
West Bank seeing largest displacement since 1967: U.N.
The United Nations said an Israeli military operation launched in the north of the occupied territory in January had displaced tens of thousands of people, raising concerns about possible "ethnic cleansing".
The military operation "has been the longest since ... the second Intifada", in the early 2000s, said Juliette Touma, spokeswoman for the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees.
"It is impacting several refugee camps in the area, and it is causing the largest population displacement of the Palestinians in the West Bank since 1967," she told reporters in Geneva via video from Jordan, referring to the six-day Arab-Israeli war that led to Israel's occupation of the West Bank.
The U.N. rights office meanwhile warned that mass forced displacement by an occupation force could amount to "ethnic cleansing".
Since Israel's military launched its operation "Iron Wall" in the north of the West Bank in January, rights office spokesman Thameen Al-Kheetan said that "about 30,000 Palestinians remain forcibly displaced".
Israeli security forces had during the same period issued demolition orders for about 1,400 homes in the northern West Bank, he said, describing the figures as "alarming".
He pointed out that Israeli demolitions had displaced 2,907 Palestinians across the West Bank since October 2023.
Another 2,400 Palestinians — nearly half of them children — had been displaced as a result of Israeli settler actions, he added, lamenting that the combined result was the "emptying large parts of the West Bank of Palestinians".
"Permanently displacing the civilian population within occupied territory amounts to unlawful transfer," Mr. Kheetan said, stressing that depending on the circumstances this could be "tantamount to ethnic cleansing" and could "amount to a crime against humanity".
Mr. Kheetan said 757 attacks by Israeli settlers had been recorded in the West Bank during the first half of the year, a 13 percent increase on the same period in 2024.
The attacks injured 96 Palestinians in the occupied territory in June alone, he told reporters, stressing that this was the highest monthly injury toll of Palestinians from settler attacks, "in over two decades".
Violence in the West Bank has surged since the October 2023 attack on Israel by Palestinian militant group Hamas triggered war in the Gaza Strip.
Since then, at least 964 Palestinians have been killed in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, according to the U.N.
During that same period, 53 Israelis have been killed in reported attacks by Palestinians or in armed clashes -- 35 of them in the West Bank and 18 in Israel.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Who are Syria's Druze, caught in sectarian clashes and Israeli strikes?
Israel has launched air strikes in southern Syria after days of intense clashes between Druze militias and Sunni Bedouin fighters in the province of Suweida, according to several media reports. Fighting broke out on July 13 following the reported abduction of a Druze merchant, triggering violence that has left at least 350 people dead, according to the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). On July 15, Israel said its military stepped in to protect the Druze community and eliminate pro-government forces accused of attacking them. The strikes initially targeted Syrian security forces and military vehicles in Suweida but expanded the following day to include the Ministry of Defence and army headquarters in Damascus. Syrian authorities have condemned the attacks. Who are the Druze, caught between Damascus and militias? The Druze community, who represent about 3 per cent of Syria's population, have historically operated local militias in southern regions, resisting integration into national forces. Since the fall of former president Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, many Druze factions have opposed the new government's attempts to assert authority over Suweida. Syria's current leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, has pledged to safeguard the country's minorities. However, the SOHR has documented incidents of government forces attacking Druze civilians, including reports of summary executions, fuelling mistrust between the community and Damascus, according to a BBC report. The current violence in Suweida is the first major unrest in the Druze-majority region since fighting between Druze militias and Syrian security forces in April and May. Combined with Israeli air strikes, the clashes highlight Syria's fragile security landscape following over a decade of civil conflict and the Islamist-led takeover of Damascus in December 2024. Israeli military escalation in Syria the largest since December 2024 The latest strikes are Israel's most significant military escalation in Syria since December 2024, when it carried out extensive operations across Syrian territory and seized a United Nations buffer zone in the Golan Heights. Israeli officials said their primary goal is to prevent Syrian army deployments near its northern border and establish a demilitarised zone in southern Syria, citing concerns over Islamist fighter presence near the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. In recent months, Israel has attempted to build relations with Syria's minority groups, specifically the Druze, Kurds, and Alawites. Israel's officials have depicted the state as a defender of minorities in the region amid Syria's on-going instability. On the contrary, some Druze leaders in Syria and Lebanon claim that Israel promotes sectarian divisions to achieve its own strategic ends in the region. As Ahmed al-Sharaa's government implements strategies to stabilise the country, sectarian standoffs and foreign involvement pose a threat to reconstruction and state-building. Analysts are of the opinion that Israel will likely have a suspicious view of Syria's new Islamist-aligned leadership and continue military actions against the Syrian government while promoting alliances with marginalised groups in southern Syria.


