Pressure grows on Yvette Cooper to abandon plans to ban Palestine Action
In two separate letters to Yvette Cooper, the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) lawyers' group and the Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers said that proscribing the group would set a dangerous precedent.
Additionally, several UN special rapporteurs, including those for protecting human rights while countering terrorism and for promoting freedom of expression, said they had contacted the UK government to say that 'acts of protest that damage property, but are not intended to kill or injure people, should not be treated as terrorism'.
On Tuesday two people were arrested after Palestine Action claimed to have blockaded the entrance of an Israeli defence company's UK headquarters.
Avon and Somerset police said a 30-year-old woman and a 36-year-old man, both from London, were arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, unauthorised entry to a prohibited place and locking on to a person, object or land to cause serious disruption.
Earlier, a Palestine Action spokesperson said activists had blocked the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol and covered it in red paint 'to symbolise Palestinian bloodshed'.
The Netpol lawyers' group letter, shared exclusively with the Guardian, was signed by 266 solicitors, barristers and legal academics, including 11 KCs and 11 law professors. 'Proscription of a direct-action protest group is an unprecedented and extremely regressive step for civil liberties,' they write. 'The conflation of protest and terrorism is the hallmark of authoritarian regimes. Our government has stated that it is committed to respecting the rule of law: this must include the right to protest.
'To use the Terrorism Act to ban Palestine Action from direct action would be an abuse of this legislation and an interference with the right to protest. Misusing terrorism legislation in this way against a protest group sets a dangerous precedent, threatens our democratic freedoms, and would be a terrifying blow to our civil liberties.'
Signatories of the Haldane Society letter, which will be handed to Cooper before MPs vote on Wednesday, include Michael Mansfield KC and Imran Khan KC – who represented the family of Stephen Lawrence and victims of the Grenfell Tower fire – and the Labour peer John Hendy KC.
It has been signed by thousands of people including the politicians Caroline Lucas, Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell, the actors Adeel Akhtar and Juliet Stevenson, teachers and vicars.
The letter says: 'It [a ban] would leave many ordinary members of the public vulnerable – for example, simply wearing a T-shirt saying 'I support Palestine Action' would be seen as violating the proscription and action would need to be taken.
'There are many dangers to proscribing peaceful direct action groups, even if their objectives are those some of us may disagree with. Current and future governments may misuse this precedent to attack other interest groups in future, offering no avenues for peacefully venting dissent.'
The prime minister, Keir Starmer, was a member of the Haldane Society but left when he became director of public prosecutions in 2008.
The UN experts said: 'Mere property damage, without endangering life, is not sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism … Protest actions that are not genuinely 'terrorist', but which involve alleged property damage, should be properly investigated as ordinary crimes or other security offences.'
The Home Office referred the Guardian to Cooper's statement last week announcing the proposed ban, and comments in a press release issued on Monday in which she said that Palestine Action's acts 'do not represent legitimate acts of protest and the level of seriousness of Palestine Action's activity has met the test for proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
WFH justice boss quits after Andrew Malkinson scandal
Ms Kneller became chief executive in 2013, having joined as director of casework in 2005. Her departure follows the enforced resignation of the previous chairman, Helen Pitcher, who claimed she had been made a scapegoat. Dame Vera said: 'The CCRC has a vital role to play in the criminal justice system, but confidence in the organisation has been badly damaged. Confidence in our work must be restored. I thank Karen for her work at the CCRC over many years.' Amanda Pearce, CCRC the casework operations director, has been appointed interim Chief Executive. In February, the CCRC received an application from Lucy Letby, the former nurse convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others. Asked if she thought the CCRC could deal with it, Dame Vera said: 'Remember I'm quite new to it. It will need complexity. It will need a team. It will need the readiness to commission reports, I would guess from what's been said about the lack of scientific value in some of the things that were asserted. 'So it's going to be a very complex task.'
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘My neighbour's rat-infested garden is devaluing my house. What can I do?'
Do you have a legal question to put to Gary? Email askalawyer@ or use the form at the bottom of the page. Dear Gary, My concern is that an empty house next door is devaluing my property. The owner was reclusive and died a year ago after being in a care home for some time. When he lived at home, his garden became untidy, and after he vacated the property, it became very overgrown. There are substantial saplings growing down the sides of the house between paving stones, which will obviously do the building no good. I know our neighbour has a grandson. My one conversation with him resulted in him saying he would be back soon to 'fix' things, but he has not been seen again. While our neighbour was alive and in care, I did contact the local authority about the state of the house, particularly with the trees growing out of the sidewalls. It would only tell me that my neighbour was in care, but not where, and that it would pass my concerns on to the 'relevant party' – without telling me who that party was, or indeed if that party was now the local authority. I recently reported that rats seem to be nesting in the rear garden somewhere, and I have also seen a mink poking its head up from underneath the adjoining fence. The front hedge has been trimmed once by the council after a report from another neighbour that it had completely overgrown the pavement forcing pedestrians on to the road. It is now in that same state again. I have specific questions: Is the local authority obliged to look after the house or force the owner to do so, or do we just have to wait until the situation somehow resolves itself? If there is a local authority obligation, how do we get it to do anything? Can the immediate neighbours on either side enter the garden to cut down the trees/bushes that are damaging the dividing fences? – Simon, by email Dear Simon, This is a sad situation arising from the death of your neighbour. We must have sympathy for his family who will be grieving, and who may have a good reason not to have tackled the house. When someone dies, their executors (if there is a valid will) become responsible for the estate. They are called 'administrators' if there is an intestacy (no valid will). The executors or administrators should be stepping up here to secure the property. By 'secure', I mean both protect it from intruders and damage, but also protect its value for the beneficiaries. This makes me think the ongoing lack of action and neglect of the house may be because there are unknown legal issues going on in the background. Maybe there is no valid will or some other dispute. It is odd if someone has inherited a house and is letting it continue to deteriorate. First off, try to find out in whose name the house is registered at the Land Registry and if – as assumed – it is your deceased neighbour, see if anyone has stepped up as executor or administrator and taken out a Grant of Representation naming them as responsible for the estate. These checks can be carried out at the Land Registry and Probate Registry, and in each case cost less than £5. In other words, get some facts and then attempt to contact anyone who is responsible for the house. If you end up going back to the local authority, any enforcement action they take will be against the person with legal responsibility for the estate. To answer your questions: Firstly, the short answer is that the local authority is not exactly obliged to look after the house, nor take enforcement action on the owner. But they can act if the property becomes a public health hazard, a so-called 'statutory nuisance', or causes issues like dangerous structures or vermin. All of these may be relevant in this case, so I would urge you to continue to press your case and produce succinct and compelling evidence of what is going on. Relevant legislation is the Environmental Protection Act 1990, which allows the local authority to serve notices and take enforcement action in relation to statutory nuisance (things occurring which spoil 'enjoyment' of neighbouring land or which are a hazard), and the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Section 215, which allows the local authority to serve an 'untidy land notice'. In extreme cases, the local authority can insist on repairs, and if the owner does not act it may take over and put a charge on the property. As an aside, there may already be a charge with regard to care home fees, which may incentivise the local authority to step up. Secondly, in terms of how to get the local authority to take action, I say report in writing (ideally by email so you have a record), to Environmental Health (for rats/minks/other vermin), and Planning Enforcement (for visual amenity or Section 215 concerns), and Highways (for overgrown hedges blocking the footpath). I know you have been in touch already, but be persistent and be specific – document sightings, dates and effects on your property (for example, garden fences damaged, evidence of vermin infestation). Ask for a reference number or a case officer and keep photos and logs of what's happening. Also involve your local elected councillor. Finally, as to whether neighbours can enter the garden and cut down the trees or bushes damaging their fences – the short answer is not without permission. That's unless the branches or roots cross the boundary into your land, in which case you can cut them back. You cannot enter the neighbour's garden or do works on their land without permission. You must not remove or damage anything that does not cross the boundary.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Pensioner drives scooter down A-road after ‘following satnav'
A pensioner drove a mobility scooter down a three-lane A-road at night after 'following his satnav'. The man was filmed travelling slowly along the edge of the 70mph A13 near Dagenham, east London, on Monday evening as passing lorries and cars slowed to avoid him. He was pulled over by a fire engine and questioned by police before being escorted on to local roads. One onlooker said the man was 'following his satnav' in dashcam footage capturing his dangerous excursion. His scooter only had small flashing lights alerting other motorists to his presence and he wore dark clothing. A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said: 'At around 9.40pm, officers were alerted to a man on a mobility scooter travelling eastbound on the A13. 'The man was escorted to safety and advised. The road has since reopened.' Mobility scooter 'evades' police In December 2024, a mobility scooter driver 'evaded' police in an 8mph chase along the A14 in Northamptonshire. Mobile phone footage showed drivers taking action to avoid the man as he rode along the major road for at least two miles. Officers were unable to catch him when he U-turned and drove off in the opposite direction against the flow of traffic. Police said the man refused to stop or engage with them, and they were forced to leave empty-handed, with a subsequent search of the area proving 'negative'. In November 2023, a learner driver also had their scooter seized after driving it on to two motorways. Lancashire Police said the vehicle had been driven at 30mph in the middle lane of the M6 and the M61. Mobility scooters are banned from dual carriageways with speed limits in excess of 50mph and are only permitted to drive at 8mph on roads and 4mph on pavements. In 2023, 16 people were killed, 90 were seriously hurt and a further 222 suffered minor injuries in incidents involving mobility scooters.
