Google could be planning its own take on Samsung's Now Bar — what we know
AI is becoming a part of every part of our phones, whether we realize it or not, and each new feature is just the beginning.
One good example is Samsung's Now Bar, and it sounds like Google may have its own version in the pipeline — dubbed Gemini Space.
This comes from Mishall Rahman over at Android Authority, who finds hints about the feature in the Android 16 QPR 1 beta 1 release. Apparently new files reference something called "Ambient Data", which is believed to be the internal code name for Gemini Space.
Other strings refer to "Ambience Hub", "Ambient Display" and "Ambient AOD." That suggests Google is working on a feature that relies on contextual data, and is prepping it for a bunch of different devices and use-cases — including smart home hubs and devices with an Always on Display.
Rahman believes that this could be the start of Google rebranding its existing "At a Glance" feature, in an attempt to offer something similar to the Now Bare and Now Brief features on the best Samsung phones.
For those that don't know. Now Bar is a section of the lock screen that features real time information, which changes throughout the day depending on whatever contextual information the phone can pick up.
At a Glance does do some of this, but it's not quite as easy to access. Shifting it to the lock screen, and adding extra features, could be one way for Google to offer comparable features for other Android phones to utilize.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Though Rahman does admit that he could be wrong, Gemini Space may end up being something entirely different. With limited information, we can't really make strong affirmations either way.
But considering Google and Samsung do have a close relationship, especially with AI, it would be surprising if we didn't get something similar to the Now Bar at some point in the near future. We're just going to have to wait and see, though.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Digital Trends
28 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
Windows has a major AI problem, and it's pushing me closer to Apple
Just over a year ago, Apple Intelligence was announced. It continues to be somewhat of a 'meh' affair compared to other rival products like Microsoft's Copilot and Google's Gemini. What was not 'meh' was the support for Apple's generative AI bundle, which extended all the way back to the M1 silicon introduced in 2020. Even the fresh batch of AI features — such as live translations and intelligent Shortcuts — are fully supported on the machines that will soon be five generations old. I can't say the same about Windows and its AI-powered rebirth with the Copilot package. Before confusion ensues, let me clear things up. Recommended Videos Copilot is a suite of AI features, just like Gemini or Apple Intelligence. Then we have Copilot+ machines, which is a branding for PCs that meet certain hardware-level requirements to enable AI-powered features on Windows laptops and PCs. Here's the weird part. A healthy bunch of Intel silicon launched in 2025 — even those in the powerful 'H' class — don't meet those AI processing requirements. All of it has created a weird kind of divide in the Windows ecosystem where certain advanced AI features are locked to a handful of cheaper machines, even if you paid a much higher price to get a laptop with a far more powerful processor. Oddly, it's not just the hardware, but the software experience that now feels different. Copilot+ is not merely AI hype Before we get into the hardware limitations, let's break down the features. Copilot+ machines require a powerful hardware chip for AI acceleration to enable certain features, down to the OS level. For example, in the Settings app, Microsoft is pushing its own Mu small language model (SML) that runs entirely on the NPU. The NPU on a chip, however, must meet a certain performance baseline, something not even Intel and AMD silicon launched in 2025 fulfill universally. Let's start with the AI-powered Settings app interactions. It can now understand natural language queries and make suggestions so that users can directly take action with a click. If you type something like 'My screen doesn't feel smooth,' the Settings app will show a dialog box underneath the search bar, where you get an actionable button to increase the refresh rate and make the interactions smoother. Apple is chasing something similar and has implemented it within the Spotlight system in macOS Tahoe. Next, we have Recall. It's like a time machine system that takes snapshots of your PC activity in the background and analyzes them contextually. In the future, if you seek to revisit or find something, you can simply type a natural language query and find a record of the activity, complete with a link to the webpage or app you were working with. It almost feels magical, and you can read more about my experience here. The crucial benefit is that a healthy bunch of Copilot+ AI features will run on-device, which means they won't require an internet connection. That's convenient, but in hindsight, it's a huge sigh of relief that all user activity remains locked to your device and nothing is sent to servers. Copilot+ hardware also enables a bunch of creative features such as Cocreator and Generative Fill in Paint, Super Resolution, Image Creator, and Restyle in the native Photos app. But there are a few that are meaningful for day-to-day