John Healey and MPs bask in nauseating non-mea culpas over secret Afghan relocation scheme
So no wonder a government official and/or a soldier had been less than diligent with the names of Afghans at risk. Following by example. Which one of us hasn't accidentally emailed an entire spreadsheet of more than 18,000 endangered people to someone who might pass on their names to the Taliban? Such an easy mistake to make. Why bother to check a confidential file when you can just press send and go and grab yourself a coffee?
Shortly after 12.30 and the lifting of the superinjunction, the defence secretary, John Healey, came to the Commons to give a statement on the data leak, the subsequent cover-up, and the news that a secret relocation scheme costing at least £800m, the Afghan Recovery Route (ARR), was being wound up. He might as well have been talking about the, by now familiar, Arse Covering Scheme (ACS).
Time and again, Healey would commend MPs from both sides of the house for the tone they were taking. The sombre, measured sentences. No surprise there. The fuck ups all originated and were set in motion under the Tories. So they were hardly going to complain. But the self-congratulatory non-mea culpas all became nauseatingly cloying.
This was not a time to not rock the boat. This was a time for righteous anger. How dare our government – not the government – be so cavalier with data? Put allies at risk. And then try to cover up the entire shambles. And get us to pay for it. Thanks for that. At the very moment Rishi Sunak was shouting 'Stop the Boats', he was running his own private relocation and immigration scheme to mop after his government's own failings. Someone should hang their head in shame at the hypocrisy.
Time and again Healey would insist that it caused governments great pain to keep things secret from the public. That would have come as news to most of us. More frequently, it feels like getting blood from a stone. A desperate attempt either to conceal or, when that's no longer an option, to spin the truth to their best advantage.
Tuesday's statement felt like no exception. There was no avoiding this one for Healey once the superinjunction was lifted. If he hadn't given a statement he would soon have been playing catchup, as the journalists who had known about the story for years but had been prevented from writing about it would have got to work. Best to get the government version out first. Time for the ACS.
Healey began by apologising for having kept parliament in the dark about the data leak and the ARR. This broke his heart, he said. He sounded almost sincere. But what could he have done? He too was bound by the superinjunction. What we had to remember was that it was all in a good cause. So top secret, that even those whose data had been breached were not allowed to be informed. That way, if the Taliban had wanted to send in a death squad then at least it would come as a surprise. So much better than spending months worrying about it. Or trying to flee the country.
Anyway, Healey concluded, everything was fine now. The Taliban had promised to be a lot nicer. So it was OK for the superinjunction to be lifted and it was just fine to end the ARR. Everyone who needed to be in the UK was now accounted for. Or thereabouts. And anyone who wasn't could just take their chances. The UK had done its bit. Paid all its debts. You couldn't go around feeling sorry for Afghans you'd let down indefinitely. Part of the healing process was the moving on.
In reply, the shadow defence secretary, James Cartlidge, was keen to absolve both the Tories and Labour. And especially himself. He had been a very – ever so humble – junior minister in August 2023 and his involvement had been minimal. So minimal that he might as well not have been there. So let's just say he wasn't there. Or anywhere. It was all down to Ben Wallace or Grant Shapps. One of the two. But they too had been doing their best. So it was probably right for all concerned to just reflect quietly and look to the future.
This pretty set the tone for the next hour and a quarter. Everyone was very sorry but none of them had done anything wrong. And it was important to remember that. They were the real victims in this, not the Afghans. The Lib Dem's Helen Maguire went on to wonder just how many other superinjunctions the government might have in place. Er … That's the whole point. We'll never get to find out unless they are lifted.
For all his rhetoric about the value of transparency in the cradle of democracy – yuk – Healey was relatively opaque with his answers. He ignored requests to identify the leaker as either a government official, a civil servant or a soldier and refused to say if the person had been sacked or forced to resign. Above all of our pay grades.
He also threw his hands in the air. Much of the detail was in the papers of the former government. And luckily he didn't have access to them. Long may it stay that way.
Some of the dimmer MPs from both parties sought assurance that this could never happen again. A question that always gets asked at such moments. As if you could stop idiots from being idiots. You can't foolproof the system. Especially when Psycho and the Shappster are setting the mood.
The most interesting contributions came from Tories Edward Leigh and Mark Pritchard. Leigh suggested that one useful takeaway was we should think twice before committing to any more liberal imperialist urges to send British troops into unstable countries. Pritchard reckoned it was time to rock the boat. Shake the Commons out of its complacency and for people to feel a genuine sense of outrage. Healey shook his head. This was the wrong tone. That would never do.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Channel 4
17 minutes ago
- Channel 4
Afghan data breach: UK spies and special forces details exposed
'The more we find out about this leak, the worse it gets'- according to the Liberal Democrats. They've called for an urgent inquiry into the accidental release of personal details of thousands of Afghans trying to flee the Taliban as well as British spies and special forces. The Ministry of Defence hasn't commented further on the latest revelations but said they 'take the security of personnel very seriously'.
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
British spies and special forces identities exposed in Afghan data leak
A data leak that led thousands of Afghans to be resettled in the U.K. after their safety was jeopardized because they assisted forces against the Taliban also exposed the identities of British spies and special forces, news organizations reported Thursday. U.K. media reported that the names of more than 100 special forces troops, MI6 spies and military officers were part of the leak. A person with knowledge of the events confirmed to The Associated Press that 'a small number of special forces personnel' names were leaked. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the sensitive nature of the information. The revelation followed a London judge's order Tuesday to lift a so-called super injunction that prevented any reporting on an email inadvertently sent by a defense official in February 2022 that included personal information of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to come to the U.K. The Afghans, who worked with Western forces as fixers, translators or served in the internationally backed Afghan army, applied under a program to bring some to the U.K. because they faced retribution. The British government only became aware of the leak when some of the data was posted on Facebook 18 months later by someone who threatened to publish the whole list. A secret program was then launched to relocate Afghans to the U.K. When High Court Judge Martin Chamberlain lifted the rare and controversial super injunction, which also prevented reporting on existence of the injunction itself, he allowed information to be reported on the Afghans. Defense Secretary John Healey apologized Tuesday in Parliament on behalf of the British government and said a small number of names of people who supported the applications, including members of Parliament, senior military officers and government officials, were listed on the document. While Chamberlain lifted the super injunction, he had barred reporting that would show members of British forces and spies had also been on the list. Media groups sought a modification of the judge's order Thursday after The Sun tabloid, which was not a party to the case and not subject to the injunction, published information about the British identities being exposed. News of the blunder has become a scandal because the government went to the extreme lengths to hide it from the public while relocating thousands of people. Some 4,500 Afghans — 900 applicants and approximately 3,600 family members — have been brought to Britain under the program, and about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the time it closes, at a total cost of about 850 million pounds ($1.1 billion). The government said it was closing the program after an independent review found little evidence the leaked data would expose Afghans to a greater risk of retribution from the Taliban. The review said the Taliban had other sources of information on those who had worked with the previous Afghan government and international forces. Critics, however, said thousands of people who helped British troops as interpreters or in other roles could be at risk of torture, imprisonment or death. Sean Humber, a lawyer who has represented Afghan claimants, said the 'catastrophic' data breach had caused 'anxiety, fear and distress' to those affected. Hamdullah Fitrat, the deputy spokesman for the Taliban government of Afghanistan, said the supreme leader had declared a general amnesty for everyone that prevented anybody being arrested, killed, or targeted, he told The Associated Press. 'Intelligence agencies do not need to monitor such people, who have already been pardoned, and all documents and information related to them are available here," he said in a WhatsApp message. 'Any rumors and gossip only serve to intimidate those individuals and cause fear and anxiety to their families.' British soldiers were sent to Afghanistan as part of an international deployment against al-Qaida and Taliban forces in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. At the peak of the operation, there were almost 10,000 U.K. troops in the country, mostly in Helmand province in the south. Britain ended combat operations in 2014, and its remaining troops left Afghanistan in 2021 as the Taliban swept back to power, two decades after they were ousted. The Taliban's return triggered chaotic scenes as Western nations rushed to evacuate citizens and Afghan employees.
Daily Mirror
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
At least 100 ex-Afghan special forces still on the run from Taliban death squads
Scores of Afghan special forces and undercover operators killed in Taliban purge in the aftermath of the 2021 fall of Kabul - horror emerges after leak of almost 20,000 names endangers many At least 56 Afghan Special Forces commandos have been hunted down, captured and killed by Taliban revenge units since the fall of Kabul, it has been claimed. And a further 102 of the western-trained elite troops remain on the run, often moving from house to house, as they flee a terrible end at the hands of Taliban death squads. Many of those killed suffered enormously at the hands of their cruel captors who inflicted torture on them for days before executing them and those still free are taunted. It is impossible to know how many are being targeted as a result of the massive MoD data breach in which almost 20,000 files of Afghans wanted to flee were leaked. It also emerged today that details of as many as 100 UK special forces and MI6 spies were mentioned in a data breach along with almost 20,000 names of Afghans associated with UK forces and diplomatic missions - further escalating the cover-up scandal. Their names were of people who vouched for applicants trying to flee Afghanistan to the UK because they they feared their work with UK forces and civilian or diplomatic missions would cost them their lives once the Taliban found out. A former British military source, who mentored many of the commandos dubbed 'Triples' because of the name of their special units, told the Daily Mirror: 'The precise number of those captured or executed by the Taliban remains uncertain, though anecdotal evidence suggests the figure is tragically high. Since the fall of Kabul we have lost 56 individuals, predominantly former members of the Triple Unit and the Afghan National Directorate of Security. 'Their deaths, whilst heart-breaking, are not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of retribution. I have been closely engaged in these issues and speak regularly with those who remain deeply involved in supporting those still in danger." The 'Triples' were three Special Forces units called 222, 333 and 444- all of them highly-targeted by the Taliban. The horror facing many remaining Afghan operatives emerged as political figures scrambled to deny they had mismanaged the nightmare 2021 fall of Kabul. It was worsened with the catastrophic and accidental leak of 18,500 names of Afghans, many military, who needed to flee Afghanistan for the UK. The list of names was accidentally sent out by a UK military official, the Taliban became aware of it and it triggered them to step up the hunt. Meanwhile thousands of Afghans endangered by the leak have been smuggled to the UK under the Afghan Relocation Route system set up when the leak emerged. The Mirror source revealed how many fleeing Afghan Special Forces and members of other western-trained units were ghosted to safety from Kabul as the capital fell in 2021. Their 'Triple' units were codenamed 'CRU 222' or Crisis Response Unit 222 - a counter-terror fighting unit supported by the British special forces, 'CF 333 - or Commando Force 333, counter-terror and targeting of top Taliban 'high value targets supported by the US Green Berets, and ATF 444 - the Afghan Territorial Force 444 whose role was to do all of the above but in Helmand and Kandahar Provices. They were called "the Triples" because they used three numbers in their title. There were plans underway to expans the "Triples" special forces with five or six more units dubbed 555, 666, 777, 888, 999 but the fall of Kabul stopped that in its tracks. As the Taliban death units closed in on them they were were helped to the Panjshir Valley, where they were looked after by the National Resistance Front. Others crossed into Pakistan, Turkmenistan or Uzbekistan, but many remain stranded in Afghanistan. The Mirror source added: 'The danger they face is ongoing. Death threats are routinely delivered by phone to family members and many who were captured were subjected to prolonged torture before execution, some murdered outright without warning or process. 'The cruelty has been systematic and calculated and continues to this day with the personnel we speak with when safe to do so.' In 2021 a scheme to relocate Afghans who helped the British military during the war was launched and called the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP). But in February 2022 an unnamed British official accidentally emailed details of 18,714 Afghans who applied to be relocated to the UK. He had thought he was emailing 150 rows of information, but it actually contained around 33,000. Roughly a year later the MoD discovered the breach and also in 2023 officials realise the Taliban may have obtained a 'kill list of thousands.' Then defence secretary Ben Wallace applied for a court order after the MoD reeived two inquiries about the breach from journalists. And soon after a High Court granted a super-injunction gagging order until a hearing scheduled for 1 December, preventing the reporting of the breach.
