Kemi Badenoch to take fight to Nigel Farage over his vow to axe two-child benefit cap
The Tory leader will attempt to draw battle lines with Reform by forcing a vote on the issue in Parliament.
2
2
Mr Farage has called for the cap to be axed as a way of getting more parents to have children amid a declining birth rate.
But the move - also being demanded by dozens of Labour MPs - would cost around £3billion a year and widen the hole in the public finances.
Ms Badenoch last night told The Sun: 'Britain is spending too much, there is no money for increasing benefits.
'The two child benefit cap was there for a reason.
"Now Keir Starmer and Nigel Farage want you to pay for other people's children.
'Only the Conservatives believe we shouldn't be borrowing money to pay for welfare.
"What Labour and Reform are doing will lead to more spending, and higher taxes.'
Sir Keir Starmer has not ruled out lifting the cap - which limits child benefit to two kids - being part of his child poverty strategy that will report in the autumn.
But he has warned rebellious backbenchers there is now less money for spending after climbing down on his welfare crackdown.
Ms Badenoch will use the Opposition Day vote demanding the cap is kept - which is not legally binding - to open up a divide not just with Labour but Reform, who are leading the polls.
The Tories hope to use the two-child benefit cap as a 'wedge issue' to set them apart from Mr Farage, who is hoovering up former Conservative voters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
UK draining aid budget with asylum seeker hotel policy
Some £1.8 billion of the projected £8.9 billion budget for overseas assistance could be spent on supporting refugees and asylum seekers in Britain in 2027-28, a report by the Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) says. THE UK's shrinking aid budget is being drained by the Government's prolonged use of asylum hotels — diverting life-saving global development funds while failing to provide refugees with humane and timely support, a watchdog has warned. Despite the June spending review suggesting a reduction in such costs over the next three years, the asylum seeker system is still on course to absorb a 'significant portion' of total aid funding, leaving as little as 0.24% of gross national income for global development, according to the watchdog. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has announced plans to end the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this Parliament after the National Audit Office said accommodation costs could hit £15.3 billion over a 10-year period. READ MORE: Heckling of Nigel Farage will only help reinforce Reform UK's mantra But progress in bringing down aid spending on so-called in-donor refugee costs remains 'slow', the ICAI said. International OECD rules allow governments to use their aid budgets to cover some of the costs of helping people claiming asylum in the first year of entering a country, such as housing and food. According to ICAI calculations, asylum costs are expected to take up £2.2 billion of total UK official development assistance (ODA) funding for 2026-27, £1.8 billion the following year and £1.5 billion by 2028-29. The UK Government slashed Britain's aid budget earlier this year from 0.5% of gross national income to 0.3% in order to pay for increased defence spending. Total ODA spending is now expected to fall from £10 billion in 2026-27 to £8.9 billion the following year before increasing slightly to £9.4 billion in 2028-29. This means a fifth of the total aid spend in 2027-28 is expected to go towards asylum costs, before dipping to around a sixth in 2028-29. ICAI commissioner Harold Freeman, who led the new report, acknowledged the Government had already taken some steps to address 'flaws in the system' but said further changes would be likely to be needed. READ MORE: Russell Findlay under fire for £150k taxpayer cash given to ex-spin doctor's firms He said: 'The UK's development programme is at a turning point, with budget reductions coming against a backdrop of increasing global conflicts, climate threats and rising humanitarian needs. 'At the same time, UK asylum costs are likely to continue to absorb a significant proportion of our aid funding. 'The Government has already taken steps to address some of the flaws in the system for managing aid identified by past ICAI work. 'But further changes will likely be needed to maximise the impact and value for money of the remaining development budget.' The UK Government has been contacted for comment. Last year, the watchdog raised 'value for money' concerns after some 28% – or £4.3 billion – of all UK aid in 2023 was spent on hosting refugees and asylum seekers in Britain under the previous Conservative government. The amount of ODA spending on in-house refugee costs has risen dramatically since 2020, in part due to visa schemes for Afghan and Ukrainian people but largely linked to lengthy stays in so-called asylum hotels, the ICAI said. In response to its latest report, the Tories said the 'eye-watering cost' of housing asylum seekers was 'utterly indefensible, particularly when so many people are struggling to get by'. Shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said: 'This broken system rewards delay and indecision, while the British taxpayer foots the bill. 