logo
Editorial: A city where every teen can find work — that should be the goal

Editorial: A city where every teen can find work — that should be the goal

Chicago Tribune11 hours ago
The city of Chicago is connecting more young people with work than it has in years.
The mayor's office recently announced that nearly 29,000 teens and young adults were hired this summer through One Summer Chicago, a city-led jobs initiative for people ages 14 to 24. That's welcome news: Research shows summer jobs can reduce youth violence, boost academic and career outcomes and support mental well-being.
It turns out that kids still like responsibility — and the independence that comes with earning their own cash.
The One Summer Chicago youth jobs program has grown under Mayor Brandon Johnson; there were just 20,544 participants in 2022. Johnson pledged in his campaign to double the program as a violence prevention strategy.
Still, the underlying model raises questions. The city partially or fully subsidizes these jobs. Without taxpayer funding, many wouldn't exist.
In a stronger local economy, teens would be able to find work without so much government matchmaking.
We should also note that the city's youth jobs initiative still falls short of pre-pandemic levels, when more than 30,000 young people were hired annually, including over 31,000 in 2019. Demand continues to far exceed supply, with roughly 51,000 applicants competing for limited spots in 2023, due in part to funding constraints and a lack of private-sector partners, according to WBEZ.
Anecdotally, we've heard from many Chicago-area families that their teens are having a hard time finding work, even when they want it. As costs increase and wages rise — the statewide minimum wage grew to $15 this year, and Chicago's is up to $16.60 — many businesses are hiring fewer workers.
And when that happens, young people with less training and experience often don't make the cut. Look no further than the reductions many Chicago restaurants are making to their workforces.
Restaurants and service jobs are among the most popular for young workers. But as labor costs rise, many businesses are cross-training employees and cutting staff. As we've written, Chicago's decision to continue increasing the tipped minimum wage won't help.
The good news is that, nationwide, overall youth unemployment has been declining. At the same time, rising school and university attendance has reduced the number of young people participating in the labor force, which in turn lowers the unemployment rate among that group.
But like many other economic indicators, Illinois trails the national average. The state's youth unemployment rate is higher than the U.S. yearly average — consistent with Illinois' broader trend of elevated joblessness across all age groups compared with the rest of the country.
In Chicago, the challenge is especially acute. More than 45,000 young people ages 16 to 24 were both out of school and unemployed in 2022, a figure that far exceeds both state and national benchmarks. Employment disparities are even starker for Black and Latino youth. For example, the jobless rate for Blacks aged 16 to 19 nearly doubled in a single year, climbing from 9.4% in 2021 to 17.5% in 2022, according to a 2024 report from the University of Illinois Chicago's Great Cities Institute. In some predominantly Black neighborhoods, that number soared as high as 92%.
When it comes to youth jobs, the stronger the economy, the more opportunities there will be for teens trying to make some money while school is out and gain valuable experience.
But even when conditions aren't ideal, the private sector has a role to play. The city of Chicago's financial constraints are as tight as we can remember, and the city shouldn't be the primary provider of summer jobs for teens anyway. As much as they're able, private-sector employers should make summer work opportunities available and help soak up some of that excess demand for jobs.
Everyone in Chicago will benefit if more of our youth are gainfully employed while school is out.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Churches, now allowed to endorse candidates, could transform campaign finances

