BBC admits it is still letting biological men use women's lavatories
In response to a Freedom of Information (FoI) request, the corporation said it would only change its policies once guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is approved by the Government.
In the meantime, the BBC said that 'sanitary facilities vary' across its estate, which includes studios and offices across the country. Signs will not be changed until the guidance is approved this autumn.
The Supreme Court ruled in April that the word 'sex' in the Equality Act refers to biological sex and not to a person's gender identity.
It means that facilities such as lavatories, changing rooms and showers should be segregated by sex and gender.
The EHRC followed this up with interim guidance which confirmed that transwomen – biological males – should not be allowed in such women's spaces.
And last month, Sir Keir Starmer said public bodies must implement the ruling 'as soon as possible'.
However, the BBC said it would wait until the final guidance is published and signed off by the Government before taking any action.
Catherine Leng, advocacy lead at the gender-critical group Seen in Journalism, said: 'We know that before the ruling, the BBC did not signpost facilities for women only by biological sex – in fact, it refused requests to do so – and they've done nothing since the Supreme Court judgment to change that.
'The BBC itself said the judgment gives clarity, so why is it dragging its feet on single-sex spaces?
'How can female journalists and other staff feel confident their employer will support them in being impartial when it won't respect the law itself? The law is the law now, it doesn't depend on EHRC guidance and the EHRC chair has made that clear.
'It needs to stop asking its diversity teams what to do and start asking lawyers.'
'Deeply shocking'
In its FoI request, Seen in Journalism asked: 'Do all or any BBC buildings and workplaces in the UK have single-sex toilets, changing rooms and/or showers which are accessible only to members of one sex and not to trans-identified members of the opposite sex?'
The response was: 'Sanitary facilities vary across the BBC property estate. We fully intend to comply with any new guidance once approved, while ensuring that we provide facilities that respect the needs and rights of all staff and visitors to our buildings.'
A BBC spokesman said: 'We want to ensure dignity and respect for all colleagues. We currently have self-contained facilities and/or mixed-sex toilets everyone can use at most of our sites.
'We are now working through what steps we might need to take, noting the EHRC's interim update, to ensure we have sufficient provision of facilities everyone can use across all BBC sites. No signage has been changed at this time.
'An EHRC consultation on its Code of Practice for services, public functions and associations following the Supreme Court Ruling closed on 30 June. After this, a new Code of Practice will be sent for ministerial approval.
'Following this we will be reviewing our policies and practices to consider if they need to be updated, to meet any legal obligations across any applicable legislation.'
Fiona McAnena, the director of campaigns at women's rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'It is deeply shocking that the UK's flagship broadcaster, which covered the Supreme Court judgment extensively, cannot give a straight answer to a very clear question on whether it provides single-sex facilities for its employees.
'In fact, the BBC's response suggests that the organisation could currently be operating outside the law, and gives the impression it is in no hurry to ensure it complies with the law.
'The ruling laid out clearly how the Equality Act should be interpreted, with single-sex toilets and changing rooms operating on the basis of biological sex.
'The Prime Minister himself has said that public bodies refusing to implement the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman must do it 'as soon as possible'. The BBC surely has the legal resources to interpret and implement a clear judgment. It is only putting itself at increased risk of legal action with each day it delays.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Monday briefing: What Zarah Sultana's new breakaway party could mean for Labour and the left
Good morning. Last week, Zarah Sultana resigned from the Labour party and announced she was co-founding a new leftwing political party alongside former leader Jeremy Corbyn. The MP for Coventry South, who was first elected in December 2019, lost the Labour whip last July after defying the party to oppose the two-child benefit cap. She has stood by that decision, saying she would 'do it again'. In her resignation statement, Sultana accused the government of seeking to make disabled people suffer and called the political system in Westminster 'broken'. She said she was joining forces with other independent MPs and activists to build an alternative to what she described as a political establishment that no longer served ordinary people. The news will not come as a surprise to many Westminster watchers – Corbyn has been hinting at the formation of a new party since last September, and an appeareance on Peston on Sunday two weeks ago was widely seen as a soft launch for the project. But so far Corbyn has confirmed only that he is in discussions about a new party; some reports suggest Sultana caught parts of the emerging alliance off guard, exposing divisions over strategy and direction – and a struggle for leadership and power. While we await more key details – including the party's name – it's worth asking whether there is real public appetite for a new leftwing party, what it could look