New Arkansas law aimed at restricting companies from influencing drug prices is first of its kind
Why it matters: With Congress gridlocked on PBM legislation, more states are taking the lead in addressing industry practices that critics say drive up costs and are pushing independent pharmacies out of business, Axios' Tina Reed writes.
Driving the news: Last week, Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed a first-in-the-nation law barring PBMs from owning pharmacies in that state.
39 state attorneys general have urged Congress to enact similar similar curbs, saying the companies "wield outsized power to reap massive profits at the expense of consumers."
Zoom in: The Arkansas law, Act 624, received bipartisan support in the state legislature plus endorsement from the Arkansas Pharmacists Association.
"PBMs are massive corporations that negotiate drug prices between pharmacies and insurance companies," according to a news release from Sanders' office.
"However, in recent years these PBMs have bought up pharmacies, allowing them to take advantage of the convoluted healthcare landscape, inflate pharmaceutical prices and push competitors out of business."
Zoom out: Among the states that might follow suit is Indiana, which is weighing legislation that would ban PBMs from owning pharmacies or having ownership ties with health carriers.
Mississippi is working on a measure that would end the practice of "spread pricing," in which PBMs charge an insurer more than they pay a pharmacy for a drug, and pocket the difference. The bill also would restrict patient steering to affiliates and require mandatory data reporting to the state.
Connecticut, Iowa, Maryland, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Virginia also have bills pending.
In March, Alabama passed a requirement that PBMs reimburse independent pharmacies at rates no less than those paid by Medicaid.
The intrigue: Large PBMs often are vertically integrated with insurance carriers, and critics say they're capable of funneling the majority of volume and profits directly to insurers and employers.
The other side: The Arkansas measure drew sharp criticism from the trade group representing PBMs, which said it would force the closure of dozens of retail pharmacies, suspend home delivery of prescription drugs and restrict access to specialty pharmacies.
PBMs like UnitedHealth Group's Optum Rx, which said it had "serious concerns" about the measure and was working with the state to ensure access to drugs for vulnerable populations.
Patients who receive integrated mental health services that include medicines via an Optum-owned pharmacy for schizophrenia and severe depression could be cut off from their drugs, while cancer patients who get their specialty medications at home could lose that access, Patrick Conway, the CEO of Optum Rx, said during UnitedHealth Group's first-quarter earnings call.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Social Security Warning Issued as Retirees Could Face $18,000 Cut
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Retirees could face a huge cut to benefits in the next seven years if a new funding solution isn't found for Social Security, a new report from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) has outlined. The committee has estimated that a couple with medium dual income retiring in 2033 would lose $18,100 per year in benefits if the trust fund conundrum is not solved. For a single income couple, this would be $13,600. Why It Matters Social Security is relied on by tens of millions of Americans who collect monthly benefits, which help form the bedrock of income in retirement. The program is funded by a combination of payroll taxes and government reserve funds. But according to the latest Social Security Trustees report, the program's two trust funds—the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and Disability Insurance (DI) funds—when combined are projected to reach insolvency by 2034. At that point, benefits would rely entirely on incoming payroll taxes, resulting in an automatic cut of approximately 21 percent, unless Congress intervenes. What To Know The size of future Social Security benefit cuts would vary significantly depending on a couple's age, marital status, and employment history. Dual-earner couples with low incomes would face a slightly smaller cut of around $11,000 per year, while high-income couples might experience reductions approaching $24,000 annually. While the dollar amount is lower for low-income couples, the impact would be more severe relative to their total income and lifetime earnings. These projected reductions are higher than those outlined in the latest Social Security Trustees' report, which projected a 21 percent cut in benefits if no solution is found. The CRFB calculations are based on a 24 percent cut, due to the recent passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which include tax rate cuts and an expanded senior standard deduction. The OBBBA ensures that almost 90 percent of Social Security recipients will no longer be required to pay income taxes on their benefits, according to the Social Security Administration (SSA). "The tax rate cuts and increase in the senior standard deduction from the recently enacted OBBBA would reduce Social Security's revenue from the income taxation of benefits, increasing the required cut by about a percentage point upon insolvency," CRFB said in its report. "If the expanded senior standard deduction and other temporary measures of OBBBA are made permanent, the benefit cut would grow larger." Social Security has weathered similar financial challenges before. In the early 1980s, the program neared insolvency, making Congress implement a series of reforms. These included increases in payroll taxes, gradually raising the full retirement age, and introducing taxes on a portion of Social Security benefits. Stock image/file photo: A Social Security card with U.S. Dollars. Stock image/file photo: A Social Security card with U.S. Dollars. GETTY What People Are Saying The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said in its report: "Policymakers pledging not to touch Social Security are implicitly endorsing these deep benefit cuts for 62 million retirees in 2032 and beyond. It is time for policymakers to tell the truth about the program's finances and to pursue trust fund solutions to head off insolvency and improve the program for current and future generations." Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano said in a news release earlier this month about the OBBBA: "This is a historic step forward for America's seniors. For nearly 90 years, Social Security has been a cornerstone of economic security for older Americans. By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump's promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they've earned." What Happens Next? Lawmakers are offering proposals to shore up the system. Among them is the reintroduced Medicare & Social Security Fair Share Act from Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and Representative Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, both Democrats. Their bill would impose payroll taxes on wages and investment income exceeding $400,000. A bipartisan effort comes from Republican Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, who have proposed establishing a $1.5 trillion investment fund for Social Security. The Treasury would front the funding, which would be invested across a broad portfolio of stocks, bonds, and other assets to generate higher long-term returns. After 75 years, the Treasury would be repaid, and the accumulated gains would be directed toward supporting Social Security benefits.
