'Heavy Weapons Fire" Kills 4 in Sweida, Druze Militia ‘Attack' Sharaa's Men, Israel Raids Syria
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
AI traffic signals at 91 locations soon
Porvorim: Chief minister Pramod Sawant on Tuesday said govt will install AI-based traffic signals at 91 locations. He also mentioned that a Bhasha Bhavan would be constructed in Goa. Four-hour drinking water supply will be provided to households, the CM said, and added that govt is working to combat the water tanker mafia. Also, water filters would be provided to govt schools within two months, he said, and mentioned that the beautification of roads would be undertaken in two phases, with the first phase covering the area between Mopa and Old Goa. He announced that he made a Rs 100 crore allocation to MLAs for developmental work, and that the finance department is tracking the allocation. Sawant highlighted that the state has around 120 grounds, 112 coaches, and 46 associations in the sports sector, even as he urged MLAs to visit sports centres to observe the performance of coaches in their respective constituencies. Sawant expressed surprise that despite being the sports minister, he had never seen some of the coaches for badminton, swimming and boxing. He said that to establish Goa as a sports destination, govt has organised various events. He also mentioned that govt set a target to create 11,000 'Lakhpati Didi'.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Justice delayed yet again
Last week, a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court acquitted all the seven accused, including BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case. Six people were killed and 95 injured in the bombing that had struck the Muslim-majority town in Maharashtra. The case, which was investigated by two different agencies, triggered accusations of 'saffron terror'. All the accused were charged by the Maharashtra Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) in 2008 of being 'Hindutva extremists'. The trial was controversial as Rohini Salian, the former special public prosecutor, had alleged in 2015 that the government had put pressure on her, through the NIA, to 'go soft' on the accused. The case was initially probed by ATS chief Hemant Karkare, who was gunned down by terrorists during the November 26, 2008, terror attack on Mumbai. Eventually, it was handed over to the NIA. While acquitting the seven accused, the court pointed out several lapses in the investigation and criticised the NIA for presenting 'inconclusive', 'unreliable', and 'legally inadmissible' evidence. It said that there were procedural lapses in the invocation of stringent laws such as the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. It added that the investigators had failed to link the motorcycle, allegedly used in the crime, to Ms. Thakur; that there were problems with witness statements; and that there was no proof that Lt Col Prasad Purohit (retired) or the right-wing outfit, Abhinav Bharat, was linked to the blast. In the order, Special Judge A.K. Lahoti observed, 'The testimony of prosecution witnesses is riddled with material inconsistencies and contradictions. Such discrepancies undermine the credibility of the prosecution's case and fall short of establishing the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.' While he said that terrorism has no religion, the Special Judge also added that a court cannot convict someone based on mere perception. Civil society members were critical of the verdict given the allegations that it was politically driven; and also since it came on the back of another verdict acquitting all the accused in another blast case. On July 21, the Bombay High Court acquitted all the 12 accused in the 2006 serial bomb blasts case. Seven explosions had ripped through Mumbai's local trains on the evening of July 11, 2006, killing 189 people and seriously injuring 824. The coordinated blasts had scarred the estimated 70 lakh people of Mumbai who use the local trains, often dubbed the city's lifeline, every day. Many victims feared taking the local train again. This case too was riddled with controversies. While the Maharashtra ATS, which had conducted the probe from the beginning, claimed that the attacks were the handiwork of the Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Students' Islamic Movement of India, several other investigating agencies, including the NIA, claimed that the Indian Mujahideen had carried out the terror attacks. While acquitting the 12 accused, the High Court laid bare the inconsistencies, loopholes, and lapses in the probe by the Maharashtra ATS. It asked how key witness statements were recorded after an unexplained delay of 100 days. It questioned the trustworthiness and credibility of witnesses, highlighted deep flaws in both the investigation as well as prosecution, and demanded to know why the circumstantial evidence, such as call detail records, which the investigators had relied on so much, was inconclusive. It pointed out that the witness statements were delayed and inconsistent; that there were procedural lapses and coercion allegations about the confessions retrieved; that there was no proof of actual explosives used; and that the chain of custody of the recoveries was broken. The High Court also rapped the trial court for the conviction order. The judgments on two terror cases in India have left the victims, who have had to wait for nearly two decades for verdicts, without a sense of justice. The investigations raise serious questions about India's criminal justice system and specifically about the accountability of investigating agencies. Who are the agencies answerable to, for their contradictory claims and shoddy procedures, which have allowed extremist organisations to get away with such terrible crimes in Maharashtra? And when — if at all they do — will the victims of these blasts get a sense of closure?
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Graphic designer who made provocative posters for PFI before ban, granted bail
The Bombay High Court has granted bail to Maula Nabisab Mulla, a Nashik-based graphic designer who had spent over two years in custody for allegedly designing posters for the Popular Front of India (PFI) — at a time when the organisation was not yet banned by the Government of India.A bench comprising Justices A S Gadkari and Rajesh S Patil noted that the case against Mulla pertained solely to graphic designing work, including banners and social media content, and that the PFI was not a proscribed organisation at the time of the alleged to the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), Nashik, a PFI office was inaugurated on June 14, 2022, in Malegaon, where a meeting allegedly took place discussing various incidents of atrocities against the Muslim community, including mob lynching. The prosecution claimed that during the meeting, attendees called for Muslim unity and discussed waging war against the country by 'any means necessary.' One of the accused was alleged to have issued a fatwa inciting violence against those who spoke against was arrested for his alleged role in creating posters and graphic content that the ATS said were of an 'objectionable nature,' inciting hatred between for Mulla, advocates N N Gawankar and Advait Tamhankar argued that their client's role was limited to that of a professional graphic designer, and he had no active involvement in the ideological or organisational activities of pointed out that the FIR was lodged on September 22, 2022, while the PFI was officially banned only on September 27, 2022. 'Therefore, at the time of registration of the FIR, the organisation was not banned and no offence under anti-terror laws was made out,' the defence lawyers also noted that five other accused in the same case had already been granted bail by the Supreme Court and Bombay High Court, with roles similar or greater than Mulla' the prosecution opposed the bail plea, the Court observed that the trial had not yet commenced and there were over 190 witnesses to be examined, indicating a prolonged legal process bench concluded that Mulla's role — as per the ATS charges — was comparable to that of others who had already been released on bail.'The role attributed to the applicant is similar to the other co-accused, who have already been granted bail by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The FIR was registered when the organisation was not yet banned. Hence, on parity and considering the long incarceration, the applicant deserves to be released on bail,' the bench was granted bail subject to conditions imposed by the Court. The order brings attention to the delays in trial and the legal complexities surrounding retrospective application of bans on organisations.- EndsTrending Reel
