logo
Why the UK is lagging behind other countries on measles vaccinations

Why the UK is lagging behind other countries on measles vaccinations

Independent9 hours ago
The UK is the worst-performing G7 country for coverage of measles vaccines, as rates lag behind Europe, with experts warning declining health budgets and the spread of misinformation are putting children at risk.
Now, health officials in the UK have sounded the alarm over our waning vaccine coverage after a child with measles died in Liverpool.
On Monday, health secretary Wes Streeting said that the child's death shows the nation needs to 'redouble its efforts' to vaccinate more children and said improvements promised in the NHS's 10-year plan, such as giving parents access to digital health records, could help.
One expert told The Independent a multitude of issues have impacted the UK's measles vaccination rates, including declining public health budgets, lower access to GP services, and the increased circulation of misinformation on social media.
How does the UK compare to other G7 countries?
Data published by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the charity UNICEF estimates the UK has just 89 per cent coverage of the first measles vaccine in 2024 and 85 per cent coverage of the second dose.
This is down from 93 per cent a decade earlier and well below WHO target of 95 per cent, which it said is needed to effectively eliminate the spread of the disease in the community.
And we're lagging well behind our G& counterparts, with vaccine rates in Germany the highest (96 per cent), Italy and France (95 per cent) and Japan (94 per cent)/.
The organisations warned that the global rates of childhood vaccinations are falling, with 30 million children unvaccinated.
Rates of the first MMR vaccine across the UK have been in decline since 2014. An analysis by the Nuffield Trust of 2023-24 data shows England lags behind Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland on coverage of this vaccine.
Within England, London has the worst coverage by far, with just 81 per cent of children having received a first course by their second birthday. Data as of June 2025 shows that the capital accounted for 44 per cent of all measles cases.
Measles is a highly contagious, serious airborne disease caused by a virus that can lead to severe complications and death.
Dr Connor Bamford, Virologist, Queen's University Belfast, explained: 'Various conditions can make individuals more vulnerable to severe measles. This may include immunosuppressed individuals undergoing cancer treatment for example who, because of their condition, have lost immunity to the virus, even if they have been vaccinated."
He said: "We do see children and adults dying from measles in the UK and the last young person who died was reported in 2024. In 2023, we saw another child die of a disease called SSPE (subacute sclerosing panencephalitis), which is a fatal complication of measles that occurs years after an earlier infection. In 2023 two adults also died."
In the UK, immunisation against it is typically given as part of the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella.
According to the NHS, around 99 per cent of people who receive the MMR vaccine will be protected against measles and rubella. Meanwhile, around 88 per cent will be protected against mumps, and anyone who does get it after vaccination will experience milder symptoms.
What has impacted vaccine uptake in the UK?
According to the Nuffield Trust, uptake of the MMR vaccine decreased significantly following a now discredited article by Dr Andrew Wakefield in 1998, which linked MMR vaccination to autism. By 2003-04 uptake of the vaccine had dropped to 80 per cent.
However, coverage then improved and hit 93 per cent in 2013-14, before dropping again to 89 per cent in 2023-24.
A recent survey by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) suggested that overall, parents in the UK have a high level of confidence that vaccines work for children, with 87 per cent of those surveyed having agreed with this.
However, vaccine coverage for MMR and other key childhood vaccines has declined in recent years, and now health officials are urging parents to get their children vaccinated.
Speaking with The Independent, Adam Finn, Professor of Paediatrics at the University of Bristol, and a member of the government's Joint Vaccinations and Immunisations Committee, explained there were several factors, including the fact that there has been a general decline in immunisation over the past 15 years, which had initially been ignored.
He said: 'The public health authority officials favour the idea that it's because there's been a waning of resource in the health service to deliver the vaccine programme, so as primary care in particular has become more stretched the capacity to chase people up and go after the people that are otherwise not getting their act together has disappeared and that's resulted in the vulnerable edge getting worse and worse.'
'The competing hypothesis, which is quite convenient for the politicians, is that it's mad internet misinformation, and in a sense, people are somehow to blame for believing it and that it's not really a governmental problem, it's myth and legend, as it were.'
'My view is that those two things are not mutually exclusive.'
He said while there are a group of parents and people who avoid vaccination, there are another group who don't do it because they're not aware, or it's not high up on their priority list.
The professor of paediatrics also suggested that vaccines, such as MMR, were a victim of their own success, with the public no longer having a living memory of the severe and life-threatening impacts of the disease.
In the 1960s, people would've queued around the block to get their children immunised because they were afraid of them dying of those diseases where whereas now they've never heard of them, he said.
Possible solutions?
One key solution is enabling healthcare workers, such as GPs or health visitors, to have conversations around vaccines with parents, says Professor Finn.
'The government has come in with a mission to solve the problem of the under-resourced health service and has emphasised the way it wants to do that is to stop people from getting ill rather than build more hospitals.
'And one of the most obvious and effective, proven and countable ways of doing that is to ensure vaccine programmes are delivered, and so I think it should be a fairly open and closed argument that this is where Wes Streeting needs to put his money.'
Where access to GPs and health visitors is an issue, experts have suggested expanding the list of places where parents can get vaccines, and information about them could help.
Malcolm Harrison, Chief Executive of the Company Chemists' Association (CCA), has suggested pharmacies could assist.
He said last year, a pilot in the North West of England allowed children aged 5 to 11 who had missed doses to get the MMR vaccine at their local pharmacy for the first time.
Experts have also suggested that schools could be an important place for children's vaccines to be accessed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

