
Seminar in Madikeri revives Codava demand for geo-political autonomy
Referring to the Codavas as an 'animistic, mono-ethnic group with deep-rooted ties to their ancestral lands,' Hegde noted that the community met several criteria under both domestic law and international conventions on indigenous peoples, particularly the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). He argued for a 'holistic and historically informed assessment' of the Codavas' demand for Scheduled Tribe classification. CNC President N.U. Nachappa Kodava, who presided over the seminar, reiterated the community's call for a Codava Autonomous Region (CAR) within the Indian Union—akin to the Gorkha Hill Council or the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Councils.
'Our aspiration is not secession but dignity—through federal accommodation of our unique identity,' Nachappa said. Citing the dilution of Codava presence in Parliament since the 1967 election of C.M. Poonacha, the seminar highlighted how Kodagu's merger with Karnataka in 1956 eroded the political representation of the community. Hegde called for serious consideration of Constitutional mechanisms such as inclusion under the Fifth or Sixth Schedule or a new provision like Article 371 tailored for Kodagu.
'Asymmetric federalism is not alien to India—it is the framework by which we have protected many identities. Codavas, with their contributions to national defence and administration, deserve similar recognition,' he said. The seminar also addressed growing concerns over the application of general laws—such as the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions Act and the SARFAESI Act—which threaten to undermine Codava religious freedom and land tenure. Senior Karnataka High Court advocate M.T. Nanaiah, supporting the CNC's legal initiatives, emphasised the community's peaceful advocacy over decades. 'Codavas have not resorted to agitation. They have used democratic and legal means. That alone deserves attention from the Centre,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Parliament Monsoon Session Day 5 LIVE: Protests over Bihar SIR likely to continue in both Houses; Oppn MPs submit adjournment notices
Parliament Monsoon Session 2025 LIVE Updates: The protests over the special intensive revision (SIR) of the voter list in Bihar are likely to continue in both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha today, with Opposition MPs demanding that the Election Commission of India halt the exercise. The first four days of the Monsoon session were rocked by adjournment as Opposition members continued to chant slogans and carry placards inside on the floor, disrupting House proceedings. The Lok Sabha functioned for less than 12 minutes on Thursday before it was adjourned for the day at 2 pm. On Wednesday, Rajya Sabha proceedings were adjourned in less than a minute at 2 pm amid ruckus in the House. Extension President's rule in Manipur: Union Home Minister Amit Shah is likely to move a proposal in the Rajya Sabha today to extend President's Rule in Manipur for another six months. President's rule had been imposed in Manipur in February following months of clashes between the Meitei and Kuki communities. Manipur Chief Minister N Biren Singh stepped down from his position amid the conflict, primarily due to political pressure from other BJP MLAs from the Meitei community who were dissenting against his leadership. MPs push for Yashwant Varma's impeachment: 145 Lok Sabha members and 63 Opposition MPs in Rajya Sabha submitted a memorandum to remove Justice Yashwant Varma under Articles 124, 217, and 218 of the Constitution. Lok Sabha was adjourned till 4 pm, minutes after resuming at 2 pm as the Opposition continued to shout slogans. However, proceedings resume in Rajya Sabha. Monsoon session will comprise a total of 21 sittings, spread over 32 days, and will conclude on August 21. In between, both the Houses will be adjourned on August 12, 2025, and will reassemble on Monday, August 18, to facilitate Independence Day celebrations.


The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
‘Untainted' teachers and non-teaching staff left in the lurch, both in Kolkata and Delhi
Kolkata After holding protests in Kolkata for months, the 'untainted' teachers and non-teaching staff whose jobs were axed after the April 3 Supreme Court order headed to Delhi to make their grievances heard, but they were left in the lurch in both places. This came after the last date to fill up the form for the fresh recruitment process by West Bengal School Service Commission came to an end on July 21. A group of representatives went to Delhi's Ramlila Maidan and staged protests between July 23-25, to make their voices heard in the national capital. 150 members of the 'untainted' teachers and 15 'untainted' non-teaching staff participated in the protests. They met with Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta and Sarad Pawar, they also filed deputations with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Droupadi Murmu on Thursday (July 24, 2025). 'We were not part of the corruption, we rightfully got jobs in 2016, why do we have to do the process again? Many of the teachers also could not apply due to the new exam rules,' Shubhojit Das of 'Joggya Sikkhak Sikkhika Adhikar Mancha' (Deserving Teachers' Rights Forum) said. Mr Das also said that they have filed over 190 review petitions at the Supreme Court to reconsider their April 3 order, which cancelled the jobs of all candidates in the 2016 panel and restore the jobs of the 'untainted' candidates with dignity. Teachers had appealed at both Calcutta High Court and the Supreme Court against the new recruitment rules of the SSC where the eligibility criteria of the 2025 exams are different from 2016 making the process harder for older candidates. The appeals were rejected on both accounts. Around 13,000 of the 15,403 'untainted' teachers have filed out the fresh recruitment form. The teacher forum held a press conference on Thursday (July 24, 2025) at the Delhi Press Club. Academic community members warned that their 'retrenchment' was part of a 'design to systematically destroy government schooling.' 'Where will students in rural areas, in small towns, from poor and lower-middle-class backgrounds go?' questioned Mehboob Mondal, a member of JSSAM. 'Many among us are first-generation teachers teaching first-generation learners. Are we not entitled to jobs that we earned through massive hard work? Why are we being made scapegoats in the power tussle between the Central and State governments?' Academicians present at the press conference lent strong support to the cause. Economist Atul Sood of JNU said, 'The attack on government schools is part of the same policy that also imposes the rules of business owners on working people… These are anti-worker, anti-people policies.' Jamia Milia Islamia professor Debaditya Bhattacharya remarked, 'No one in the system cares because this goes well with the National Education Policy that prescribes closing down government schools and colleges.' Similar concerns were echoed by faculty from Delhi University and Ambedkar University, who warned that government schooling was being hollowed out through structural defunding and policy neglect. Meanwhile, the WBSSC on Thursday (July 24, 2025) announced September 7 and 14 as the dates for fresh recruitment exams for assistant teacher posts. A total of 35,726 posts in state-aided and sponsored schools are up for grabs in the new recruitment cycle and according to SSC officials over 5 lakh candidates have applied. 'How will we appear for exams when we have been on the roads demanding justice for so many months? They are trying all ways to make it harder for us,' Mr Das added. On April 17, the Supreme Court allowed 'untainted' candidates to continue in service until December 31, or until a fresh selection process is completed, but the same relaxation was not given to the non-teaching staff. The thousands of non-teaching staff have not received any salary since last April and on multiple occasions have said that their families are struggling to make ends meet.


Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
No plan or intention to reconsider or remove 'socialism' & 'secularism' from Preamble of the Constitution: Govt
Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal clarified in the Rajya Sabha that the government has no plans to remove 'socialism' and 'secularism' from the Constitution's Preamble, despite discussions in political circles. He emphasized that no formal legal or constitutional process has been initiated to alter these terms, which were added during the Emergency. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal on Thursday submitted a written reply in the Rajya Sabha saying there is no current plan or intention to reconsider or remove the words ' socialism ' and ' secularism ' from the Preamble of the Constitution inserted during the Emergency period The minister further said that the Centre has not initiated any formal legal or constitutional process to remove the two words from the Preamble of the however, said there may be discussions or debates in certain political circles. "No formal decision or proposal has been announced by the government" regarding amendments to these terms."The government's official stand is that there is no current plan or intention to reconsider or remove the words 'socialism' and 'secularism' from the Preamble of the Constitution. Any discussions regarding amendments to the Preamble would require thorough deliberation and broad consensus, but as of now, the government has not initiated any formal process to change these provisions," the minister further said that the Supreme Court had dismissed petitions challenging the 1976 amendment, which affirmed that Parliament's power to amend the Constitution extends to the Preamble, in November last court had observed that "socialism" in the Indian context signifies a welfare state and does not impede private sector growth, while "secularism" is integral to the Constitution's basic acknowledged that certain groups may be expressing opinions or advocating for reconsideration of these words."Such activities can create a public discourse or atmosphere around the issue, but this does not necessarily reflect the official stance or actions of the government," he month, former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar had said that the words inserted in the Preamble of the Constitution through an amendment during the Emergency era were a "festering wound", indicating support to the call by a top RSS leader for a review of the added terms 'secular' and 'socialist'.