logo
State withheld records in Rio Arriba sheriff death investigation

State withheld records in Rio Arriba sheriff death investigation

Yahoo08-06-2025
The New Mexico Department of Public Safety took 42 days — far beyond the 15 days allowed by state statute — to release information this week about the mysterious April death of Rio Arriba County Sheriff Billy Merrifield.
Forensic pathologists reported May 15 that Merrifield's Easter morning death was due to the toxic effects of fentanyl and alcohol. Other questions remained unanswered, including whether the sheriff knowingly consumed fentanyl and where he may have obtained it.
In the days after Merrifield was found dead in his patrol car April 20, The New Mexican filed a public records request for related police reports and other information.
At first, the Department of Public Safety refused to release additional records. Next, it described the request as burdensome, buying the agency more time. After additional complaints from The New Mexican, it released a batch of investigative reports Thursday evening — 42 days after receiving the request. Those records — 105 pages of reports, photos and other documents — show the agency's investigators have not yet determined how Merrifield ingested the fatal dose of fentanyl that caused his death, along with alcohol.
The recent secrecy over Merrifield's death reflects a pattern of slow-walked disclosure of public records like state police reports and lapel camera footage, shielding public information on homicides, crashes, police shootings around the state and other public safety-related incidents.
The department's initial decision to withhold police reports from the investigation — as well as documents in another unrelated case — appears to have potentially run afoul of state public records laws and a Supreme Court ruling in recent years.
Department of Public Safety spokesperson Herman Lovato declined to respond to some questions about the matter in an email Friday, but he wrote each request through the New Mexico Inspection of Public Records Act 'is addressed individually' by department staff.
'If it involves an active or ongoing investigation, records that are complete will be produced if not subject to an exception, even on an active or ongoing investigation,' Lovato wrote. 'If the records have not been completed because of an active or ongoing investigation, they may be temporarily withheld until completed.'
He wrote the department's process 'aligns with New Mexico Supreme Court precedent and the requirements of IPRA.'
However, the department's written reason for denying a recent request for state police reports tied to Merrifield's death did not appear consistent with the process Lovato described.
In response to a request from The New Mexican seeking reports on Merrifield's death, a staff member at the department's records division wrote in early May, 'this is still a active/on going investigation and I was not given the approval to release the documents as they are still being [processed].'
About two weeks later, the department's reasoning changed, with a different staffer writing the request for reports was 'overburdensome.'
The records were finally released Thursday after The New Mexican submitted a complaint concerning an alleged violation of the Inspection of Public Records Act to the Department of Justice — and after sending emailed questions about the records request to officials that day.
Advocate: Court ruling 'clear'
Christine Barber, the executive director of New Mexico Foundation for Open Government, said in an interview the department's initial denial of the request appeared to potentially violate a state Supreme Court ruling a few years ago on the specific topic of records in active law enforcement investigations.
The ruling came as a result of a lawsuit brought by Andrew Jones against the Department of Public Safety, which had denied his request for records related to a state police investigation into the fatal shooting of his brother by Albuquerque police officers.
Barber said the 2020 ruling was clear, holding that 'the status of a criminal investigation as 'ongoing' does not serve to exempt public records related to the investigation from inspection under [the Inspection of Public Records Act].'
'Sometimes government agencies need to be reminded of the law,' Barber said, noting past litigation between the Foundation for Open Government and the Department of Public Safety. In a 2007 settlement between the department, the foundation and several news publications — including The New Mexican — department officials agreed to provide records like incident reports within the 15-day timeline required by state law.
An attorney for the government transparency group said at least one other journalist reported receiving a similar response recently when requesting the reports on Merrifield's death, but she added she did not recall other recent instances of state law enforcement agencies explicitly citing an open investigation as the reason for denying or delaying the production of records.
The Department of Public Safety cited the Supreme Court's decision in a letter denying a different request from The New Mexican earlier this year for an incident report in a different death investigation.
In the letter, staff acknowledged the court ruling stated exemptions to public records law 'cannot be interpreted so broadly as to withhold records simply due to the existence of an ongoing investigation.' The letter described exemptions that allow for redactions of parts of records, like names of potential subjects and informants, and ultimately stated the agency would withhold the entire report.
'Once the investigation is closed and no longer subject to these legal restrictions, certain records may become available for inspection,' the letter states.
Weeks to fulfill requests
While records are not usually withheld outright by the Department of Public Safety, it often takes several months to disclose reports from an investigation.
In the past two years, The New Mexican has submitted at least 24 requests to the Department of Public Safety seeking reports or other documents such as the agency's written policies, lists of employees or financial data — not including requests for records like police lapel camera footage.
The department provided the requested records in an average timeframe of more than two months per request. A little more than half of the requests for police reports or other documents were deemed 'broad' or 'burdensome' by the department's record staff, which allows for delays longer than 15 days. As of Friday, records have not been provided in response to two of the requests.
Department of Justice spokesperson Lauren Rodriguez said attorneys from the division that investigate public records complaints had contacted the Department of Public Safety earlier this week regarding the complaint from The New Mexican.
The investigators — after being assigned a complaint — usually contact the government agency in question to obtain more information, she said. They are trying to determine if there is actually noncompliance as well as whether the agency's staff knew their actions were out of compliance and whether they acted purposely in denying or delaying a records request.
Apart from the complaint submitted against the Department of Public Safety by The New Mexican, the department has been the subject of one other records-related complaint so far this year to the Department of Justice, Rodriguez said.
Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's office did not respond to an email seeking comment on the Department of Public Safety's practices concerning the release of public records.
Lujan Grisham stood behind the department when asked about the issue last year, with a spokesperson writing the governor 'defers to law enforcement authorities to determine when the release of information is appropriate based on the status of ongoing investigations, notification of next of kin, etc.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man Admits to Beheading Mom With Axe, Fleeing Scene With Head—Prosecutors
Man Admits to Beheading Mom With Axe, Fleeing Scene With Head—Prosecutors

Newsweek

time4 days ago

  • Newsweek

Man Admits to Beheading Mom With Axe, Fleeing Scene With Head—Prosecutors

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A 31-year-old man in the Netherlands, identified only as Jesse R., confessed to decapitating his mother with an axe before fleeing with her head in an Ikea bag, prosecutors in the case said, according to local media reports. Newsweek reached out to the man's defense attorney via email for comment on Monday. The Context The case of the man accused of the beheading in Hellevoetsluis and identified only as Jesse R. in Dutch media reports, has shocked residents and reignited debate in the Netherlands concerning mental health oversight and legal responsibility in violent crimes. The brutal nature of the event and the suspect's mental health history, coupled with his interactions with psychiatric professionals, have drawn scrutiny from local officials and concerned citizens. What To Know Prosecutors told a Dordrecht court on Monday that Jesse R. confessed to beheading his mother, Alia, with an axe at her home in Hellevoetsluis, just before Easter. Alia's partner discovered her body and saw Jesse R. fleeing, prompting police to apprehend him shortly afterward, Dutch News reported. Police found Alia's head and the axe in a bag in her car, which Jesse R. was driving when arrested on the A4 motorway, according to the NL Times news site. Prosecutors said in court that Jesse R. was likely experiencing a psychotic episode at the time of the killing. He had posted on social media about his bipolar disorder and past psychosis treatment. He also had contact with a psychiatric nurse before the slaying. A man's hand gripping a steel axe by its wooden handle. A man's hand gripping a steel axe by its wooden handle. Photo by H. Armstrong Roberts/ClassicStock/Getty Images Jesse R. is scheduled for psychiatric assessment at the Pieter Baan Centre, although the evaluation is delayed until at least November due to waiting lists. Defense attorney Job Knoester has requested mental health professionals who interacted with Jesse R. before the incident be called as witnesses. Residents of Hellevoetsluis previously expressed their horror and disbelief at the killing. Mayor Arno Scheepers in April described the event shortly after it occurred as shocking and noted how the community is grappling with the tragedy, the NL Times reported. The victim, Alia, was described by neighbors as a "very sweet woman" and devoted mother of two. Jesse R. had previously lived in Diemen and Amsterdam, and was not residing with his mother at the time, but was visiting her for Easter, according to the local media reports. Police and prosecutors confirmed that Jesse R. remains in custody pending further investigation, with a pro forma hearing scheduled for October 21. What People Are Saying Knoester, while in court on Monday: "It's slowly starting to sink in what he's done, and he finds it horrific," according to Dutch News. Knoester, to the Netherlands' Brabants Dagblad newspaper: "He's not just the perpetrator, he's also a bereaved son. He has to live with this. He's receiving help on the psychiatric ward of the detention center in Scheveningen. When I try to imagine what he must be feeling, I get chills." Scheepers in April said he and the municipality were "shocked and in disbelief about the horrific event," according to NL Times. What Happens Next Jesse R. will remain in custody at the Pieter Baan Centre while awaiting psychiatric assessment, which is not expected to begin until at least November due to high demand. The court has scheduled the next pro forma hearing for October 21. Investigators continue reviewing the adequacy of his prior mental health care and will call a mental health worker as a witness to further clarify Jesse R.'s state of mind at the time of the killing.

82-year-old Le Sueur man killed in UTV crash, sheriff says
82-year-old Le Sueur man killed in UTV crash, sheriff says

CBS News

time23-07-2025

  • CBS News

82-year-old Le Sueur man killed in UTV crash, sheriff says

An 82-year-old man was killed in a UTV crash on Tuesday afternoon in southern Minnesota. Le Sueur County Sheriff Brett Mason says it happened at about 4 p.m. in Sharon Township, located about 60 miles southwest of Minneapolis. The victim, from Le Sueur, was driving eastbound on Le Sueur Creek Road in a side-by-side when he collided with a sedan traveling southbound on County Road 15. The man was "ejected from the side-by-side," Mason said, and was pronounced dead at the scene by first responders. The driver of the sedan, a 16-year-old girl, was not hurt in the crash. Mason says his office is still investigating with the assistance of the Minnesota State Patrol. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety says as of Tuesday, there have been 184 traffic deaths in the state.

Sri Lanka Catholics seek prosecution of sacked spy chief
Sri Lanka Catholics seek prosecution of sacked spy chief

Yahoo

time21-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Sri Lanka Catholics seek prosecution of sacked spy chief

Sri Lanka's Catholic Church on Monday demanded the criminal prosecution of the intelligence chief who was sacked for failing to prevent the 2019 Easter bombings that killed 279 people, including 45 foreigners. Church spokesman Cyril Gamini Fernando said they welcomed the dismissal days ago of Nilantha Jayawardena, who was head of the State Intelligence Service (SIS) when jihadist suicide bombers attacked three churches and three hotels. "This (sacking) is for the negligence part of it, but we want the authorities to investigate Jayawardena's role in the attack itself," Fernando told reporters in Colombo. "We want a criminal prosecution." He said evidence presented before several courts and commissions of inquiry indicated that the SIS, under Jayawardena, had attempted to cover up the actions of the jihadists in the lead-up to the April 21 attacks. "Six years on, we are still looking for answers. We want to know the truth about who was behind the attack," he said. Jayawardena, 52, was dismissed Saturday from the police department, where he was the second most senior officer in charge of administration and on track to become the next inspector-general. Court proceedings have revealed that both military and police intelligence units were closely linked to the home-grown jihadists, and some had even been on the payroll of the intelligence services. The current ruling party, led by Anura Kumara Dissanayake, had while in opposition accused Gotabaya Rajapaksa of orchestrating the attacks to win the 2019 presidential election. The once powerful Rajapaksa family has denied the allegations. The attacks occurred despite a warning from an intelligence agency in neighbouring India, which alerted Jayawardena 17 days before the devastating bombings. He was found guilty of ignoring a series of alerts. More than 500 people were also wounded in the bombings, Sri Lanka's worst jihadist attack on civilians. Jayawardena was removed from his position as SIS chief in December 2019 but was later promoted to deputy head of the police force, overseeing administration. However, he was placed on compulsory leave a year ago, pending the disciplinary inquiry, following repeated judicial orders to take action against him. aj/bb/rsc Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store