More bad news for rat-infested cities: Climate change is making it worse
Social Sharing
More rats: that's the latest indignity that climate change is dumping on major cities around the world, including in Canada's largest city, according to a new study from a group of global rodent and public health scientists.
Growing rat populations are correlated with rising temperatures driven by global warming in at least 11 major cities across the world, according to the study. The cities seeing rat increases include Toronto, famously rat-prone New York City, and many other major centres like Washington, San Francisco and Amsterdam.
The study's authors say it's a wake-up call for cities to move away from a whack-a-mole approach to dealing with rodent complaints.
"I think every large city should have a dedicated team that focuses on nothing but rodents and the issues with rodents," said Jonathan Richardson, lead author of the study and an urban ecologist at the University of Richmond in Virginia.
The study used data on public complaints and inspections about rats from 16 cities around the world. The 11 cities that saw significant increases in rats also experienced greater temperature increases over time, though that correlation doesn't prove the temperature caused the increase. Cities with more dense human populations and more urbanization also saw larger increases in rats.
The research comes at a time when rats have become a big issue in Toronto, which is seeing a large increase in rodent-related complaints after a brief decline during the COVID-19 pandemic. City officials are currently working on a new strategy to proactively deal with the rats.
"Even when you leave city hall or walk around city hall, you can see the burrows in the tree wells. I've walked along one of the streets and a giant rat ran past me in the middle of the day," said Alejandra Bravo, a Toronto city councillor who proposed the successful motion to build a rat strategy.
"I think people need to see action."
Toronto councillors push for rat reduction strategy
Why are rats thriving?
Rats are resilient and remarkably adaptable to different environments, says Alice Sinia, entomologist with pest control company Orkin Canada. It makes biological sense that warmer temperatures would be helping them out, for three big reasons.
The harsh winter acts as a sort of "nature's pest control," with the cold killing rats every year. Climate change has led to milder winters in Toronto, allowing greater numbers of rats to make it through the season.
Meanwhile, the warmer seasons have become longer, and that's when the rats breed and reproduce. Sinia says that could further boost their numbers.
And finally, climate disasters themselves could be bringing rats closer to people and buildings. Sinia used the example of the floods in Toronto in July last year, caused by a line of storms that dumped rain on the city in rapid succession in a matter of hours.
Studies suggest that Canada will see more extreme rain, with warmer air able to hold more moisture that it will dump in short, severe storms.
The flash floods last year caused nearly a billion dollars in insured damages, flooding basements, highways and transit stations across the city. But apart from the damage, floods also overwhelm the city's sewer system — which are teaming with rats that get displaced.
"Now instead of the underground sewers, they [the rats] will come to the surface and when that happens … they're going to start occupying other areas," Sinia said.
"They're going into people's homes, structures… and they're going to have an opportunity to reproduce very fast."
But none of this means people will just have to resign themselves to a rat-filled future, the experts said.
Keeping up the fight
Richardson, the study author, said that they key was a proactive rat strategy that addressed the root causes of infestations. That's similar to what the Toronto council is working on, according to Bravo. City staff will look at food disposal, managing construction sites, new approaches like birth control and other ways to manage the rat population on a larger scale.
Ultimately, Richardson says, cities need to put more money and resources into fighting rats, because simply tolerating them is not a good option.
"They carry at least 50 known zoonotic pathogens and parasites that can make residents sick in cities," he said. A zoonotic infection or disease is one that can transmit between animals and humans.
"They also have mental health impacts for residents where if you're living alongside rats regularly and see them in your daily life, you tend to have worse mental health outcomes and feel less secure in your environment.
