The future is being written for listening to the radio in cars
By 1922, commercial radio was starting to catch on, and several inventors were keen to install receivers in cars. An amateur named George Frost showed off a radio that he MacGyvered in a Ford Model T. Others followed: the Airtone 3D in 1925 and the Philco Transitone of 1927. Nice, but impractical. They were very bulky, ran on very fragile vacuum tubes and were very expensive. A Transitone cost $150 (about $2,300 in today's money) when you could buy a whole car for under $700. Electrical interference from the car's ignition system was also a major problem.
Story continues below advertisement
The big breakthrough came in 1930 when the owner of a radio supply business, William R. Lear (yes, the Learjet guy and the first promoter of the 8-track player) worked with Elmer Wavering (one of his employees and the inventor of the car alternator) met up with Paul and Joseph Galvin, owners of an electronics manufacturer.
Together, they built a radio for Paul's Studebaker. It was big and bulky – all the controls were mounted on the steering column – but it worked and sounded good. Galvin then drove it to a radio manufacturers convention in Chicago, parked it outside, cranked it up, and the orders flooded in for his 'Motorola.' (Yes, the same people who are now in the mobile phone business.) It was still expensive – $110 — but it was the first useful and practical car radio.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
As the technology improved — solid state circuits replaced vacuum tubes in the 1950s, the introduction of in-dash FM radios in 1952 — it was unimaginable for any vehicle to be without a radio for entertainment, news, companionship and keeping one awake on long, late-night drives. It's free, it's local and when done right, it feels like the person on the other side of the speaker is riding along with you. Even today, about 80 per cent of in-car listening is radio.
Today, infotainment systems are deeply integrated into automobile systems and offer all kinds of listening options and connectivity. Radio is still there, but it has to compete against many other options and functions.
Story continues below advertisement
When I travel, I like to rent vehicles from different manufacturers to see what they're doing infotainment-wise. On more than one occasion, I've become frustrated when it comes to finding the radio functions. Why would anyone bury a radio, something that's been part of the driving experience for almost 100 years, so deep in the interface that you can't use it?
The good news is that there's plenty of pushback. At the WorldDAB Automotive 2025 Conference in Madrid, public and private broadcasters — some 200 senior executives — from all over the world got together to deliver this message: Broadcast radio must remain prominent in vehicles. If not, motorists will miss out on a lot — and radio itself could fatally suffer from underexposure.
While AM radio is under siege — it looks like it will take an act of Congress to keep it alive in cars (Spoiler: AM radio is still necessary) — FM radio is still going strong. Other countries have adopted DAB (digital audio broadcasting) radios — a format shunned by the U.S., killing its chances in North America — which also have large audiences. Norway, Switzerland and a few other nations either have dumped FM radio entirely or are in the process of going all-in with DAB. Then, of course, there's satellite radio. Although pretty much just a North American thing, it has tens of millions of listeners.
Here's a comment from Edita Kudláčová, head of radio for the European Broadcasting Union: 'Radio has always been there for us in our cars, a much loved and greatly trusted companion. I can't imagine what could fill the gap if it were ever to disappear from the dashboard. We must continue to innovate – together! – to ensure that radio distribution is fit for our increasingly connected world.'
Story continues below advertisement
And then there's this from Stefan Möller, president of the Association of European Radios: 'We need to work together as an industry and collaborate with the car industry to maintain radio in the car; this is also important from a safety point of view.'
These broadcasters, including the BBC, Radio France, NRJ (France), Global (U.K.), Bauer (U.K.), RTL (Luxembourg), Radio Hamburg (Germany), and Australia's Commercial Radio and Audio as well as the country's RCA Engineering group, are behind a new international initiative called Radio Ready that will see radio stay in cars even as vehicles become more connected. There are three pillars: 1) Radio must remain prominent and convenient with the dashboard, 2) radio-related apps must be easy to find, and 3) voice assistants must be able to offer access to radio content. Anything less risks making traditional broadcast radio too hard to find and use.
The more international pressure is placed on manufacturers (as well as software suppliers such as Canada's QNX as well as Apple CarPlay and Android Auto), the more radio will be protected within infotainment systems. Other broadcasters are invited to join the movement.
This is from Tobias Nielsen from Britain's Bauer Media Group: 'It is essential for democracy and public safety in times of emergency, as well as the cultural value that radio offers, that it remains accessible, prominent, and easily discoverable in connected cars in the future.'
No argument from me. And let me add in one more thing: Broadcast radio is free. No subscription required. As entertainment media goes, it's about as frictionless as it gets.
