The U.K. says thousands of Afghans have been brought to Britain under a secret resettlement program
The government now plans to close the route, which the media had been barred by a court order from disclosing.
'I have felt deeply concerned about the lack of transparency to Parliament and the public,' Defense Secretary John Healey said in the House of Commons.
Healey told lawmakers that a spreadsheet containing the personal information of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to come to Britain after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan was accidentally released in error in 2022 because of a defense official's email error, and extracts were later published online.
The then-Conservative government sought a court order barring disclosure of the leak, in an attempt to prevent the personal information being made public. The High Court issued a strict order known as a super injunction that barred anyone from revealing its existence. The government then set up a secret new program to resettle the Afghans.
The injunction was lifted on Tuesday in conjunction with a decision by Britain's current Labour Party government to make the program public. It said an independent review had found little evidence that the leaked data would expose Afghans to a greater risk of retribution from the country's Taliban rulers.
About 4,500 Afghans – 900 applicants and approximately 3,600 family members — have been brought to Britain under the secret program, and about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the time it closes, at a total cost of 850 million pounds ($1.1 billion).
About 36,000 more Afghans have been relocated to the U.K. under other resettlement routes.
Critics say that still leaves thousands more people who helped British troops as interpreters or in other roles at risk of torture, imprisonment or death.
British troops were sent to Afghanistan as part of a deployment against al Qaeda and Taliban forces in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. At the peak of the operation, there were almost 10,000 British troops in the country, mostly in Helmand province in the south.
Britain ended combat operations in 2014, and its remaining troops left Afghanistan in 2021 as the Taliban swept back to power, two decades after they were ousted.
The Taliban's return triggered chaotic scenes at Kabul Airport in August 2021 as Western nations rushed to evacuate citizens and Afghan employees.
Super injunctions are relatively rare, and their use is controversial. Unlike regular court injunctions, super injunctions bar reporting that they were even ordered The handful of cases in which they have come to light involved celebrities trying to prevent disclosures about their private lives.
This is the first known case of a super injunction being sought by the government. Healey said he was not aware of any others in existence.
Judge Martin Chamberlain, who ruled that the injunction should be lifted, said Tuesday at the High Court that the gag order had 'given rise to serious free speech concerns.'
'The super injunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability, which operate in a democracy,' he said. 'This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum.''
Lawless writes for the Associated Press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
11 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
GOP Split on Gaza Grows, as MTG Calls Crisis a 'Genocide'
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a right-wing lawmaker closely identified with President Donald Trump's MAGA movement, this week became the first Republican in Congress to describe the situation in Gaza as a 'genocide.' 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct. 7 in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene, who represents Georgia, said in a social media post Monday evening. The post was in response to fellow Republican Rep. Randy Fine, who had posted last week on X: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away.' Greene's declaration represented a sharp turn for her on the fraught issue of Gaza. Since Hamas' terror attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, in which over 1,200 people were killed and around 250 taken hostage, virtually all prominent Republicans have been in lockstep in support of Israel's military campaign. Weeks after Hamas' attack, Greene filed a resolution to censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat, over her criticism of Israel. Read More: The Malnutrition Crisis in Gaza Will Outlive the War, Experts Warn The shift from Greene was the latest sign of a broader debate within the Republican Party over Gaza. Greene's words came the same day as Trump seemed to break with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Netanyahu's claims that there is no starvation in Gaza. Trump made clear to reporters at an event in Scotland with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that he believed the starvation there was 'real.' 'We're going to set up food centers, and we're going to do it in conjunction with some very good people,' Trump said. 'We're going to supply funds… and we're going to spend a little money on some food. Other nations are joining us.' Starmer later said on Tuesday that the U.K. would recognize Palestine as a state if Israel did not make 'substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza' and make moves towards 'sustainable, long-term peace.' Though Trump did not explicitly condemn Netanyahu, he did acknowledge he 'told Bibi [Netanyahu] that you have to maybe do it a different way.' Republicans are more divided on the issue than they have been since the Oct. 7 attack. While a few fellow Republicans have joined Greene's condemnation—'More need to speak out,' she said in response to a post from Rep. Lance Gooden of Texas about Gaza's 'humanitarian crisis'—others are insisting the fault over the situation still lies with Hamas. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he 'shares the President's view,' but also accused Hamas of intercepting and diverting much of the food aid going to Gaza. 'The humanitarian thing obviously when you see people hurting in a need like that, is to want to help meet that need and alleviate that pain,' Thune said at his weekly press conference. 'I think all of us want to see, obviously, a peaceful solution there that gets the hostages freed and ends the reign and rule of Hamas in the region. But in the meantime, do everything we can to ease the pain and the hunger that's afflicting so many of the people in that region.' North Carolina's Republican Sen. Thom Thillis simultaneously told The Hill that Hamas deserves blame and that Trump was 'right to hold elected [officials] accountable,' saying he would 'encourage Mr. Netanyahu to just be sensitive to that.' Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Chris Hollen of Maryland said Sunday on CBS's Face The Nation that claims that Hamas was stealing U.N.-delivered food were a "big lie." Many others in the Republican Party remain staunch in their support for Netanyahu's government. 'I want to be crystal clear on my thoughts regarding the catastrophe in Gaza: I blame Hamas 100%,' South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham said on X on Tuesday. 'If you want this suffering to end, call on Hamas to lay down their weapons and their leaders to take safe passage out of Gaza. The criticism of Israel is beyond the pale as they are fighting for their very existence.' The split within the GOP comes amid mounting pressure from Democrats and the international community for both Israel and the U.S. to better address starvation in Gaza. On Tuesday, 40 Senators sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, imploring them and Trump to address starvation in Gaza with the resumption of ceasefire talks. The Senators also expressed opposition to 'permanent forced displacement of the Palestinian people.' 'To prevent the situation from getting even worse, we urge you to advocate for a large-scale expansion of humanitarian assistance and services throughout the Gaza Strip, including through the use of experienced multilateral bodies and NGOs that can get life-saving aid directly to those in need and prevent diversion,' the letter reads.


