
EXCLUSIVE How 'the worst builder in Britain' demolished a family's £500k home after they refused to pay his bill in a bitter war lasting four years
Because, what the young family didn't know when they jetted off for a rare holiday that year was they'd return to find this dream in ashes and that depending on who you ask, they were entirely to blame.
It all started with an argument. Mr Kurji claims he fell out with his workman - who he has never named- after refusing to pay him an additional £3,500 because he was unhappy with the standard of his work.
These sorts of dispute aren't uncommon in the building world, but what happened next certainly is.
The row escalated and the builder tore off the roof of his dream home while Mr Kurji was on holiday, leaving behind an interminable construction zone that infuriated neighbours and almost bankrupted the family.
After it was bulldozed, horrified neighbours called the family to tell him that the roof had been removed and the plot had been left scattered with building rubble.
For four years, the house was uninhabitable.
In the interim, the young family were squeezed into a modest bungalow belonging to the paternal parents while the £500,000 home in Guilford Road, on the outskirts of the Midlands city, was once again being rebuilt.
Now finally, they say they have been able to move in, and are trying to put their encounter with the 'worst builder in Britain' behind them for good.
A source close to the family has told how they lost 'tens of thousands of pounds' but are now re-building their lives after their shocking ordeal.
As they are now settling into their 'forever home' in a leafy street in Stoneygate, a desirable suburb of Leicester, Mrs Kurji told a friend: 'The whole episode made us very angry and upset, but it is life, and it has to move on, and we're enjoying living in the house and having so much space.'
The family had been forced to live for several years, squeezed into a modest bungalow belonging to the paternal parents while the £500,000 home in Guilford Road, on the outskirts of the Midlands city, was once again being rebuilt.
The pal, speaking for the first time on the family's behalf, said: 'The house was destroyed in May 2021 and it took ages to rebuild after the owners, not surprisingly had a mistrust of builders and trades people.
'But they found a reliable and competent team and their home was completed in January 2024, and they were thrilled to move in.
'It has seven bedrooms and is open plan downstairs with marble-effect porcelain tiles and underfloor heating, and a beautiful kitchen and garden.
'It is a stunning property and they finally have their forever home. They love it and enjoy living there. It is their happy place.'
The friend told MailOnline how tax adviser Mrs Kurji, 38, and her 44-year-old husband were 'unfairly' blamed by some locals residents for leaving the property inhabitable and 'a pile of rubble' for so long.
They said: 'Mrs Kurji was particularly upset that a couple of neighbours blamed them for the house being knocked down and not being re-built for over two years.
'Then when it was re-constructed some complained, saying it was not in keeping with the street, it was too white, and made it look bad.
'But she insisted it was the family's personal choice and feel they shouldn't be judged.'
The Asian family - including a nine-year-old son and daughter, aged six, and two grandparents - had expected to move in at the end of 2021.
Some of the neighbours blame the family for leaving an unsightly pile of rubble for so long.
And since the re-build they have mixed feelings on the controversial property, with one saying: 'It is a monstrosity and looks out of place in a street full of mainly red brick Edwardian houses.'
A man living opposite, who declined to be named, said of the large white washed three-storey building with pitched grey roof and matching plastic window frames, said: 'A modern house should not have a place like this in the street but would fit well on a new build estate.'
He said there had, surprisingly, not been one single objections to the plans submitted to Leicester City Council.
The resident of 22 years told MailOnline: 'I saw the plans and wanted to object but was told not to make nay negative comments by my wife who wanted to keep the peace.'
Another said: 'It looks different and sticks out like a sore thumb. But it is their choice and shouldn't judge their style.
'We're more concerned about the road here because drivers are using it as a rat run from London Road, racing along a residential road.
'The council fail to do anything, and sadly, it may take a death before they do, and need to introduce a traffic calming scene,.'
The Kurji source, revealing the family's nightmare, told how they were granted planning approval to a 1920's standard detached house, which had been owned y a widowed pensioner and was very dated, into a modern six-seven bedroom house with an extension and loft concession.
They got on board an English builder called Thomas (no surname), who was self trading, and had been recommended by several previous customers and friends, and they had viewed the work done.
But while the family was on holiday in Wales there was a dispute over payment between the family and builder, who had been left working during their absence.
The friend said: 'The builder had been paid an initial sum agreed when a dispute followed.
'The house had three outer walls and no back wall facing the garden, which was waiting for bifold doors to be installed, and no roof.
'While the family was away, the builder was due to be constructing the triangular roof.
'They had already paid him lots of money, tens of thousands of pounds, but it was agreed that he had to do X, Y and Z before the next payment instalment was made.
'While they were on holiday the builder kept calling the Mr Kurjo saying 'Pay me, pay me!' but he was told the agreed works needed to be completed first.
'The next thing a neighbour rang Jay to say the three standing walls and roof structure had been bulldozed and totally demolished.
'The family was very angry and upset but the builder did a runner and they have never heard from him since. He just ran away.
The source continued: 'They were devastated when they saw the house, and have since had to live in a bungalow while they had to re-do everything they had already paid for.
'They got new builders in, which initially they had been wary about doing, but the owner's father-in-law stayed there every hour to oversee, like a hawk, all th worked being done.
'He is the major reason the house was completes, he put in immense hours and watched them morning and night.
'He had to keep his eye in them because they were concerned about the actions of the previous builder.
'The couple have a big mortgage on the property and they have lost tens of thousands of pounds.
'They have since heard on the grapevine that the builder, who was never investigated by police over his action, had an intention to exit the project half way through and take the money,
'It appears the job was too big for him and his sub contractors, and there was a lot of lying.
'But they are having to put al this behind them and not dwell on it.
'They enjoy living in the house, they love it, and the children, who were very young at the the time have seen the journey of the house.
'They kept the design very simple and modern, but it has lots of space inside. It is there forever home.
'They say their neighbours, despite a few objecting ones, are really nice and they all look out for each other and have a community WhatsApp page.
'All they want now is for the council to introduce some traffic calming measures to stop traffic speeding along the street.'
Mr Kurji previously admitted that he and the builder had fallen out over a £3,500 bill.
Speaking in April 2021, he told how he had bought the house the previous year for £475,000.
He said: 'The builder started in February and we wanted lots of work done so it could become our family home for six of us.
'We wanted a two-storey extension, a new roof, new wiring and for it to be more environmentally friendly. It's a nightmare.
'Unfortunately I picked the worst builder in Britain.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN GLOVER: Starmer is signing his political death warrant with his futile ‘smash the gangs' policy. Deterrence is the only solution
Why are Sir Keir Starmer and Labour unable to reduce the number of migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats? Last week, as Vice-President J.D. Vance accused Europe of 'engaging in civilisational suicide', our Government established a bleak record. More than 25,000 migrants have come across the Channel so far this year, a 50 per cent increase on 2024. It seems certain that 2025 will be the worst year ever.


The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK pornography taskforce to propose banning ‘barely legal' content after Channel 4 documentary airs
The new pornography taskforce will propose legislation this autumn aimed at banning a type of 'barely legal' content produced by the porn star Bonnie Blue, the Guardian has learned. The proposed action by the independent pornography taskforce, launched last month by the Conservative peer Gabby Bertin, comes in response to the broadcast of the Channel 4 documentary 1000 Men and Me: The Bonnie Blue Story. The programme followed the performer for six months and included her claim to have had sex with 1,057 clients over the course of 12 hours. Visa and Smirnoff are among a number of businesses that have pulled online advertisements from streaming of the documentary, after reviewing the content. The film was condemned by the children's commissioner for England, Dame Rachel de Souza, for 'glamorising and normalising' extreme pornography. The documentary also includes footage of Tia Billinger, whose stage name is Bonnie Blue, in a classroom preparing to film an orgy with a group of models dressed in school uniform; the performers acknowledge that they have been selected because they look very young. Lady Bertin said she planned to lodge amendments to the crime and policing bill in the autumn to make it illegal for online platforms to host any content that could encourage child sexual abuse, including pornography filmed by adults dressed as children. 'This content is pushing at the boundaries. We will be trying to address the 'barely legal' aspect legislatively,' she said. The Online Safety Act charged the regulator Ofcom with monitoring whether pornography sites are protecting UK viewers from encountering illegal material involving child sexual abuse and extreme content, such as portrayals of rape, bestiality and necrophilia. However, other forms of harmful pornography that are regulated offline (in cinemas, for example) are not subject to similar restrictions online. This regulatory anomaly means adults role-playing as children to create pornography that appears close to child sexual abuse imagery is not prohibited online. The Channel 4 documentary only showed preparations for the classroom scene rather than the footage itself. Clips showing Bonnie Blue having sex with more than 1,000 men were pixellated, but the programme has still been widely criticised for promoting her brand and for failing to challenge adequately her assertion that her activity is harmless. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Bertin said the documentary would be on the agenda at the taskforce's next meeting. 'She has become extremely successful; she is an adult and it is consensual, so it may not be harming her, but it has potentially harmful effects on people who think that this is a normal way to behave,' she said. 'We should be asking more about the men who arrive with balaclavas on their head to have sex with her.' De Souza said: 'For years we have been fighting to protect our children from the kind of degrading, violent sex that exists freely on their social media feeds. Now this documentary risks taking us a step back by glamorising, even normalising the things young people tell me are frightening. Bonnie Blue's content showcases violence against women as entertainment and allows sexist ideas that women are 'lesser' than men to go unchecked.' Visa's advertisements were placed by a third-party agency, but the company requested that they be removed from online streaming of the Channel 4 documentary after staff viewed it and judged that the content did not align with its internal guidelines. Staff at the drinks company Diageo are assessing how a Smirnoff advertisement was cleared to appear during online transmission of the show, and have also subsequently pulled their advertising from streaming of the programme. An Ofcom spokesperson said the regulator was assessing the documentary and would decide whether to launch a formal investigation. The policing minister, Diana Johnson, said last week that she would discuss the ease with which children could access the documentary on Channel 4's website with ministerial colleagues. Channel 4 requires users to be 16 to register an account, but there is no age-verification process, so children could lie about their age. A Channel 4 spokesperson said the observational film was designed to provoke debate. 'The film looks at how Bonnie Blue has gained worldwide attention and earned millions of pounds in the last year, exploring changing attitudes to sex, success, porn and feminism in an ever-evolving online world. Director Victoria Silver puts a number of challenges to Bonnie throughout the documentary on the example she sets and how she is perceived, and the film clearly lays bare the tactics and strategies she uses, with the audience purposefully left to form their own opinions.'

Finextra
44 minutes ago
- Finextra
Klarna considers autumn IPO revival
After pausing plans for its initial public offering amid market turbulence in the spring, Klarna is looking to revive its listing this autumn. 0 The buy now, pay later giant and its advisers are preparing to go public in September or October, according to a Sky News, citing a memo. However, no firm decision has been made with the move only expected if market conditions are conducive. In April, the Swedish company paused plans to list its ordinary shares on the New York Stock Exchange amid market turbulence sparked by President Donald Trump's tariffs. The firm had been looking to raise in the region of $1 billion with a market valuation of $15 billion. Having made its name as a BNPL pioneer, Klarna is busy diversifying. Last week it scored an Electronic Money Institution licence from the UK's FCA, paving the way for a full-frontal assault on the retail banking market.