'Those who have no right to stay here should not be languishing in hotels; they should be detained and deported within days – not years. 'We need a migration system that is firm, fair, and fast. 'Over the past 12 months, Keir Starmer has systematically dismantled every deterrent, while his joke of a migrant deal agreed with France last week will do nothing to stem the flow of migrants risking their lives to cross the Channel.' The One campaign, which aims to reduce poverty in Africa, said the report confirmed that UK aid had been 'stretched to breaking point'. Executive director Adrian Lovett said: 'While it's right that refugees are housed in safe accommodation, paying for this from the diminished international aid budget means there will be even less support for the world's most vulnerable people at a time of growing global need.' Lovett added: 'The UK is at its best when it delivers a strong and growing aid budget, but also uses its political and diplomatic muscle to help create the conditions for sustainable solutions. 'We look to ministers to be creative and ambitious on both fronts in the months and years ahead.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Labour not learning lessons from deaths of domestic abuse victims, report finds
The voices of women who have died at the hands of a partner or former partner are being ignored and the government is failing to heed warnings from their deaths, a damning report from the domestic abuse commissioner reveals today. An examination into how the government learns lessons from the deaths of domestic abuse victims has found that half of the national recommendations made in domestic homicide reviews (DHRs) are not put into action, with only a quarter fully implemented. The domestic abuse commissioner, Nicole Jacobs, told the Guardian that a study of DHRs – carried out whenever anyone over 16 is murdered in a domestic setting – revealed a 'deeply concerning' lack of oversight at the top of government. Between 2019 and 2021 DHRs made 110 national recommendations, the majority of which were for the Home Office. Of these only 25% were fully implemented, while a further 25% were deemed to be happening already, 21% were missing, 20% were partly met and 8% were not met. The report found that 'most shockingly' in the majority of cases government departments were not aware a recommendation had been made to them, and not a single one could confirm they had told the review's local authors about the action they had taken. Despite the value of DHRs, which were introduced in 2011, the report states: 'We currently have no idea the extent to which recommendations and action plans are being implemented on a national level. This is a huge opportunity missed.' Asked if the government was ignoring the voices of women who had been killed, Jacobs said: 'Yes, we're ignoring that tragedy. The whole point of these reviews is to shine a light on what is going wrong.' Jacobs said that in hundreds of meetings with the families of women who had been killed by domestic abusers, they all spoke of their desire to prevent further murders. Calling for more accountability and central oversight, she added: 'What we're saying at the moment is we're not willing to put in the work to make sure that we're doing everything we can so that no one else has to go through this.' The government's highly anticipated Violence Against Women strategy, part of Keir Starmer's pledge to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG) in a decade, is expected in September. Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister, has promised to tackle the 'scourge of femicide' and reduce the number of women killed by partners and former partners. But Jacobs said she worried that instead of a 'big vision' the government was employing a 'spending review strategy' and risked limiting itself to 'what was affordable right now'. She urged Starmer to take control in delivering the promise. 'The prime minister and the most senior people in government have got to stop – right now – and take a very hard look to see if their commitments are anywhere near where they need to be,' she said. 'This is the critical moment. It is now or never. This is going to be the period where they will either look back in 10 years and say that's when we made the decisions that really turned the tide on this or when the opportunity was missed.' Jacobs, who became the first person to hold the post in 2021 when it was created by the Domestic Abuse Act, already has concerns. Failing to put tackling VAWG at the heart of the government's 10-year plan for the NHS, launched this month was a missed opportunity, she said. Analysis shows that the NHS has more contact with victims and perpetrators than any other public service, but a recent report concluded that the health service is failing victims by not training staff. 