£200 private health check gave incorrect blood pressure but I was denied a refund: SALLY SORTS IT
£200 private health check gave incorrect blood pressure but I was denied a refund: SALLY SORTS IT

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

£200 private health check gave incorrect blood pressure but I was denied a refund: SALLY SORTS IT

I had a private health assessment through Bluecrest Wellness in September. The results of my £199 check contained a blood pressure measurement, which was highlighted with a red flag and a comment that I was at an increased risk of heart disease and stroke. I thought I might have a stroke at any minute, so was shaking with shock for three hours until my daughter, a nurse, came to see me. She read the report and told me the result was impossible and that Bluecrest should have known this before sending it out to me. The top figure, the systolic measurement, was 140, and the bottom, the diastolic, was 185. The bottom figure can never be higher than the top figure. Readings taken at my GP surgery earlier in 2024 recorded 130 over 72. I expected a full refund because of the anxiety caused, but after going through the complaints process, I was offered only £50. Can you help? D.M., Ipswich. Sally Hamilton replies: If you'd tested your blood pressure on receipt of your scary results, I imagine it would likely have been through the roof. Not a calming prescription for a woman of 80 with a family history of heart attacks. I can understand how an off-the-scale figure gave you such a fright. Luckily, your daughter saw immediately there was a mistake and tried to reassure you. But I wondered why Bluecrest hadn't spotted the error just as quickly and intervened before the paperwork was sent. It wasn't just the BP error that upset you. You were unhappy with the complaints process that followed – and the way the company, of which you have been a customer for more than a decade, went silent when you said you weren't happy with the £50 payout. On my intervention, Bluecrest investigated swiftly. It admitted the health assessment specialist had mistakenly entered an incorrect number in your report but said this was corrected within three days and you were updated. However, it did confirm it had not responded to your last letter expressing discontent with the conclusion. This was because it considered your complaint closed and had informed you in that correspondence of your right to contact the Care Quality Commission should you be unhappy with the resolution. As a result of your experience, Bluecrest confirms it will now track letters that arrive after a complaint has been closed. It tells me your experience has led it to make improvements to its data input procedures. This includes making enhanced verification checks to stop results being submitted that fall outside expected and physiologically possible ranges, as happened with your BP readings. It is also refunding you the £199 cost of your assessment, offered you a further check free of charge should you want it, and donated £50 to the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, a charity you support. Openreach is bullying my 87-year-old mother In April, my 87-year-old mother received a request from Openreach to consent to a 'wayleave agreement' relating to the installation of fibre network cables on a route across her property to supply another customer. There was a lot of paperwork to review and she asked me to help. Three days after the first letter, she got a chasing letter saying it had heard nothing. A week later, a third arrived, this time mildly threatening, and a week after that a fourth advising they would take the matter to a tribunal and bemoaning the 'radio silence' on her part. My mother couldn't sleep with worry. I want an apology for the bullying approach. K.T., Norfolk. Sally Hamilton replies: Openreach is behind most of the country's phone and broadband infrastructure and is used by the likes of BT and Sky. When it needs to install, maintain or repair equipment on private land or inside a property such as a block of flats, it will often need permission from those not benefiting from the service. This comes in the form of