News18
17 minutes ago
- News18
'They'll Get US Nuked': Old Clip Of Alex Jones Blaming Israel For 9/11 Viral Amid Syria Strikes
Last Updated: As tensions rose in West Asia, following Israeli strikes on Syria, a clip by famous right-wing podcaster Alex Jones blaming Israel for 9/11 has gone viral. Alex Jones, right-wing commentator of the famous The Alex Jones Show, has gone viral once again for an old video from his podcast shot a day after the September 11 terror attacks. Back on September 12, 2001, during an early episode, Jones made controversial remarks blaming Israel for the 9/11 attacks. ' 'I don't support the Palestinians either. They're all hyped up and psychotic. But Israel's going to get us nuked, always backing them up like this. Israel calls the Palestinians goyim, or cattle, or dogs, or subhuman. They keep them on concentration camps. I've got video of them taking Palestinian women's tomatoes they grow, and breaking their water containers, and stealing. That's why you have this crap," the podcaster says in his rant. 🇺🇸🇮🇱 Alex Jones blamed Israel for 9/11 a day after it happened."We're gonna have nuclear war, because Israel likes to go around bombing everybody." — Censored Men (@CensoredMen) December 8, 2023 'And our children are going to die. We're going to get nuked because of this. Iran's got the nukes now, (and) Syria. We're going to have nuclear war because Israel likes to go around bombing everybody," Jones says in the now-viral clip. The clip appears to have resurfaced amid Israel's airstrikes on Syria. Israel has bombed Syrian government sites and other targets since Monday, saying it was seeking to defend the Druze minority after bloody sectarian clashes in southern Syria. — RiftTV (@TheRiftTV) April 10, 2025 Technically at war with Syria for decades, Israel has said it would not accept the presence of forces of the Islamist-led government in the country's south, which borders the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. 'I'm sorry. It's just the facts. I have been supportive of Israel for many years. When I found out what they do, shooting little Palestinian children and laughing, it's on video," he says. Jones made similar comments earlier this year while appearing on another podcast where he accused Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister, of dragging the US into war in West Asia. view comments First Published: July 17, 2025, 21:28 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


News18
27 minutes ago
- News18
India's Voice Is Strategic, Not Silent
To say India has 'lost its voice,' as some critics argue, is to misunderstand what that voice sounds like today. In moments of war, outrage is easy. Diplomacy is not. And in the shadow of the Gaza crisis, with bombs falling, civilians dying, and global opinion fracturing, the urge to take a moral stand can feel overwhelming, especially for a democracy like India, long seen as a voice for the voiceless. But to say India has 'lost its voice," as some critics argue, is to misunderstand what that voice sounds like today. It's not the voice of X (previously Twitter) diplomacy. It's not always loud. But it is deliberate, strategic, and deeply shaped by history. India was one of the earliest champions of the Palestinian cause. In 1974, it became the first non-Arab country to officially recognise the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO). By 1988, it had recognised the State of Palestine. This was not just foreign policy, it was an extension of India's own story: a nation born from anti-colonial struggle, standing in solidarity with others seeking the same. And while the headlines may focus on India's growing defence partnership with Israel, its support for Palestinian civilians has been steady and substantial. Since the conflict began, India has sent nearly 70 metric tonnes of humanitarian aid to Gaza, including 16.5 metric tonnes of life-saving medical supplies delivered in two separate tranches. This aid went directly to United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA) and the Palestinian Ministry of Health. That's not all. In 2024 alone, India disbursed $5 million to UNRWA, matching its contribution from the previous year. These funds support education, healthcare, and emergency services for Palestinian refugees, many of whom have nowhere else to turn. India's diplomatic engagements also underscore its commitment to the Palestinian cause. In September 2024, Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on the sidelines of the Summit of the Future in New York, expressing deep concern over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and reaffirming India's steadfast support for the Palestinian people India's policy is rooted in a clear position: firm support for a negotiated two-state solution. Since the Hamas–Israel war erupted in October 2023, the UN General Assembly has voted 13 times on resolutions related to Palestine. India voted for 10 of them. It abstained on just three. That's not indifference, it's discernment. India isn't choosing sides. It's choosing balance. In 1992, as the Cold War order gave way to new alliances and economic pragmatism, India established full diplomatic ties with Israel. India wasn't walking away from Palestine. It was stepping into a multipolar world, where relationships needed to reflect not just ideology, but national interest, security, and innovation. Israel offered what India urgently needed: advanced defence technology, agricultural innovation, counter-terror expertise. And for Israel, India became a key democratic partner in the Global South, vast, stable, and increasingly influential. Today, the relationship is multifaceted. Israel supplies India with drones, radar systems, and missile technology. Intelligence cooperation runs deep. For a country facing cross-border terrorism, complex insurgencies, and a volatile neighbourhood, this partnership is neither optional nor ideological, it is essential. India lives with the daily reality of terrorism. Its foreign policy can't be built on ideals alone, it must function in a world of asymmetric threats, complex alliances, and 1.4 billion people watching. And yet, India has not abandoned the Palestinian cause. India continues to support a two-state solution. It sends humanitarian aid to Gaza. It engages with both Israeli and Palestinian leadership. This is not fence-sitting. It's calibration. And it's exactly what a rising power is supposed to do. It has consistently called for restraint, civilian protection, and de-escalation. India's commitment to peace remains unchanged. What's evolved is its approach: quieter influence, strategic action, and diplomacy that prioritises outcomes over optics. And then there's Iran. India's ties with Tehran run deep. Strategically, Iran gives India access to Afghanistan and Central Asia through the Chabahar Port. Economically, Iran has long been a vital source of energy. India's engagement with Iran remains active and strategic, anchored by the Chabahar Port, a project critical to New Delhi's regional connectivity and geopolitical balancing. In May 2024, India and Iran signed a 10-year agreement granting India Ports Global Ltd. (IPGL) the rights to operate the Shahid Beheshti terminal. India committed $120 million in direct investment and extended a $250 million credit line to upgrade infrastructure. Jointly managed by IPGL (a JV between Jawaharlal Nehru and Kandla Port Trusts) and Iran's Aria Banader, Chabahar offers India a crucial alternative trade route to Afghanistan, Central Asia, and Russia bypassing Pakistan and countering China's influence through Gwadar Port and the Belt and Road Initiative. As tensions between Iran and Israel escalate, India is closely monitoring risks to both Chabahar and the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), a multimodal trade network linking India to Eurasia via Iran. These tensions are not abstract for India, they are tied to real infrastructure, energy flows, and diplomatic alignments. And they sharpened dramatically after October 7, when Hamas launched a brutal attack on Israel that triggered the ongoing war in Gaza. India responded immediately and unequivocally: it condemned Hamas's actions as terrorism. But condemnation did not mean abandonment. India's support for Palestinian self-determination, anchored in decades of principled diplomacy remains intact. To some, that duality may look like fence-sitting. In truth, it's strategic autonomy: a deliberate choice in a volatile world. This is not appeasement. It's agency. India has always believed in peace but not performatively. It acts. Quietly. It evacuated its citizens from Israel and Iran during the height of tensions. It sent aid to Gaza. And it remains one of the few countries that can still speak to all sides, Israel, Palestine, Iran, the United States, the Gulf. That, too, is power. The world is not binary. India knows this better than most. To expect India to echo talking points is to ignore the reality of a multipolar world. India doesn't follow anymore. It positions. Predictably, much of the moral outrage over India's foreign policy comes not from the global South or West, but from India's own opposition benches, especially the Congress Party, which now seems more committed to performative critique than constructive diplomacy. Whether it was the Balakot airstrikes, the abrogation of Article 370, or India's engagement with Israel, Congress's pattern has remained consistent: question first, assess later. From surgical strikes to border skirmishes, Congress's instinct has been reflexive doubt, especially when national interest clashes with its preferred narrative. At best, it's ideological rigidity. At worst, it's political self-sabotage. Either way, it does not align with India's 21st-century realities. After the October 7 Hamas attacks, India unequivocally condemned terrorism. Congress chose to frame this as a deviation from India's principled foreign policy, overlooking the fact that condemning terrorism and supporting Palestinian rights are not mutually exclusive. This tendency to politicise foreign policy choices, often in the face of cross-party consensus, undermines both credibility and coherence. Moreover, by portraying strategic partnerships as ideological compromises, the party risks disconnecting from the lived realities of a rising India, one that must engage with a multipolar world on its own terms. Foreign policy isn't theatre. It's triage. India today is balancing multiple priorities, deepening ties with Israel, managing energy dependencies with Iran, building strategic infrastructure in Chabahar, and remaining a voice for de-escalation in West Asia. That balancing act is fragile. It cannot afford to be derailed by outdated moral binaries or domestic political point-scoring. top videos View all In a world that's fracturing into camps, India is refusing to be boxed in. It is doing what serious nations do, preserving space to speak to all sides. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. About the Author Natasha Jha Bhaskar Natasha Jha Bhaskar is Executive Director at Newland Global Group, Australia's leading corporate advisory firm focused on strengthening India-Australia trade and investment ties. She is also the UN Women More tags : israel-gaza war Israel-Iran tensions Narendra Modi view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 23, 2025, 11:55 IST News opinion Opinion | India's Voice Is Strategic, Not Silent Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.