Agency baffled by decision to protect wapiti deer
Hunting and Fishing Minister James Meager announced on Monday the government was looking to make the wapiti deer a herd of special interest (HOSI).
It would also allow the introduced animal to live in Fiordland National Park.
A HOSI would improve herd and trophy health, better manage the impact of valued and other introduced species and continue to improve biodiversity, Mr Meager said.
Forest & Bird chief executive Nicola Toki said the agency was baffled by the prioritisation of government time and energy into helping 512 hunters shoot 86 deer in a national park.
"It's hard to put into words just how questionable this decision is."
Wapiti deer were an introduced feral species contributing to biodiversity damage in Fiordland National Park, she said.
The park forms part of the South West New Zealand World Heritage Area, which covers 2.6 million hectares — almost 10% of Aotearoa New Zealand's total land area.
It was recognised by Unesco as the largest and least modified area of New Zealand's natural ecosystems and the world's best intact modern representation of the ancient biota of Gondwana.
"Instead of trying to ensure Fiordland can welcome kākāpō back to their home, this government is instead looking at changing the law to let a North American deer species use the national park as a glorified vege patch — eating away at the very natural heritage that these sanctuaries have been legally designed to protect.
"What's next? A sanctuary for stoats?"
The plan was catering to a handful of vested interests at the expense of all New Zealanders, Ms Toki said.
Forest & Bird was appalled at the ongoing attacks on conservation land.
"This is merely the latest salvo in this government's war on nature.
"Is there nothing that this government won't do to our precious places, including conservation land and national parks?
"Mining on the Denniston Plateau, commercial fishing carve-outs in the Hauraki Gulf, selling off conservation land, and now game parks instead of national parks.
"New Zealanders are deeply concerned at this constant erosion of conservation in the very places that the government has been charged with protecting."
Forest & Bird was not anti-hunting," she said.
Hunting was part of the toolbox in tackling the out-of-control numbers of browsing animals that were causing significant damage to New Zealand's environment.
"Forest & Bird is supportive of the role the hunting community can and does play in helping to stem the tide of deer, pig and goat numbers.
"However, we are equally clear that putting precious time and taxpayer money into a [HOSI] is not a priority." — APL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
3 hours ago
- Newsroom
When it's worth waiting for democracy
Undemocratic and a breach of human rights. That's what most experts and officials think of the Government's proposed changes to the electoral law. Last week Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced a suite of changes around who can vote and how they do so. Those include more opportunity for digital enrolment methods and introduce automatic enrolment updates. But the big one is the moving of the enrolment deadline. At the last election, you could rock up on election day, enrol and cast your vote at the same time. But under this bill New Zealanders would have to enrol 13 days before election day to be eligible to vote. Goldsmith says it's to ensure a final election result is achieved sooner but he's being met with fierce critics, including from some within his own party who think the change takes things a step too far. While entities like the Ministry of Justice can, and do, offer advice in the form of policy papers and regulatory impact statements, electoral law expert Graeme Edgeler says the final decision falls on the shoulders of who New Zealanders have elected to represent them – the politicians. 'The Government and the MPs are the ones that are elected, so they get to make the policy calls and argue for them and the opposition, if they want to, gets to argue against them,' he says. Edgeler says the Ministry of Justice had its own suggestions for reducing the number of special votes, for example, automatic enrolment updates. 'So if you tell MSD, 'Here's my new address,' they'll tell the Electoral Commission, 'Hey, this person has updated their address with us'; the Electoral Commission will see person's already enrolled … and so your enrolment should be updated automatically now,' he says. The Government took this suggestion on board, but Edgeler says stopping enrolment 13 days before election day takes things a step further. Goldsmith told RNZ that people don't start coalition negotiations until they know the final outcome. But while it might be a political preference to wait until the special votes are counted, Edgeler says there's nothing legally stopping politicians from starting negotiations as soon as election day finishes. 'The John Key-led National government, when it was first elected, it had its coalition negotiations complete and John Key was sworn in as Prime Minister before the special votes were announced,' he says. Edgeler says that's because the initial count on election night made the result clear, and he thinks that was the case with the last election as well. 'Prime Minister Chris Hipkins came out on election night and said, 'We've lost, we're not going to be the next government,' he says. National, Act and NZ First could have started coalition negotiations that same day if they had wanted to, so Edgeler doesn't think special votes delaying coalition negotiations is a good enough reason to push the enrolment deadline out to 13 days. Newsroom's political editor Laura Walters confirms that waiting until the final result is announced before starting negotiations is the preference of some political leaders. 'Winston Peters, the New Zealand First Leader, he doesn't like to actually start negotiations proper, if you will, until they have that final result back,' she says. Walters says Peters told her advanced enrolment also benefited political parties. 'He said if people don't enrol ahead of that voting period how do they know who they're campaigning to, who their message should be pushed towards,' she says. David Seymour was more blunt in his support of the change, saying only 'dropkicks' enrol on election day. But Walters says those 'dropkicks' include quite a broad sector of society. 'What we do know from Electoral Commission data is that these people tend to be younger, we've also seen a higher proportion of Māori and Pasifika and Asian, but especially Māori,' she says. Walters adds renters and people who move around a lot and forget to update their enrolment details as people who might also be caught out by these changes. Exactly how many people will be impacted by this change is unclear, but if last election is anything to go by, Walters expects the number of people impacted is in the hundreds of thousands. 'There were 450,000 people who registered or enrolled to vote during that advanced voting period and 110,000 people did that on election day,' she says. It's these figures the Attorney-General Judith Collins referred to in her report examining whether or not there was enough justified reason behind the changes to the election law. She ruled that denying voters the political franchise is a 'heavy price' to pay just to have the election result a week or two sooner. Aside from the automatic enrolment update Walters says reaction to the bill has been mostly negative. 'Essentially people are saying nothing should ever be done to suppress or reduce the number of people who are able to vote. Anyone who is eligible to vote, eligible to register to vote, should be given every opportunity to exercise that right. 'Is this worth it? Should the Government and the Electoral Commission be bearing a little bit more administrative cost, a little bit more administrative burden, maybe waiting a little bit longer after the election to get the results, isn't that just the cost of democracy?'
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Greens Launch Petition Against Govt's Attack On Democracy
The Green Party has launched a petition calling on the Government to keep its hands off voting rights. 'We cannot allow this Government to rob New Zealanders of their democratic rights,' says the Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson. 'Make no mistake, the Government is making calculated changes to electoral law that erode the democratic rights of regular people and play into the hands of a wealthy few. 'By blocking voters and also opening the floodgates for anonymous donations from the rich, this Government is distorting the settings of our democracy in their favour. 'Who gets to vote and who gets to influence Parliament, decides the future of our country. These laws slam the door on everyday people while rolling out the red carpet for wealthy donors who bankroll parties in this Coalition Government. 'We are calling on the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice to drop this anti-democratic legislation. 'A Green Government will reverse these rollbacks: restoring same-day enrolment, reinstating voting rights for prisoners, cleaning up campaign finance and extending the vote to 16-year-olds. 'Democracy is for everyone, we should be expanding voting and participation, not restricting it,' says Marama Davidson.
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
'Shame on our country': Homelessness in Auckland raised with ministers
General vision of homelessness in Auckland central city. Photo: RNZ / Luke McPake An Auckland city missioner is meeting with government officials to talk about how to respond to rising homelessness . Outreach providers in the city say it now has 809 rough sleepers -- 90 percent more than last September. Helen Robinson said that's a crisis and she met with both the Minister and the Associate Minister for Housing recently. "The reality that we have, in our census, just under 113,000 people who are homeless is absolutely a crisis," she said. "This is a moral shame on our country and I know that there are many New Zealanders who long for a reality where everybody has a home and everybody has enough support." Robinson said in recent weeks, she has had meetings with both the Housing Minister Chris Bishop and Associate Minister of Housing Tama Potaka. "I requested a meeting to talk about the reality of street homelessness, the growth of that happening here in Auckland, the demand that was placing on services and the mission." Robinson said she met with Tama Potaka and expressed concern about the "direct relationship between emergency housing policies being tightened in September of last year and then a growth in street homelessness". She said two weeks ago, Chris Bishop contacted her. "He simply said to me, please tell me directly Helen, what is the reality that you're seeing in central city Auckland? So I took the opportunity," she said. "Since then we have had a face to face meeting with them with other a small group of other providers here in Auckland and also we are now working with both MSD [Ministry of Social Development] and the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development to actually see what is it that we can do in response to two particular areas." Associate Minister for Housing (Social Housing) Minister Tama Potaka. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Robinson said today she is meeting with officials from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development to continue those talks. "I am hopeful and look forward to a reality very soon where we can see a sig change at that em h end of homelessness here in New Zealand." She is asking for two changes. "A change to the emergency housing policy so that genuinely the genuine needs of people are met. And secondly, we're asking to contract with organisations like the mission so that we can provide that immediate access to shelter and appropriate support services for everybody that needs it." On Tuesday, Auckland Council's Community Committee voted to write to the government, asking officials to work with frontline agencies and make sure they are using up-to-date data when dealing with the issue. Community Committee chairperson, councillor Angela Dalton, told Checkpoint on Tuesday recent government policy changes had "made it harder for people to access emergency housing", as had declining people deemed to have contributed to their own lack of accommodation. "I think there's some policies that have been changed that show a lack of compassion because they are making assumptions that people are not trying hard enough." Talking to Morning Report on Wednesday, Associate Minister for Housing Tama Potaka said there were "a lot of contributing factors and causes" behind the rise in homelessness. "There's a number of things that this government is doing, whether or not it's the build program, making sure we build another 500 social homes in Auckland, Māori housing, Kainga Ora, 1500 new homes with chips, resetting the housing system. You would have heard us talking about granny flats and enabling those… and I look forward to the council actually supporting those actions." Potaka said he had "directed officials to identify some potential target interventions and understand the utilisation rates across transitional housing first, and other support programmes, to make sure we're getting the right utilisation of programmes". "We're also liaising with a lot of those providers like Strive, Auckland City Mission…and a whole range of others in Auckland," Potaka said. "No one I know wants to see Kiwis living without shelter, and we're very concerned with the level of rough sleeping and people in cars, and in tents and other things, including in Auckland."