39 minutes ago
Georgia Republican Mike Collins joins field seeking to challenge Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff in 2026
ATLANTA -- Georgia Republican Mike Collins said Monday that he will join the field challenging Democratic U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff in the state the GOP has named as their top target to add a Senate seat in 2026. A second-term member of Congress from a district east of Atlanta, Collins becomes the newest top Republican to get into the primary race. U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter is already running, while state Insurance Commissioner John King dropped out. Also expected to run is former University of Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley. 'Jon Ossoff must go,' Collins said in a July 8 video. 'He certainly doesn't represent the vast majority of Georgians. He certainly doesn't represent the Georgia values that I cherish so much. Collins had been mulling a run since Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp announced in May that he would not run against Ossoff, depriving Republicans of their top choice to challenge a senator who won the 2021 runoff in the wake of the 2020 election. Twin victories by Ossoff and Raphael Warnock gave Democrats control of the U.S. Senate at the time and. It was the first time since 2002 that Georgia had two Democratic senators. Although Democrats have made Georgia increasingly competitive, Collins is among those who view Ossoff's election as a fluke and proclaim that the state is still fundamentally conservative. 'We deserve to have two U.S. senators who are out there fighting for us, and protecting us, not some woke overlords or some far-left-wing California donor base," Collins said in the video. The 58-year-old Collins is the son of the late Mac Collins, who was an eight-term congressman who began his political career as a Democrat before becoming a Republican. Mike Collins is a co-owner of a family trucking firm and made a losing bid for Congress in 2014. He reemerged to win a 2022 race for an open seat, portraying himself as an everyman trucker and hard-core Donald Trump acolyte. With a big, booming personality and an edgy social media presence, Collins calls himself a 'MAGA workhorse.' Kemp and Trump have met and said they would try to agree on a preferred candidate. Anyone anointed by both of them would be stamped as the Republican front-runner. Kemp told Collins and others he would support Dooley, but Trump isn't ready to endorse yet. Collins has portrayed his interest in the Senate as seeking to best serve Trump 'I am going to continue to talk with President Trump and his team just about where we can be the best, beneficial, most help in this mission to make sure we get a Republican in the U.S. Senate from Georgia," Collins said in the July 8 video. Collins' district stretches across 18 counties from the eastern suburbs of Atlanta through Athens. His best-known legislative accomplishment is a law passed this year to require the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency to detain undocumented immigrants charged with theft. That was a response to the 2024 murder of Laken Riley, a nursing student who was killed by Jose Antonio Ibarra, a Venezuelan man who federal officials said entered the U.S. illegally and was allowed to stay while he pursued his immigration case. The representative portrays himself as someone who can get things done, but he often takes a combative approach on social media. In March 2024 he was criticized for promoting a post from an antisemitic account that attacked a Jewish journalist as a 'garbage human.' In February 2024, his account on the social media platform X was temporarily suspended after he suggested that someone who had been arrested by federal authorities should be transported by 'Pinochet Air,' a reference to people who were thrown to their deaths from helicopters during the rule of Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet. That strategy could help Collins draw attention to wield against Ossoff — the only Democratic Senate incumbent seeking reelection in 2026 who represents a state Trump won. The race has already begun. Ossoff held his second campaign rally July 12 in Savannah. National Republicans have advertised against Ossoff's opposition to a bill barring schools from allowing transgender athletes to participate in women's sports. Ossoff raised $21 million in the first six months of this year and had $15.5 million in cash on June 30. But that's only the beginning. Ossoff and Warnock's twin Senate victories in 2021 cost more than $900 million combined, according to OpenSecrets, which tracks political spending. Warnock's 2022 reelection over Republican Herschel Walker cost more than $470 million, OpenSecrets found.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Stakes high for UnitedHealth Group's Q2 earnings
After suspending guidance and changing leadership last May, investors now want to know how UnitedHealth Group is going to weather the profit headwinds which have hobbled its Medicare Advantage program. Bertha Coombs previews the health care giant's second quarter earnings report.
