Stocks slip in Asia on U.S. tariff confusion, oil skids
The United States is close to finalizing several trade agreements in the coming days and will notify other countries of higher tariff rates by July 9, President Donald Trump said on Sunday, with the higher rates to take effect on August 1.
'President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that if you don't move things along, then on August 1 you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level,' U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN.
Trump in April announced a 10% base tariff rate on most countries and higher 'reciprocal' rates ranging up to 50%, with an original deadline of this Wednesday.
However, Trump also said levies could range in value from 'maybe 60% or 70%,' and threatened an extra 10% on countries aligning themselves with the 'Anti-American policies' of the BRICS group of Brazil, Russia, India and China.
With very few actual trade deals done, analysts had always suspected the date would be pushed out, though it was still not clear if the new deadline applied to all trading partners or just some.
'This renewed escalation in trade tensions comes at a time when major trade partners, including the EU, India and Japan, are believed to be at crucial stages of bilateral negotiations,' analysts at ANZ said in a note.
'If reciprocal tariffs are implemented in their original form or even expanded, we believe it will intensify downside risks to U.S. growth and increase upside risks to inflation.'
Investors have grown somewhat used to the uncertainty surrounding U.S. trade policy and the initial market reaction was cautious. S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures both eased 0.3%.
EUROSTOXX 50 futures eased 0.1%, while FTSE futures fell 0.2% and DAX futures held steady.
Japan's Nikkei lost 0.5%, while South Korean stocks went flat. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan eased 0.6%, as Chinese blue chips dropped 0.5%.
DOLLAR MIXED
Safe-haven bonds were better bid, with 10-year Treasury yields down almost 2 basis points at 4.326%.
Major currencies were mixed as the dollar index nudged up to 97.071. The euro held at $1.1771, just off last week's top of $1.1830, while the dollar was a fraction firmer at 144.76 yen.
The dollar has been undermined by investor concerns about Trump's often chaotic tariff policy and what that might do to economic growth and inflation.
The same worries have kept the Federal Reserve from cutting rates and minutes of its last meeting should offer more color on when the majority of members might resume easing.
It is a relatively quiet week for Fed speakers with only two district presidents on the docket, while economic data is also sparse.
The Reserve Bank of Australia is widely expected to cut its rates by a quarter point to 3.60% at a meeting on Tuesday, the third easing this cycle, and markets imply an eventual destination for rates of 2.85% or 3.10%.
New Zealand's central bank meets on Wednesday and is likely to hold rates at 3.25%, having already slashed by 225 basis points over the past year.
In commodity markets, gold slipped 0.3% to $3,324 an ounce though it did gain almost 2% last week as the dollar fell.
Oil prices slid anew after the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies, a group known as OPEC+, agreed on Saturday to raise production by a larger-than-expected 548,000 barrels per day in August.
The group also warned that it could hike by a similar amount in September, leaving analysts with the impression it was trying to squeeze lower margin producers and particularly those pulling oil from U.S. shale.
'We see OPEC+ targeting Brent oil futures around $US60-65/bbl as a result,' said Vivek Dhar, an analyst at CBA.
'This would challenge the economics of U.S. shale oil supply growth and prevent non-OPEC+ supply growth from taking market share in coming years.'
Brent dropped 52 cents to $67.78 a barrel, while U.S. crude fell $1.01 to $65.99 per barrel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
an hour ago
- The Diplomat
The Path to a US-India Trade Deal Lies Through Economic Security
A broader trade agreement, including cooperation on key supply chains, foreign investment, and advanced technologies makes a deal more likely and can help the U.S. and India more effectively counter China. Negotiations for a U.S.-India trade deal have been progressing at breakneck pace, as officials rush to reach an agreement before President Donald Trump's July 9 tariff deadline. India being near the front of the line is surprising, given that the two countries have consistently imposed high trade barriers and haven't signed a deal despite years of discussions. But Delhi is ready to negotiate because it sees an even bigger geoeconomic play: undercut China's status as a leading manufacturing hub and destination for investment by securing key supply chains and investing in advanced technologies. To seal the deal, Washington and Delhi should put economic security issues at the heart of the agreement. Getting to yes will require overcoming a long history of nos. In 2019, the U.S. removed India from the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program, and India imposed retaliatory tariffs on 28 U.S. goods in response to earlier Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum. While mutual tech and defense cooperation increased during the Biden administration, and India joined the non-trade pillars of the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, there was little progress in improving market access apart from the removal of previous tariffs and resolution of WTO disputes. Despite Trump's recent optimism, ongoing negotiations for a first tranche deal are facing several hurdles, largely due to U.S. demands for lower trade barriers for steel and agricultural products. The task of lowering tariffs and non-tariff barriers for agriculture is especially politically costly for the Indian government, given that 46 percent of the workforce is involved in agriculture. While still willing to negotiate, Indian officials have signaled their preference for a good deal that puts national interest first rather than just a deal, which may defer discussions on tariffs for key industries and constituencies to a future round of negotiations. Washington and New Delhi's mutual economic dependence on China presents yet another opportunity for collaboration in national interest. The U.S. and India are reliant on China for a variety of goods, ranging from steel and rare earths to solar cells and pharmaceutical inputs, which are vital for commercial industry as well as national security needs. Recent episodes, including China's export ban on rare earths, have highlighted just how vulnerable their respective economies are to Chinese economic coercion. This dependence is holding back the U.S.-India economic partnership, and while reducing tariffs and other trade barriers is an important step, addressing the dragon in the room can cement this relationship as 'the defining partnership of the 21st century.' To this end, policymakers must consider deepening cooperation in three core pillars of economic security — securing supply chains, building resilience against foreign economic coercion, and building an allied ecosystem for advanced technologies — to enhance the value of a trade deal and address common security concerns. Collaboration on supply chains should include sectors critical to economic and national security, and where there is a clear dependence on China. Obvious candidates include pharmaceuticals and critical minerals, where China either manufactures a large proportion of inputs or possesses significant reserves and processing capacity. India is a key supplier of pharmaceutical products to the U.S. but is reliant on China for key starting materials. While India has already introduced incentives to onshore the production of inputs, there is space to coordinate industrial policy with the U.S. to fund the co-production of key starting materials and active pharmaceutical ingredients, or establish a strategic pharmaceutical ingredient reserve. Similarly, India's vast critical mineral reserves (rare earths, cobalt, and graphite) and push for domestic production could provide an opportunity for the U.S. to fund and transfer technology for refining projects in exchange for security of supply agreements. Building resilience against Chinese economic coercion also includes anticipating and mitigating the risk of Chinese capital in domestic markets while simultaneously filling the gap through bilateral investment. While both countries have robust investment screening frameworks, India has pursued a significantly more restrictive policy toward Chinese FDI since a border clash in 2020. Attitudes in Delhi may be softening, however, as India needs foreign investment to build out domestic manufacturing. To court investments from the U.S., Indian officials must consider expanding the automatic route for FDI approvals to more sectors, including raising the 74 percent cap for the burgeoning defense industry, and reducing tax rates for U.S. firms investing in target sectors and regions. Although FDI from India pales in comparison to that from China ($4.6 billion vs $28 billion in 2023), Washington should include Indian investment into a proposed CFIUS fast track to ensure it capitalizes on the growth of the world's fourth-largest economy. To win the global technology race, the U.S. must also look to India, among other allies, to manufacture and adopt advanced technologies. Capturing the market of the world's most populous country, after all, is perhaps the only way to achieve global adoption of tech platforms like AI and quantum based on U.S. IP. The above-mentioned reforms are key to increasing investment and developing secure supply chains, but the core problem of technology and knowledge transfer remains. The scrapping of the 'AI Diffusion Rule' is a step forward in increasing access to advanced chips among partners like India and Singapore, and the Trump administration should prioritize such countries in negotiations relaxing export controls for advanced tech. Given that Washington will be rightfully concerned about the flow of these chips to Russia and Iran, New Delhi should consider increasing resources to the Directorate General of Foreign Trade and customs authorities to better enforce the SCOMET (special chemicals, organisms, materials, equipment, and technologies) list and implementing contractual solutions that impose liabilities on exporters shipping to Russia or Iran. While the U.S. and India often clash on tariffs and market access, a broader trade agreement including concrete provisions for cooperation on key supply chains, foreign investment, and advanced technologies may help them move past enduring pain points and more effectively counter China's coercive practices.
2 hours ago
Yen Tumbles to 2-Week Low over Trump Tariff Letter
Tokyo, July 8 (Jiji Press)--The yen tumbled to a two-week low around 146.50 per dollar on Tuesday after U.S. President Donald Trump said in a letter to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba that his country will impose a 25 pct reciprocal tariff on goods from Japan, higher than the 24 pct he announced in April. At 5 p.m., the dollar stood at 146.03-04 yen, up from 145.19-20 yen at the same time Monday. The euro was at 1.1759-1760 dollars, up from 1.1744-1745 dollars, and at 171.73-75 yen, up from 170.52-53 yen. Trump's tariff letter prompted yen selling, as speculation grew that Japan's trade deficit could expand, and that an economic slowdown could make it difficult for the Bank of Japan to raise interest rates, market sources said. The Japanese currency was also dampened against the dollar by a rise in U.S. Treasury yields amid concerns that Trump's tariffs could rekindle inflation in the United States, they said. On the Tokyo Stock Exchange, the benchmark Nikkei 225 average closed at 39,688.81, up 101.13 points from Monday's closing, with export-oriented stocks supported by the weaker yen. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.]
NHK
2 hours ago
- NHK
Japan, US tariff negotiators agree on continuing talks
The Japanese government says tariff negotiators from Japan and the United States have agreed to continue vigorous consultations between the two countries. Economic Revitalization Minister Akazawa Ryosei had a telephone conversation with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick for about 40 minutes on Tuesday afternoon Japan time. The talks come after US President Donald Trump said Washington will start charging Japan a 25 percent tariff from August 1. In a news conference after the talks, Akazawa said their discussion made some progress. He said that he expressed regret that the rate was hiked in the newly-announced tariff even though it is one percentage point, and the series of other US tariff measures are also regrettable. Akazawa noted that he will hold further talks with the US side by visiting the country or over the telephone as needed. He added that Japanese officials will negotiate as much as possible through various channels and "vigorously hold serious and sincere talks" to reach an agreement that benefits both Japan and the US. The Japanese minister said he has no sense of reassurance at all about the outlook. He said negotiations with the US have been held as far as possible for Japan's national interests, but President Trump is tough. Akazawa added that the US president achieved big success as a businessman and he is very numerate. Akazawa was asked about the possibility that Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru and Trump will have talks to break the impasse. He replied that this negotiation is not at all easy for the leaders to achieve a breakthrough by having a brief discussion. He said it is necessary to negotiate on details at the working level and create a package that the leaders can agree on.
