logo
Capital A Targets $200 Million Through Hong Kong Listing Amid Strategic Overhaul

Capital A Targets $200 Million Through Hong Kong Listing Amid Strategic Overhaul

Arabian Post06-05-2025
Capital A Berhad, the parent company of budget airline AirAsia, is preparing for a secondary listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, aiming to raise at least $200 million. This move is part of a broader strategy to access deeper pools of capital in Greater China and to support the company's ongoing financial restructuring.
The proposed listing follows a series of significant financial maneuvers by Capital A, including a $226 million private placement completed in March 2025. This placement featured a $100 million investment from Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund, with additional contributions from investors in Singapore and Japan. These funds are intended to bolster the company's capital base and facilitate its exit from Malaysia's financially distressed PN17 classification.
Capital A has also secured a $443 million revenue bond, with $200 million provided by Ares Management Corp and Indies Capital Partners. This financing is earmarked for reactivating aircraft grounded during the pandemic and refinancing existing lease liabilities, thereby strengthening the company's balance sheet.
The company is undergoing a significant restructuring, including the sale of its aviation business to long-haul affiliate AirAsia X. This consolidation aims to unify short and long-haul operations under a single AirAsia brand, streamlining operations across Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Cambodia. The merger is expected to create a new listed entity valued at approximately $1.42 billion.
Capital A's financial performance has shown signs of recovery, with a net profit of RM2.01 billion reported in the third quarter of 2024, partly due to foreign exchange gains. The company anticipates a return to profitability in 2025, following a loss of $106.5 million in 2024 attributed to one-off forex losses.
The Hong Kong listing is seen as a strategic move to tap into the region's revitalized equity markets and attract mainland Chinese investors. Capital A is reportedly close to appointing an international investment bank to advise on the listing structure and process, pending internal reviews and regulatory approvals.
CEO Tony Fernandes has emphasized that the company's financial uncertainties are linked to pending milestones rather than underlying business strength. He remains confident in completing the regularization and restructuring efforts by June 2025.
As part of its commitment to transparency, Capital A has announced plans to publish internal business targets alongside quarterly results. This initiative aims to provide investors with a clearer picture of the company's financial outlook and progress toward its strategic goals.
The company's efforts to exit PN17 status are progressing, with shareholder approval secured for the aviation business disposal and a vote scheduled for May 7 to revoke its distressed classification. Capital A also plans to retain an 18% stake in the resulting AirAsia airline group, focusing on its non-aviation businesses, including logistics firm Teleport and aircraft maintenance company Asia Digital Engineering.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China proposes global AI cooperation organisation
China proposes global AI cooperation organisation

Al Etihad

time5 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

China proposes global AI cooperation organisation

26 July 2025 08:42 SHANGHAI (REUTERS)Chinese Premier Li Qiang on Saturday proposed establishing an organisation to foster global cooperation on artificial intelligence, calling on countries to coordinate on the development and security of the fast-evolving at the opening of the annual World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai, Li called AI a new engine for growth, but adding that governance is fragmented and emphasising the need for more coordination between countries to form a globally recognised framework for three-day event brings together industry leaders and policymakers at a time of escalating technological competition between China and the United States - the world's two largest economies - with AI emerging as a key battleground."Currently, overall global AI governance is still fragmented. Countries have great differences particularly in terms of areas such as regulatory concepts, institutional rules," Li said."We should strengthen coordination to form a global AI governance framework that has broad consensus as soon as possible," he has imposed export restrictions on advanced technology to China, including the most high-end AI chips made by companies such as Nvidia and chipmaking equipment. Despite these restrictions, China has continued making AI warned that AI could become an "exclusive game" for a few countries and companies, and said challenges included an insufficient supply of AI chips and restrictions on talent exchange. China wanted to share its development experience and products with other countries, especially those in the Global South, he is an annual government-sponsored event in Shanghai that typically attracts major industry players, government officials, researchers and investors. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has in past years regularly appeared at the opening ceremony but did not speak this than 800 companies are participating, showcasing more than 3,000 high-tech products, 40 large language models, 50 AI-powered devices and 60 intelligent robots, according to organisers. The exhibition features many Chinese companies, including tech giants Huawei and Alibaba and startups such as humanoid robot maker Unitree. Western participants include Tesla, Alphabet and Amazon.

Ambassador GAO Wenqi Visits Chinese-Invested Enterprises in Rwanda
Ambassador GAO Wenqi Visits Chinese-Invested Enterprises in Rwanda

Zawya

time15 hours ago

  • Zawya

Ambassador GAO Wenqi Visits Chinese-Invested Enterprises in Rwanda

On July 25, Ambassador GAO Wenqi visited the C&D Products Group. The company executives gave a briefing on the company's production, operations, and development, as well as the working and living conditions of its employees. Ambassador GAO encouraged the company to adhere to safe production and compliant operation, and take good care of its employees, so as to actively fulfill its social responsibilities and set up a good image for Chinese enterprises. He also asked the company to actively take part in and contribute to Rwanda's economic and social development, and promote China-Rwanda relations. Specializing in apparel manufacturing and export, C&D was established in Rwanda in 2019. It has created over 7,000 jobs for local communities. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the Republic of Rwanda.

The wisdom of ending wind and solar subsidies
The wisdom of ending wind and solar subsidies

Gulf Today

time15 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

The wisdom of ending wind and solar subsidies

Diana Furchtgott-Roth and Ryan Strasser, Tribune News Service The recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act signals a major shift in federal energy policy. Among its provisions, the law accelerates the phase-out of tax credits for new wind and solar projects and eliminates long-term subsidies for renewable developers on public land. The law revives a principle that should guide all energy policy: Let the best ideas win on their own merit. Rolling back the subsidies should relieve pressure to use valuable land for solar and wind farms. Consider the direct land use involved in today's energy sector. Wind projects take up approximately 30,000 acres to produce the same amount of electricity as a 2,500-acre coal plant. Solar is also land-intensive, requiring about 5,000 acres for equivalent output. However, when government subsidies reduce the use of public land for renewable energy sources, investors are no longer incentivised to look at the tradeoffs of their land-use footprint. Land is a finite and valuable resource. Using it for energy comes at the expense of other potential uses. When developers receive subsidies, they do not have to account for the value of alternative uses for the land. If an energy source requires more land, it should pay for that land. Communities across the country are voicing concerns, objecting to large-scale wind and solar developments that disrupt local land use, strain water resources, and alter rural landscapes. According to Robert Bryce's Renewable Rejection Database, more than 800 wind and solar projects have been rejected or restricted by local governments in the United States since 2015. One example of the disadvantages of large-scale renewable energy projects is the Spotsylvania Solar Energy Center in Virginia, a solar facility that spans over 6,300 acres, one of the largest solar projects east of the Rockies. Locals raised their concerns over the project's environmental effects, particularly the clearing of 3,500 acres of forested land, which involved the removal of around a million trees. Residents feared toxic substances leaching from panels into groundwater, in addition to the heat generated by the installation of 1.8 million solar panels, manufactured by Chinese companies. Despite the opposition, full operation began in 2021. Virginians' average electricity rates rose from 10 cents per kilowatt hour (kWh) in 2019 to 15 cents/kWh in June 2025. This 50% rise in energy prices over less than 6 years underscores that wind and solar projects generally don't save money and entail serious environmental and community costs of their own. Supporters of climate-change subsidies often argue that a rapid shift to renewable energy is necessary as they believe resource depletion or environmental harm is on the horizon. Even though America still holds centuries' worth of recoverable fossil fuels, this argument is flawed in its understanding of energy production. Coal, oil, and gas are the most efficient and profitable energy sources available. Over the past 20 years, wind and solar have received global subsidies of $9 trillion. The most recent data from the Energy Information Administration show that renewable energy sources received over $15 billion in federal subsidies in 2024, compared to $3 billion for fossil fuels. If renewable energy is truly the cheapest and most competitive option, why do its supporters call for lavish government support? Some argue that without such incentives, renewable energy investment will dry up. However, when the government gives special financial help to one type of energy, it makes it harder to see which energy sources are the best and most affordable. This distorts fair competition. If wind and solar energy are the future of America's energy sector, they should compete without the crutch of federal aid. Subsidizing large-scale land for renewable energy development raises electricity prices and uses public, taxpayer-owned lands. The result is not cleaner and more reliable energy, but misallocated resources. Spain offers a cautionary tale. With over half of its grid supplied by renewables and a national push toward 100% by 2050, the country suffered a 12-hour blackout on April 28. Two solar panels in southwest Spain went down, and the grid had insufficient inertia, or backup, to continue operating. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act represents more than just a shift in federal spending; it reflects a renewed commitment to competitive land use in America's energy sector. By phasing out preferential tax treatment and below-market land deals, the law encourages energy developers to compete on merits and meet America's rising energy demands with an approach rooted in efficiency, reliability, and competition.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store