Trump's Gulf Gambit: Economic Pacts, Strategic Realignments, and the Battle for the Middle East's Future
Qatar: Aviation Deals as a Tool of Influence
In Doha, an unprecedented agreement was announced: Qatar Airways' order of 210 Boeing aircraft, valued at $96bn. This deal transcended a simple economic transaction; it was a strategic alignment in which the aviation industry served as an instrument of soft power. The agreement ensured continued US aerospace dominance in Gulf markets, while denying China's COMAC, and Europe's Airbus, further opportunities.
Positioning Qatar as a pivotal ally in America's strategy to counter Chinese economic encroachment, this transaction also intertwined with American employment and technological sectors. It embodied a fusion of foreign policy and domestic industrial revival.
United Arab Emirates: AI, Semiconductors, and the Tech War
Perhaps even more strategically significant was the UAE's preliminary agreement to annually import 500,000 advanced semiconductor units from US firm NVIDIA. In the broader context of the US-China tech war, semiconductors had emerged as critical geopolitical assets. Through this agreement, Abu Dhabi not only secured access to cutting-edge American technology but also solidified its role as a regional hub for AI development and data infrastructure.
This alignment reinforced Washington's effort to exclude Chinese tech giants such as Huawei from vital Gulf networks. The move reshaped the digital power map of the Middle East, positioning the UAE as a counterweight to Chinese-backed technological initiatives across Iran and parts of the Levant.
Syria: The End of Isolation and the Limits of Rehabilitation
One of the most consequential — and controversial — outcomes of Trump's tour was the decision to lift all US sanctions on Syria. This followed the December 2024 ousting of Bashar al-Assad and the appointment of Ahmed al-Sharaa as interim leader. The conditional removal of sanctions, contingent upon chemical weapons disarmament and counterterrorism cooperation, served multiple US objectives.
Strategically, it diminished Iran's military and economic influence in Syria by opening avenues for US and Gulf investment in reconstruction. It also sought to pivot Damascus towards a moderate Gulf bloc, reducing Russian and Iranian leverage in the Levant. However, Syria's fragile stability posed significant risks, with the potential for proxy conflicts and power vacuums looming over reconstruction efforts.
Gaza: A Dangerous Vision of Demographic Engineering
The most morally contentious and geopolitically destabilizing element of Trump's Middle East policy was his proposal for Gaza. The plan envisioned transforming the territory into a 'freedom zone' for business and leisure, accompanied by the relocation of two million Palestinians to neighbouring states, a proposal that amounted to demographic engineering.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's endorsement of this plan revealed a troubling strategic convergence between Washington and Tel Aviv. International observers widely condemned the proposal as an act of ethnic cleansing, warning of the regional unrest it could spark. Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon — potential hosts for displaced Palestinians — were already grappling with domestic challenges that rendered such a plan politically untenable.
Moreover, this initiative reflected a deeper recalibration of US policy: prioritizing economic pacification over genuine political resolution and disengaging from the long-held two-state framework. The implications for regional stability, Palestinian rights, and America's moral standing were deeply concerning.
Israel: Fragile Alliances and Shifting Priorities
For Netanyahu, Trump's visit presented a double-edged sword. While the Gaza plan aligned with Israel's longstanding security ambitions, other aspects of the US strategy — including rapprochement with Syria and potential direct talks with Iran — complicated Israel's strategic calculus.
Netanyahu's cautious optimism about potential ceasefire prospects belied growing unease over Washington's readiness to engage adversaries and recalibrate alliances. The lifting of sanctions on Syria and the intensification of US-Gulf cooperation risked marginalizing Israel's role in shaping regional dynamics. Domestic political turbulence within Israel further undermined Netanyahu's capacity to manage these emerging fault lines.
China: The Unspoken Target of Economic Diplomacy
While Trump's public rhetoric emphasized regional stability and counterterrorism, the tour's underlying objective was unmistakable: containing China's growing influence in the Middle East. By clinching aerospace, technology, and infrastructure deals worth over $1.8trn, the United States not only revitalized its economic partnerships but also directly challenged Chinese investments in aviation, energy, and digital infrastructure.
China's Belt and Road projects in Iraq, Iran, and the Levant now faced the risk of exclusion from key Gulf markets. The semiconductor agreement with the UAE, in particular, struck at the heart of Beijing's ambitions to dominate AI and data infrastructure in the region.
President Trump's 2025 Gulf tour marked a watershed moment in the Middle East's geopolitical landscape. Through a calculated mix of colossal economic deals, strategic realignments, and deeply controversial initiatives, the United States sought to reclaim regional dominance while curbing the influence of China and Iran.
The ramifications are immense: the potential rehabilitation of Syria, a digitized Gulf, the sidelining of the Palestinian question, and increasingly fragile US-Israel relations. Whether these moves herald a sustainable new order or ignite fresh cycles of instability remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the Middle East stands at the threshold of a new and contested geopolitical era.
Dr. Marwa El-Shinawy – Academic and Writer
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
See - Sada Elbalad
4 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
BRICS Nations Voice 'Grave Concern' Over Trump's Tariff Blitz Ahead of Rio Summit
Taarek Refaat As global trade tensions escalate, the BRICS nations are preparing to deliver a sharp rebuke to U.S. President Donald Trump over what they describe as a wave of "arbitrary" and "illegal" tariffs that threaten to destabilize the global economy. The warning is set to be issued during the BRICS summit scheduled for Sunday in Rio de Janeiro, where leaders of the powerful bloc of emerging economies will gather amid mounting concerns over U.S. trade policy. According to a draft communiqué obtained by Agence France-Presse (AFP), the five-member group—which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—plans to jointly express 'grave concern' over Washington's increasingly aggressive use of tariffs. While the statement stops short of naming Trump or the United States directly, its language leaves little ambiguity about the target. 'We express our grave concern about the rise in unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures that distort trade flows and are inconsistent with World Trade Organization rules,' the draft reads. The document warns that such policies 'threaten a further decline in global trade' and 'adversely impact the prospects for global economic development,' underscoring a rare moment of unity among countries that together account for nearly half the world's population and 40% of global GDP. Since taking office in January, President Trump has doubled down on protectionist trade policies, frequently issuing threats—and more recently, formal notifications—to both adversaries and longtime allies. The most recent round of tariff hikes has rattled global markets and drawn criticism from governments across the world. For the BRICS nations, many of which are still navigating fragile post-pandemic recoveries, the Trump administration's trade measures have become a growing source of economic instability and geopolitical friction. Sunday's summit in Rio is expected to produce one of the bloc's most forceful collective responses to U.S. trade actions to date. However, the summit's political weight may be undercut by the unexpected absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping. For the first time since assuming power over a decade ago, Xi will not attend the BRICS summit—a notable departure that risks weakening the group's unified message and raising questions about internal cohesion. China, the largest and most influential member of BRICS, has often been viewed as the bloc's de facto leader, using the alliance as a platform to counterbalance Western economic and political influence. Without Xi, analysts say, the group may struggle to project the same diplomatic clout—particularly on matters where Beijing's voice is pivotal. Still, the remaining leaders are pressing ahead with the summit's agenda, which includes calls for fairer global governance, reforms at international financial institutions, and renewed commitments to multilateralism at a time when protectionist policies are gaining traction in the West. Founded in the early 2000s as a loose coalition of rising economies, BRICS has evolved into a more structured diplomatic and economic bloc. While its internal diversity often limits unified action, its member states remain bound by a shared frustration with Western-dominated global systems and a desire to assert greater influence on the world stage. This year's summit arrives at a pivotal moment. With geopolitical alignments shifting and global trade at an inflection point, BRICS leaders face a delicate balancing act: defending their national interests while presenting a coordinated front against what they see as the destabilizing impulses of U.S. unilateralism. As the summit gets underway, the message from Rio is likely to be clear: the world's emerging powers are not prepared to remain silent in the face of policies they believe endanger global stability. read more CBE: Deposits in Local Currency Hit EGP 5.25 Trillion Morocco Plans to Spend $1 Billion to Mitigate Drought Effect Gov't Approves Final Version of State Ownership Policy Document Egypt's Economy Expected to Grow 5% by the end of 2022/23- Minister Qatar Agrees to Supply Germany with LNG for 15 Years Business Oil Prices Descend amid Anticipation of Additional US Strategic Petroleum Reserves Business Suez Canal Records $704 Million, Historically Highest Monthly Revenue Business Egypt's Stock Exchange Earns EGP 4.9 Billion on Tuesday Business Wheat delivery season commences on April 15 News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean
See - Sada Elbalad
5 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
Elon Musk Declares New Era in America: 'The Two-Party System Is Dead'
Taarek Refaat In a stunning Independence Day announcement, American billionaire and tech titan Elon Musk declared that the United States has reached the end of its two-party political era. Calling the current system obsolete and destructive, Musk unveiled his vision for a new political movement: The America Party. The announcement came via a series of posts on Musk's social media platform, X (formerly known as Twitter), where he accused both the Democratic and Republican parties of failing the American people. He claimed that what the U.S. currently operates under is not a democracy, but a form of 'destructive partisanship' that serves entrenched interests and perpetuates financial and political dysfunction. In his posts, Musk did not mince words. 'When it comes to bankrupting America through corruption and waste, we live in a one-party system,' he wrote. 'That's not democracy.' He added that polling shows Americans, by a margin of two to one, support the idea of a new political party—one he believes they will soon have. The timing of Musk's political declaration was far from coincidental. By choosing July 4th, a date symbolic of America's independence from British rule in 1776, Musk was clearly making a point. Observers say he is casting his effort as a new kind of revolution—one that seeks freedom not from colonial rule, but from the modern grip of political monopolies. To Musk, the Republican and Democratic parties represent a kind of 'partisan occupation' of American power, and his movement, he suggests, is a long-overdue liberation. Historically, attempts to establish a third party in the United States have ended in frustration. The complex architecture of the American electoral system—combined with institutional resistance from media, finance, and politics—has made it nearly impossible for alternatives to thrive. Yet Musk enters the scene with unique advantages that set him apart from past challengers. He commands an enormous and diverse public following that cuts across traditional party lines, especially among younger voters. His control of X gives him a direct, unfiltered communication channel to millions of Americans, bypassing conventional media. And, unlike most political newcomers, Musk is not reliant on donors or party machines; his vast personal wealth allows him to fund any campaign or political infrastructure independently. Despite his increasing political engagement, Musk has not yet announced any plans to run for public office. Still, his language—frequent references to candidates 'closer to the people,' and repeated criticism of the two-party 'monopoly'—has raised questions about his long-term ambitions. Whether or not he puts his name on the ballot, Musk is already emerging as the likely face of The America Party should it come into formal existence. The response to his announcement has been predictably polarized. A growing number of disillusioned citizens have applauded Musk's call, arguing that the U.S. political system needs disruption, not reform. They view him as a much-needed outsider who can deliver that jolt. But political figures on both sides of the aisle have responded with skepticism or outright dismissal. Critics claim that Musk's 'digital popularity' does not equate to political substance, especially given the absence of on-the-ground structures like local chapters, staff, or voter outreach mechanisms. Still, even the most cautious observers concede that Musk's move reflects a broader undercurrent in American politics—a mood of frustration, fatigue, and yearning for something new. Whether The America Party becomes a lasting institution or not, Musk's challenge to the political status quo has already struck a chord in a nation weary of gridlock and polarization. As traditional political alliances continue to fracture and the electorate grows more restless, Elon Musk's entry into the political conversation may be more than a passing headline. It could mark the start of a deeper transformation—one in which power, messaging, and influence shift away from legacy institutions and toward the disruptive force of one of the world's most unorthodox visionaries. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean
Al-Ahram Weekly
10 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
France hopes EU will reach tariff deal with US 'this weekend' - International
France's finance minister said on Saturday he hoped the European Union would reach a deal on tariffs with Washington "this weekend". EU and US negotiators are holding final stretch talks over the weekend as Brussels chases a deal before a July 9 deadline to avoid the return of steep tariffs. "On tariffs, it could all be decided this weekend," said French Finance Minister Eric Lombard, speaking at an economic forum in southern France. "If not, Europe will undoubtedly have to respond more vigorously to restore the balance," he said. Without a deal, the default levy on EU imports is set to double to 20 percent or even higher -- US President Donald Trump having threatened at one point to slap 50 percent duties. EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said on Thursday Brussels sought an agreement in principle, which would mean further talks would be necessary on the details. But the commission believes that whatever happens, an imbalance in trade measures between the EU and the United States will remain. It is "essential" for the European Union to protect its industries from the United States and China, said Lombard. "Imagine the world as a playground where everyone is playing ... and following the rules," he said. "And then three bullies come along and don't follow any rules... and push around the children who were playing nicely. That's the world of predators," he said, referring to the US, Russia and China. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