like, and what impact it could have on not just Labour but the entire political landscape. To explore those questions, I spoke with veteran pollster and Deltapoll co-founder Joe Twyman for today's newsletter. That's after the headlines. Labour | Downing Street is facing another bruising battle after last week's humiliating retreat on welfare reforms as MPs, campaigners and parents voice concern at its overhaul of special needs education for children in England, the Guardian can reveal. Middle East | Israeli warplanes launched a wave of strikes in Gaza on Sunday, killing at least 38 Palestinians, according to hospital officials, as talks over a ceasefire in the devastated territory reached a critical point. US news | Residents in central Texas were observing a day of prayer on Sunday for at least 82 people killed and dozens missing in flash flooding. A search, rescue and recovery operation was continuing. Australia | A jury in Australia has found Erin Patterson, 50, guilty of murdering three relatives and attempting to murder a fourth with a poisoned beef wellington lunch almost two years ago. UK news | Keir Starmer, King Charles and the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, have marked the 20th anniversary of the 7 July attacks in London in which Islamist suicide bombers killed 52 people and injured more than 770. Sultana published a statement on Thursday accusing Labour and the Conservatives of offering 'nothing but managed decline and broken promises'. She pointed to Reform – and its leader, Nigel Farage, a 'billionaire-backed grifter' in her words – leading the polls as evidence of the political system's failure. Framing the next general election as a battle between 'socialism or barbarism', a slogan famously used by the Marxist thinker Rosa Luxemburg, she called for urgent political change. The MP's statement strongly criticised some of Labour's most controversial policies in government, including the two-child benefit cap, winter fuel payment cuts and welfare reform proposals that the government's own impact assessment says would push many disabled people into poverty. She also condemned politicians across the spectrum for smearing 'people of conscience trying to stop a genocide in Gaza as terrorists'. Sultana ended the statement by urging supporters to 'join us' in building what she presented as a new political alternative. As of this morning, more than 45,000 people had signed up as 'actioners'. Together, these two themes – inequality and poverty, and anger over the war in Gaza – point to the communities this new party is hoping to mobilise and represent. But is there any appetite for this among the British electorate? What does the polling say? It's hard to measure hypotheticals in polling, Joe Twyman told me, yet he warned: 'The last 10 to 15 years of British politics have taught us that you cannot rule anything out, and that nothing can be guaranteed.' On the question of whether there is a desire for a new leftwing party among the electorate, Twyman said: 'There is always a desire for a new party … if there were a general election tomorrow and the following parties were running, the normal parties, and then a new party, left, right, whatever, they will always poll relatively well. And by relatively well, I mean around 10-15%.' A recent poll by More in Common, shared with the New Statesman last month, backed this up, finding that a new party fronted by Corbyn could pick up 10% of the votes in an election. But Twyman was keen to temper expectations. 'That's because you're asking in an abstract way: how would you hypothetically vote in a hypothetical election for a hypothetical party? But what people are actually answering is how they feel about the existing parties. We project our hopes and expectations on to a new party. People think, 'Oh yeah, I'd vote for that,' not because they like the new party, but because they don't like the established ones. There's nothing bad yet about this new party in the eyes of many people.' He added that he speaks from experience. Twyman was the official pollster for the ill-fated Change UK party, made up of centrist defectors from Labour and the Conservatives in 2019. Ultimately, not a single candidate won a seat. 'It lasted so short a time I didn't even get the T-shirt,' he joked. What does this mean for the Greens? It has been particularly interesting to see how leading figures in the Green party have responded to the announcement of a new political party. Zack Polanski, the insurgent London assembly member running to lead the Greens on a radical, mass-membership 'eco-populism' platform, quickly announced he would work with any party that wanted to stop Reform and challenge Labour. So did Mothin Ali, the most high-profile candidate currently running to become the party's deputy leader. Could we soon see a political pact between the Green party and this new organisation? James Meadway, an economist, former adviser to John McDonnell and now a Green party member, has been calling for exactly that, and he isn't alone. He claims there are 60 seats up for grabs for an alliance between socialists and environmentalists. But could this actually work? Twyman told me it is difficult to test the public appetite for formal alliances. 'The average person in the street has not thought about this at all,' he said. 'What you're dealing with here is hypotheticals, but the reality can be very, very different.' He said the mistake people often make is simply adding up parties. It's the same trick Conservatives use when they add Reform's vote to their own and claim that is what they would get if Reform didn't stand. So for now, there is no reliable way to model how well such an alliance would actually perform. Will it be a serious threat to Labour? As for Labour leadership, they have so far brushed off the announcement of this new party, while some Labour backbenchers actively welcomed Sultana's resignation. But could this new party prove to be a headache for Labour down the line? 'Everything's a headache for Labour,' Twyman said. 'If you're Tony Blair and you're 40 points ahead in the polls and you get complaints from your left flank, then you can laugh it off. If, on the other hand, you're Keir Starmer and you have had a really tough first year, you're trying to get things back on track, you recognise the risk that Reform represents on some of your voters … and now you're thinking, well, maybe here's another risk.' Should Downing Street be worried as things stand right now? No, Twyman said. But he wouldn't dismiss it completely, especially if the new party gains money, momentum, or defections. He suggests the announcement of the party adds to growing evidence of fragmentation in British politics. 'Reform and this new party didn't create this wave of dissatisfaction, but what they're being very effective at doing is riding it on to the beach.' 'Labour governments are meant to make people feel less scared, not more.' John Harris is typically powerful in today's column asking incredulously: is Labour really about to target the educational rights of special needs children? Charlie Lindlar, acting deputy editor, newsletters What does it mean to come dead last on the nation's most beloved reality TV show? I loved this roundup of contestants from a range of shows, from The Traitors to Bake Off. Aamna In case you missed it on Saturday: First Edition's own Archie Bland is excellent in this column on Bob Vylan and the coalescing of a steadfast public opposition to Israel's war on Gaza. 'It isn't just that people are angry that the catastrophe in Gaza isn't being given due attention: it is that their encounters with observable reality are being flatly denied,' he thinks. Charlie From his earliest reading memory (The Very Hungry Caterpillar) to the author he once struggled with but now frequently rereads (Jane Austen), this is a lovely, quiet meditation from bestselling author David Nicholls on the books that changed his life. Aamna I'm in the midst of yet another Girls rewatch – the perfect time for Lena Dunham's long-awaited next project, Too Much, and this Michael Segalov interview with its star, Megan Stalter. Charlie Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Tennis | At Wimbledon, Cameron Norrie lost a third-set match point but beat Chile's Nicolás Jarry 6-3, 7-6 (4), 6-7 (7), 6-7 (5), 6-3 to set up a quarter-final against Carlos Alcaraz. Briton Sonay Kartal lost to Russian Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova 7-6 (3), 6-4 in a clash marred by technological failure, with Wimbledon organisers apologising after the electronic line-calling system was turned off in error at a crucial moment on Centre Court. Football | Second-half goals from Géraldine Reuteler and Alayah Pilgrim gave Switzerland a 2-0 win against Iceland in Group A of Euro 2025. Caroline Graham Hansen struck late on as Norway ended 2-1 against Finland for their second win in two games at Euro 2025, with Switzerland's win sealing their qualification. Formula One | Lando Norris took his maiden win at the British Grand Prix after a dramatic and incident-packed race at Silverstone in treacherous wet and dry conditions. The Guardian begins the week with 'New battle for No 10 as MPs raise alarm on special needs provision'. The Times likewise has 'PM facing fresh revolt over special needs help'. 'Labour 'willing to explore' wealth tax' says the Telegraph. 'State pension tax would be 'insult to all OAPs'' – that's the Express while the i leads with 'UK was 10 years from turning off the taps: Labour vows to avert new water crisis'. The Financial Times tells us that 'China reroutes exports via south-east Asia in bid to skirt Trump's tariff wall'. The Metro reports on a call by the Met commissioner, Mark Rowley, for ''12 mega forces' in policing shake-up'. Biggest story in the Daily Mail is 'Top police chiefs: Smell of cannabis is a 'sign of crime''. ''Fined'... for keeping teeth healthy' – it's a 'perverse' case that stains NHS dentistry, says the Mirror. A rogue fertility clinic, stolen eggs, and an unlikely friendship Jenny Kleeman reports on the IVF clinic in the US that stole women's eggs to get other women pregnant. Sign up for Inside Saturday to see more of Edith Pritchett's cartoons, the best Saturday magazine journalism and an exclusive look behind the scenes A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad Two decades after the 7/7 London bombings, families of victims have channelled grief into powerful memorials that continue to change lives. The Miriam Hyman Children's Eye Care Centre in India now treats thousands of children each month, while initiatives like Fiona Stevenson's swimming project in Belize and Michael Matsushita's orphanage fund in Cambodia and Vietnam have safeguarded and uplifted countless young lives. Closer to home, bursaries and hospital donations honour victims like Helen Jones, Benedetta Ciaccia, and Philip Russell. Alongside these legacies, families have also campaigned for reconciliation and social cohesion. From clinics to classrooms, each initiative reflects the values of those lost and the enduring power of compassion. Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Row over plans to transform old United Reform Church in Norwich
