Japan launches a climate change monitoring satellite on mainstay H2A rocket's last flight
TOKYO (AP) — Japan on Sunday successfully launched a climate change monitoring satellite on its mainstay H-2A rocket, which made its final flight before it is replaced by a new flagship designed to be more cost competitive in the global space market.
The H-2A rocket lifted off from the Tanegashima Space Center in southwestern Japan, carrying the GOSAT-GW satellite as part of Tokyo's effort to mitigate climate change. The satellite was released into a planned orbit about 16 minutes later.
The launch follows several days of delays because of malfunctioning of the rocket's electrical systems.
Sunday's launch marked the 50th and final flight for the H-2A, which has served as Japan's mainstay rocket to carry satellites and probes into space with a near-perfect record since its 2001 debut. After its retirement, it will be fully replaced by the H3, which is already in operation, as Japan's new main flagship.
'Even though our launches seemed stable, we have run into difficulties and overcome them one by one to come this far,' said Iwao Igarashi, senior general manager of the space systems division at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which operated launch services. 'As we now move on to the H3 launch service, we will firmly keep up the trust we gained from H-2A."
The GOSAT-GW, or Global Observing SATellite for Greenhouse gases and Water cycle, is a third series in the mission to monitor carbon, methane and other greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere. Within one year, it will start distributing data such as sea surface temperature and precipitation with much higher resolution to users around the world, including the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, officials said.
The liquid-fuel H-2A rocket with two solid-fuel sub-rockets developed by Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency has so far had 49 flights with a 98% success record, with only one failure in 2003. Mitsubishi Heavy has provided its launch operation since 2007.
H-2A successfully carried into space many satellites and probes, including Japan's moon lander SLIM last year, and a popular Hayabusa2 spacecraft in 2014 to reach a distant asteroid, contributing to the country's space programs.
Japan sees a stable, commercially competitive space transport capability as key to its space program and national security, and has been developing two new flagship rockets as successors of the H-2A series — the larger H3 with Mitsubishi, and a much smaller Epsilon system with the aerospace unit of the heavy machinery maker IHI. It hopes to cater to diverse customer needs and improve its position in the growing satellite launch market.
The H3, is designed to carry larger payloads than the H-2A at about half its launch cost to be globally competitive, though officials say more cost reduction efforts are needed to achieve better price competitiveness in the global market.
The H3 has made four consecutive successful flights after a failed debut attempt in 2023, when the rocket had to be destroyed with its payload.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Detect Radio Burst From Deepest Space, Then Realize It's Just A Satellite, Then Realize The Satellite Was Signaling From Beyond The Grave
A scientific paper was recently published on Cornell University's arXiv describing a radio burst that lasted for a mere 30 nanoseconds. Maybe that doesn't sound too exciting, except that the signal was thought to come from another galaxy. But then it turned out it was just from a satellite. But then it turned out that the satellite had been dead for decades and couldn't actually produce a transmission like that. So now it's a story about a zombie satellite sending impossible messages from beyond the grave, in space. Interested yet? In June 2024, the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) radio telescope detected what was thought to be a fast radio burst (FRB). Makes sense, as that was exactly what the telescope was trying to find. From reporting by FRBs remain something of a mystery even 20 years after their discovery, which of course just make scientists want to study them more. So detecting one was pretty great... until the team examining the find realized that the FRB made no sense at all. For one thing, the signal was too short — FRBs typically last micro- or milliseconds, not mere nanoseconds. Yes, those time frames are all incredibly small, but they are orders of magnitude apart. The radio telescope's image of it was also very fuzzy, which, like with a normal camera, indicated that the source was actually very, very close, not in a distant galaxy, where other FRB signals were from. What on Earth (or off it) was going on? Well, the answer turned out to be very boring, right before it got incredibly weird. Read more: These Cars Are Going To Age Terribly Once scientists had worked out the exact origin position of the signal, they realized that it was actually so close to Earth that it might well be a satellite, per New Scientist. They cross-referenced with known orbits, and sure enough, one popped up. Ah, darn, just a satellite then. No big deal — hey wait, is that satellite dead? Yes, and not just dead, but long dead. NASA's Relay 2 was in fact one of the first ever satellites, launched all the way back in 1964 at the dawn of the space age. Along with its sister Relay 1, these were experimental communications satellites intended to map the Van Allen radiation belt, per our friends at Gizmodo. Then in June 1967 (everything in this story happens in June, weird), the transponders failed, and that was the end of that. Except, now it isn't. Apparently the long-dead experimental communications satellite decided to get very experimental with its communications, since it sent out a radio burst all of a sudden. If you're wondering how a dead satellite can do that, you're not alone, because no one knows for sure. In fact, the on-board equipment is not even capable of transmitting a 30 nanosecond pulse. Rising from the grave to send impossible messages? What is this, space Ouija? In their scientific paper, the team theorizes one of two possible explanations, as lays out. First is that an electrostatic discharge (ESD) might have built up, causing a brief spark that caused a radio burst. Think of rubbing your hand along a carpet, then touching something metal. In space, the "carpet" would be ionized gas or plasma, so if Relay 2 passed through some of that, it might have sparked. This has actually been observed before, but again, at much longer timescales than 30 nanoseconds, which might count against this theory. If it does prove to be true, it actually has some practical value. ESDs are known to cause damage to satellites, but they are difficult to detect. Possibly, these scientists have stumbled on a way to detect them, making it easier to diagnose a faulty satellite. The second theory, as if this all couldn't get any better, was that the zombie satellite was actually hit by a teeny tiny micrometeorite traveling at 44,000 mph. This little hypothetical guy would only be a few micrograms, but if it struck Relay 2, it would create a puff of charged plasma, which is what the radio telescope would have detected. Both of these are still just theories, and really, nobody knows for sure. If you think that space necromancers must surely be involved, I wouldn't doubt it. It all just goes to show that space is a vast, weird place, and even our brightest minds are still only just scratching the surface of all it has to tell us. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
First Signal of Climate Change Became Detectable 130 Years Ago
If scientists of the 19th century could have used modern tools to study the atmosphere, they might have noticed the early warning signs of a major shift: human activities, like burning coal and wood, had already begun changing the climate. In a recent thought experiment, a team of Earth and atmospheric scientists found that with the right equipment, we could have hypothetically detected the first stages of this shift by around 1885, just before fossil fuel-powered cars were invented. Their results suggest that a discernible human influence on atmospheric temperature has likely existed for over 130 years. In reality, the heat-trapping properties of carbon dioxide were only just being discovered in the mid-1800s. Emissions of this gas were rising as a result of the Industrial Revolution in Europe, and it wasn't until the 1970s that systematic scientific studies really began to reveal its role – and our hand – in modern climate change. In their hypothetical scenario, the researchers set the assumption that scientists were capable of making accurate measurements of global atmospheric changes by 1860, equipping them with instruments as reliable as today's satellite microwave radiometers and contemporary estimates of carbon dioxide changes from ice cores and stratospheric balloons. "We then apply a pattern-based 'fingerprint' method to disentangle human and natural effects on climate," the authors explain. Despite the overall warming effect of greenhouse gases, climate change's early warning signal would have actually taken the form of stratospheric cooling. This is a direct radiative response to human emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, and human-driven ozone loss. Greenhouse gases trap radiation from the Earth's surface in the lower layer of the atmosphere, the troposphere. These gases increase the reflective power of the next layer, the stratosphere, causing heat to bounce off it and back toward Earth. Meanwhile, ozone depletion decreases the stratosphere's ability to absorb radiative heat. The overall effect is stratospheric cooling, while below, the troposphere starts to warm. The stratosphere is also less affected by the fluctuating weather going on in the troposphere below, which is what makes it difficult to see long-term climate patterns from ground measurements. "Pronounced cooling of the mid- to upper stratosphere, mainly driven by anthropogenic increases in carbon dioxide, would have been identifiable with high confidence by approximately 1885, before the advent of