More than 1,500 wildfires in decade must be ‘wake-up call', Tories say
Statistics from the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service released to the party under freedom of information legislation show 1,574 wildfires between 2015 and the end of May this year.
The Highlands suffered most, reporting 574 fires during that period, followed by 131 in the Western Isles. That compares with just seven in Renfrewshire and Clackmannanshire.
The statistics also show the first five months of 2025 have already seen more wildfires reported than in any other full year apart from 2017 and 2018.
It comes as a report from Scottish Land & Estates found two wildfires last year, at Carrbridge and Dava in the Highlands, were the biggest in Scotland's history.
Scottish Tory rural affairs spokesman Tim Eagle said it was 'disgraceful' it took rural affairs minister Jim Fairlie three weeks to visit areas impacted by recent blazes.
He said: 'These figures need to be an urgent wake-up call for ministers like him to change their approach.'
He welcomed that the Scottish Government's controls on muirburn had been delayed by a year, but urged the First Minister to ensure rural areas 'won't be harmed further by misguided legislation and that the SNP's actions do not increase the threat these communities are increasingly facing from wildfires'.
Muirburn – the controlled burning of vegetation on peatland – can help to limit wildfires, with the Scottish Government's new licensing scheme for the practice due to be in place this year.
Mr Eagle added: 'This alarming rise in wildfire numbers raises significant concern about the growing threat they are posing to rural Scotland in particular.
'Areas like the Highlands are already facing huge challenges but are now having to brace themselves every time there is a spell of good weather.
'The recent wildfires we saw across the Highlands had a devastating impact across our landscape.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh is going nowhere under Labour
Conservative councillor Neil Cuthbert Aberdeen just hosted the Tall Ships race, welcoming 400,000 visitors to Scotland's biggest tourism event this year. The major Union Square shopping centre broke footfall records with over 140,000 visitors during the weekend. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Did these massive crowds cause traffic chaos? Actually, no. Traffic Scotland reported drivers were 'getting a good run on the A90, A96 and the AWPR this afternoon' on Sunday. This contrasts sharply with Edinburgh, where large-scale events like Murrayfield concerts regularly cause bypass gridlock. The difference is simple: the north east has invested in proper trunk road infrastructure, particularly the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route (AWPR). The results speak for themselves. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon noted in 2019 that the AWPR shifted vehicles away from nose-to-tail traffic, reducing emissions and improving air quality for around 75,000 homes while creating better conditions for pedestrians and cyclists. You might expect Edinburgh's politicians to learn from this success. Think again. An artist's impression of the proposed Sheriffhall roundabout flyover At June's Transport Committee, I proposed a comprehensive motion requesting traffic impact assessment for the City Mobility Plan's proposed road closures. The A720 bypass already handles over 120,000 vehicles daily beyond capacity, with frequent congestion at key junctions. Recently both East Lothian and Midlothian councils have written to the Scottish Government expressing frustration over delays to the Sheriffhall roundabout improvements. My motion sought proper analysis of how city centre road closures planned by the council might worsen A720 congestion, especially during major events. Recent examples like Robbie Williams' concert at Murrayfield in May demonstrated the bypass's vulnerability to traffic displacement. I requested investigation of mitigation measures, enhanced public transport options and coordination with the Scottish Government on this trunk road responsibility. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The response? Labour's Convener moved to simply ignore the mounting evidence, with the Liberal Democrats, SNP and Greens ganging up to pretend these road problems don't exist. No evidence-based assessment. No consideration of network resilience. No coordination with neighbouring councils. Just 'do nothing'. This coalition of inaction leaves Edinburgh commuters facing daily chaos with no hope of improvement. While Aberdeen demonstrates how proper road investment creates benefits for everyone – drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists alike – Edinburgh's politicians prefer ideological posturing over practical solutions. Labour has run out of ideas for Edinburgh. Their approach of ignoring problems while they worsen shows complete indifference to residents' daily struggles. When these parties next seek your vote, perhaps the response should be 'No Action' in return.