wayleaves, which are written legal agreements. For individuals such as your mother, who have never come across these before, it can be bewildering. What might you be signing up to? Scam Watch Oasis fans who missed out on concert tickets are being warned about last minute scams. The band are currently on a sellout tour and will play Wembley, Manchester and Edinburgh, as well as shows overseas. Lloyds Bank says fans have lost £2 million buying fake Oasis tickets this year. The bank says 90 per cent of ticket purchase scams take place via fake ads and posts on social media. It warns fans only to buy tickets from official vendors – and never to send money to anyone you don't know and have only spoken to on social media. You were particularly aggrieved at the hectoring letters sent to your elderly mother and the lack of response as you tried to find out more from your sickbed. You called the number printed on the correspondence several times and only ever got an answer machine on which you left messages outlining the situation. You emailed, but also had no response. You only heard back from Openreach once you had emailed with the signed agreement on May 5, together with a formal letter of complaint about how the matter had been handled. Now it was Openreach's turn for radio silence. You have chased for a resolution to your complaint, but with no response. I agree it was over the top for Openreach to be sending four letters in a row with little appreciation that recipients might struggle to understand what was being asked of them – and who might need to ask for input from family or friends. In some situations, it can be sensible for a property owner to take legal advice before signing a wayleave agreement. Not many lawyers would move as quickly as Openreach was expecting your mother to. Openreach needed her permission because it involved her property being used to provide a service to another homeowner. Standard rates or recompense apply in these situations, which for your mother meant a one-off payment of about £184. But of more importance to her, and you, was an apology and a promise to improve the process. Once I contacted Openreach, it responded at lightning speed, sending a bunch of flowers, a note to say sorry and a promise of a gift card. An Openreach spokesperson says: 'This was a very unusual and unfortunate situation, and we're really sorry for causing such distress. We want to thank K.T. and her mother for their feedback and we've sent them a gesture of goodwill. We're also using their feedback to review and improve our wayleaves processes.' Straight to the point In December, I booked a two-night stay in a Liverpool apartment for June through But in March I was told the reservation was cancelled and my £183 would be returned to me. I have supplied all of the information has requested numerous times but my money has not been repaid. Last time I called, it could not find the reservation. D.E., via email. apologises for the delay and says a technical error deleted it from its system. It is getting confirmation of the charge from you and will then process the refund. *** I Bought a new car from a dealership for £52,000 in December and agreed to pay a £5,000 deposit along with £500 each month on finance. After driving just 200 miles, one of the wheels fell off while I was going over a speed bump. My breakdown cover engineer said the nuts must have been loose. I returned the car to the dealership and would like to either get a new one or get the money back I've paid so far. I'm still paying £500 a month. I've now had to put a deposit down on a new car. E.D., Leicester. You have been refunded the £6,500 you have so far spent on the vehicle and also been handed back the £7,157 you had splashed out on the deposit for your new car. Write to Sally Hamilton at Sally Sorts It, Money Mail, Northcliffe House, 2 Derry Street, London W8 5TT or email sally@ — include phone number, address and a note addressed to the offending organisation giving them permission to talk to Sally Hamilton. Please do not send original documents as we cannot take responsibility for them. No legal responsibility can be accepted by the Daily Mail for answers given.

