The Settlers review – this vital film forces Louis Theroux to do something he's never done before
Then lockdown happened, and the wheels fell off. After going viral for a self-consciously ironic rap he did 20 years earlier, Theroux settled into the low-stakes quicksand of a generic celebrity interview podcast. You were left with the feeling of an extraordinary talent being wasted.
The Settlers lays all those worries to rest in an instant. By travelling to Israeli settlements in the West Bank, Theroux is revisiting the subject matter of a documentary he made in 2011. That film, The Ultra Zionists, concerned a clutch of Jewish people who – propelled by religious nationalism – were infringing on international law by building their homes in Palestinian territory. But, 14 years on, he has returned to find that the settlements have accelerated. The settler ideology has found itself gaining political traction. What was fringe has now become mainstream.
As such, The Settlers requires Theroux to alter his approach. Ever since Weird Weekends, his stock in trade has been the faux-naïf, lulling his subjects into a false sense of security with his bumbling charm. With everyone from Jimmy Savile to the members of the Westboro Baptist Church, he was able to lay traps they simply didn't see coming.
But the situation in the West Bank is so dire that the kid gloves have to come off. This is partly because he and his crew repeatedly find themselves subject to many of the confrontations and intimidations that blight the lives of Palestinians on a daily basis. During a visit to a Palestinian home, settlers drive up and point guns with laser sights through the windows at him. More than once, he has to politely ask people to lower their guns while talking to him. In one especially tense encounter, he has to bark 'Don't touch me' at a pair of balaclava-wearing Israeli soldiers.
In the early years, Theroux would gently attempt to convince his subjects that their worldview might not be the only one around. In the later, more serious films, he would leave long silences on which the viewer could project scorn on his behalf, saving his true feelings for the voiceover afterwards. In truth, there is some of this in The Settlers. When he meets Ari Abramowitz, a Texas settler in the West Bank who refuses to even use the word 'Palestinian', he holds his tongue. When he meets a rabbi who calls Palestinians 'savages' and 'camel riders', he manages to do the same.
Then comes Daniella Weiss. A key member of the Israeli settler movement for 50 years, Weiss is Theroux's prime target. She is able to hide her extreme views behind a friendly smile, no matter how aggressively he plays cat and mouse with her. But, at the end of the episode, they both get to each other like never before. Theroux corners Weiss and presses her on settler violence against Palestinians. She says none exists. He says he has witnessed it, notably in a video of a Palestinian being shot. She claims the Israeli shooter was acting in retaliation, then physically shoves Theroux in the hope that he'll push her back. Instead, he does something he's never done before. He calls her a sociopath.
I've been watching Theroux's films for more than three decades, since his days on Michael Moore's TV Nation, and watching him be this forthright feels like a true watershed moment in his career. This level of stridently editorialising just hasn't been in his toolbox until now. Whether it works or not is debatable – by the end of the encounter Weiss has recovered herself enough to taunt 'I wish you'd pushed me back' at him – but this new version of Louis Theroux feels like a deliberate adaptation to the ages. It suits him.
As with everything, you wish certain aspects of the situation could be explored more. Most notably, the peripheral glimpses of Israeli activists who protest against the settlements probably need more airtime, if only to demonstrate that this is a problem of individuals rather than an entire nation. But that's by the by. It looks very much like we've got Louis Theroux back, and not a moment too soon.
