Former NZ Idol judge living in his car, found guilty of drink driving
Paul Ellis, a former prominent figure in the Kiwi music industry, is back in court on more driving charges - this time after being caught nearly seven times the legal alcohol limit.
Ellis pleaded guilty in the Nelson District Court today to driving with excess breath alcohol on a third or subsequent time after blowing 1688 micrograms of alcohol per litre of breath. The legal limit is 250mcg.
He was also convicted of driving while disqualified.
According to a summary of facts, police tracked Ellis down on the morning of February 21 after investigating a report that someone had collided with a parked vehicle in the Nelson suburb of Tāhunanui.
Police followed a clear trail of vehicle fluid from the crash-damaged vehicle that led directly to the front passenger wheel of Ellis' vehicle, which was parked on a nearby street.
Ellis, exhibiting signs that he had been drinking, admitted he was a disqualified driver.
An evidential breath test followed and showed a reading which was 6.7 times the limit.
Ellis told the police that he had been living in his car at Nelson's Isel Park. He had been drinking wine but the crash was an 'oversight' he had not been aware of.
It is not the 62-year-old's first time before the courts.
In November 2023 he was convicted in the Blenheim District Court for driving while disqualified, fined $400 and given a six-month disqualification.
He was also granted leave to apply for an alcohol interlock licence at the time. But, police said he failed to do this, which meant that when he was caught in February this year, he was still driving as a disqualified driver.
Ellis was also convicted in the same court in June 2018 on two separate charges, 10 days apart of driving with excess blood alcohol.
He was convicted again in May 2022 on a charge of driving with excess breath alcohol for a third or subsequent time.
Ellis was born in Timaru but grew up in Picton, and moved back to the region in 2020 when he helped organise the Linkwater Summer Sounds Music Festivals.
He had a successful career in the music industry as a producer and manager and had worked with international music stars, including several from New Zealand.
Ellis was a Sony Music executive living in New York at the time of 9/11 and was a judge on the first two NZ Idol seasons, before appearing as a judge on New Zealand's Got Talent in 2008.
Ellis was remanded on bail for sentencing in August. His earlier request for name suppression lapsed today.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Prominent figure with name supression set to reappear in court
Photo: RNZ / Dan Cook A prominent New Zealander is set to reappear in court on Monday. RNZ earlier revealed a prominent New Zealander had been arrested . After being made aware of the man's arrest, RNZ approached the Wellington District Court to see if there were any suppression orders and when he would be appearing in court. In response, a registrar said the man faced eight charges, all of which are category three offences meaning the offence is punishable by imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for two years or more. However, an application had been granted prohibiting media from being able to report the man's name, identifying particulars as well as the nature of the charges he faced before his first appearance. The man appeared in the Wellington District Court via audio visual link on 3 July. Media opposed the suppression orders. However, the defendant's lawyers asked for the orders to continue on an interim basis until their next appearance. Judge David Laurenson agreed to continue the orders. The man was remanded on bail without plea until his next appearance on Monday. Under the Criminal Procedure Act a court may make an order forbidding publication of the name of a person who is charged with an offence if the court is satisfied publication would be likely to result in eight different outcomes including causing extreme hardship and creating a real risk of prejudice to a fair trial. The fact a defendant is well known does not, of itself, mean that publication of his or her name will result in extreme hardship. At first appearance a defendant only needs to advance an "arguable case" that one of the eight grounds applies. The only section in the Criminal Procedure Act that permits suppression of the charges is section 199C, which permits suppression of "trial-related information" where the court is satisfied publication of that information is likely to create a real risk of prejudice to a fair trial. Trial-related information includes "any other specific information in relation to any trial". Where an interim order is made under section 199C it only lasts until the defendant's next court appearance. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
1News
13 hours ago
- 1News
Police charge man with $2m worth of Auckland home burglaries
A man who allegedly burgled around $2 million worth of property from more than 50 homes across Auckland in two years has been arrested by police — who say he was on his way to his next job. Detective Sergeant Amanda Reed said police had been collecting evidence and information on the 51-year-old's movements for several months and had intercepted a burglary attempt on Friday. Police sighted a vehicle belonging to the man travelling on Shore Rd in Remuera just after 6pm, she said. "Based off inquiries made into his movements in recent months, it was believed that he was on his way to commit another burglary." Extra police units were deployed along with assistance overhead from the Eagle helicopter. He was tracked from a distance to Waterview and was blocked in by police when he turned into a service station. ADVERTISEMENT Reed said the man was taken into custody without incident. "Upon searching his vehicle, a number of tools were located, which police believe are used to assist him with his offending." It is alleged the man committed more than 50 residential burglaries across Auckland in the past two years, including in the North Shore, Remuera, and Sunnyhills areas. Reed said police estimated he had stolen around $2 million worth of property. "This is a significant result for the team, not only because this is someone who we've been keeping an eye on for a lengthy period of time, but also due to the large scale of his offending." Investigation into the man's offending continued and police were hopeful some of the stolen property could be returned, she said. "We hope this result comes as a relief to his victims, and that both the North Shore and Remuera communities feel some reassurance knowing a prolific offender is off the street." The 51-year-old man was due to appear in the Auckland District Court charged with seven counts of burglary on August 4. Police said further charges had not been ruled out.
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Mother of seven Samantha Tepana evicted from Kāinga Ora home after 45 complaints from neighbours
One neighbour, however, was willing to provide evidence of rubbish dumped on his property, trespass on to his property, and damage to his property when he appeared before tribunal adjudicator Nicholas Blake. Kāinga Ora said it had issued six anti-social behaviour notices and three breach notices, while information from police showed officers were called to the property several times. The Kaipara District Council had contacted Kāinga Ora with concerns because of 'numerous complaints from different complainants' relating to 'extreme noise on a weekly basis and two to three days at a time' and 'barking dogs and wandering dogs'. The tribunal heard that the council's record of dog control and noise control complaints for the property and responses ran to 47 pages. While Tepana didn't attend the tribunal hearing, copies of emails between herself and Kāinga Ora were provided as evidence. In one of the emails, Tepana said, 'Kāinga Ora has set me up to fail, I am a mother with seven kids put into an environment where it's [quiet] and not for Māori. 'We are a loud family and to put us smack bang in the middle of a quiet area with no privacy and close neighbours with [a] shared driveway [is] everything I didn't ask for.' Blake didn't accept her explanation, saying in a recently released decision that if it was merely a matter of a large and loud family being in a quiet area, there would be no suggestion of terminating the tenancy. 'People in the community must tolerate some amount of noise from their neighbours. However, the evidence shows that the issues at . . . are massively, exponentially, beyond this.' Blake was satisfied Tepana had caused and permitted an unreasonable interference with the peace, comfort and privacy of her neighbours. He said the breaches were not capable of being remedied and Kāinga Ora had given Tepana every opportunity to address the problem. While Kāinga Ora confirmed the situation had improved since it had filed an application with the tribunal in June, 'that was too little and too late'. The nature and extent of the breaches were such that it would be unreasonable to refuse the request for termination, given the frequency of the interferences with peace, comfort, and privacy during a 12-month duration. They included disruptive behaviour and the seriousness and extent of the incidents, in particular intentional property damage, threats to people and animals posed by wandering dogs, and allegations of threatening and intimidating behaviour. The tenancy was terminated on July 16. Al Williams is an Open Justice reporter for the New Zealand Herald, based in Christchurch. He has worked in daily and community titles in New Zealand and overseas for the past 16 years. Most recently he was editor of the Hauraki-Coromandel Post, based in Whangamatā. He was previously deputy editor of the Cook Islands News.