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
Readers' Letters: Scots blessed with abundant natural resources, are more than capable of creating an enlightened future for their country
Any reference to the Scottish Enlightenment must be an anathema to Jill Stephenson (Letters 25 July) as so many Scots of the past have shaped global thinking today, among them Black, Boswell, Burnett, Burns, Cullen, Ferguson, Hume, Hutcheson, Hutton, Playfair, Reid, Smith and Stewart. Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Instead of expressing her gratitude for the high quality of the drinking water provided by Scottish Water and the relatively minimal impact of 'storm overflows' on our bathing waters in rivers and around our beaches, Ms Stephenson embarks on another misguided tirade of denigration of the Scottish Government and the SNP, with this time the performance of Scottish Water the source of her discontent. The facts (omitted by UK Environment Secretary, Steve Reed, in recent TV interviews) are that SEPA reports that 87 per cent of Scotland's rivers are in good health while only 15 per cent of England's rivers are rated at that level with The Rivers Trust reporting that not a single waterway in England is in overall good health. It is of course understood that with England being more densely populated there is a greater level of monitoring in England but most sensible people would rather be taking a shower, never mind drinking the water, in Glasgow or Edinburgh, rather than in London. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Perhaps Ms Stephenson should draw some positivity from Scottish history (as it seems that confidence in her fellow 'Scots' is not yet flowing through her veins) and recognise that the people of Scotland, blessed with Scotland's abundant natural resources, are more than capable of creating an enlightened future for their country. Stan Grodynski, Longniddry, East Lothian Tax tipping point The economy of the UK may have passed a tipping point where increased taxation results in reduced tax revenue and higher benefit payments. The result of the various increases in the cost of employing staff is becoming apparent. Many companies do not have the income to be able to retain so many semi-skilled staff. My suggestion is medium sized companies and charities together with those such as supermarkets that employ large numbers of semi-skilled staff have been forced to reduce head count by say 5%. Those no longer employed are no longer paying tax and newly draw benefits. Increasing the tax burden by whatever means will continue this avalanche effect reducing GDP progressively. Scotland may be able to avoid some of the effects of this economic deterioration. Firstly Scotland must stand up to the EU and the London Government by insisting on the same economics ties to the EU as northern Ireland has obtained. Shelve independence, this will eventually come anyway and concentrate on this objective with the grim determination needed to avoid an economic collapse. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Secondly encourage profitable companies to relocate to Scotland by building reasonably priced decent housing in areas with access to economically successful regions such as Glasgow and Edinburgh and offering this to key workers as has been done in the past. Reinforcing success will inevitably allow all areas to benefit from the overall rise in economic activity even if it is just concentrated in the central belt. Above all do not reinforce failure. I suggest governments must realise that they cannot continue to magic money out of thin air by endlessly increasing the tax burden on the people and companies which they represent. In the end they must spend within their means just as every member of our population is forced to. Ken Carew, Dumfries Trump Hypocrisy Gerald Edwards (Letters, 26 July) claims that, unlike Swinney and Starmer, Trump makes good on his election pledges. Ending the Ukraine War within 24 hours was pure hyperbole and failure to recognise that Putin was 'tapping me along' earlier was extremely bad judgement. Our leaders may be ailing but they are not arrogant and incompetent. As Trump landed in Scotland he may have reflected on his presbyterian upbringing from his Scottish mother. 'Blessed are the peacemakers..' (Matthew 5:9). Trump may believe he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize but his track record suggests otherwise. The Gaza War is so one sided the idea that Hamas could end it tomorrow as Mr Edwards claims, is without foundation, they are well beaten and have little influence. As your editorial states Trump is in a unique position to help Gaza by championing humanitarian aid. He could also end the war by withdrawing arms to Israel but allows Prime Minister Netanyahu to string him along with talk of ceasefires to save himself from facing trial for war crimes. Instead Trump is complicit in mass starvation and murder of innocent civilians at US/Israeli food points, some would argue ethnic cleansing. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As for releasing the Epstein files Trump continues to act with rank hypocrisy as his MAGA base are starting to realise. It's unlikely, however, that our leaders will do anything other than play to Trump's ego given there's a trade deal to sign. Contrary to Mr Edwards view, Swinney should raise Gaza as he pledged to do, just don't mention the windmills John! Neil Anderson, Edinburgh Inquiring minds Stephen Jardine's negative views on public inquiries are spot on (Opinion, July 26). My only criticisms of them is that they are too mild and too measured. Remedying what has become a very expensive British disease is needed. To assuage politicians who need a mechanism to kick issues into touch, and to keep lawyers happy for years to come, I suggest a remedy. A Public Inquiry into public inquiries should be established. Hugh Pennington, Chair, Public Inquiry into the September 2005 Outbreak of O157 in South Wales, Aberdeen Write to The Scotsman