'When the VAWG strategy is published later this year it must link more closely to the NHS plan to make sure the NHS plays its part in keeping victims and survivors safe,' said Jacobs. Before the review Jacobs – who knows the pressure of the frontline having run a domestic abuse services for 20 years – said it was time for cash-strapped services dealing with abuse victims to get core funding from the government, in the same way that the Domestic Abuse Act imposed a duty on local authorities to provide refuges. Last year a slew of women's charities wrote to Starmer to warn him that funding cuts and rising costs would have 'dire consequences' for victims of domestic and sexual violence and put the government's mission to halve violence against females 'in jeopardy'. 'When those services are not there victims die, are severely harmed and suffer lifelong impacts,' said Jacobs. 'There is a tragic human cost to that but an economic cost as well.' A spokesperson for the Home Office said it did a public consultation on DHR in 2024 and was looking at the statutory guidance underpinning the recommendations to ensure 'a more effective process'. Phillips said: 'My thoughts are with the family and friends of those who have lost a loved one to domestic homicide. Every single death is a tragedy, and more needs to be done to ensure domestic homicide reviews are effective and timely. 'A new oversight board with publicly-appointed members and training for review chairs would make sure recommendations went to the right person, and lessons were learned. We cannot afford to have recommendations lost.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Antisemitism report finds increase in anti-Jewish discrimination
A new report into antisemitism has laid out a number of recommendations, including that the NHS tackle what it found was a "specific unaddressed issue of antisemitism". Launched by the Board of Deputies of British Jews in 2024, the report made 10 recommendations after taking evidence from a range of organisations, including the NHS, the arts industry and the John Mann, the government's independent advisor on antisemitism, who led the review with ex-Conservative cabinet minister Dame Penny Mordaunt, said the commission heard "shocking experiences".He said it was "unacceptable" there had been what he called an "onslaught of antisemitism" in the UK since 7 October. He added that they hoped the recommendations would provide guidance and 1,200 people were killed in a Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, while 251 others were taken Israeli military launched an ongoing campaign in Gaza in response to the attack. At least 57,823 people have been killed in Gaza since then, according to the territory's Hamas-run health majority of the recommendations in the report pointed towards antisemitism training in different was the creation of an "Antisemitism Training Qualification" for those who carry out training on what it called "contemporary antisemitism". It explained that Jewish communal organisations wanted to increase knowledge on anti-Jewish discrimination, which could be done if there was a standard training given by a "credible provider".On Jewish identity, it said Judaism "should always be seen and understood... as an ethnicity as well as a religion", which the commission said would ensure antisemitism is dealt with report found many Jewish employees within the NHS felt antisemitism was not being addressed in the workplace, as well as some Jewish patients feeling "uneasy about using the service".Among its recommendations are that the NHS should hold a summit to tackle the "specific unaddressed issue of antisemitism" within the health service. It also suggested that antisemitism should be included in all Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) training, which it said would increase the number of people "educated" about it and "confident in tackling it"."No person should face abuse or discrimination whilst going about their business, whether it is pursuing the career of their choice or accessing public services," Dame Penny education, the report claimed to have received evidence of some Christian primary school teachers "inadvertently using antisemitic tropes" in subjects such as religious said it welcomed an initiative proposed by the Winchester Diocese and the local Jewish community to teach the teachers how to avoid doing so, and recommended that it be evaluated and applied to all faith Board of Deputies said that while it believed "everyone should have the right to express their opinions and beliefs", those in a role of "welfare, safety or security... have an additional duty to ensure people feel able to ask for their assistance".Other recommendations asked that Jewish members of the arts industry and unions be treated key recommendation was on policing and devising a "consistent approach" to dealing with antisemitic of Deputies president Phil Rosenberg said the report could be "summarised as one of a failure to apply the protections rightly afforded to different vulnerable groups equally to Jewish people in the same positions".