time18 minutes ago

Churches, now allowed to endorse candidates, could transform campaign finances

President Donald Trump is praising an Internal Revenue Service's court filing, which effectively clears the way for churches to endorse political candidates -- a reversal of decades of legal precedent. Yet half a dozen religious leaders told ABC News they didn't foresee a large increase in political endorsements from their peers, despite last week's IRS court filing. The filing said it would not revoke nonprofit status from two Texas churches, Sand Springs Church and First Baptist Church Waskom, for doing so. The filing formalizes for the first time a lack of enforcement of the 1954 Johnson Amendment, which prohibits nonprofits from endorsing or opposing political candidates if they want to remain tax exempt. Both political parties have tested the line in trying to harness the power of the pulpit, with many Republicans wooing evangelical leaders while Democrats often try to curry favor with Black churches. "God is once again welcomed back into our public square," Trump said of the filing during a White House Faith Office summit on Monday. The president has opposed the Johnson Amendment since his first term. He said he asked religious leaders for their endorsements while running in 2015, but came up against the barrier of the Johnson amendment. "I said, 'you have more power than anybody, but you're not allowed to use your power.' I said, 'we're going to get rid of that because people want to hear what you have to say more than anybody else,'" Trump said Monday. "You were even afraid to talk about it. But they're not afraid any longer, and I think they appreciate it." Tax experts predict the filing could transform how money flows around elections, making houses of worship a way to avoid both taxes and transparency for campaign finances. Ellen Aprill, a professor emerita of tax law at Loyola Marymount University Law School, said the filing could open the door to political campaigns channeling money through churches to take advantage of their tax-exempt status and lower application and reporting requirements. Unlike other 501c3 organizations, churches are not required to file 990 forms disclosing financial information, leadership and activities. They also qualify automatically for tax exemption -- while other nonprofits have to apply. "One of my concerns, and others of us in this area, is this will encourage the creation of fraudulent churches who want to be able to get tax deductible money to engage in opposing or supporting candidates … so they don't have to disclose any other campaign intervention activities," Aprill said. Many evangelical Christians viewed the filing as a win for free-speech rights. Robert Jeffress, senior pastor of the 14,000-member First Baptist Church in Dallas, praised the filing and said he "personally thanked President Trump" for the outcome. "This would have never happened without the strong leadership of our great President Donald Trump!" Jeffress wrote in an X post. "Government has NO BUSINESS regulating what is said in pulpits!" Jeffress was on Trump's Evangelical Executive Advisory Board during his first campaign and had expressed support for the president in the leadup to the 2024 election, which he said led the IRS to investigate his church. Jeffress' church is distinct from First Baptist Church Waskom, the plaintiff in the case against the IRS. Cary Gordon, senior pastor and president at Cornerstone Church in Sioux City, Iowa, said he thought "anyone with half a brain" could see that "the Johnson Amendment was unconstitutional." A longtime opponent of the amendment, Gordon has said since 2010 that he hopes the IRS would sue him for his political speech so that he could fight the agency in court. That year, Gordon led an effort organizing religious leaders across Iowa to oppose retention for three Iowa Supreme Court Justices who supported same-sex marriage. The IRS has not sued Gordon. Gordon said although he thinks "hardly any pastors in the country will ever" endorse a candidate, the filing could allow religious leaders to address politics more directly. "The issue is not, 'oh no, they're going to endorse someone.' It's really about free speech and being able to communicate on any issue someone might perceive as political in a sermon, which must be done because all of our problems are moral, all of our problems are theological," he said. Brad Sherman, a former Iowa state representative who founded Solid Rock Christian Church in Coralville, Iowa, and is now running for governor, said he thought the filing was "long overdue," but he didn't anticipate a surge in endorsements. "There are other reasons why pastors and Christian leaders do not endorse candidates," Sherman said, adding that some leaders may be wary of pushback from their congregations. Regarding whether the filing would lead him to consider seeking endorsements from religious leaders during his own campaign, he said, "I haven't really thought much about it yet, but yes, it may influence that to some degree." Reactions from leaders of Black churches were more mixed. Rev. Thomas Bowen, who served in the Biden White House as a faith liaison and preaches in Black churches both in Ohio and D.C., said he was concerned the filing could risk turning churches into "campaign surrogates." "For me, the new ruling opens the doors to money that's just not transparent, money that can be used for political influence," Bowen said. "The fear that our sacred spaces will be at risk of becoming these stages for unchecked influence causes me to tell folk to tread carefully … Moral authority is sacred and it must never be sold for access." Unlike Bowen, Pastor Jamal Bryant said he approved of the filing. Bryant heads a congregation with more than 10,000 members at New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Stonecrest, Georgia, which hosted Democratic nominee Kamala Harris when she visited the state during the 2024 presidential elections. Bryant said he would "absolutely" consider explicitly endorsing political candidates from the pulpit, including in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections. "There's a whole lot on the line," he said. "All of America is going to be leaning in with intentionality for the midterm election on who best will speak for the masses."