Britain's Moore handed four-year ban after CAS upholds ITIA appeal
Britain's Moore handed four-year ban after CAS upholds ITIA appeal

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Britain's Moore handed four-year ban after CAS upholds ITIA appeal

July 15 (Reuters) - Britain's Tara Moore, who was previously cleared of an anti-doping rule violation, was handed a four-year ban on Tuesday after the Court of Arbitration for Sport upheld an appeal filed by the International Tennis Integrity Agency. Moore, Britain's former number one-ranked doubles player, was provisionally suspended in June 2022 due to the presence of prohibited anabolic steroids Nandrolone and boldenone. Moore said she had never knowingly taken a banned substance in her career and an independent tribunal determined that contaminated meat consumed by her in the days before sample collection was the source of the prohibited substance. Moore lost 19 months in the process before she was cleared of the ADRV but CAS upheld the ITIA's appeal against the first instance "No Fault or Negligence" ruling with respect to nandrolone. "After reviewing the scientific and legal evidence, the majority of the CAS Panel considered that the player did not succeed in proving that the concentration of nandrolone in her sample was consistent with the ingestion of contaminated meat," CAS said in a statement. "The panel concluded that Ms Moore failed to establish that the ADRV was not intentional. The appeal by the ITIA is therefore upheld and the decision rendered by the Independent Tribunal is set aside." Moore had previously said how she saw her reputation, ranking and livelihood "slowly trickling away" for 19 months during her initial suspension. The 32-year-old had also filed a cross-appeal at CAS "seeking to dismiss the ITIA appeal, dismiss the nandrolone result in the ADRV or alternatively confirm that she bears no fault or negligence". However, CAS said the cross-appeal was declared inadmissible and her four-year period of ineligibility would start from July 15, with credit for any provisional suspension that has already been served. "Our bar for appealing a first instance decision is high, and the decision is not taken lightly," ITIA CEO Karen Moorhouse said in a statement. "In this case, our independent scientific advice was that the player did not adequately explain the high level of nandrolone present in their sample. Today's ruling is consistent with this position."

Sick crimes of morgue rapist David Fuller ‘could be REPEATED unless bodies are better cared for'
Sick crimes of morgue rapist David Fuller ‘could be REPEATED unless bodies are better cared for'

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Sick crimes of morgue rapist David Fuller ‘could be REPEATED unless bodies are better cared for'

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE sickening crimes of morgue rapist David Fuller could be repeated unless bodies are better cared for, an inquiry has warned. Fuller, 68, was jailed for life in 2021 for sexually assaulting 101 female corpses while working as a maintenance engineer at NHS hospitals. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Necrophiliac killer David Fuller abused at least 100 deceased women and girls Credit: PA The inquiry has already ruled better management and security could have prevented his crimes at Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust in Kent. Now it has concluded regulation of the care of people after death is 'partial, ineffective and, in significant areas, completely absent'. Chairman Sir Jonathan Michael said: 'I have come to the conclusion that the current arrangements for the regulation and oversight of the care of people after death are partial, ineffective and, in significant areas, completely absent. 'I have concluded that it is entirely possible that such offences could be repeated, particularly in those sectors that lack any form of statutory regulation.' More than half a million British people die every year, with 568,613 in England and Wales in 2024. Sir Jonathan added he was concerned there are no industry standards for caring for dead people, and that anyone could become a funeral director without any qualifications. He said there is a 'cultural reluctance' to accept bodies can be abused. He went on: 'I am not confident arrangements currently in place satisfactorily protect the deceased from the risk of abuse.' 'I urge all those involved in the care of people after death to question whether they uphold the same standards as they would if that person were alive. 'The deceased are as vulnerable as the living and they are worthy of the same protection. 'The harm inflicted on David Fuller's victims and the hurt and trauma experienced by their families must never be repeated.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store