PC usage. With Click to Do in the Snipping Tool, the AI analyzes the text and image on the screen, somewhat like Google Lens and Apple Intelligence. You can select text, look it up on the web with a single click, send email, open a website, summarize, rewrite, and take a wide range of image actions such as copy, share, visual search in Bing, erase objects, remove background, and do more — without ever opening another app. On the more practical side of things, we have translated Live Captions that cover over 40 languages. The translation and captioning happen in real-time and work during video calls and video watching, too. Finally, we have Windows Studio Effects, which can perform chores such as automatic frame adjustment, portrait lighting tweaks, switch background effects, minimize noise, and even make gaze adjustment. The Copilot+ hardware wall Even if you splurge $4,899 on a Razer Blade 18 with an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor and Nvidia's top-of-the-line GeForce RTX 5090 graphics, your beastly gaming laptop still won't be able to run the Copilot+ features in Windows 11. That's because the NPU on this processor can only manage 13 TOPS, but a pint-sized $800 Microsoft tablet with a Qualcomm Snapdragon X processor can handle all the exclusive Copilot+ features just fine. It's disheartening, because the Copilot+ experiences in Windows 11 are meaningful OS advancements. Most of them, at least. I have used a few of them extensively, and they feel like a practical evolution. Yet, depriving machines that merely miss out on a powerful NPU, despite packing plenty of compute and graphics processing power, is simply unfortunate. Microsoft has laid out tight hardware requirements for machines that can bear the Copilot+ badge — 256GB of storage, 16GB DDR5 RAM, and a processor with a dedicated AI accelerator chip that can output a minimum of 40 TOPS performance. That's a bottleneck from both ends. First, there are still a healthy bunch of machines that ship with 8GB of RAM, and that too, the DDR4 type memory. Take, for example, the Asus Vivobook 17, which costs $700 and ships with 8GB of DDR4 memory on the entry-point configuration, even with the variant that packs a 13th-generation Intel processor. Let's say you pay up to reach 16GB of RAM. Despite that added stress on your wallet, you are still limited by the RAM type and won't be able to run Copilot+ tools on the machine. It's worth mentioning that there are a LOT of Windows machines that still pack 8GB of RAM, and even when they go up to 16GB capacity, they still rely on the DDR4-type memory. Now, it's time to address the elephant in the room. The silicon situation. The latest from Intel is the Ultra 200 series processor family, which is bifurcated across Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake lines. These Ultra 200 series processors are available in four formats: V-series, U-series, H-series, HX-series, and H-series. Out of the four brackets, only the V-series processors support Copilot+ experiences on Windows 11. Even the enthusiast-class H and HX series processors don't meet the NPU requirements, and as such, they are devoid of the Copilot+ AI features. As perplexing as the situation remains with Intel Core 200 series silicon, the situation with AMD and its Copilot+ readiness isn't too different. At the moment, only AMD's Ryzen AI 300 series processors fall under the Copilot+ bracket. That means if you invested in a top-shelf AMD silicon in the past few years, or even aim to build an AMD gaming rig this year, you either lose out on Copilot+ perks or must pick from the Ryzen AI 300 series line-up. Even older Macs do better The situation with Copilot+ is weird because it has created fault lines in the Windows 11 experience that don't make sense, neither from a price perspective, nor from a firepower angle. It even makes one feel bad about spending a fortune on a top-tier Intel processor, only to find it locked beyond next-gen AI features in Windows 11 because the NPU isn't up to the task. The only other option is to pick a Qualcomm Snapdragon X-series processor. But in doing so, you run into the compatibility hurdles that come with Windows on Arm. Plus, the GPU limitations rule out gaming or other demanding tasks where you need a powerful GPU. Right now, it seems like Copilot+ is a bag of serious caveats. And as Microsoft's team comes with more AI-first experiences, the gulf within Windows 11 is only going to widen. An $800 Copilot+ machine will run native AI experiences that even a powerful desktop won't be able to handle in the near future. The situation within the Apple ecosystem is just the opposite. Even if you have a nearly five-year-old M1 MacBook Air, you can run all the Apple Intelligence features just fine. Now, one can argue that AI is not the deciding factor for picking up a laptop. But as companies like Microsoft, Apple, and Google deeply integrate AI packages such as Copilot, Siri, and Gemini across their OS at the native level, these AI features will essentially serve as a key computing evolution. Google has already given us a glimpse of how tightly interweaving Gemini across its Workspace tools can flesh out, and somewhat similar is the progress of Apple Intelligence within maCOS. But when it comes to the OS-level AI progress, it's Microsoft that finds itself in an odd place where a huge chunk of Windows 11 users are going to feel left out, while macOS users will move forward just fine even on aging hardware.
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
I tested the Garmin Vivoactive 6 and Apple Watch SE, and I still prefer Garmin as a gym mate
Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority The Apple Watch SE is the blueprint for what most people expect from a smartwatch: a clean design, deep smartphone integration, and enough wellness tracking features to stay reasonably healthy. At a reduced price compared to the brand's flagship lineup, the SE is also accessible. However, with the launch of the Vivoactive 6, Garmin seems to be stepping up to the plate with a potential competitor. After testing both watches side by side, it's clear Garmin isn't trying to beat Apple at its own game. It's playing a different one. And for anyone serious about fitness, it might be a tempting prospect. Do you prefer the Garmin Vivoactive 6 or Apple Watch SE? 0 votes Garmin Vivoactive 6 NaN % Apple Watch SE NaN % At a glance, these watches tell different stories. The Apple Watch SE wears like a piece of jewelry. It's minimalist, rounded, and familiar. Despite its robust tracking suite, I tend to set it with watch faces that emphasize aesthetics more than stats, so the daily impression is less sporty and more covert-tech (or as covert as a smartwatch can be). It's also so ubiquitous that it doesn't say much about my fitness regimen; you're as likely to see an Apple Watch on an exec as you are on a power-walking mom. Where the Apple Watch SE shoots the gap between tech and refinement, the Vivoactive 6 is unapologetically built for sport. In other words, I'm just as comfortable wearing the SE to a dinner party as I am on a treadmill. The Vivoactive 6, by contrast, feels unapologetically purposeful. Its rounded, sport-first build and physical buttons are made for the gym (or the trail), and while I think it's a good-looking watch, it's not quite as upscale as Apple's offerings. It's a fitness tracker first and foremost. Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority Yet, despite the fact that the SE fits more scenarios, the Garmin stays on my wrist longer thanks to its fantastic battery life. As is often the case with Garmin watches, longevity is a strong point of the Vivoactive 6. The Apple Watch SE requires a daily top-up, lasting just over 24 hours between charges. The Vivoactive 6 easily lasted me five days per charge. That kind of endurance means I don't have to think about charging it before a hike or a morning workout, and I can take it on overnight adventures without packing a cable. Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority Workouts and weekend adventures are, of course, where Garmin shines. The Vivoactive 6 tracks everything from steps and calories to training load, recovery time, heart rate variability (HRV), stress, and sleep, plus Garmin-specific tools like Body Battery and Health Snapshot. It's an incredibly dense platform that turns stats into actionable insights. Garmin still offers a more robust fitness tracking platform for serious training. Apple has made huge strides in sports tracking, but Garmin contextualizes data in a way that feels more athlete-focused. When I train too hard, Garmin responds with recovery advice. When I underperform, it guides me just the same. I love Apple's Rings for basic motivation as much as the next person, but Garmin's tools are built for more dedicated athletes and data junkies. Even on GPS accuracy, Garmin still holds the edge. I ran identical routes with both watches and compared the maps. Garmin's tracks were tighter and more consistent, especially in tree cover and dense areas. You can see on the map above the SE's route dips into the road rather than sticking to the path I actually ran. Around the bend, it even has me on the complete opposite side of the street. To be fair, overall, the SE is very good, but if true precision matters, Garmin is still the benchmark. Garmin also still holds the edge for precise GPS data. Without a doubt, the Apple Watch SE is the better smartwatch. It handles calls, texts, voice commands, app support, and music control with the kind of seamlessness only Apple can pull off. The haptics are crisp, the interface is smooth, and the third-party app support is unmatched. And yet, during workouts, I found myself constantly distracted by it. Deep iPhone integration means a flood of buzzes, banners, group chats, and news alerts breaking my focus. The Vivoactive 6, by contrast, stayed quiet. It delivered only the essentials: a notification here, a calendar alert there. And when I needed to check something, the interface was simple and distraction-free. I wasn't tempted to scroll through the family chat while pausing a workout or changing my music. Sometimes, less really is more, especially when you're mid-run and looking for any excuse to quit early. Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority So yes, the Apple Watch SE remains a crowd-pleaser. It's the ultimate entry point into the Apple Watch world and impressively capable for the price. It's long been my preferred option for everyday wear because I love the seamless integration with my iPhone and the robust app support (outside of the gym setting). But Garmin isn't chasing Apple's formula. The Vivoactive 6 doubles down on data-rich fitness, weeklong battery life, and tools that help you train smarter. When I'm in the thick of a training cycle and care more about split times than text replies, that focus makes it a far more useful device.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Google Photos Supercharges Ultra HDR Photos: Here's What You Can Do Now
Google Photos just received a significant update that dramatically improves how it handles Ultra HDR ... More pictures. Key Takeaways Google Photos just received a significant update that dramatically improves how it handles Ultra HDR pictures. Now, you get expanded editing capabilities, greater control over HDR intensity and the ability to enhance standard photos into Ultra HDR. How Has Google Photos Upgraded HDR Editing and Why Does It Matter? Ultra HDR pictures unlock your display's full range of brightness and color, creating more vibrant images compared to standard (SDR) photos. However, while almost all photo apps can open and edit Ultra HDR files, the HDR effect will then be lost unless the app is specifically coded to handle Ultra HDR. Ultra HDR images can really pop on social media, so you'll want to retain the HDR effect wherever possible. Thanks to this Google Photos update, you can now edit and save Ultra HDR pictures using its most powerful AI-based features, such as Photo Unblur, Magic Eraser and Portrait Light. While these tools did work before, using them would cause Ultra HDR pictures to revert to SDR. Simple adjustments such as cropping and rotating worked, but more complex adjustments and filters would strip out the HDR information, resulting in a significant loss of quality. Now you can utilize advanced tools to create Ultra HD pictures that were previously impossible. Google Photos: New Ultra HDR Tool Works On SDR Pictures Too! Google Photos now offers a new "Ultra HDR" control that adjusts the intensity of the HDR effect and ... More even add it to SDR photos. To provide greater control over HDR output, Google has added a new 'Ultra HDR' editing tool, represented by a simple slider that allows you to adjust the intensity of the HDR effect from 0 (completely off) to 100 (maximum strength). Previously, the Ultra HDR effect was either on or off, with no way to adjust it. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder A notable feature of this tool is that it can also add Ultra HDR effects to SDR images. The effect won't be as good as if you were working on an Ultra HDR original, as the app has to 'guess' any brightness information that wasn't present in the original file and won't always be able to reproduce highlight details effectively. However, the results can also be quite convincing. If you're new to Ultra HDR, the new slider is a great way to learn how the effect works. Try it on a contrasty image, such as a sunset, and you should see the results immediately. Most Raw files, and some SDR files saved in advanced 16-bit or 32-bit formats, contain valid information for creating true Ultra HDR images, however, Google Photos doesn't yet support such conversions. To unlock the potential of these files in Google Photos, you'll need to first edit them in an external app that supports HDR, such as Adobe Lightroom, and save them as HDR JPEGs before opening them in Google Photos. I wrote more about the new HDR conversion tool in a previous article after its initial discovery two months ago. Ultra HDR: Too Compatible For Its Own Good? The genius of Ultra HDR lies in its compatibility. Because it's based on the standard JPEG format, you can display and edit Ultra HDR files in basic SDR mode without any special software. The flip side to that coin is that developers can decide that SDR mode is 'good enough' rather than committing resources to adding Ultra HDR support. In expanding Ultra HDR support in Google Photos, Google is now leading by example, which should help raise user expectations and encourage wider support of the format from other developers. Crucially, giving users complete control over the HDR effect, including the ability to reduce it to zero, will prevent situations where unpleasantly bright images prompt users to turn off Ultra HDR entirely. Follow @paul_monckton on Instagram. Subheading