Story continues below advertisement
Let's hope this turns into a worldwide movement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
8 hours ago
- Global News
Manitoba government touts $115M in Highway 2 improvements
The Manitoba government says it's spending $15 million on Provincial Trunk Highway 2 improvements. The funding is set to be used for 'repairing and replacing structures' on the highway, which runs west from Winnipeg to the provincial border with Saskatchewan. 'These upgrades reflect the priorities of our government in ensuring that local producers, grain elevators and community members have safe and efficient roads in their region,' Premier Wab Kinew said in a statement Friday. 'Some of these roadways have been neglected for a long time and our government recognizes the importance to the community.' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Among the planned improvements: rehabbing 15 kilometres of PTH 5, north of PTH 2, which will allow weight restrictions to be lifted during the spring thaw, as well as bridge replacements at Spruce Woods and north of Holland, Man. Story continues below advertisement 'By addressing these long-standing infrastructure challenges, we're not only improving safety and reliability for drivers, but we are also supporting the economic lifelines of agricultural producers,' Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Lisa Naylor said. The announcement is the latest in a series of provincial funding initiatives for western Manitoba, ahead of a byelection in Spruce Woods that must be held by mid-September.
Global News
a day ago
- Global News
Traffic so bad it belongs in a museum: Exhibit probes North Shore's transportation future
Anyone who's spent time on the North Shore knows that traffic is bad. But have you ever felt it was so bad it belongs in a museum? The past, present and future of the region's traffic is currently the subject of an exhibition at the Museum and Archives of North Vancouver dubbed 'Are We There Yet,' diving into the future of sustainable travel. Museum director Zoe Mackoff de Miranda said the North Shore's transportation troubles are a result of the region's desirability and its geography — with just two bridges to the rest of the mainland. They're also nothing new, as the exhibit proves. 1:51 Ironworkers Bridge traffic proposal pushback 'We also have a series of sort of political cartoons … from the 1970s that were in the local paper, really talking about the issue of congestion at that time, and you look at the cartoons, I mean, they could have been written yesterday,' she said. Story continues below advertisement 'Getting that sort of perspective of how long this really has been a topic of conversation is really interesting, and it sort of puts a finer point on why we're really reaching that inflection point of what are we all going to do to contribute to reducing congestion and make moving around more sustainable?' Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy If you ask the North Vancouver RCMP, they'd probably agree those old cartoons are as relevant as ever. Last week, the detachment set up at Keith and Lillooet roads, a notorious intersection feeding the Ironworkers Memorial Bridge, where they doled out 60 traffic tickets in just five hours. More than half of those tickets were to frustrated drivers pulling illegal U-turns in the hopes of getting on the bridge faster, said Const. Mansoor Sahak. 'We're quite aware of the problems that congestion causes during rush hour, but people still have to be mindful that they are bound by the rules of the road and they still have to follow the rules, the signs,' he said. 'You could be stopped by our officers and be issued a fine. And that is what happened here, where they issued 60 tickets at just that one intersection in a span of five hours.' There's no quick fix or easy solution to the region's transportation woes, but Mackoff de Miranda said part of the museum exhibit is to get people thinking and talking about a better future. Story continues below advertisement 3:14 North Shore SkyTrain proposed 'There's a combination of potential solutions, some of them will come through infrastructure, which different levels, both municipal and other levels of government, are really advocating for, whether that is either a third crossing, if that is additional rapid transit,' she said. The exhibit includes a look at plans from the 1990s to twin the Lions Gate Bridge, a plan that obviously never came to fruition. TransLink is currently planning to add a Bus Rapid Transit line to the North Shore, a specialized express bus line with traffic signal priority and station-style boarding platforms — but the project remains unfunded. The prospect of a future SkyTrain line to the region is also frequently discussed, though it remains a dream at this point. The three North Shore municipalities, along with its two First Nations, continue to work on the transit issue. Story continues below advertisement 'With the amount of growth we're seeing in the region, we haven't been able to keep up with those investments,' City of North Vancouver Mayor Linda Buchanan said. Buchanan is also advocating for the aging Ironworkers bridge to be replaced. 'It's not easy to build large bridges, but it's time,' she said. Mackoff de Miranda, meanwhile, said the challenges with infrastructure highlight the other half of the equation. 'Which is also, you know, the choices that we all make individually,' she said. 'That's another part of what the exhibition really touches on is, you know, even if we do increase the infrastructure, it's about the choices that people make of how we can move around consciously and sustainably,' she said. 'Are We There Yet? The Sustainable Transportation Journey' runs at the Museum and Archives of North Vancouver until Feb. 28, 2026.
Japan Forward
a day ago
- Japan Forward
The Astonishing Brazenness of Shigeru Ishiba
The Shigeru Ishiba government and the Trump administration have concluded their tariff negotiations. In a breakthrough just ahead of the August 1 US deadline, they reached an agreement to keep the reciprocal tariff rate at 15%. Had they not done so, the rate would have risen to 25%. An additional 25% tariff on Japanese cars will also be halved, so that together with the existing tariffs, the total tariff rate comes to 15%. Worst-case scenarios appear to have been avoided. Nevertheless, these tariffs are significantly higher than those instituted under the first Trump administration. It is disappointing that they will now be imposed. America is Japan's only ally. Despite being faced with the threat of unreasonably high tariffs from this same United States, Prime Minister Ishiba was unable to convince the US to withdraw the measures. We doubt whether the government did enough to protect Japan's national interests. It is outrageous that the Prime Minister should be allowed to remain in his position just because such a flawed agreement has been reached. He should rightly announce his resignation as soon as possible. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba meets with US President Donald Trump in Kananaskis, western Canada, on June 16. (©Cabinet Public Relations Office) President Donald Trump has gone wild during his second term. He has taken a self-righteous approach of pressuring other countries by arbitrarily imposing tariffs on their exports to the US. A series of unjustified claims have emanated from the White House, such as blaming Japan for the lack of sales of American cars, which are imported tariff-free into Japan. Those claims contain glaring factual errors and are unacceptable. First, the Japan-US trade agreement concluded by Trump in his first administration confirmed that additional tariffs would not be imposed on Japanese motor vehicle imports. However, Trump has acted as if he were free to simply renege on this agreement. Wasn't that exactly why the Ishiba administration kept calling for the US to withdraw its high tariff measures? Of course, it was bound to be difficult to convince Trump to stop using tariffs only in the case of Japan. It is a weapon he obviously dearly loves, and concessions by Japan might have been unavoidable to a certain degree. However, that doesn't mean we can agree with Prime Minister Ishiba's self-adulation for having "achieved the largest reduction among countries with a trade surplus with the United States." It was evident all along that the US response would depend on a decision made by Trump personally. Nonetheless, Ishiba chose to leave it up to his Cabinet to manage. He displayed absolutely no initiative to negotiate directly with Trump in order to break the deadlock. Ishiba hardly deserves the plaudits he is awarding himself. Ishiba has also said that the two sides reached an agreement that was "in line with the national interests of both Japan and the United States." Objectively, however, how much has Japan improved its national interests compared to before the advent of the current Trump administration? The Prime Minister is prioritizing the expansion of investment in the United States. This should both create American jobs and boost profits for Japanese companies. He has offered explanations, such as "Government-affiliated financial institutions will be able to provide investments, loans, and loan guarantees of up to $550 billion" (approximately ¥80 trillion JPY). Ishiba also emphasized that, together, Japan and the US will build resilient supply chains in areas important to economic security. However, the expansion of investment in the US has been a trend among Japanese companies for some time. It is also natural that the two countries should strengthen cooperation in terms of economic security. However, we must be careful not to fall into the trap of investing to fulfill our promises to the US without fully considering the costs. In the agricultural sector, Japan will increase the amount of rice it imports from the US within the existing minimum access framework. Fortunately, Japan's farmers were not sacrificed through tariff reductions or other measures. Nonetheless, a careful assessment of the impact of the increased inflow of US rice on rice prices is needed. For Japanese companies, the fact remains that the 15% tariff will constitute a heavy burden. Nevertheless, the conclusion of the negotiations means they can finally rework their strategies for doing business with the US. Not only large companies but also subcontractors must remain undeterred by the high American tariff policy. Hopefully, they will go all out to improve productivity and develop new demand. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba explains the results of the Upper House election at a press conference. July 21 (©Sankei by Akira Konno). With the conclusion of the negotiations, the government will now face other issues, including those involving domestic policies. However, Prime Minister Ishiba should not use these as an excuse to remain in power. He failed to attain his self-set minimum target for the number of ruling party seats in both the Lower and Upper House elections. As a consequence, the ruling parties lost their majorities in both houses of the Diet. It is the Prime Minister's responsibility to promptly announce his resignation. Even after his meeting with three former prime ministers from his own Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) on July 23, Ishiba again reiterated his intention to remain in office. His brazenness is absolutely astonishing. It is unacceptable for him to continue to ignore the will of the Japanese people as expressed at the polls. There is a rising chorus of demands from LDP lawmakers and local organizations for Ishiba to step down. This is a totally understandable reaction since, if he is allowed to remain prime minister, the LDP will be completely abandoned by its support base. Moreover, unless the LDP and its ruling coalition partner, Komeito, actually force him to resign, Ishiba will likely lose even more support than he did in the recent Upper House election. If that happens, implementation of the Japan-US trade agreement could become uncertain, and the ruling parties' ability to clean house would be called into question. An extraordinary Diet session will be convened on August 1. The Diet will require a certain number of days to thoroughly deliberate on the new Japan-US agreement. That will not change, regardless of whether there is a prime ministerial election as well. (Read the editorial in Japanese.) Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun Keywords/tags:
