Trump tells Russian official to 'watch his words,' but he bites back instead
In a midnight social media post, President Donald Trump called Dmitry Medvedev a "failed former President of Russia" who had better "watch his words."
Less than three hours later -- morning by then in Moscow -- Medvedev responded.
He said Trump should picture the apocalyptic television series "The Walking Dead" and referred to the Soviet Union's system for launching a last-ditch, automatic nuclear strike.
"Russia is right about everything and will continue to go its own way," said Medvedev's post on the Telegram messaging app.
It was the second time this summer that Trump and Medvedev, Russia's head of state from 2008 to 2012, traded blows on social media.
The exchanges have been striking not only for the verbal brinkmanship on display between the world's nuclear superpowers, but also for the mismatched stature of the figures involved. While Trump commands the world's most powerful military, Medvedev is widely seen as a social-media attack dog relegated to the periphery of President Vladimir Putin's inner circle.
The viciousness of the overnight exchange highlighted the volatility and opacity of a geopolitical relationship in which Trump and Putin set policy largely on their own.
And it put on display the combustible mix that can occur when the Kremlin's long-standing willingness to use nuclear threats meets Trump's penchant for late-night diatribes on the internet. Hanging in the balance is the future of Ukraine, three years into Russia's full-scale invasion.
"In wars, traditionally diplomatic messaging is something that's done with a lot of care and discipline," said Michael Kimmage, a professor at Catholic University in Washington who specializes in the U.S.-Russia
relationship. "The consequences of screwing up can be so huge."
Grigorii Golosov, a professor of political science at the European University in St. Petersburg, Russia, said there was something symbiotic about Trump and Medvedev fighting on social media. Medvedev, who had styled himself as a pro-Western liberal when he served as president more than a decade ago, has recast himself as an uncompromising soldier in Russia's showdown with the West.
But attacking Medvedev may also be useful to Trump, Golosov posited, by allowing him to show he's getting tough on Russia without attacking Putin directly. In June, Trump attacked Medvedev for saying countries could send nuclear warheads to Iran, adding: "I guess that's why Putin's 'THE BOSS.'"
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
MEA dials down Trump noise: India, US weathered challenges, focus on future
OVER 30 remarks crediting himself for the India-Pakistan ceasefire, referring to India as a 'dead economy,' dropping the 25% tariff bombshell and a Russia penalty even as talks are on — US President Donald Trump's diatribe was met Friday by diplomatic pragmatism from the Ministry of External Affairs. Underlining that the India-US partnership has 'weathered several transitions and challenges,' the MEA said that New Delhi will remain 'focused on the substantive agenda' even as it flagged that its friendship with Russia was 'time-tested.' This response came the day Trump unveiled sweeping new tariffs on dozens of countries including 25 per cent for goods from India. Responding to a question, MEA's official spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said Friday: 'India and the United States share a comprehensive global strategic partnership anchored in shared interests, democratic values, and robust people-to-people ties. This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges. We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.' Asked about India-US defence ties in the wake of reports of India refusing to consider F-35 fighter jets, the MEA spokesperson said, 'We have a strong defence partnership with the U.S. which has been strengthening over the last several years. There is potential for this partnership to grow further under the India-US COMPACT for the 21st century.' Responding to Trump's talk of a penalty on India for buying energy from Russia, Jaiswal said: 'In securing our energy needs, we are guided by what is on offer in the markets, and by the prevailing global circumstances.' Incidentally, this has been Delhi's position for the last three years, since the war in Ukraine broke out after the Russian invasion in February 2022. On Trump's tirade against India-Russia ties and that they are both 'dead economies', the MEA spokesperson said: 'Our bilateral relationships with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. India and Russia have a steady and time-tested partnership.' On Trump's anger at India buying Russian defence equipment, he said, 'The sourcing of our defence requirements is determined solely by our national security imperatives and strategic assessments.' While India does depend on Russia for the defence supplies, much of it is because of the legacy from the Soviet Union era. Although the dependency is about 60 to 70 per cent, India has, in the past few years, steadily diversified its defence purchases from countries including the US. Yet, the framing by Trump — 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care' — has been seen as offensive by many. While his criticism of India putting high tariffs has been a pet grievance from his first term — when he called India a 'tariff king' — the US President's latest statement described India's trade policies as 'most strenuous and obnoxious'. Trump's remarks deepen Delhi's diplomatic challenge when India and the US are negotiating a bilateral trade deal. There are two possible impulses that guide Trump's responses, according to Delhi's analysis. First, his negotiating style to browbeat and bully the adversary by imposing high tariffs and try and get the deal on his own terms. This has been seen with China, where he imposed 145 per cent tariffs and then dialled down to 35 – after talks in Geneva. Second, some in the Indian establishment feel that the US President has not taken very kindly to Delhi fact-checking Trump's claims on brokering a ceasefire. Not only has PM Narendra Modi conveyed this in the phone call with Trump on June 17, but Indian ministers and officials have repeatedly denied the claim. Despite not stating that President Trump is a 'liar' — as demanded by Congress leader and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi — the Indian government has forcefully contradicted the US President. But New Delhi feels that Trump's remarks threaten to undo the hard work made by the two countries as 'strategic partners' in a relationship that was framed as the 'defining partnership of the 21st century' by US President Barack Obama. South Block is, however, trying to not get drawn into an emotional and angry response, and is projecting restraint amid the US President's verbal tirade and social media blitzkrieg of epithets directed at India. While the Commerce ministry said it has 'taken note' of Trump's statement on bilateral trade and the Government is studying its implications, sources said that any response had to be shorn of emotion. 'India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective,' the Commerce ministry statement had said. Sources said that negotiators from both sides are in touch and they have to be immune from the noise. The diplomatic challenge is three-fold, sources said: how long can Delhi stand its ground against the US; whether India can engage with Trump's inner circle; and whether they can overcome the distrust fuelled by the Trump's comments in the long term. 'We will not get drawn into the tit-for-tat response with the US President, and our negotiators have been asked to not pay attention to Trump's unique style of public negotiations. Those are best left to be done away from the public gaze,' a source said. Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism '2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury's special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban's capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More
Economic Times
7 minutes ago
- Economic Times
As Trump deploys nuclear submarines after Putin aide Medvedev's warning of war, here's a look at US and Russian navy submarine capabilities
Synopsis President Trump responded to Dmitry Medvedev's provocative statements by ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines. Medvedev's remarks, which included threats of war between the U.S. and Russia, prompted Trump's action as a precautionary measure. The U.S. Navy boasts a fleet of 71 submarines, while the Russian Navy operates 64 vessels, both undergoing modernization efforts. President Donald Trump has taken a bold step by ordering the deployment of two U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia, following aggressive nuclear threats from Russian official Dmitry Medvedev. This unexpected move, announced on August 1, 2025, has sent shockwaves through global capitals and triggered urgent responses from NATO allies. As the war in Ukraine drags on and nuclear rhetoric escalates, Trump's action signals a high-stakes moment in international diplomacy. In a sharp response to former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, days after he made 'provocative statements' and threatened war between the US and Russia, President Donald Trump said Friday he's ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of the country's former president, Dmitry Medvedev. Currently, Medvedev is serving as deputy chairman of Russia's National Security US president, in a social media post, stated that based on the 'highly provocative statements' from Medvedev, he had "ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances,' the president further stated.'Based on the highly provocative statements of the former president of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!,' Trump said on Truth in his post on X on Monday (July 28, 2025), said, 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10… He should remember 2 things.' '1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war,' Medvedev wrote. 'Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country. Don't go down the Sleepy Joe road!' Medvedev stated, referring to former President Joe President Trump hits back at Russia over Medvedev's war threats, here's a look at US and Russian naval submarines: The United States submarine force consists of four operational classes: Ohio, Los Angeles, Seawolf, and Virginia, all of which are nuclear-powered, according to (Nuclear Threat Initiative website, The Ohio class includes 14 SSBNs that make up the sea-based part of the U.S. nuclear triad. Four more Ohio-class submarines have been converted to SSGNs, equipped for both strike missions and Special Forces other three active classes—Virginia, Seawolf, and Los Angeles—consist of SSN attack submarines designed for targeting enemy ships, supporting operations ashore and carrier groups, and conducting surveillance. Total Submarines in Fleet: 71 Ballistic Missile Submarines (SSBNs): 14Nuclear-Powered attack submarines (SSNs): 53Guided Missile Submarines (SSGN): 4Diesel-electric attack submarines (SSKs): 0Air-independent propulsion submarines (AIPs): 0The Russian Navy operates one of the world's largest submarine fleets, with an estimated 64 vessels. Its 16 nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) are a core part of Russia's strategic deterrent. Despite financial challenges after the Soviet Union's collapse, Russia has made major upgrades to its submarine force in recent years. Total Submarines in Fleet: 64 Ballistic Missile Submarines (SSBNs): 16Nuclear-Powered attack submarines (SSNs): 14Nuclear-powered cruise missile submarines (SSGNs): 11Diesel-electric attack submarines (SSKs): 23After the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia took up several projects to boost its submarine fleet. In 1993, Russia started the construction of a Yasen-class submarine, the Severodvinsk (K-885). The country, however, did not commission it until Russian Navy is planning to replace both its SSNs and SSGNs with the multirole Project 885-M Yasen-class submarines. Russia launched its second Yasen-class submarine, the Kazan, in 2017. This vessel entered into service in the Northern Fleet in signed a contract with the shipbuilding company Sevmash to build two Project 885-M Yasen-class nuclear-powered attack submarines in June Borei-class (NATO: Dolgorukiy) SSBNs play a key role in Russia's post-Cold War strategic arsenal. Launched in 1996, the Borei-class is set to replace the aging Typhoon-class, Kalmar-class (NATO: Delta III), and Delfin-class (NATO: Delta IV) submarines, according to Russia launched its first Borei-A class submarine, Knyaz Vladimir, in 2017. It includes several upgrades over the original design. The Russian military declared Knyaz Vladimir fully operational in 2021, and it has since taken part in groundbreaking under-ice April 2019, the Russian Ministry of Defense revealed its plans to build two new Borei-K-class nuclear submarines. The first of these boats, the Knyaz Oleg, was laid down in July 2014-15, completed sea trials, and was commissioned to the Pacific Fleet in late second submarine, Generalissimo Suvorov, was commissioned in late 2022. As of early 2023, reports indicate it is serving with Russia's Northern Fleet. These vessels are nearly identical to earlier Borei-class models but can launch long-range cruise missiles.
News18
17 minutes ago
- News18
Enough nuke submarines to control 2 deployed by Trump, says Russian lawmaker
Moscow, Aug 1 (PTI) There are enough Russian nuclear submarines in the high seas to tackle two American subs dispatched by US President Donald Trump to counter Russia, a member of the Russian Parliament Duma has said. 'The number of Russian nuclear submarines in the world's oceans is significantly higher than the American ones, and the subs that US President Donald Trump ordered to be redirected to the appropriate regions have long been under their control. So no response from the Russian Federation to the American leader's statement about the submarines is required," a senior Russian lawmaker, Viktor Vodolatsky, was quoted as saying by TASS. Earlier on Friday, Trump wrote on his Truth Social post that he had ordered the redeployment of US submarines 'to appropriate regions" allegedly over 'extremely provocative statements" by former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, who is also the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council. 'Let the two US subs sail, they have been in the crosshairs for a long time now," the Russian lawmaker said. 'A fundamental agreement that must be concluded between Russia and America so that the whole world calms down and stops talking about the beginning of World War III," he added. Meanwhile, editor-in-chief of Russia in Global Affairs magazine, Fyodor Lukyanov, said that Trump's nuclear submarine statement should not be taken seriously for now. Following the American leader's statements, the Moscow Exchange index plummeted 2,709.26 points (0.99%) by 08:01 pm Moscow time (10:31 pm IST) on Friday. Earlier, responding to a media question over US State Department Secretary Marco Rubio's recent interview with Fox News, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that Russia agrees with the US administration that a direct military confrontation between Moscow and Washington must not happen. 'While Europeans are hysterically pushing for Ukraine's integration into NATO and preparing for potential conflict with Russia, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently reaffirmed a responsible stance, explicitly stating that a direct military confrontation between the United States and Russia must be avoided. We wholeheartedly concur with this position. Such shared understanding has been facilitated through constructive Russian-American dialogue," Lavrov said. PTI VS AMJ AMJ view comments First Published: August 02, 2025, 03:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