Florida Councilwoman Sues After Suspended Over Racist Tweets
Florida Councilwoman Sues After Suspended Over Racist Tweets

Black America Web

time23 minutes ago

  • Black America Web

Florida Councilwoman Sues After Suspended Over Racist Tweets

Source: eyecrave / Getty In today's episode of If They Have Nothing Else, They Have The Caucasity, a city councilwoman in Florida is suing the city council for anti-bigotry discrimination. No, that's not the language used in the lawsuit filed by Groveland City Council member Judi Fike — because Liar Liar is only a movie — but that's essentially what Fike is alleging after she was suspended and stripped of her duties pending a full investigation into homophobic and racist tweets she allegedly posted as far as 2015 and as recent as 2022. According to the Clermont Sun, Fike's suspension came after the Sun published an exclusive investigation revealing dozens of her old tweets, in which she joked about throwing gay people off a roof and showed extreme racial resentment for Black people. The District 4 councilwoman reportedly had to be escorted from a July 7 meeting by police for disrupting proceedings after Vice Mayor Barbara Gaines, who had received printed out copies of Fike's alleged tweets from an anonymous source, gave an impassioned speech about racism and inclusivity. 'Fike's attorney, Anthony Sabatini, filed a motion for a preliminary injunction against the City of Groveland at the Fifth Judicial Court of Lake County on July 9,' the Sun reported. 'In the filing, he is claiming $100,000 plus in damages.' Last month, Judi Fike issued an apology, claiming she takes 'full responsibility for my past words,' but much of her statement was devoted to defending herself against what she unsurprisingly calls a 'political attack.' 'I've campaigned on inclusiveness, fairness and standing up for Groveland – not tearing others down,' she wrote. 'That's what makes this political attack so disappointing. These tweets didn't suddenly resurface; someone chose to dig them up and distribute them anonymously in an election season, to distract from the real issues. 'I will not let that tactic work,' she continued. And there it is… Judi Fike claims she takes 'full responsibility' for her words, saying, 'I regret them deeply, and I sincerely apologize to anyone who was hurt by them.' She even went as far as to declare, 'Personal growth isn't always neat or pretty, but it is necessary.' However, she hasn't grown so much that she's above suing over her suspension, because the exposure of her regretful words is part of a 'political attack.' That's not 'regret' for what she said; it's regret for getting caught. In fact, let's take a look at the old tweets she regrets and takes full responsibility for — minus, of course, the ones she claims were 'manipulated.' From LGBTQ Nation: Just hours after the Pulse nightclub shooting in June 2016 in nearby Orlando, Fike posted to Facebook, 'Duh….why would the shooter target a gay club? My answer…Easier than marching them up steps to push off the sarcasm, some truth…' In 2015, Fike posted to her 'Widow Fike' account on Twitter (now X), 'Can we divert our attention back to real news? The #LGBT freak show has had its run.' Fike owns and operates a catering company called The Black Napkin. Last week, the city council confronted Fike with the posts in an open meeting, displaying screenshots as Fike watched, the Orlando Sentinel reports. Groveland Vice Mayor Barbara Gaines, who is Black, said the posts included 'racist' portrayals of then-President Barack Obama as a monkey. 'This is a picture of President Ronald Reagan babysitting Barack Obama, except it is an ape, a baboon, a monkey or whatever you call it,' Gaines said. In several tweets shared at the meeting, Fike obsesses over the word 'thug'. '#thug the new n word,' she posted in 2015. 'Thug life = thug treatment = no pity from me,' she wrote in 2019. In 2022, Fike shared a meme that read, 'What's the magic word to get what you want? Racist!' Judi Fike essentially claimed that her post about the Pulse nightclub shooting went over the heads of council members, and that her message was about a presidential candidate in 2016 aligning with a community in the Middle East who were 'pushing gay individuals off of buildings.' (So, she wasn't being homophobic; she was being Islamophobic. Got it.) 'It was meant as a support of the community, not against the community,' she said. 'It might have been written in poor taste, but I want to clarify that for you because that was going on at the time.' Then, predictably, the councilwoman who takes full responsibility for her words — does not take full responsibility for her words. 'Those are indeed manipulated, and so I'll just let that rest,' Fike said during the meeting. 'They are not my words. Some are, there are some copies, but what Barbara just showed were absolutely not products of mine.' It's unclear exactly which tweets Judi Fike is copping to and which ones she's claiming were 'manipulated,' but the council didn't buy any of it anyway, so she was voted out all the same. Apparently, they didn't believe this so-called victim of a 'political attack' was also the victim of vicious photoshoppers who 'manipulated' images of her being bigoted to supplement the actual images of her being bigoted. 'Words have impact. As elected officials, we are committed to respecting all people in our community by being accountable and inclusive leaders,' Gaines said during the meeting. 'When you make hateful and racist remarks, it only hurts people and fails to align with that commitment.' Exactly. SEE ALSO: Florida Law Student Suspended For Antisemitism After He Was Awarded For Writing That Constitution Only Applies To White People White Florida Man Says He Would Have Shot Black Girl Who Rang His Doorbell Florida Councilwoman Files Lawsuit After Being Suspended Over Racist And Homophobic Tweets was originally published on