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Hostage families blast UK and France for moves to recognize Palestinian state
Families of hostages held in Gaza, along with a freed captive, are blasting Britain, France and other nations for deciding to recognize a Palestinian state, warning that these steps reward Hamas terrorists while dozens of hostages remain trapped underground. The backlash came after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Tuesday that his government will formally recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire, allows U.N. aid and commits to a two‑state solution. Emily Damari, a dual British‑Israeli citizen who survived Hamas captivity, posted on X, "As a Dual British-Israeli citizen who survived 471 days in Hamas captivity, I am deeply saddened by your decision Keir Starmer to recognize Palestinian statehood. This move does not advance peace—it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy. "By legitimizing a state entity while Hamas still controls Gaza and continues its campaign of terror, you are not promoting a solution; you are prolonging the conflict. Recognition under these conditions emboldens extremists and undermines any hope for genuine peace. Shame on you," Damari wrote. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum, representing relatives of people still held in Gaza, also slammed the announcements. "Recently, we've seen an increase in initiatives calling for unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state – all while 50 hostages have been held captive by Hamas for 663 days. Recognizing a Palestinian state while 50 hostages remain trapped in Hamas tunnels amounts to rewarding terrorism. Such recognition is not a step toward peace, but rather a clear violation of international law and a dangerous moral and political failure that legitimizes horrific war crimes. "The abduction of men, women, and children, who are being held against their will in tunnels while subjected to starvation and physical and psychological abuse, cannot and should not serve as the foundation for establishing a state. If the international community truly desires peace, it must join U.S. efforts by demanding first the release of all hostages, followed by an end to the fighting." On Tuesday, Starmer announced his intentions. "I can confirm that the U.K. will recognize the State of Palestine by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in September, unless the Israeli government take substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution." France announced a similar step last week. After those statements, ten more countries said they intend to follow: Malta confirmed it will, and Andorra, Australia, Canada, Finland, Iceland, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Portugal and San Marino declared plans to move in that direction. Spain, Ireland, Norway and Belgium have also expressed support. The Netherlands, once considered one of Israel's closest allies, has hardened its stance, threatening to remove Israel from an EU research program and barring Israeli ministers from entry. Speaking aboard Air Force One after meeting Starmer in Scotland, President Donald Trump didn't back the plan. "Essentially, they (the U.K. and France) are saying the same thing, and that's OK. But you know it doesn't mean I have to agree," he told reporters. Veteran U.S. diplomat Dennis Ross also weighed in on X, warning that recognition without clear benchmarks could backfire, posting "Recognizing a Palestinian state without conditions will perpetuate the conflict not end it. What conditions? Leaders credibly committed to coexistence/non-violence, no independent militias, no alliances with rejectionists, recognition of the historic Jewish ties to the land."


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
PM Carney to hold news conference amid Palestine statehood talk, U.S. trade talks
OTTAWA - Prime Minister Mark Carney will hold a news conference in Ottawa later today after meeting with his cabinet on the state of trade negotiations with the U.S. and the situation in the Middle East. Carney will take questions from reporters alongside Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand at 5 p.m. ET. The cabinet meeting comes as trade talks escalate and as some of Canada's closest peers move toward recognizing a Palestinian state. Carney spoke Tuesday with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer after Starmer said the U.K. would officially recognize a Palestinian state if Israel does not implement a ceasefire and drastically scale up aid in Gaza, where multiple humanitarian groups say starvation is taking place. Canada and allied countries co-signed a statement Tuesday expressing their willingness to recognize a Palestinian state. The statement included France, Australia and New Zealand; France announced last week it will recognize a Palestinian state. The statement came out after a major conference at the United Nations on the two-state solution, which Israel and the U.S. boycotted. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 30, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .