WES STREETING: 'NHS tech upgrade will be a revolution for cancer care'
Cancer 360, a new data system to be rolled out across the health service after a successful trial, will slash treatment delays and waiting times for millions in the next decade.
And it will ensure early warning signs aren't missed.
I know from personal experience how important a quick diagnosis is, and there is no doubt the NHS saved my own life,' the Health Secretary wrote for the Sunday Mirror.
'I went into A&E with kidney stones, but thanks to a meticulous doctor, I came out with a cancer diagnosis. That is the best of the NHS in action – and that's why I am taking the best of the NHS to the rest of the NHS.'
The system will bring every cancer patient's data - including test results and details of appointments and treatments together, so clinicians only have to go to one place to find key information.
It'll mean medical professionals can prioritise those most in need and see patients quicker.
A pilot scheme at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London saw impressive results from the new tool.
In 2022, some 71.5% of patients got a diagnosis within 28 days - but that increased to 84.7% after the tool was introduced.
Technology Secretary, Peter Kyle said: 'I've seen first-hand the stress and heartbreak that cancer causes in my own family.
'Dependent on archaic pen-and-paper systems, life-saving diagnostics appointments hung on whether a post-it note lost its stick, or a piece of paper went missing. That put lives at risk, and with the technology we have today, there's no reason for any part of our healthcare service to run in such a way.
'Simply by keeping accurate records, the technology we are putting to work today will cut waiting times and save lives, delivering on our Plan for Change. That way, people can once again trust that their local hospital has the tools it needs to focus on what matters – treating their loved ones and keeping families together for longer.'
Dr Rubina Ahmed, Deputy Director of Research, Policy and Services at Blood Cancer UK, said: 'The 280,000 people living with or in remission from blood cancer in the UK should be readily able to access the care they need, whether they have leukaemia, lymphoma, myeloma or another type of blood cancer.
'To make the best clinical decision for each blood cancer patient, clinicians must be able to see all the information they need at the point of consultation, whatever the setting.
'As everything is recorded electronically, it is often surprising to people with blood cancer that this information is not already readily available. Yet due to system failures, this has frequently been the case, resulting in a huge waste of healthcare professionals' time, unanswered questions for people with blood cancer and shocking delays in care.
'As highlighted in our UK Blood Cancer Action Plan we welcome the Government's ambition to improve this issue and the much-needed investment to modernise NHS systems. We'll be watching the roll out of this tool and wider investment closely, to ensure people with blood cancer aren't left behind.'
'I know from personal experience how important a quick diagnosis is'
By WES STREETING, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
WHEN I came into office, I said the NHS was broken. A decade of underinvestment left staff frustrated and patients waiting.
But I also said it wasn't beaten, and Lord Ara Darzi agreed in his investigation into the NHS that what it needed was both investment and reform to fix it.
The Chancellor delivered that record investment at the Budget last autumn, making the difficult but necessary choices to put in £26 billion extra to improve care and deliver an additional 40,000 appointments a week.
I firmly believe that technology will drive the reform needed to match that investment. We are in the foothills of a scientific and technological revolution that is changing the world around us. And I want Britain to be leading this new era.
That's why I'm announcing the roll-out of pioneering new tech across our NHS that will revolutionise cancer diagnosis for staff and patients, as we turn the NHS from a service run on fax machines to one able to share data, partner with innovators, and adopt new technologies at scale.
Too often our archaic IT can't even get the basics right, with medics painstakingly scouring a complex labyrinth of databases, spreadsheets, and even emails to find key data and information about a cancer patient. That data is crucial to diagnose people quickly, spot patients in need of urgent attention, and provide lifesaving treatment.
That's why we're using funding from the Budget to roll out the ground-breaking new system Cancer 360. This will bring every cancer patient's data together – so medical teams have everything they need in one place.
Piloted at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London, the tool led to outstanding results. The percentage of patients receiving a diagnosis within 28 days rose dramatically from 71.5% in November 2022 to 84.7% in November 2024.
It will help track a patient's progress, avoid devastating diagnosis delays, and even produce personalised treatment plans. Most importantly, it will mean early warning signs aren't missed so cancer patients don't fall through the cracks.
I know from personal experience how important a quick diagnosis is, and there is no doubt the NHS saved my own life. I went into A&E with kidney stones, but thanks to a meticulous doctor, I came out with a cancer diagnosis. That is the best of the NHS in action – and that's why I am taking the best of the NHS to the rest of the NHS.
Through our Plan for Change and the difficult but important decisions taken at the Budget, we are delivering this seismic shift in care from analogue to digital.
It's a long road, but we will reform the NHS to fix it and make it fit for the future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Medical regulator urged to rule that NHS strikes are 'incompatible' with doctors' duty to protect patients
The medical regulator is being urged to rule that NHS strikes are 'incompatible' with doctors' duty to protect patients. The General Medical Council (GMC) is facing calls to review its guidelines for practitioners following the latest walkout by resident doctors. Amid an ongoing row over pay, resident doctors - formerly known as junior doctors - have just staged a five-day strike to bring huge disruption to the NHS in England. The British Medical Association (BMA), the union behind the walkout, has refused to rule out further strikes if the Government doesn't meet their demands. The GMC is now under pressure to take 'immediate' steps to prevent a further walkout. In a letter to the regulator, Tory shadow health secretary Stuart Andrew has told the GMC to review its 'Good Medical Practice', which doctors are expected to abide by. This sets out the principles, values and standards expected of all doctors, and includes 'making the care of patients the first concern'. The Conservatives want the GMC to look again at the guidelines with 'a view to make striking incompatible with Good Medical Practice'. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has already pledged to ban doctors' strikes if the Conservatives return to power. She vowed to introduce legislation to block medics from taking widespread industrial action, placing the same restrictions on them that apply to police officers and soldiers. The Tory plans would see minimum service level requirements - which were brought in for some sectors by the previous government and scrapped by Labour - introduced across the health service. But, in his letter to GMC chief executive Charlie Massey, Mr Andrew said that 'action is needed now' to protect NHS patients while legislative measures are formulated. He wrote: 'Our proposals require new primary legislation, particularly relating to the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. 'If the Government will not make these changes, patients will be condemned to four more years of disruptive strikes. Conservatives believe that action is needed now. 'Given the reckless approach the BMA has taken, warning that the recent strikes may even cause harm to patients, we believe that in response the GMC must review Good Medical Practice with a view to make striking incompatible with Good Medical Practice. 'This would have the immediate effect of preventing further strikes while legislative measures were formulated and ensure patients and their safety remain at the core of Good Medical Practice. 'We hope that the GMC can stand with us in protecting the health of patients upholding the fundamental duty of care of the NHS.' A GMC spokesperson said: 'Doctors are legally entitled to take part in lawful industrial action, including strike action. 'During strike action, doctors' employers will have a vital role in planning and preparing for how patients will be cared for. 'They play an important part in maintaining the continuity of patient care to the highest possible standard. 'We expect any doctors choosing to take part in strike action to continue to follow the principles of our guidance, Good Medical Practice. 'It highlights the importance of doctors working collaboratively with the healthcare team to keep patients safe, staying within the limits of their competence.' But, in a letter to GMC chief executive Charlie Massey, shadow health secretary Stuart Andrew said 'action is needed now' to protect NHS patients while legislative measures are formulated Both the Labour Government and BMA have said they are prepared to continue negotiations with a view to avert further strike action. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said talks could lead to improvements in the working lives of resident doctors but he has repeatedly said there is no more money for pay. But BMA leaders have insisted that there must be some pay discussions during talks. The BMA has also launched a 'linked dispute' with the Government over a lack of places for doctors in training, which could lead to common ground during future talks. The BMA has branded the Tory pledge to ban doctors' strikes if they return to power as 'a desperate intervention from a party that spent nearly 15 years failing the NHS'. Dr Tom Dolphin, BMA chair of council, said: 'Threatening to ban strike action is not the right response for a modern democracy. 'Doctors aren't militants - they're professionals sounding the alarm about a health service in crisis. Silencing them won't fix the NHS. Listening to them might. 'Patients are having operations or appointments postponed every single day in the NHS due to understaffing and lack of beds, and undervaluing staff contributes to that. 'Doctors have a human right to strike just like everyone else. If something is wrong, you don't ban the canary in a coalmine from singing. 'Striking is always the last resort and should never be used lightly, but fundamentally the right to strike should always be there.' He added: 'The BMA and NHS England have in place an agreed national 'derogations' process whereby hospitals can request to have specific striking doctors return to work in the event of an unforeseen emergency or mass casualty event. 'That process is there day and night throughout industrial action, and we remain ready to respond to any emergency requests. 'However, we need to be clear that the purpose of this agreement is not to facilitate the continued delivery of non-urgent care.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Fit to leave, but can't: why families are being left powerless
If a person cannot consent to matters affecting their welfare, which includes decisions relating to care and whether they can be relocated to a care home, there can be significant legal issues. Unless there is an attorney appointed who can legally make the decisions on behalf of the adult, the only option may be to obtain a guardianship granted by a sheriff, which can be a costly and time-consuming process. It has been over 25 years since the ground-breaking Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act was passed, providing a legal framework for protecting adults who lack the capacity to make decisions for themselves. Yet there are still so many individuals without a Power of Attorney in place. One of the reasons often cited for this is the perceived complexity and timescale for getting a Power of Attorney. At present, the required registration process with the Office of the Public Guardian takes over 11 months to complete. In England, registration is eight to 10 weeks, marking a significant difference in the delivery of an incredibly important