
What to know about the ‘Epstein files' - now haunting the White House
What is the origin of the case?
Epstein paid teenage girls money to perform sex acts and used his onetime girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell to recruit and manage his stable of victims.
An FBI and Florida police investigation led to his indictment in 2006.
Two years later he pleaded guilty in state court to two criminal charges, including soliciting a minor, in a deal that avoided federal charges that could have meant far more serious prison time.
A series of articles years later by the Miami Herald revealed how the criminal justice system had bent over backward for Epstein, despite the reams of evidence against him.
In 2019, he was arrested by federal agents in the New York area, accused of trafficking dozens of girls, some as young as 14, and engaging in sex acts with them.
Authorities say he hanged himself in a jail cell while awaiting trial.
Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted in 2021 of conspiring with Epstein for nearly a decade to aid his abuse.
The very nature of the charges against Epstein contributed to some of the confusion about what he did.
By calling him a sex trafficker, federal officials left many with the impression that Epstein was selling children to others to be abused, but that was never part of the criminal case against him.
Why is the Epstein investigation the source of so many conspiracy theories?
The case has many of the real-life elements that fuel speculation and propel conspiracy theories: a rich, politically connected person getting away with horrific crimes for years, an apparent unwillingness by government officials to punish the offenders, and then a sudden death under seemingly suspicious circumstances.
The Epstein case offers a twist on those elements. Conservatives seized on Epstein's acquaintance with former President Bill Clinton, while liberals point to his years-long friendship with Trump and his death in custody during Trump's first term.
While Epstein's death heightened suspicions of government from liberals and conservatives alike, Trump's supporters have publicly embraced the notion that he would finally expose sordid crimes by elites against children.
The Epstein obsession became just the latest and strongest iteration of other conspiratorial notions that have captivated Trump loyalists over the years, including outlandish and shadowy theories like QAnon and Pizzagate, both of which involved specious allegations of child molestation.
In an unsigned memo last week, the Justice Department and the FBI said that the Epstein files did not contain the kind of evidence that would justify investigating other people.
The video recordings of child sexual abuse material found by investigators were not, as some have suggested, videos that Epstein recorded of crimes by himself or his friends, but material he downloaded, Attorney-General Pam Bondi said.
So what is in the material that Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have refused to release?
FBI files about the rich and famous tend to be a mix of real intelligence, strange rumours and absurd speculation.
For example, federal agents once entertained the notion that Frank Sinatra was in a secret conspiracy with his dentist, as they sought to determine whether the singer and actor was a communist sympathiser.
What was Trump's relationship with Epstein?
Contrary to what Musk suggested, merely being mentioned in an FBI file is not by itself incriminating, since such files often contain witness statements, victim information and bad tips.
And a wealth of reporting shows that Epstein and Trump were friends for years who saw each other frequently at high-society parties in Florida and New York.
In a 2002 interview with New York magazine, Trump called Epstein a 'terrific guy' whom he had known for 15 years.
Trump added, 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side'.
Two years later, though, in November 2004, the two ended up competing to buy a Florida estate out of a bankruptcy. Trump ultimately outbid Epstein for the property.
There is little public record of the two men interacting after that real estate battle.
Trump sold the property four years later to a Russian businessman, getting more than double what he paid for it.
Not long after the November auction, police in Palm Beach fielded a tip that young women had been observed going in and out of Epstein's home, the police chief said in a deposition.
Four months later, police received a more substantive complaint, from a woman who said her teenage stepdaughter had been paid by Epstein to give him a massage while she was undressed, according to a police report.
That led to an investigation that later identified at least a dozen potential victims.
Epstein survived that investigation with his fortune and freedom largely unscathed.
His 2019 arrest, followed by his death in custody, gave new meaning to a case that had posed disturbing questions about the role that money and influence play in criminal cases.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Devlin Barrett
Photographs by: Haiyun Jiang
©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
11 hours ago
- NZ Herald
NZ sharemarket closes up more than 1% as heavyweight stocks rally
'Even though Trump sent a letter to Mexico, it won't affect goods that are compliant with the USMCA [United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement]. So there's still a feeling that Fisher & Paykel will be compliant and exempt,' Smith said. 'I suppose after the initial concern around those letters that were sent on the weekend, the market has gained some poise and become a bit more relaxed about the situation overall.' Fisher & Paykel Healthcare rose 76c to $36.75 after 333,220 shares changed hands to the value of $12,182,093.91. Infratil also had a positive day, with its share price rising to $11.38, with $11,103,102.81 worth of shares changing hands. Elsewhere, Auckland Airport said the Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) had provided an update to those who made submissions on its recent request for viewpoints on the effectiveness of the economic regulation of airport services. In its findings, MBIE advised that at this time, it is not considering legislative change. 'A bit of relief around the fact that regulatory oversight is now a non-issue, and it was now off the table,' Smith said. Auckland Airport shares subsequently rallied 4.36% to $7.78, with 1,363,985 shares changing hands to the value of $10,580,401.99. Meanwhile, a2 Milk's share price also climbed, rising 4.81% to $8.28 after $4,056,430.72 worth of shares were traded. 'The Chinese infant milk market is shrinking, but the reality is a2 has been taking market share, and I suppose there's some optimism that the result in mid-August will be a good one,' Smith said. Wall Street stocks finished higher on Wednesday local time, shrugging off a mid-session swoon after US President Donald Trump denied he was planning to fire Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell. Major indices had moved suddenly negative after reports that a dismissal could be imminent. They recovered quickly when Trump ruled out firing Powell, for now. Trump, who has bitterly attacked the Fed chairman for months, said such a move was 'highly unlikely' and that 'I'm not talking about that' when asked if he would fire Powell. The tech-rich Nasdaq Composite index advanced 0.3% to 20,730.49, a third straight closing record. The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.5% to 44,254.78, while the broad-based S&P 500 advanced 0.3% to 6,263.70. 'It's very clear that the market wants to go higher,' said Adam Sarhan of 50 Park Investments, who described investor reaction to Trump's mixed messaging on Powell as typical of a bullish tilt. 'Every time we get bad news thrown at it, the market shrugs it off and continues to rally, including today,' Sarhan said. – Additional reporting AFP Tom Raynel is a multimedia business journalist for the Herald, covering small business, retail and tourism.

1News
13 hours ago
- 1News
Sushi restaurant ordered to pay $30k over employment standard breaches
A Lower Hutt sushi restaurant has been ordered by the Employment Relations Authority to pay $30,000 in penalties after multiple breaches of employment standards in relation to an "inherently vulnerable" migrant worker. The restaurant, Well Sushi, was previously ordered to pay the former employee, who was in New Zealand on a work visa, $53,940.03 in wage arrears, the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) said. The arrears have since been paid to the worker, who is now a permanent resident of New Zealand. The breaches, which Well Sushi acknowledged, included: failing to keep accurate wage and time records; not paying the minimum wage; not providing the full annual holiday entitlement; failing to pay time and a half for work on public holidays; and not paying for sick leave taken. The labour inspector involved in the case said Well Sushi's conduct "has undermined the obligations of mutual trust and confidence that should exist in any employment relationship". The inspector noted the affected employee was a migrant worker on a work visa sponsored by the restaurant, making him 'inherently vulnerable' particularly due to having little experience of New Zealand employment standards and little ready access to support and information about those standards or its enforcement. ADVERTISEMENT The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including an Auckland teen seriously ill in Vietnam, Trump slams supporters, and Icelandic volcano prompts evacuations. (Source: 1News) The restaurant argued that the penalties should not be imposed, saying the breaches were partly 'inadvertent'. Employment Relations Authority member Davinia Tan said while the restaurant and worker had resolved the dispute, 'engaging in a settlement process does not achieve the objective of deterrence'. 'Well Sushi's conduct fell below the minimum standards of good faith, mutual trust and confidence.' The Labour Inspectorate investigations manager for the central/southern region, Taahera Begum, said employers breaching employment standards could have serious consequences. 'The fact that the wage arrears in this case amounted to more than $50,000 is a sign of how much this employee was disadvantaged by his employer, someone he no doubt trusted. 'The Labour Inspectorate views exploitation as among the most serious breaches of employment standards. Exploitation of vulnerable workers as occurred in this case, undermines the labour market by undercutting fair competition and causes great hardship to those affected.'


NZ Herald
14 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Teen dies after AI sextortion scam; rise in ‘nudify' app blackmail
'They are well financed, and they are relentless. They don't need the photos to be real, they can generate whatever they want, and then they use it to blackmail the child.' US investigators were looking into the case, which comes as nudify apps – which rose to prominence targeting celebrities – are being increasingly weaponised against children. The FBI has reported a 'horrific increase' in sextortion cases targeting US minors, with victims typically males between the ages of 14 and 17. The threat has led to an 'alarming number of suicides', the agency warned. After a Kentucky teenager's suicide, his parents found he was blackmailed over an AI-generated nude image. Photo / Getty Images In a recent survey, Thorn, a non-profit focused on preventing online child exploitation, found that 6% of American teens have been a direct victim of deepfake nudes. 'Reports of fakes and deepfakes – many of which are generated using these 'nudifying' services – seem to be closely linked with reports of financial sextortion, or blackmail with sexually explicit images,' the British watchdog Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) said in a report last year. 'Perpetrators no longer need to source intimate images from children because images that are convincing enough to be harmful – maybe even as harmful as real images in some cases – can be produced using generative AI.' The IWF identified one 'paedophile guide' developed by predators that explicitly encouraged perpetrators to use nudifying tools to generate material to blackmail children. The author of the guide claimed to have successfully blackmailed some 13-year-old girls. The tools are a lucrative business. A new analysis of 85 websites selling nudify services found they may be collectively worth up to US$36 million ($60.8m) a year. The analysis from Indicator, a US publication investigating digital deception, estimates that 18 of the sites made between US$2.6m and US$18.4m over the six months to May. Most of the sites rely on tech infrastructure from Google, Amazon, and Cloudflare to operate, and remain profitable despite crackdowns by platforms and regulators, Indicator said. The proliferation of AI tools has led to new forms of abuse impacting children, including pornography scandals at universities and schools worldwide, where teenagers created sexualised images of their own classmates. A recent Save the Children survey found that one in five young people in Spain have been victims of deepfake nudes, with those images shared online without their consent. Earlier this year, Spanish prosecutors said they were investigating three minors in the town of Puertollano for allegedly targeting their classmates and teachers with AI-generated pornographic content and distributing it in their school. In the United Kingdom, the Government this year made creating sexually explicit deepfakes a criminal offence, with perpetrators facing up to two years in jail. And in May, US President Donald Trump signed the bipartisan 'Take It Down Act', which criminalises the non-consensual publication of intimate images, while also mandating their removal from online platforms. Meta also recently announced it was filing a lawsuit against a Hong Kong company behind a nudify app called Crush AI, which it said repeatedly circumvented the tech giant's rules to post ads on its platforms. But despite such measures, researchers say AI nudifying sites remain resilient. 'To date, the fight against AI nudifiers has been a game of whack-a-mole,' Indicator said, calling the apps and sites 'persistent and malicious adversaries'. -Agence France-Presse