unconvinced. The administration now faces the challenge of reuniting a fractured base ahead of the 2026 midterms elections. Related Articles India Accuses Pakistan of 'Violations,' After Trump Announced CeasefireTulsi Gabbard Outlines Four Key Priorities if ConfirmedTrudeau's Tariff Response: What Is IncludedFox News' Tucker Carlson Admits Trump Is A 'Full-Blown BS Artist' and 'Compulsive Self-Promoter' 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Miami Herald
23 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Kristi Noem Defends Texas Floods Response at TPUSA
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem staunchly defended the federal disaster response to historic flash floods in Central Texas, at the Turning Point USA (TPUSA) Student Action Summit this week. With over 120 lives lost and more than 160 people still missing, Noem faced mounting criticism that her department's centralized contracting policy delayed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)'s on-the-ground aid. Newsweek contacted FEMA for comment via email on Sunday outside of usual working hours. Noem's tenure marks a pivotal shift in U.S. disaster management policy, favoring state-led responses over a centralized FEMA approach. Critics argue that this centralized approval policy, requiring that her office sign off on contracts exceeding $100,000, contributed to a 72-hour delay in some rescue operations, according to reporting by CNN and The Washington Post, which cited unnamed current and former FEMA officials, as reported by Newsweek. Former FEMA insiders reportedly expressed frustration over the additional bureaucracy created by Noem's new approval requirement, saying that frontline rescue teams were stalled until she gave the green light, as reported by New York Magazine. #ResignNoem trended after CNN's story, as groups like Republicans Against Trump demanded she step down for the 72-hour delay, as reported by The Economic Times. On Fox & Friends, Noem laughed off the CNN report, calling it "fake news" and "absolutely trash," claiming that federal assets were deployed promptly and efficiently. The DHS said Noem did not need to initially authorize additional FEMA resources because the department used other DHS search and rescue assets. Disaster hit Texas on July 4th when the Guadalupe River overflowed, resulting in deadly flash floods. Noem and the government were widely criticized for what was seen by some as a delayed reaction to the crisis. While acknowledging the devastating impact of the floods, Noem defended her agency's early involvement, highlighting the swift deployment of Coast Guard, Border Patrol, and BORTAC [Border Patrol Tactical Unit]. "I'm also very proud of the fact that I have the super advisory authority over the U.S. Coast Guard," Noem said at TPUSA. "Aren't you proud about what the U.S. Coast Guard just did in Texas to help those individuals? "Texas just went through an incredibly incredible tragedy with the flooding event that happened and is still looking for their loved ones, and for children and have been absolutely devastated," Noem continued, "and the individuals who showed up there from the Coast Guard, from Border Patrol, those individuals from the BORTAC teams, from FEMA that showed up immediately and supported that state in its response to its individuals. " Noem, appearing confident at the TPUSA event, asserted that her department responded immediately to every request and made federal resources available as soon as possible. "I'm so proud of them because for the very first time, we acted in a way that disaster response should, you know," Noem said. "The way statute lays out is that every emergency that happens in this country should be locally executed. That means the people that are closest to that emergency need to be the ones making the decisions to respond to people. It should be state-managed, which means the state makes the decisions on how they're going to universally handle this disaster. "And the federal government, our role should be to support," she added. "We should be there to support. We shouldn't be making the decisions. We should be sending the support that is necessary to get that state through that situation. And that's exactly how we implemented it in Texas and are continuing to do so to support Texas as it gets through this." Several Democrats in Congress have called for an investigation into Noem's handling of the floods, with Representative Jared Moskowitz urging scrutiny over FEMA's slowed response, as reported by Newsweek. Despite this, Noem has doubled down on her stance, reiterating her wider vision to dismantle FEMA as currently structured and replace it with a leaner, state-empowering model, as reported by Reuters. President Donald Trump has pledged to scrap the federal agency in charge of disaster relief and return disaster response to the states. Experts have warned that dismantling the agency completely would leave gaps in crucial services and funding. Jared Moskowitz, in a letter to the top lawmakers on the House Committee on Homeland Security and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, on Thursday: "As a former Emergency Management Director of Florida, I am alarmed by reports that the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) response to the Texas floods was delayed and hampered by a new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) 'cost-control' policy imposed by Secretary Kristi Noem," "If accurate, this represents a major deviation from long-standing FEMA protocol that may have slowed down lifesaving efforts and contributed to the tragedy's severity." Debate is intensifying in Washington over the future of federal disaster response. Supporters view Noem's reforms as a necessary step toward more agile, local empowerment. Critics, however, warn the changes risk undermining a federal safety net at a time when climate-driven catastrophes are becoming more common. Further congressional hearings and investigations appear likely, particularly as lawmakers question whether structural reforms should override FEMA's established crisis-response authority. As recovery efforts continue in Texas, all eyes will be on whether emergency response can be both swift and state-controlled, or if the traditional federal apparatus must remain intact. Related Articles Five States in Talks for Detention Centers Like 'Alligator Alcatraz'-NoemDem Calls for Investigation of Kristi Noem Over Fema's Texas Flood ResponseICE Gives Update on Ending Migrant ProtectionsThree More TSA Rules That Need to Go, According to Agency's Top Critic 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Miami Herald