A plan to transform a disused church into a cultural and arts centre with a bar is expected to be given the proposal would see the former United Reform Church in Princes Street, Norwich turned into a venue with space for 300 people.A report for city councillors said more than 600 people had signed an online petition backing the idea – and advises them to approve planning 101 people have objected, with concerns raised over noise and anti-social behaviour in the area, along with fears the church could become a nightclub. The dispute over the plans has led to one set of solicitors accusing another of trying to "bully" the council. Sitting empty since closing as a place of worship in 2020, a developer has put forward plans which would see the building used as a venue to host cultural events, classical music concerts and plans would also see the site used for art exhibitions and fitness classes, with features – including the church's historic organ – being preserved.A report for the council's planning committee said an online petition backed the idea, along with 41 people writing letters of person writing in favour said "spaces for positive and creative activities are essential" whilst another said it "would be an unbelievable asset".But there is strong opposition from others, with many concerned the building would be open until the early hours.A legal letter sent on behalf of one local landlord claimed the plan was to use the building as a nightclub, which would have a "serious, irreparable and unacceptable impact" on response, the developer's solicitors said the claim was "grossly unfair and based on a false premise" and the letter had sought "to bully the local planning authority into refusing the application". The report for councillors said that, with proposed closing times of no later than 11pm, the hours for the building "differ significantly from those typical of a nightclub".It recommends they give planning permission, subject to conditions including restricted opening hours and measures to insulate planning committee will vote on the plan on Thursday, where they will also decide on proposals for a piano bar at another nearby former church, which have also been recommended for approval. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
US trade deal makes Britain top investment destination in the world
Britain has become the most attractive place to invest in the world after Sir Keir Starmer struck a trade deal with Donald Trump. A survey of the finance chiefs of some of Britain's biggest listed businesses found that the UK was now their preferred country to invest in, overtaking the US, Japan and the Middle East. The UK has leapt up the rankings since the end of last year, when it came in at sixth spot. Deloitte, which conducted the survey, said the boost was 'in the light of the UK-US trade deal announced in early May.' Conflict in the Middle East has also weakened that region's relative appeal as a destination for investment. Ian Stewart, chief economist at Deloitte UK, said: 'Despite conflict in the Middle East and volatility in oil prices, levels of concern about geopolitical risk fell slightly in the second quarter. This may reflect an easing of concerns around trade in the light of the UK-US trade deal announced in early May.' It comes as the world braces for the return of US tariffs on trading partners when a 90-day pause on Mr Trump's 'liberation day' levies expires this Wednesday. The president said be would notifying about a dozen countries on Monday of the new tariff level on their shipments to the US. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent said on Sunday that the new tariffs would take effect from August 1. He said several trade deals were close to completion. 'We're going to be very busy over the next 72 hours, ' Mr Bessent said Sunday on CNN's State of the Union. 'If you don't move things along, then on Aug 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level.' In the latest Deloitte survey, a net 13pc of UK finance chiefs described Britain as very or somewhat attractive for investment. Only India ranked as highly, with the two countries sharing the top position. Meanwhile, more finance bosses said they were open to expanding, with 17pc saying now was a good time to take risks. The survey covered finance chiefs for both public and private businesses, including FTSE 100 companies. While they are UK-based, a majority of the companies surveyed have international operations. Richard Houston, chief executive of Deloitte UK, said: 'This renewed confidence, coupled with a rise in risk appetite, is welcome and underscores the considerable investment potential the UK offers.' Britain was the first country to secure a trade pact with the US in May. Mr Trump at the time hailed the UK as 'truly one of our great allies' and said it was a 'great honour' to have Britain sign the first deal with the United States. Under the terms of the agreement, the Prime Minister secured lower tariffs on UK car imports into the US, while the aerospace sector was shielded from levies. The Government called it a 'landmark' deal that would save thousands of jobs and make it easier for British companies to do business across the Atlantic. The findings will be a welcome boost for the Government, which has been battling to convince companies to invest in Britain. Last year, foreign investment into Britain plunged to a record low. Official figures showed the number of inbound foreign direct investment (FDI) projects dropped to 1,375 last year, down 12pc from the 1,555 in 2023-24. Deloitte's positive findings also come after a torrid week for Labour that has seen Sir Keir's authority significantly weakened by a rebellion on cuts to welfare spending. Ms Reeves said: 'Finance leaders see the UK as the best place in the world to invest. Under this Government we are open for business, delivering more investment, more jobs and putting more money in people's pockets across Britain.'
