
Britain must stop subsidising pensioners to save the NHS
Despite its radical tone and many good ideas, this report did not go far enough. In particular, it accepted the continuation of the current system of funding whereby just about the whole cost of the Service is borne by the taxpayer.
In a report published last week by Policy Exchange entitled 'The NHS – a Suitable Case for Treatment?', I and two co-authors went much further and called for an end to the system of predominantly taxpayer funding which has been the model since the NHS was founded in 1948.
In the mid-1950s the government spent about 3pc of its GDP on healthcare. Today the figure is 9pc (excluding the private sector), amounting to almost a fifth of all government spending. If nothing is done, by 2070 we could end up spending more than a fifth of our GDP on the NHS.
This is unacceptable. If we allowed this to happen, other sorts of public spending would have to be squeezed and/or taxes would have to be raised to eye-watering levels. This would have a devastating effect on incentives and therefore a materially depressing effect on the economy.
The funding system is the first of the NHS's major problems. The second is inadequate quality. Many British people think that the NHS delivers a first-class service. Yet, it is clear that the NHS offers neither the best nor the worst healthcare in the world. Admittedly, at its best, it is superb, but the standard is hit and miss, and at its worst, it is pretty bad.
Among a group of countries of comparable economic development (Australia, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland and the US), on both life expectancy and healthy life expectancy the UK comes in second to last. Only the US scores worse.
On preventable and treatable mortality, the UK again comes in second to last, ahead of only the US. On the proportion of patients waiting over a year to see a specialist, the UK is the highest in the group. We also perform badly on the ease of securing an appointment with a GP and access to GPs out of hours.
What is to be done? Whenever someone criticises the NHS and suggests that we need to move to a different model, a chorus of voices loudly proclaims that we must not become like America. Indeed not. The US health system pulls off a remarkable double whammy. Although some of the best healthcare in the world is to be found in the United States, average health outcomes for the population as a whole are simply dire.
Meanwhile, the system is about the most expensive in the world. However bad the NHS may seem, it is infinitely preferable to the American system. Under no circumstances should we consider copying the US.
But we don't have to. There are many countries in the world which operate a different system for funding healthcare and enjoy better average health outcomes than the UK. The essence of their approach is to combine charging and co-payments with a system of social insurance. That is to say, compulsory purchasing of medical insurance, covering everyone in the population, with concessionary rates or even full reimbursement available for poor people. The state remains involved as both a partial funder, co-ordinator and regulator of the system. But governments spend much less on healthcare in these countries than we do, and thereby place a much smaller burden on their taxpayers.
Countries that run such a system include Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Singapore and Switzerland. The most outstandingly successful of these is Singapore. It spends only about 5pc of its GDP on healthcare and of that, not much more than a half comes from government. Meanwhile, Singapore achieves just about the best health outcomes in our comparator group.
Yet Singapore is a very special case, with a particular political and social model. For an example that would serve the UK well, we should probably look closer to home. The obvious place to look is the Netherlands, not least because it underwent a radical reform of its health system in 2006. It delivers high standards of healthcare yet the government spends only 1pc of GDP on health.
Some people will argue that we already have a system of insurance to pay for healthcare, namely National Insurance. Despite its name, however, this is not really a system of insurance. It is rather another form of tax. The amount of money the state pays for healthcare is not restricted by the amount of National Insurance contributions coming into the Treasury. Moreover, unlike pensions, where eligibility is connected with National Insurance contributions, a person's ability to access the NHS is not circumscribed by their NI contribution record.
Moving from a system of funding through taxation to one based largely on social insurance is going to be a tough ask. It cannot be completed overnight. The place to start a programme to reform the financing of the NHS is with the introduction of a small charge for GP appointments and an end to the automatic entitlement to free prescriptions for pensioners, regardless of their financial circumstances.