24 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Democrat Ro Khanna Demands Vote To Release Full Jeffrey Epstein Files
Representative Ro Khanna (D‑CA) has announced plans to force a vote in the House of Representatives demanding the full, unredacted release of all documents related to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Khanna said he will introduce an amendment this week that would require the House Speaker to bring the measure to a roll-call vote, putting every member of Congress on the record. Newsweek contacted Khanna's team via email and House Speaker Mike Johnson via online form for comment outside of usual working hours on Sunday. As reported by Newsweek, Epstein, who died in prison six years ago while facing sex trafficking charges, had maintained close ties with numerous high-profile figures around the world. Though his death was officially ruled a suicide, speculation has persisted for years that he may have been murdered to prevent the release of a so-called "client list," a roster some believe could implicate prominent political figures, including President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton, and the U.K.'s Prince Andrew. After being accused of sexual abuse connected to the Epstein scandal, Prince Andrew denied all accusations against him and resigned from royal duties in 2020. Clinton maintains that he did not have any contact with Epstein after the financier was accused of sex crimes, and never visited his now-infamous private island of Little St. James in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The controversy was reignited last month when billionaire Elon Musk alleged, in a since-deleted social media post, that the government had withheld Epstein-related records because "Trump is in the Epstein files." The president dismissed the claim, saying he "had nothing to do with it," but it sparked further interest in the government's records. Trump has denied any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, although they were known to have interacted in social and professional circles in the early 2000s. The former president distanced himself from Epstein after the financier admitted soliciting prostitution from a minor in Florida and was sentenced to 18 months in prison in June, 2008. During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump pledged to make Epstein-related files public. A partial release occurred in February, overseen by Attorney General Pam Bondi. But earlier this week, both Trump and Bondi announced that their investigation had turned up "no incriminating 'client list,'" prompting sharp criticism from Democrats, and even backlash from some of Trump's own MAGA supporters who had anticipated deeper revelations. A memo, first reported by Axios, said investigators found "no incriminating 'client list'" and "no credible evidence ... that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals." It also said video footage from the Manhattan jail where Epstein was being held when he died supported a medical examiner's finding that he had died by suicide. In a TruthSocial post on Saturday, Trump urged others to "not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about." Late Saturday, Khanna posted to his X account: "Why are the Epstein files still hidden? Who are the rich & powerful being protected? On Tuesday, I'm introducing an amendment to force a vote demanding the FULL Epstein files be released to the public. The Speaker must call a vote & put every Congress member on record." The post has since had over 432k views. Khanna's initiative is seen as a way to hold both Congress and the Justice Department accountable, especially as the Department of Justice (DOJ), led by Trump-appointed officials, including Bondi, recently reversed its previous commitment to release more documents. The move is also politically strategic. If Khanna's proposal is accepted, it would force a House vote on releasing the full Epstein files, allowing the public to see how each representative stands on the matter, with many praising it as a savvy political move that puts pressure on those trying to avoid scrutiny. This comes after months of mounting bipartisan frustration. Though Democrats have led the charge, some Republican voices have also joined the call for full transparency. However, the Justice Department's decision to halt further disclosures has renewed criticism that the agency is protecting politically sensitive figures. Earlier this month, congressional Democrats, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin, called for the release of any documents mentioning Trump. In response to criticism of his proposal on X, Khanna said: "This is about transparency and restoring trust, not partisan politics. The public outcry is apparent. The files should be fully released and can be done so consistent with DOJ principles of protecting victims and the innocent." Even if the measure fails, Khanna's supporters argue it will create a clear public record—either the files will be released, or voters will know exactly who stood in the way. With trust in government transparency at stake, the coming vote could mark a pivotal moment in the long-running Epstein saga. Related Articles Republican Backs Push to Repeal Part of Trump Bill Days After Voting For ItExclusive: Ro Khanna on War Powers and Avoiding Another 'Endless' ConflictSenator Says War Powers Resolution Against Trump Will Have GOP SupportWar Powers Act Explained as Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna Push House Resolution 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