gas-powered cars," the authors write. "Even if our monitoring capability in 1860 had not been global, and high-quality stratospheric temperature measurements existed for Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes only, it still would have been feasible to detect human-caused stratospheric cooling by 1894, only 34 years after the assumed start of climate monitoring." Unless someone invents a time machine, we'll never know if this foresight would have prevented the devastating effects of unchecked fossil fuel emissions through the 20th and 21st centuries, which we are only just beginning to feel. We've known about climate change for at least 50 years now, and we are still yet to find a way to quit our species' fossil fuel habit. "We know with high confidence that sustainable pathways must be followed to avoid dangerous anthropogenic interference with climate. For the mid- to upper stratosphere and the troposphere, the projected future changes over the next 26 years are larger than the simulated changes over the 39-year period from 1986 to 2024," the authors conclude. "Humanity is now at the threshold of dangerous anthropogenic interference. Our near-term choices will determine whether or not we cross that threshold." The research was published in PNAS. Extremely Dangerous Heat Wave Now Affecting Half of US Population Glass Bottles Actually Contain More Microplastics, Scientists Find Engineered E. Coli Transforms Waste Plastic Into Common Painkiller
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Five-dimensional physics solves decades-old mystery of mercury fission
An international team of researchers, including scientists from Science Tokyo, has developed a five-dimensional Langevin model that accurately reproduces the complex fission fragment distributions and kinetic energies of medium-mass mercury isotopes like 180Hg and 190Hg. Unlike previous models that struggled to explain mercury's asymmetric fission, this approach captures the unusual double-humped mass distribution seen in mercury-180, revealing how nuclear shell effects continue to shape fission dynamics even at higher excitation energies than previously assumed. By demonstrating that these structural effects persist beyond heavy elements like uranium and plutonium, the findings enhance the understanding of nuclear fission processes and could improve predictive models for unexplored isotopes across the nuclear chart. Aiming to uncover the reasons behind mercury's unusual fission behavior, Associate Professor Chikako Ishizuka and her international team at the Institute of Zero-Carbon Energy, Science Tokyo, developed a five-dimensional Langevin model. Published online in Physical Review C on May 20, 2025, their study offers precise predictions of fragment distributions and total kinetic energy, earning recognition as an Editor's Suggestion by the journal. Unlike the well-studied fission of heavy elements such as uranium and plutonium, the way lighter nuclei like mercury split remains poorly understood. Experiments have revealed that mercury-180 undergoes an unusual asymmetric fission, producing fragments of very different sizes. These surprising results challenge current theories and highlight the need to understand how nuclear structure influences fission in elements with atomic numbers below 82. The Langevin model tracks the changing shape of the nucleus in real time, from its initial equilibrium state to the point of scission when it splits into smaller fragments. Developing consistent models for these lighter elements is crucial, as they often behave very differently from well-studied heavy isotopes. In their study, the team focused on two mercury isotopes: 180Hg, created by colliding 36Ar with 144Sm, and 190Hg, formed from 36Ar and 154Sm. They calculated how the fission fragments split and their total kinetic energies. One major improvement in the model was the introduction of a soft wall at the edges of the deformation space, allowing it to more accurately simulate how the nucleus changes shape during fission. The researchers also included the way shell effects evolve with rising excitation energy, a factor often oversimplified in earlier models. Additionally, the simulation closely matched experimental results for both the fragment mass distributions and total kinetic energy. For 180Hg, it successfully recreated the unusual double-peaked mass pattern observed in experiments. The study also revealed that shell effects remain important even at higher excitation energies of 40–50 MeV, contradicting earlier assumptions that they disappear. The researchers also included multichance fission, where the nucleus releases neutrons before splitting. They found this has little impact on fragment masses at low energies but strongly affects the total kinetic energy, making TKE a useful way to study multichance fission. According to Ishizuka, these findings offer valuable new insights into the fission process, deepening our fundamental understanding of nuclear behavior, and they confirm that the 5D Langevin approach is a reliable and effective tool for accurately predicting key fission observables.
