Gauteng woman who murdered two pensioners and forged will, faces long jail time
Image: Zelda Venter
A woman who killed two elderly people as well as committed a host of other crimes including forging a will and 36 counts of theft regarding cash withdrawals from the account of one of her victims, faces a lengthy jail sentence.
Two bodies were found within months of each going missing, both burnt beyond recognition. Both were also strangled and hit with an object before they were set alight. The Gauteng woman, killer Zaheera Boomgaard, was acquitted on a third count of murder against her, but this body was never found.
The Gauteng High Court, Pretoria said there was not enough evidence to link her to the third alleged killing. John Naisby went missing in 2012 after visiting Boomgaard and was never seen again.
Boomgaard, 63, was convicted for the murder of Jamnadas Harkant Nathvani, a British national whose body was burnt beyond recognition, as well as for the murder of her friend, Lyntette Mustapha, 72.
Nathvani, also 72, had arrived in Gauteng in 2020, and he was last seen in February that year when he took a bus from Park Station in Johannesburg to Newcastle in KwaZulu-Natal. A missing person's case was opened at the Newcastle police station, and the information was circulated.
His body was found in the open veld in Gauteng in March 2020 and was burnt beyond recognition. It was months later that the police were able to identify him by his teeth, but it was established that there were signs of blunt force trauma and strangulation.
Mustapha's charred remains were found in Walkerville a few months later. She was identified by her fingerprints.
Judge John Holland-Muter found beyond reasonable doubt that circumstantial evidence all pointed to her as the perpetrator. She was found in possession of Nathvani's cellphone and the police found pictures on the phone of his passport and bank card, taken after his death.
Further damning evidence against her included tyre marks near where the body was found, which matched that of Boomgaard's vehicle. There were also dragging marks, which the court concluded occurred when the body was taken out of the vehicle and dumped next to the road.
Mustapha was killed a few months after Nathvani and her body was found about 4 km from where his body was dumped. SANRAL gantries recorded Boomgaard's vehicle was travelling in the vicinity of where Mustapha's body was found. Blood on her shoes also matched that of Mustapha.
The court also heard evidence from the police that when Boomgaard was arrested, they found copies of two wills in her house which belonged to Mustapha and her sister Marlene, who had also died.
According to evidence, the wills were forgeries, and in the wills, Boomgaard was made the sole beneficiary. She handed the 'original' copies of the wills to FNB. Boomgaard, meanwhile, testified that she had no knowledge that the wills were forgeries.
The court was told that a piece of paper, with Mustapha's signature written several times, was also found in Boomgaard's home. She was, however, only convicted of forging one of the wills.
Apart from the two murders and 46 counts of theft of making withdrawals from Nathvani's bank account, Boomgaard was also convicted of the robbery of Mustapha's cellphone and bank card.
Sentencing procedures will start on June 30.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
Defence in Meyiwa Murder Asks for Charges to Be Dropped as Trial Pauses Again
Staff Reporter | Published 7 hours ago The five men accused of killing Senzo Meyiwa, Muzikawukhulelwa Sthemba Sibiya, Bongani Sandiso Ntanzi, Mthobisi Prince Ncube, Mthokoziseni Ziphozonke Maphisa, and Fisokuhle Nkani Ntuli appear in the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria. Image: Picture: Oupa Mokoena Independent Newspapers The murder trial of soccer star Senzo Meyiwa took another unexpected turn on Thursday, with lawyers for the five accused telling the court they plan to apply to have all charges dropped. This happened right after the state officially closed its case in the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria. State Prosecutor George Baloyi stood up and told the court, 'It is precisely three years since the state started leading evidence. We now formally close our case.' This marks the end of the prosecution's side of the trial. Now, it is up to the defence to decide whether the accused will testify or whether they will try to stop the trial completely by arguing that the state has failed to prove anything against them. Defence lawyers said they plan to bring an application under Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act. This law allows a judge to dismiss charges if the state has not shown enough evidence to continue with the trial. Charles Mnisi, who represents accused number three, said they were waiting on a decision from the Legal Aid Board to provide funds for the application. That decision is expected by 6 August. Mnisi then asked the judge to postpone the matter to 7 August, and Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng agreed. But Thursday's court session was not just about legal arguments. There was also more drama over the treatment of accused number five, Fisokuhle Ntuli. Earlier in the week, Ntuli told the court he was being mistreated at Kgosi Mampuru Correctional Centre in Pretoria. He said he was not allowed to speak to his lawyer or family and was denied basic items he needed in prison. Judge Mokgoatlheng ordered that Ntuli be transferred to Leeuwkop Correctional Centre in Sandton. On Thursday, top officials from Correctional Services came to court to explain the situation. They said Ntuli had been moved to the high-security C Max section of the prison after he was allegedly caught with a cellphone during a search on 8 July. Ntuli denied this and said it was not true. His lawyer, Zandile Mshololo, told the court that his rights were being violated. She insisted that the court's transfer order must remain in place and that her client had been treated unfairly. The area prison boss, Emmanuel Khoza, admitted there had been delays and mistakes but said the court's order had made it harder for the prison to manage discipline. He warned that they might appeal the judge's decision. 