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
UN probes Scots judge-led body's 'breach' of international law
Now the Scottish Government will be expected to give answers to a UN committee about the complaint as part of a UK response over compliance. Scotland has since 2011, been found to be in breach of Article 9 of the Aarhus Convention, a binding piece of international legislation that guarantees the right to a healthy environment and enshrines people's rights to defend it in a court of law. The United Nations council which adopted the convention in 1998 gave the Scottish Government a deadline of October 1, 2024 for a plan of action to remove or cut the cost of access to justice as legal cases can often run into tens of thousands of pounds. The ERCS says that makes access to justice to protect the environment unaffordable and while there is a 'loser pays' rule, litigants are liable to pay their opponents fees if they lose their case. The Scottish Government asked the Scottish Civil Justice Council (SCJC) - a public body comprising predominantly senior judges and other members of the judiciary and legal profession which is responsible for keeping the civil justice system under scrutiny - to review the rules on the costs of court actions. Lord Pentland is at the centre of access to justice row (Image: NQ) But despite the review, a UK progress report at the end of last year confirmed the nation has not removed the cost barriers to justice despite the SCJC intervention. They say it continues to breach the convention as they "only made minor changes and no concrete commitments for future reform". In its formal complaint to the UN's Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee, ERCS argued that the SCJC's review has breached Article 8 of the Convention, which requires public bodies to consult the public when making certain laws that can significantly affect the environment. READ MORE: What is the senior judge-led group accused of international law breach? 50 Scots councils seek ministers summit on green energy 'wild west' 'Scots nature in crisis' as one in nine species at risk of extinction It argues that that means there was no say in ensuring that international law was met and that the legal system was affordable. They say the consultation would have required the SCJC to consider and respond to representations from the public. Now the Herald has learnt that the compliance committee has decided that the complaint has been found admissible on a preliminary basis for further investigation despite official opposition. Dr Ben Christman, ERCS's legal director said: 'The way we make decisions matters. Public participation is a critical part of creating fair and functional environmental laws. The Scottish Civil Justice Council failed to consult the public and, predictably, went on to produce legal expenses rules that do not comply with the Aarhus Convention's requirements. Former co-convener of the Scottish Greens, Maggie Chapman has criticised ministers over law breaches over access to justice (Image: NQ) 'We were glad to see that the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee saw through bad faith attempts to knock out our complaint. We hope that the Scottish Government will now respond to our concerns seriously.' The SCJC has denied that there has been a breach. And Scots community safety minister Siobhian Brown has said in a response to a question about the case: "The Scottish Government has every confidence in the work of the Scottish Civil Justice Council." The council is responsible for overseeing civil justice fairness and effectiveness and provides advice on rule changes and recommends improvements while keeping the system under constant review. It is typically made up of between 14 and 20 members and are appointed by its chairman, the most senior judge in Scotland and Lord President of the Court of Session and Lord Justice General, Lord Pentland or Scottish ministers. They are predominantly entrenched in Scottish law either as judges, sheriffs, advocates, solicitors or heading up administration. At least four are members of the judiciary including at least one judge from the Court of Session and a sheriff, as well as at least two practising advocates. Other senior judges include on the council are Lady Carmichael, who was appointed as a Senator of the College of Justice in 2016 and Lord Ericht, who became a judge of the Supreme Courts in 2016. The group further includes Malcolm Graham, chief executive of the Scottish Courts and Tribunal Services, Colin Lancaster, the chief executive of the Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB) It comes amidst growing concern about local democracy being overridden as some of Scotland's most scenic areas face up to hundreds of live renewable projects. A "once in a generation" convention of 53 community councils have been demanding a summit with energy ministers in a fight to pause infrastructure projects. There were over 700 live applications in the Highland Council area alone, ranging from wind and hydro projects to energy storage and transmission grid plans. Councils convention chairman Helen Crawford at Balblair substation near Beauly (Image: Helen Crawford) Calls have been made for the Scottish Government to undertake an inquiry to address the cumulative impact of all major renewable energy infrastructure developments on the communities and landscape fearing projects "may hasten depopulation in some areas". Conservation charity John Muir Trust has previously spoken out of its concerns about the rights to justice after its attempt to challenge a windfarm development eight years ago led to it facing a near £700,000 bill, although this was eventually negotiated down to £275,000. The Trust settled out of court with the Perth-based energy company SSE and the Scottish government after its attempt to block a wind farm through a judicial review near Loch Ness failed. The dispute was over a wind farm at Stronelairg, which is in wild land in the Monadhliath mountains near Loch Ness. Consisting of 67 wind turbines, it was proposed by SSE in 2012 and granted by the Scottish government in June 2014. Glasgow had to exploit a loophole to bring the action in the name of a member who would qualify for legal aid. ERCS said it has had to resorting to questions under the Freedom of Information act on the SCJC process and any proposed new court costs rules. In response to an FOI request, the SCJC indicated in January 2023 that they intended to hold a public consultation on the new costs rules to inform decision-making "later in 2023". But in response to a chaser FOI request in October 2023, the SCJC decided against a consultation "to avoid undue resource impacts for potential respondents". And the ERCS say when the revised rules on Protective Expenses Orders - which limit a liability for costs in certain types of legal cases - came into force at the end of last year it was without public consultation and they say that they remain non-compliant with the Aarhus Convention. The Scottish Environment LINK (SEL) coalition of more than 30 leading charities said the SCJC failure was a "disappointing development which further damages accountability and the quality of environmental decision-making in Scotland". The SCJC has said that the latest amendments to the PEO rules was the first step in a process and that the review on costs as it relates to the sheriff court remains ongoing with a public consultation due to take place this year. Dr Shivali Fifield, ERCS's chief officer, said: "We submitted this complaint to uphold our right to participate in environmental decision-making. Scotland has been in breach of the Aarhus Convention's access to justice requirements since 2014. This is the third time the Scottish Civil Justice Council has reviewed rules on legal expenses and yet it remains prohibitively expensive to defend the environment in court. "Access to justice is not a favour, it is integral to our environmental human rights. We know that there is support for environmental justice across the political parties - and we will continue to hold the Scottish Government accountable until we see the barriers to justice removed." An analysis backed by Scotland's nature agency found wildlife is "in crisis" in 2023 with one in nine animals and plants being at risk of becoming extinct north of the border. A State of Nature Scotland analysis, backed by the [[Scottish Government]]'s [[Nature]]Scot agency and published by a partnership of over 50 nature and conservation organisations, warned the risk of extinction among some groups, such as vertebrates, is much higher at more than a third (36.5%). The most notable declines were with familiar birds such as swifts, curlews and lapwings which have declined by more than 60%. Kestrels have declined by more than 70%. A spokesperson for the Scottish Civil Justice Council said: 'The Scottish Civil Justice Council has approved its work programme for 2025/26, which has now been published. "As part of this , a priority for the coming year is to hold a public consultation on the extension of Protective Expenses Orders to the Sheriff Court. These orders allow litigants to limit the legal costs they might incur in the event they lose the case. The consultation is currently being finalised and we expect it to begin in the near future.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee is looking into a complaint, which says that the Scottish Civil Justice Council failed to ask the public for their views before changing rules about legal costs in environmental cas'The committee has decided the complaint is worth investigating further, but this is just a preliminary decision. They still need to follow more steps before making a final decision on whether to fully investigate. It would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.'