Federal judge reverses rule that would have removed medical debt from credit reports
Federal judge reverses rule that would have removed medical debt from credit reports

New York Post

time29 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Federal judge reverses rule that would have removed medical debt from credit reports

A federal judge in Texas removed a Biden-era finalized ruled by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that would have removed medical debt from credit reports. U.S. District Court Judge Sean Jordan of Texas's Eastern District, who was appointed by Trump, found on Friday that the rule exceeded the CFPB 's authority. Jordan said that the CFPB is not permitted to remove medical debt from credit reports according to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which protects information collected by consumer reporting agencies. Advertisement U.S. District Court Judge Sean Jordan eliminated a rule enforced by the Biden administration from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that would have gotten rid of medical debt from credit reports. DC Studio – Removing medical debts from consumer credit reports was expected to increase the credit scores of millions of families by an average of 20 points, the bureau said. The CFPB states that its research has shown outstanding healthcare claims to be a poor predictor of an individual's ability to repay a loan, yet they are often used to deny mortgage applications. Advertisement The three national credit reporting agencies — Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion — announced last year that they would remove medical collections under $500 from U.S. consumer credit reports. The CFPB's rule was projected to ban all outstanding medical bills from appearing on credit reports and prohibit lenders from using the information. The Trump-appointed judge said the CFPB can't get rid of medical debt from credit reports as part of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. AP The CFPB estimated the rule would have removed $49 million in medical debt from the credit reports of 15 million Americans. Advertisement According to the agency, one in five Americans has at least one medical debt collection account on their credit reports, and over half of the collection entries on credit reports are for medical debts. The problem disproportionately affects people of color, the CFPB has found: 28% of Black people and 22% of Latino people in the U.S. carry medical debt versus 17% of white people. The CFPB was established by Congress after the 2008 financial crisis to monitor credit card companies, mortgage providers, debt collectors and other segments of the consumer finance industry. Earlier this year, the Trump administration requested that the agency halt nearly all its operations, effectively shutting it down.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store