'We feel disempowered,' he said. 'But we apologise and commit to making sure the court runs smoothly.' Judge Mokgoatlheng did not back down. 'You can bring a formal application if you want the decision changed,' he said. 'But for now, my order stands.' Mnisi also backed the judge, saying courts have the power to run their processes. He blamed the correctional centre for delaying the court each day. 'This court starts late because accused persons are not brought on time,' he said. The five men on trial — Ntuli, Mnisi's client Mncube, plus Muzikawukhulelwa Sibiya, Bongani Ntanzi, and Mthokoziseni Maphisa — are all accused of being involved in the murder of Meyiwa, who was shot at the Vosloorus home of his girlfriend, singer Kelly Khumalo, in 2014. All five have pleaded not guilty to murder, attempted murder, armed robbery, and illegal possession of firearms and ammunition. With the state's case now closed and the trial postponed again, the spotlight will now be on the defence. If their application to drop the charges succeeds, it could bring the trial to an early end. The court is set to resume on 7 August.
IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
Defence in Meyiwa Murder Asks for Charges to Be Dropped as Trial Pauses Again
The five men accused of killing Senzo Meyiwa, Muzikawukhulelwa Sthemba Sibiya, Bongani Sandiso Ntanzi, Mthobisi Prince Ncube, Mthokoziseni Ziphozonke Maphisa, and Fisokuhle Nkani Ntuli appear in the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria. Image: Picture: Oupa Mokoena Independent Newspapers The murder trial of soccer star Senzo Meyiwa took another unexpected turn on Thursday, with lawyers for the five accused telling the court they plan to apply to have all charges dropped. This happened right after the state officially closed its case in the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria. State Prosecutor George Baloyi stood up and told the court, 'It is precisely three years since the state started leading evidence. We now formally close our case.' This marks the end of the prosecution's side of the trial. Now, it is up to the defence to decide whether the accused will testify or whether they will try to stop the trial completely by arguing that the state has failed to prove anything against them. Defence lawyers said they plan to bring an application under Section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act. This law allows a judge to dismiss charges if the state has not shown enough evidence to continue with the trial. Charles Mnisi, who represents accused number three, said they were waiting on a decision from the Legal Aid Board to provide funds for the application. That decision is expected by 6 August. Mnisi then asked the judge to postpone the matter to 7 August, and Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng agreed. But Thursday's court session was not just about legal arguments. There was also more drama over the treatment of accused number five, Fisokuhle Ntuli. Earlier in the week, Ntuli told the court he was being mistreated at Kgosi Mampuru Correctional Centre in Pretoria. He said he was not allowed to speak to his lawyer or family and was denied basic items he needed in prison. Judge Mokgoatlheng ordered that Ntuli be transferred to Leeuwkop Correctional Centre in Sandton. On Thursday, top officials from Correctional Services came to court to explain the situation. They said Ntuli had been moved to the high-security C Max section of the prison after he was allegedly caught with a cellphone during a search on 8 July. Ntuli denied this and said it was not true. His lawyer, Zandile Mshololo, told the court that his rights were being violated. She insisted that the court's transfer order must remain in place and that her client had been treated unfairly. The area prison boss, Emmanuel Khoza, admitted there had been delays and mistakes but said the court's order had made it harder for the prison to manage discipline. He warned that they might appeal the judge's decision. 'We feel disempowered,' he said. 'But we apologise and commit to making sure the court runs smoothly.' Judge Mokgoatlheng did not back down. 'You can bring a formal application if you want the decision changed,' he said. 'But for now, my order stands.' Mnisi also backed the judge, saying courts have the power to run their processes. He blamed the correctional centre for delaying the court each day. 'This court starts late because accused persons are not brought on time,' he said. The five men on trial — Ntuli, Mnisi's client Mncube, plus Muzikawukhulelwa Sibiya, Bongani Ntanzi, and Mthokoziseni Maphisa — are all accused of being involved in the murder of Meyiwa, who was shot at the Vosloorus home of his girlfriend, singer Kelly Khumalo, in 2014. All five have pleaded not guilty to murder, attempted murder, armed robbery, and illegal possession of firearms and ammunition. With the state's case now closed and the trial postponed again, the spotlight will now be on the defence. If their application to drop the charges succeeds, it could bring the trial to an early end. The court is set to resume on 7 August.
