'Great sense of responsibility': Edmonton's Olszewski goes from political abyss to Carney's cabinet
Article content
Article content
She was expected to lose again and go back to her job as a lawyer.
Article content
Fast forward to the present, and Olszewski is the lone Alberta MP to be in Prime Minister Mark Carney's cabinet. She's a prime example of how politics can change in a very short period of time.
Article content
Article content
When Randy Boissonnault announced he would not stand for reelection in Edmonton Centre, the party asked Olszewski to move from Strathcona to a riding in which the Liberals had a much better chance to win. She became the only Liberal to win a seat in the Edmonton area.
Article content
Article content
With Carney needing to show that he's serious about national unity, and having a cabinet filled with ministers from across the country, Olszewski found herself in pole position for a minister's job. Five days before the swearing-in ceremony, she found out she was going to be the minister of emergency management and community resilience, and will also oversee Prairies Economic Development Canada.
There's no understating the importance of being the lone Alberta Liberal cabinet minister. Olszewski has to represent the interests of a province which has filed numerous court challenges against the federal government, and where the spectre of a separation referendum in 2026 has the country as a whole talking about national unity. Meanwhile, Canada is under threat from the protectionist policies of U.S. President Donald Trump.
Article content
Article content
Despite the political gulf between the provincial Conservatives and the federal Liberals, there is one thing on which Olszewski and Premier Danielle Smith can agree — that the relationship between Ottawa and Alberta needs a reset. But where they differ is how to best achieve that goal. Smith does so with bluster and through the courts. Olszewski believes it can be best achieved by the two parties sitting down and being willing partners rather than adversaries.
Article content
Article content
'It's an incredible honour to be chosen to represent Alberta in cabinet,' she said. 'It's a role that I do not take lightly. It comes with a great sense of responsibility. I want to be a strong voice for Alberta. I want to move forward with respect to the relationship between Alberta and the federal government, and to show Albertans that the relationship can be based on respect and collaboration.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Federal deficit could average $78B over 4 years, think tank warns
OTTAWA – The C.D. Howe Institute predicts Ottawa's recently announced spending plans — which include a much bigger defence budget — will drive its deficits markedly higher in the coming years. In a new analysis released today, the think tank says it expects Canada's deficit to top $92 billion this fiscal year, given Prime Minister Mark Carney's plan to meet NATO's defence spending target of two per cent of GDP. C.D. Howe says it expects deficit growth to slow after that but predicts deficits will still average around $78 billion annually over four years — more than double the level forecast by the parliamentary budget officer before the spring federal election. The Liberal government did not publish a spring budget this year and has said it will instead push the planned fiscal update to the fall. In addition to ramping up defence spending, Prime Minister Carney's Liberals recently pushed forward legislation to accelerate major project development and delivered a one-percentage-point cut to the lowest income tax rate. The C.D. Howe Institute accuses Ottawa of making costly commitments without showing the numbers to Canadians. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 3, 2025.
Toronto Sun
2 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
KINSELLA: Carney a 'bootlicker' for Trump's demands. Just ask Lloyd Axworthy.
Lloyd Axworthy, the former minister of foreign affairs addressed the crowd Sunday on Parliament Hill for the "Elbows Up, Canada!" rally on March 9, 2025. Photo by Ashley Fraser / Postmedia Lloyd Axworthy stirred. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The Manitoba Liberal MP looked around the panelled boardroom in 409-S, the office of the Leader of the Opposition, in Centre Block. 'I think I am going to express outrage about this one,' he said to the room. Someone laughed. It was long ago, 1992 or so. We were gathered for the daily meeting to determine what we — the Liberal Party Official Opposition — were going to ask about during Question Period. I can't remember what Lloyd had decided to be outraged about. But I remember that he said that. I was reminded of it again when Lloyd unloaded both rhetorical barrels on Mark Carney this week. The Prime Minister was 'a bootlicker,' Lloyd had said, quote unquote. For capitulating to Donald Trump's demand that Canada scrap the Digital Sales Tax, Lloyd suggested last week, Carney had revealed himself to be a craven coward. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Axworthy continued in his blog post: 'A pattern is now set: Trump harrumphs, we comply. What else will we quietly surrender? Cultural industries? Environmental standards, agriculture security, Arctic sovereignty?' Wow. Shots fired, as they say. So, the obvious question: was what Lloyd said genuine, or was it a bit of political performative theatre? Either way, it was something Mark Carney would be ill-advised to dismiss as the rantings of a Grit ghost. Lloyd Axworthy, you see, is a Liberal Party giant — a legend, really, going back to the Pierre Trudeau days — who kept the party alive in Canada's West, for years. He is a stalwart of the Liberal Party's progressive wing, and someone not to be trifled with. Even at the age of 85. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Lloyd's broadside should give the current Liberal leader pause, for two reasons. One, there is a growing suspicion within the Liberal Party of Canada that Mark Carney actually isn't a Liberal — he's a closeted conservative. For Axworthy and many Liberals of the Trudeau persuasion, the evidence of that isn't difficult to locate: carbon tax, capital gains, defence spending, now the digital sales tax. It's a growing list. Carney, some feel, may make Liberal-ish noises about the environment or social programs. But, when the chips are down — as they were on the digital sales tax — he reveals his true colours. And they're not Liberal red. That's what the country wanted, that's why Carney won the election, his acolytes will say, and they're partly right. The Grits needed to move back to the political centre, and some progressive shibboleths needed to be shivved. True. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But Lloyd Axworthy makes a second important point, one that can't be so easily disputed: namely, who's the boss? Who determines Canadian policy, Donald Trump or Canadians? Because, make no mistake, the U.S. President isn't done with us yet. Next up: supply management. For the uninitiated, supply management is basically a system that controls the supply of dairy, as well as poultry and eggs. It's designed to keep things stable and manageable for our farmers. It is, yes, government control of part of the marketplace. And — key point — it is a practically Holy Writ in the province of Quebec. There, it is sacrosanct. Conservatives privately (and sometimes not-so-privately) deeply detest supply management. They see it as Soviet-style economics. But, in power, they've left it untouched, because they know the backlash in Quebec would be deep and wide. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Consider the parable of Andrew Scheer and Maxine Bernier: the latter lost the Conservative leadership, and his role in the Tory caucus, for opposing supply management. While the former won the leadership largely because of it. Since then, no Conservative has dared challenge the primacy of supply management. No one should delude themselves into thinking Trump will give supply management a pass. On his Truth Social platform a few days ago, Trump declared that Canada a 'very difficult country to TRADE with, including the fact that they have charged our Farmers as much as 400% Tariffs, for years, on Dairy Products.' That's supply management. Every party in the House of Commons is in the record about supply management. On June 26, Bill C-202 passed through Parliament, and it effectively bars Carney from tinkering with supply management in his trade talks with Trump. Among other things, ending supply management would likely give the separatist Parti Quebecois — now the most popular political option in Quebec — the referendum ballot question they want. Which all brings us back to Lloyd Axworthy's characterization of Carney as Donald Trump's 'bootlicker.' What will Carney do, when Trump demands that supply management be ditched, as the digital sales tax was? Will he fight or – as Trump's press bobblehead said – will he 'cave?' Summers are usually pretty dull for politics. Ask Lloyd Axworthy: this one won't be. Sports Toronto & GTA Editorial Cartoons Money News MLB
Globe and Mail
4 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
The NDP will rise again
Take a lickin' and keep on tickin'. In pondering the condition of the federal New Democratic Party, the old expression comes to mind. The New Democrats are almost as low as low can go. In 2011, they won 103 seats. They now have seven, their fewest in history. They've lost their official party status. They're broke. They have less and less working-class horsepower. They have no Bernie Sanders. The seven members that remain can't even get along. Three of them raised Cain about not being adequately consulted on the selection of Don Davies as interim leader. Tom Mulcair, the former party leader and now a shrewd CTV commentator, doesn't mince his words: 'It's a gong show.' Some, though not Mr. Mulcair, think it could be game over for the party and that we'll move to a two-party system like in the United States. Less choice. More polarization. Diminished democracy. But don't bet on that. It's not about to happen. Just as it did after the 1993 election, when it was reduced to just nine seats, the NDP will ascend from the depths once again. Before long, the New Democrats will be back to their usual level of support between 15 and 20 per cent. They will be a force that Prime Minister Mark Carney – unless he can get enough floor-crossers to form a majority government – will have to reckon with to stay in power. Given their dismal standing, the NDP will not be hesitant to force an early election. They have nowhere to go but up. Several considerations make a comeback for the party likely. Polls already indicate the recent election result was a fluke. The NDP is at 12-per-cent popularity in the latest Nanos poll, which is double their share of the vote in the election. Without official status, NDP looks to stay relevant in Parliament The Mark Carney Liberals are moving from Justin Trudeau's wokeish leftist brand to the moderate middle. This gives the New Democrats more open real estate on the political spectrum than they've had in decades. Jean Chrétien moved the Liberals to the middle but his factory-floor persona gave him blue-collar appeal. As Dalton Camp once quipped, he looked like 'the driver of the getaway car.' It's the leader who dictates a party's fortunes and the NDP will get a new one who will change theirs. For all his integrity and noble intentions, Jagmeet Singh was a dud as a vote-getter. He could not connect. As Matt Fodor, author of From Layton to Singh, points out, instead of being the outsider party challenging the status quo, the NDP was seen lately, via its support for Mr. Trudeau, as the party defending it. It diluted its brand. It became ambiguous. It was left to the Conservatives to channel the people's wrath. For a new leader, the party has potentially formidable candidates in the wings, like former Alberta premier Rachel Notley – if she can be convinced to run – and Nathan Cullen, the former British Columbia MP who made a good run for the party leadership in 2012. He's witty, camera-friendly, experienced and policy-sharp. Though feeble federally, the New Democrats are well entrenched provincially. They form the government in B.C. and Manitoba and are positioned strongly in opposition in several other provinces. Sometimes you get the breaks in politics, sometimes you don't. In the past election, the NDP got trapped by the Donald Trump effect. Progressive voters ran to the Liberals because they wanted a strong government to put up a resistance to the U.S. President. But when the next Canadian election rolls around, Mr. Trump will be either out, or on his way out. Though the NDP under Mr. Singh was a political failure, it was not a policy failure. In teaming with the Liberals, it pressed for and helped secure social advances in child care, dental care and pharmacare – improvements the party can be proud of. It's worth remembering that as recently as a decade ago, the party under Mr. Mulcair was number one in some polls and appeared on the verge of forming government. It fell victim in Quebec to Mr. Mulcair's principled stand on the niqab issue, and in the rest of the country to his tacking too moderately. The Liberals had a new, big-name leader in Justin Trudeau, and pounced. But there's no reason why the New Democrats can't rebuild and issue a hard challenge to the two main parties again. They're a Canadian institution. Their values are woven into this country's fabric. They've had their lickin'. They'll keep on tickin'.