administrative service. In an emergency, registration can be expedited. However, individuals need to have signed a Power of Attorney before that happens, and they must have had mental capacity when they signed it. When a normal registration process takes nearly a year, it can discourage people from putting a vital safety net in place when they are still fit and able to do so. However, inaction can be dangerous. At the point that a Power of Attorney is actually needed, due to a sudden accident or change in circumstances, it can be too late because the individual's health has deteriorated beyond the point that they can competently sign it. Professor Wallace's comments show one of the potential effects with the strain it puts on NHS services, not to mention the possible distress it causes to families. Granting a Power of Attorney is a vital step to ensure financial and welfare needs are protected when individuals themselves cannot fully control matters. It should be something people do irrespective of age, especially if they have dependants. Putting a Power of Attorney in place should be simple. The preparation and signing of one is straightforward and if the registration process were quicker, it could make the whole process a lot more appealing and reduce the impact on the health service. Graeme Dickson is a Private Client Partner with Thorntons
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'I was told lump was a cosmetic issue - now I've had my chin rebuilt'
Bea Churchill, 23, had a small lump on her chin that was dismissed as a cosmetic issue - but it turned out she required facial reconstruction A university student diagnosed with a rare form of cancer, initially dismissed as a 'cosmetic issue', feels "like Frankenstein" after undergoing surgery to rebuild her chin using tissue from her leg. Bea Churchill, 23, was studying biochemistry when she first noticed a small lump on her chin in August 2022. She consulted a GP, who she claimed thought it was a harmless lipoma - a benign fatty lump - and put her on a year-long NHS waiting list for cosmetic removal. However, over the next year, the lump visibly grew and began to affect Bea's confidence - leading her family to shell out £2,000 for private surgery. But what was supposed to be a routine removal turned into a life-altering event when Bea was diagnosed with papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma - an extremely rare type of cancer. She has since undergone several surgeries, including a facial reconstruction using skin, fat and an artery from her thigh. The graft grows hair - resulting in leg hair sprouting from her chin. She is now fundraising for laser hair removal, which is expected to cost more than £300. Bea, who volunteers at a centre for adults with disabilities in Leatherhead, Surrey, said: "I do feel a bit like Frankenstein. I felt ugly, I felt really, really ugly. There's such a pressure on women to look pretty and it's really hard to not be that anymore." Bea first noticed the lump while studying at the University of East Anglia in August 2022. "I went to the GP and they said it was nothing - just a lipoma," she said. "They gave it an ultrasound and put me on a waiting list to get it cosmetically removed." However, the lump continued to grow despite her wait. "People would ask me at bars or events if I'd been in a fight or fallen over," she revealed. "I felt really insecure. I became a bit of a hermit." In November 2023, her family decided to pay £2,000 for private removal surgery as a birthday gift. "All my family put their money together. I was really grateful," she said. But during the procedure, the nurse noticed something unusual. "She said 'I have seen hundreds of lipomas and this is not a lipoma'," Bea recalled. "She said I could pay £300 more to have it tested and we all agreed we should." A month later, Bea received a cancer diagnosis and had to leave university, which she described as "absolutely devastating". Due to the rarity of the tumour, she said doctors were unsure of how to treat it. So, in May 2024, she underwent Mohs micrographic surgery to assess its depth. Her chin was removed and the bone left exposed for a month. Bea said: "So I had this massive great hole in my face. My chin was basically cut off at that point and my jaw bone was exposed. "It was pretty brutal. It was really gory seeing my own jaw bone." Then, on June 18, she underwent major surgery - lasting eight-and-a-half hours - using tissue and an artery from her thigh in a "free flap" procedure. Surgeons removed the remaining tumour, rebuilt her chin, and connected a thigh artery to her neck to keep the tissue alive. "They plugged the hole with the fat and skin and then connected the artery from my chin to feed it with blood to my neck," she said. "So I had a big incision on my thigh from just above the knee all the way to my groin. I had an incision around my neck where they connected the arteries together and I had my chin removed and the bone scraped again." While recovering, Bea was unaware she'd lost function in her leg due to overstretched femoral nerves and attempted to stand, but collapsed. The tumble caused internal bleeding and she was rushed back into emergency surgery. Despite the difficult recovery, Bea's body was cancer-free. "I was just completely elated to have survived this crazy surgery on my face and not have cancer in my body anymore," she said. But the free flap on her face was large and noticeable. "There's a picture of a dog that's been stung in the face by a bee and it really looked like that," she said. "I didn't really look in the mirror for a long time. "Before this I was really popular with people and I got hit on a lot. I played volleyball and was really sporty. "I did a cool degree and I was young and went clubbing so I felt really good about myself. Then all of sudden, in less than a year my face was maimed and I couldn't walk. I felt ugly." As she began recovering, Bea discovered a side effect of the flap - it started sprouting leg hair. She explained: "My free flap was taken from my thigh, so I have leg hair on the free flap on my chin. It grows hair like a leg would. "It gets goosebumps like a leg would, it reacts exactly how leg skin does, which is very different from face skin. It has a completely different colour from my face. "It's really bizarre. I do feel a bit like Frankenstein. People asked me about my face because they were curious about my chin and I've had lots of people be quite nasty to me in public since I've had this surgery." She's since undergone multiple operations to shrink the flap size and is now hoping to raise £300 for laser hair removal to rebuild her confidence. "It would go a long way into helping me feel a bit less monstrous," she said. "It would definitely improve my confidence. I think growing hair on the entirety of your chin is quite stark."