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
Court grants Radovan Krejčíř laptop access for studies in C-Max prison
Czech fugitive Radovan Krejčíř at the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, which has granted him permission to pursue his studies at the Kgosi Mampuru C-Max Prison in Pretoria. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers Czech fugitive and jailed organised crime boss Radovan Krejčíř has been given the green light to pursue his computer-related studies and have a laptop in his single cell at the Kgosi Mampuru C-Max Correctional Centre. Krejčíř is now allowed to pursue his computer-related studies at private education provider Oxbridge Academy and has a laptop in accordance with the April 2025 Constitutional Court judgment, making provision for prisoners to have access to a laptop if they are registered students. He was sentenced to 35 years in prison about a decade ago for drug dealing, kidnapping, and attempted murder at the prison, which has no educational centre or facility for study purposes. Krejčíř also faces a 15-year jail sentence handed down in his native country in 2015 for criminal conspiracy to commit fraud and murder, tax evasion, credit fraud, and committing an offence of deprivation of personal freedom and blackmail. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Over the years, he has faced charges of alleged murder of suspected Bedfordview drug kingpin Sam Issa, the conspiracy to kill forensic consultant Paul O'Sullivan, and a former high-ranking police officer. In September last year, Krejčíř registered as a student but did not make a formal application to pursue his studies or keep a personal laptop for study purposes, which relates to the use of computers. He only made informal attempts to the authorities, but there was no response. It was only until the apex court's judgment in April in the matter involving another inmate at the Johannesburg Correctional Centre, Mbalenhle Sydney Ntuli, that Krejčíř approached the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg, to seek permission to use his laptop in his cell for his studies. The Constitutional Court declared the February 2007 policy procedures on formal education programmes, which regulate inmates' use of computers, unconstitutional, invalid, and set them aside. The policy, which applies to prisoners registered for studies and requiring the use of a computer, was declared unconstitutional and invalid to the extent that it prohibits the use of personal computers in cells for purposes of further education in circumstances where such use is reasonably required for such further education. The court suspended the order of constitutional invalidity and directed Correctional Services National Commissioner Makgothi Thobakgale to prepare and promulgate a revised policy consistent with the principles laid down in the judgment (revised policy) within 12 months from April this year. In the interim, pending the revision of the policy, the Concourt allowed any inmate in a correctional centre registered as a student with a recognised tertiary or further educational institution and who reasonably needs a computer to support their studies, and any student who has registered for a course of study that reasonably requires a computer as a compulsory part of the course, to use their personal computer without the use of a modem in their cell. Additionally, any registered student who keeps a personal computer in their cell must make it available for inspection at any given time by the head of the correctional centre or any representative of Thobakgale. "In the event of a breach of the rules relating to the use by an inmate of their computer in their cell, the head of the correctional services centre may, after considering any representations the inmate may make, direct that the inmate may not use their computer in their cell," the court ruled. In Krejčíř's case, the Correctional Services Department argued that the Kgosi Mampuru prison has no educational centre and facility for study purposes. "C-Max does not have study facilities, and therefore, the applicant (Krejčíř) cannot be given permission to study while at C-Max. Secondly, the applicant deliberately registered for Oxbridge Academy, knowing very well that C-Max does not cater to study facilities," the department explained. However, last month Judge Rean Strydom allowed Krejčíř to study while incarcerated at Kgosi Mampuru or any other prison as long as he remains a registered student at a registered academic institution. The judge also granted him access to all his study material, use of his personal computer device for studying purposes, but without a modem in his cell. Krejčíř has to make his device available for inspection at any given time and was warned that if he breaches the rules on computer use, this may be disallowed. Correctional Services spokesperson Singabakho Nxumalo did not respond to requests for comment on Thursday.