Doubtless many people will say that these proposals destroy the essence of the NHS as it was established in 1948. But the provision of healthcare in this country cannot be treated as a sort of museum exhibit. We can adhere to the spirit of the NHS in creating a system that delivers excellent healthcare for all within a funding framework that is right for the 21 st century.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nutritional expert shares popular snacks parents think are healthy... but should actually not be fed to kids
An expert nutritional therapist has revealed the popular snacks parents think are healthy – but shouldn't actually be fed to kids. With the summer holidays in full swing, families will be scrambling to find activities to occupy their little ones. And it's no secret that giving them something to eat can fill the gap for a while. But Amber Silverman is urging parents to be careful when choosing a healthy snack, as what might seem nutritious is actually doing children more harm than good. 'One of the most common things I hear from parents is: "I honestly thought that was healthy," and it's completely understandable,' the nutritional therapist, from London, told NeedToKnow recently. 'Supermarkets are full of products that look wholesome, often plastered with phrases like "no added sugar" or "made with real fruit,"' she warned. 'But once you take a closer look, the reality isn't always quite so rosy.' Here are the most common lunchbox and cupboard offenders. Fruit Snacks Amber, a mom-of-two, said that labeling on fruit snacks often states that 'real fruit' is involved, but it can be extremely misleading. She explained: They're usually little more than processed sugar, syrup, and flavorings. 'Even when fruit purée is listed as an ingredient, it's stripped of the fiber and nutrients you'd get from eating real fruit.' And the same goes for fruit pouches, which are better than ultra-processed snacks, but still aren't as good as the real deal. Smoothies and juices Amber, 54, said that while smoothies are a great way to get kids' five-a-day in, they're only beneficial if made from scratch. She warned that bottled versions often contain fruit concentrates, sweetened yogurt, or added sugars – and are surprisingly high in calories. And juice is no better. Amber added: 'Even the pure kind is still very high in natural sugars and lacks the fiber that slows down sugar absorption in whole fruit. 'It's easy to forget that one small carton of juice might contain the equivalent of sugar of several pieces of fruit. 'Better to stick with water most of the time and keep juice as an occasional treat – or just eat an orange.' Flavored Yogurts Amber said that yogurts in little tubes or pots are usually marketed towards children, and can be enjoyed as part of a healthy diet. But there's little benefit for your tot. She dished: 'Low-fat versions are particularly sneaky, as the fat is usually replaced with added sugar to keep them tasting good. 'A better option? Go for plain, full-fat yogurt and stir in some fresh fruit yourself.' Granola and Cereals Oats, nuts, and sometimes a bit of dried fruit may seem like a winner, but what's really hiding in the ingredients? Amber said: '[They're often] held together by glucose syrup or other sweeteners and can contain just as much sugar as a chocolate bar. 'Not ideal if you're after something genuinely nourishing that'll keep kids going through the day. '[And while] cereal is quick and convenient, even the ones labelled with 'whole grain' or 'fortified with vitamins' can be high in sugar and low in fibre. 'They may give a short burst of energy, but that's usually followed by a mid-morning crash – and a grumpy, hungry child asking for snacks.' Veggie Straws and Chips If the phrase 'veggie' is used, it must be healthy, right? Wrong. 'Sadly, not. They're often made with potato starch and oil, with just a dusting of powdered vegetables for color,' Amber explained. 'Nutritionally, they're not much better than ordinary crisps.' Whole Wheat or Multigrain Crackers Reaching for crackers might seem like a quick, tasty, and nutritional option to feed your tot when they're hungry. But, like most foods, the labels are misleading. Amber said: 'Just because something has 'whole wheat' or 'multigrain' on the label doesn't mean it's automatically a healthier option. 'Many of these snacks still contain refined flours, low-quality oils, and not much in the way of actual nutrients. 'If you're buying crackers, check the label and look for ones made with 100% wholegrain and minimal added ingredients.' Amber advised parents to opt for savory snacks over sweet – such as cheese, homemade hummus, edamame beans, and nuts and seeds. She said eating refined sugars can be 'detrimental' to kids. The mom continued: 'It creates unstable blood sugar levels, where the highs and lows can have an adverse effect on behaviors. 'Common symptoms of this would be irritability or anger, fatigue or lethargy, headaches, mood swings, and attention problems. 'This can impact their learning at school and at home – and how they interact with people around them. Refined sugars are also linked to inflammation in the body, which in turn is linked to a diseased state. 'In the medium to long-term, there may be impacts on immune function and other health concerns when refined sugars are consumed daily or very regularly.' She also noted that refined sugars impact teeth, weight, and digestive health – which can also damage developing brains. Since it has addictive qualities, these difficulties can last even into adulthood. While it can feel overwhelming trying to make the right choices, she says the best method is to stick to real, whole foods and recognizable ingredients. And don't be afraid to whip up simple meals from scratch. She concluded, 'Feeding your child isn't about being perfect. It's about balance, awareness, and building habits over time. 'One less fruit snack and one more real apple might not seem like a big deal today, but over months and years, it adds up.'


Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
TalkTV's James Whale reveals he is in a hospice amid terminal cancer battle - confessing he 'probably won't be here next week'
Veteran broadcaster, James Whale, has revealed he is in a hospice in a heartbreaking update amid his battle with terminal cancer. The TalkTv presenter, 74, recently confessed he 'have much longer', sharing he was told he only had 12 weeks to live amid his terminal cancer battle. The radio host was first diagnosed with kidney cancer in February 2020, which sadly later spread to his spine, brain and lungs. And while announcing his final episode of his podcast, Tales Of The Wales, James shared he would probably not 'be here next week'. In a whispered voice, he said: 'This is probably going to be our last podcast. 'I'm in a hospice. I probably won't be here next week. I'm fine. I've got so many drugs in me, I can't feel a thing.' 'A lot of people get really upset when someone is going to die,' he added. 'I'm the person who's going to die and I'm quite relaxed about it.' The couple confessed they had been crying often, but 'in a good way', while listening to voice notes and reading messages, praising James's and his impact on their lives. While he was 'very upset and worried about' his wife Nadine, she responded saying how they had been reminiscing about their beautiful memories over the years. 'Like how we went to Antigua,' James said, while Nadine added: 'We have been very lucky and very blessed with all the amazing things we have been able to do.' Despite his ill health, the Talk TV presenter has kept his humour, joking while explaining how he is craned into a bathtub at the hospice. He added that hospice staff told him his wife could join him in the bath and they could dim the lights. 'I began to wonder what sort of place this is,' he joked. As the episode came to a close, James said to Nadine: 'We've had the best time together haven't we. I love you.' 'Thank you for being a listener I hope it helps in some way. Who knows what is next so I can only say au revoir.' It comes after James shared his health has dramatically declined as he admitted he is struggling to breath, talk, think and hear in a previous episode. Speaking on his podcast Tales Of The Whales, James said: 'I can't breathe, I can't think, I can't talk. 'Anyway. Good morning. Welcome to Tales of the Whales, our weekly podcast. I have terminal 5 cancer. Can you get 5?' Last week, heartbreaking pictures emerged of James giving the 'most compelling' interview of his career. James filmed the interview with Nigel Farage as a TalkTV producer shared snaps ahead of it being released. In the images James looked frail amid his illness and had a yellow blanket over his knees. He penned on X: 'After 50 years in broadcasting, Whaley delivers one of the most compelling and profound conversations of his career. 'A masterclass in asking the right questions. @THEJamesWhale @Nigel_Farage @MitchellCMM.' Under another image of the interview set up he wrote: 'Filming Whaley's last interview with Nigel Farage. The bravest man I know. A legend and a friend.' He also appeared in an image with his co-host on Talk TV Ash Gould. It comes after last week James took to social media to share an emotional update about his terminal cancer battle - admitting that he 'hasn't got much longer'. The Big Brother star choked up as he wished his grandson a happy birthday and reflected on his own mortality in the heartfelt message. He said: 'I'm not terribly well in the final stages of cancer, but I just want to tell my grandson how proud I am of him. 'He's a Royal Marine and he's been a Royal Marine for over six months, nearly a year now, he got through all his training, and I am so, so proud, you have no idea.' The visibly emotional star added: 'Happy Birthday, mate. Happy Birthday to all of you who have put your lives where you have '360 years ago, the Royal Marines were founded. Happy Birthday to you all.' Reflecting on his mortality, James said: 'It's alright, I'm an old git, [I'm] 74. I'm still on the TV and radio but not for much longer. I love you all, guys.' Fans were quick to send supportive messages to James in the comments section of the video, which was posted to Twitter/X, thanking him for his work as a presenter. They wrote: 'You have been the voice of many people, thank you. Your family are lucky to have such an inspirational loved one. Thinking of you and sending love.';


Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
Atai Life Sciences schizophrenia drug fails to meet main goal in trial
July 25 (Reuters) - Atai Life Sciences ( opens new tab and its partner Recognify Life Sciences said on Friday their experimental drug did not meet the main goal in a mid-stage trial for patients with cognitive impairment linked to schizophrenia. U.S.-listed shares of atai fell about 14% in extended trading. Recognify said patients taking the drug, inidascamine, showed some improvement in cognitive tests compared with a placebo, but the results were not statistically significant. The trial enrolled 242 patients with cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia, which affects memory, attention and decision-making in people with the mental illness. Despite the drug missing the main goal, Recognify said patients on inidascamine showed consistent signs of improvement in areas such as processing speed and verbal learning, with positive trends on a test assessing real-world cognitive abilities.