The Settlers aired on BBC Two and is on iPlayer now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Cancellation of Jewish comedians leaves an indelible stain on this year's Edinburgh Fringe
pa Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The cancellation, three years ago, of a gig by the comedian Jerry Sadowitz marked an embarrassing low moment for the Edinburgh Fringe. Under pressure from staff, management at The Pleasance pulled the stand-up's 2022 show after a single performance over its 'extreme' sexism and racism. It simply wasn't safe for audiences - or workers at the venue - for Sadowitz to be permitted to take to the stage. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This capitulation to the demands of staff remains a stain on the reputation of the Pleasance which, faced with complaints from employees about Sadowitz's performance, should have invited them to find work elsewhere. Last week, two fringe venues took decisions to cancel Fringe shows that make the Pleasance's behaviour pale into insignificance. Popular venue Whistlebinkies pulled shows by Jewish comedians Philip Simon and Rachel Creeger over 'concerns' about staff safety. In a grotesque display of victim-blaming, these safety claims relate to the suggestion the venue might have needed extra security to ensure the protection of Jewish performers. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In the cases of Simon and Creeger, it appears Jews are being punished for the desire of some bigots to punish Jews. This instinct to blame the troublesome Jew is not restricted to Whistlebinkies. Banshee Labyrinth has also announced it will not be hosting a show by Simon. The venue would like it to be known that it has not cancelled the comedian's show because he is Jewish. Of course it hasn't. That would have been indefensible, wouldn't it? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Rather, according to a spokesperson for Banshee Labyrinth, management 'had a duty of care to our customers and staff members to review the political statements and opinions expressed by the performer'. It's difficult to know where to begin with nonsense like that. It is not the business of management at Banshee Labyrinth, or any other venue, to audit the opinions of performers. Simon, quite understandably, maintains that he has been cancelled simply for being Jewish. There is nothing, he says, controversial about his views on Israel and Palestine which stretch to a desire to see the release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas terrorists. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Doubling down on its position, the venue issued a statement reading: 'We found that the views concerning the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Palestine expressed by the performer are in significant conflict with our venue's stance against the current Israeli government's policy and actions 'We feel it is inappropriate for us to provide a platform for performers whose views and actions align with the rhetoric and symbology of groups associated with humanitarian violations.' A recent report into antisemitism in the UK found widespread failure to address anti-Jewish discrimination across the NHS, education, policing, and the arts. The review - commissioned by the Board of Deputies of British Jews and co-authored by the government's independent advisor on antisemitism, Lord John Mann, and former Conservative defence secretary Dame Penny Mordaunt - highlighted a disturbing trend for Jewish people to be blamed for the actions of the Israeli government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Among the troubling findings contained within the report was the widespread feeling among Jewish employees of the NHS that the issue of antisemitism had been swept under the carpet and the sense of unease among some Jewish patients about a service that should be taking care of them. In an interview with the BBC, Mann said Jews were 'going about their everyday life, particularly at work, and suddenly being held to account for what's happening in the Middle East'. It would appear that's precisely what has happened in the cases of Philip Simon and Rachel Creeger. Within hours of the horrific Hamas terror attacks of October 7, 2023, figures across the worlds of entertainment and politics began disgracing themselves. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The fact that islamist terrorists had murdered more than 1,200 jews - raping and torturing many before their execution - was to be minimised. Instead, the focus was to be the response of the 'Zionists' (the first rule of antisemitism club is you always call it anti-Zionism club). It is, of course, possible to oppose the policies and actions of the current government of Israel without expressing deeply antisemitic views. It is a great pity so many people with public platforms and an interest in the middle east seem incapable of doing this. Through participation in the Israel-erasing fantasy of that 'from the river to the sea' chant - or in cheering a rapper's call for the deaths of Israeli soldiers - so many self-styled 'progressives' have exposed themselves as antisemites. The cancellation of shows by two Jewish comedians leaves an indelible stain on this year's fringe. The silence - bar the occasional noble exception - of other performers about the treatment of Simon and Creeger is despicable. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If two venues had cancelled shows by performers of Muslim heritage, there would - quite rightly - have been a serious backlash. Across television news channels, politicians of every tradition would have been talking about the need for tolerance. The venues would have been facing boycotts rather than receiving garlands. The appalling treatment of Simon and Creeger has merited barely a blink of reaction from Scottish politicians. Those who cancelled those comedians' shows are enemies of the art-form they promote. Comedy dies under the 'care' of the censor. There is nothing offensive in the mainstream views of Simon and Creeger. Their only outrage is to be unashamedly Jewish. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But, even if the pair were every bit as wildly, wilfully offensive as Jerry Sadowitz, there would still be no justification for the way in which they have been treated.
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
How Edinburgh Book Festival found itself in the culture wars
At about the time Noel and Liam were getting ready to kiss and make up last year the EIBF found itself embroiled in controversy over sponsorship, a row which more than a year on has expanded to include funding and platforming. But how did we get here? And, perhaps more importantly, where does the festival go in the future? Read More: The controversy goes back to a longstanding sponsorship arrangement between the festival and Baillie Gifford, an investment management firm based in Scotland's capital. The company came under scrutiny due to its ties to the fossil fuel industry, as well as to companies operating in the occupied Palestinian territories. In 2023, climate activist Greta Thunberg cancelled a scheduled appearance at the book festival as she accused Baillie Gifford of 'greenwashing' in their sponsorship of the festival, which she said allowed them and other companies "the social licence to continue operating". She concluded: "I cannot and do not want to be associated with events that accept this kind of sponsorship." Last year the group Fossil Free Books called for literary festivals to end their relationships with the company unless it divested from such activities, after The Ferret found it had up to £5bn invested in companies which make money from the oil, coal or gas sectors at the end of 2022. Fossil Free Books also accused the firm of having "nearly £10bn invested in companies with direct or indirect links to Israel's defence, tech and cybersecurity industries, including Nvidia, Amazon and Alphabet". A 2023 report named Baillie Gifford as one of the top investors in companies involved with illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. Baillie Gifford says both of these claims are misleading. Baillie Gifford and the festival agreed to end their sponsorship The company says it is a "small investor" in three companies "that have been identified as having activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territories", and that only 2% of its funds are invested in companies related to fossil fuels. Fossil Free Books has said the 2% figure equates to between £2.5bn and £5bn, while Arts Workers for Palestine Scotland said Ballie Gifford holds investments in which advertises accommodation in the occupied West Bank; Cemex, which previously operated factories in the occupied territory through a subsidiary and has been accused of supplying materials for barricades and border walls; and Cisco Systems which provides services for the [[Israel]]i military. In May last year, the Edinburgh International Book Festival announced it would be ending its partnership with Baillie Gifford but made clear they had only done so due to "intolerable" pressure and the risk of the festival being disrupted. Allan Little, chair, said: 'Our team cannot be expected to deliver a safe and sustainable festival this August under the constant threat of disruption from activists. This was a pragmatic response to that reality. 'Funding for the arts is now in a perilous position and we should all be clear that without the support of our partners and donors, the future of festivals like ours – and all of the benefits these events bring to authors and readers alike – is in jeopardy." The activists had therefore succeeded in their goal but at the potential cost, according to the EIBF, of the festival itself. In June though, The Herald revealed that [[Edinburgh]]-based author Sir Ian Rankin had agreed to become a major financial backer of the event alongside fellow author Jenny Colgan, additional funding from the Scottish Government, and money from the People's Postcode Lottery. So, controversial sponsor gone but the book festival remains – everybody's happy, right? Well, not quite. The one-off funding from the Scottish Government, amounting to £300,000 to help the festival pay for its long-running schools programme for the next three years, proved controversial. The announcement of the funding came just weeks after Liz Lloyd, Nicola Sturgeon's former chief of staff, was appointed as director of the festival. Read More: There is a key distinction here in that while the announcement was made after the appointment, the decision on funding was made long beforehand, ministers taking the decision on March 28 and Ms Lloyd not being appointed until May. Nonetheless Lothian Conservative MSP Sue Webber told the Daily Record: "SNP ministers should come clean on how this funding was awarded and if there was any lobbying from former colleagues who were once at the heart of the nationalist government.' While there is no suggestion of any wrongdoing, the injection of further public money brought further controversy to the festival. After all, many asked, why should the taxpayer foot the bill for a sponsorship lost because of targeting by activists? The counter-argument, of course, would be to ask why a cultural institution liked the Edinburgh International Book Festival needs a controversial corporate sponsor in the first place. There was criticism, too, from the anti-woke brigade who felt that the festival was insufficiently open to debate on various culture war issues. One given example was a lack of invite for Susan Dalgety and Lucy Hunter Blackburn, who edited the gender critical tome The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, released in May 2024. The narrative was that a bestseller about and by Scots was not being given a platform, which could only be for ideological reasons. The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht could accurately be described as such given it debuted at number three on the Sunday Times Bestsellers List, though it dropped off of there pretty quickly and by the imperfect science of Amazon rankings is probably now selling 250-300 copies per month in its various formats a little over a year after its release, a respectable if not earth-shattering number. It might be tempting to suggest that both the climate campaigners and the gender critics are a small but passionate bunch capable of creating noise beyond their numbers, but then they'd both get very angry, which is probably why no-one has suggested that. The closest anyone has come is Edinburgh East and Musselburgh MP Chris Murray who told The Herald: "It's getting pelters because people think it's either too woke or not woke enough, or that it's taking money from a big business or the public sector. 'And actually, I think we need to take a step back and remember what the book festival is for; the book festival is supposed to be a festival of, fundamentally, ideas.' Thankfully organisers can expect things to calm down a bit this year, with the headline event of the festival the launch of [[Nicola Sturgeon]]'s memoirs, dealing with Brexit, Covid, Boris Johnson, Alex Salmond and the independence campaign. No-one and nothing likely to get people worked up in there, surely? When it comes to the matter of sponsorship and invites there is, clearly, a line to be drawn somewhere. The author Val McDermid accused those protesting Baillie Gifford on the grounds of climate and Israel of 'virtue signalling', saying: "No-one is saying that Baillie Gifford is white than white. But there is no such thing as a clean sponsor." That may well be true, but where does one draw the line? It's fair to say most festivals would accept sponsorship from Coca-Cola, which operates in the occupied West Bank, but probably wouldn't from Elbit Systems which produces weapons for the Israeli military. On the same subject, Viktor Orbán's government banned the group Kneecap from entering Hungary for the Sziget Festival due to the Irish rap trio's comments on Palestine but Chappell Roan will headline despite saying U.S support for Israel was 'genocidal'. If the Hungarian Prime Minister writes a bestseller should he be invited to the EIBF next year as Sturgeon, Rachel Reeves and Ed Miliband have been? Benjamin Netanyahu is a published author, should he be invited? Yanyha Sinwar, the deceased Hamas leader, wrote a novel in 2004 – what about him? To move it away from the Middle East, most would agree there should be a platform for diverse opinions but also that a festival which is partially publicly funded shouldn't provide a platform for, say, holocaust deniers. In all matters of contention a line has to be drawn somewhere, and those on the wrong side of it will be unhappy. The challenge for the Edinburgh International Book Festival, and others like it, would appear to be how to keep as many as possible on the right side.
North Wales Chronicle
a day ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Swinney brands Gaza crisis ‘genocide' after Fringe show disrupted
Police were called to the Stand Comedy Club in Edinburgh after the First Minister was interrupted seven times by six different groups of protesters during a conversation with comedian Susan Morrison. The protesters urged the First Minister to describe the crisis as a genocide and stop state funding for arms companies. Speaking to journalists after the event, the First Minister said: 'It's quite clear that there is a genocide in Palestine – it can't be disputed. 'I have seen reports of terrible atrocities which have the character of being genocide. 'I've expressed that and obviously it's not reached all those individuals, but that's my feeling.' The Scottish Government has also been criticised for – while not funding directly the manufacturing of munitions – providing money for apprenticeships at firms which build weapons. But the First Minister said the Government's commercial arm Scottish Enterprise has the 'strictest assessments imaginable about the purpose and the use of public expenditure in companies who may be related to defence industries'. Pushed on providing money for staff who could potentially build munitions, the First Minister added: 'We're trying to enable companies to diversify their activities, that's the purpose. 'That's why the due diligence checks are applied and they are applied unreservedly.' Throughout the show, groups of attendees stood up, holding signs which spelled the word 'genocide', and heckled the First Minister. As the event continued, the interruptions became more forceful, before two groups stood at the same time, angrily shouting at the First Minister and chanting slogans such as 'call it genocide'. Members of his security team stood in front of the stage, stopping protesters from approaching the First Minister, before three uniformed police officers arrived at the venue to usher the protesters out. I still remember the bus ride to my first Edinburgh Festival show as a teenager, with my late mother – not knowing it would spark a lifelong love of culture. As the Festival season starts, I want every community in Scotland to have that same access to a booming cultural scene. — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) August 2, 2025 During the tense exchange, which lasted several minutes, a number of the crowd – who were not protesting – appeared to be in tears. A final disruption came from one woman in the crowd, who asked the First Minister why he had not responded to her letter about heavy metal band Disturbed playing at the Hydro in Glasgow. The band's lead singer David Draiman has been criticised after being pictured signing an Israeli bomb. The woman asked the First Minister why he did not speak out on Disturbed playing at the city's biggest venue, when he said it would be inappropriate for Irish band Kneecap to play the TRNSMT festival after comments members of the band had made about Tory MPs. The First Minister said his comments on Kneecap had come due to questions from the media and he 'didn't particularly' want to speak about the band earlier this year, adding that he did not want to choose what art people do and do not consume. The woman became increasingly angry with the First Minister's response and was eventually dragged from the venue by a police officer, whom she branded a 'thug'.