"If we can reassess how much tolerance we have for rats in our everyday daily life as we're walking around, maybe that applies some pressure to the city governments and advocates for more resources to knock these populations back."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
17 hours ago
- Global News
WHO still seeking COVID-19 origin, says all scenarios ‘remain on the table'
The World Health Organization says its probe into the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which caused the COVID-19 pandemic, is still ongoing, and despite a three-year investigation, has yet to find the exact cause. 'As things stand, all hypotheses must remain on the table, including zoonotic spillover and lab leak,' WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said during a press briefing Friday. His comments came after a report published Friday from the Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens (SAGO), which said 'available evidence' supports the hypothesis that the coronavirus jumped from animals to humans, likely from bats 'or through an intermediate host,' through a process called zoonotic spillover. SAGO is a panel of 27 independent, international, multidisciplinary experts formed by the World Health Organization to advise on technical and scientific considerations regarding emerging and re-emerging pathogens, like COVID-19. Story continues below advertisement 'While most available and accessible published scientific evidence supports hypothesis #1, zoonotic transmission from animals, possibly from bats or an intermediate host to humans, SAGO is not currently able to conclude exactly when, where and how SARS-CoV-2 first entered the human population,' the report reads. It notes the closest known 'precursor strains' were identified in bats in China and the Lao People's Democratic Republic, but says the strains are too distantly related to the virus to be the direct source of the pandemic. The report notes that some of the difficulty in determining a cause is due to China not having shared certain information, which also has made it difficult to examine the second hypothesis suggesting an accidental lab leak. The WHO requested the country share hundreds of genetic sequences from individuals with COVID-19 early in the pandemic, as well as more detailed information about the animals sold at markets in Wuhan, and information on work done and biosafety conditions at laboratories in Wuhan. Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'To date, China has not shared this information either with SAGO or WHO,' a news release says. Marietjie Venter, the chair of the group, said on Friday during a press briefing that without the necessary data, it could not evaluate if the virus was the result of a lab accident. 'Therefore, this hypothesis could not be investigated or excluded,' Venter said. 'It was deemed to be very speculative, based on political opinions and not backed up by science.' Story continues below advertisement That hypothesis is one U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested as the cause, though a U.S. intelligence analysis found there was insufficient evidence to prove the theory. 1:57 WHO says COVID-19 origins still under investigation despite recent reports Two other hypotheses were also provided in the report, the first being the introduction of the virus into animal markets via 'cold chain processes' and subsequent infection in humans through contact with products sold at the market. Venter said no added evidence has become available to support the hypothesis and more data is needed to prove it. The last hypothesis, involving deliberate manipulation of the virus in a laboratory, followed by a biosafety breach, remains unsupported, with Venter noting that SAGO examined the genome structure of the virus and any related publications and reports but found no evidence to support it. All four hypotheses will be re-evaluated if further information becomes available, but Venter said the first related to zoonotic spillover is considered the supported hypothesis. Story continues below advertisement 'Until more scientific data becomes available, the origins of how SARS-CoV-2 entered human populations will remain inconclusive,' she said. Ghebreyesus recognized during the briefing that the task of investigating the cause was difficult, and told reporters that members of SAGO have not all agreed on everything, which is 'to be expected.' He said earlier this week that one member of the team resigned and three others asked for their names to be removed from the report. Ghebreyesus went on to express concerns that China had not provided further information and encouraged it, as well as other governments he said have conducted COVID-19 investigations, to provide this data. Last year, The Associated Press found that the Chinese government had frozen meaningful domestic and international efforts to trace the virus's origins in the first weeks of the outbreak in 2020, and that the WHO may have missed early opportunities to investigate how the pandemic began. Chinese officials have repeatedly dismissed the idea the pandemic could have started in a lab, saying the search should be conducted in other countries. Last September, researchers zeroed in on a short list of animals they think might have spread COVID-19 to humans, including raccoon dogs, civet cats and bamboo rats. — with files from The Associated Press


Toronto Star
20 hours ago
- Toronto Star
WHO expert group fails to find a definitive answer for how COVID-19 began
LONDON (AP) — An expert group charged by the World Health Organization to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic started released its final report Friday, reaching an unsatisfying conclusion: Scientists still aren't sure how the worst health emergency in a century began. At a press briefing on Friday, Marietjie Venter, the group's chair, said that most scientific data supports the hypothesis that the new coronavirus jumped to humans from animals.


Winnipeg Free Press
20 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
WHO expert group fails to find a definitive answer for how COVID-19 began
LONDON (AP) — An expert group charged by the World Health Organization to investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic started released its final report Friday, reaching an unsatisfying conclusion: Scientists still aren't sure how the worst health emergency in a century began. At a press briefing on Friday, Marietjie Venter, the group's chair, said that most scientific data supports the hypothesis that the new coronavirus jumped to humans from animals. That was also the conclusion drawn by the first WHO expert group that investigated the pandemic's origins in 2021, when scientists concluded the virus likely spread from bats to humans, via another intermediary animal. At the time, WHO said a lab leak was 'extremely unlikely.' Venter said that after more than three years of work, WHO's expert group was unable to get the necessary data to evaluate whether or not COVID-19 was the result of a lab accident, despite repeated requests for hundreds of genetic sequences and more detailed biosecurity information that were made to the Chinese government. 'Therefore, this hypothesis could not be investigated or excluded,' she said. 'It was deemed to be very speculative, based on political opinions and not backed up by science.' She said that the 27-member group did not reach a consensus; one member resigned earlier this week and three others asked for their names to be removed from the report. Venter said there was no evidence to prove that COVID-19 had been manipulated in a lab, nor was there any indication that the virus had been spreading before December 2019 anywhere outside of China. 'Until more scientific data becomes available, the origins of how SARS-CoV-2 entered human populations will remain inconclusive,' Venter said, referring to the scientific name for the COVID-19 virus. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said it was a 'moral imperative' to determine how COVID began, noting that the virus killed at least 20 million people, wiped at least $10 trillion from the global economy and upended the lives of billions. Last year, the AP found that the Chinese government froze meaningful domestic and international efforts to trace the virus' origins in the first weeks of the outbreak in 2020 and that WHO itself may have missed early opportunities to investigate how COVID-19 began. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. U.S. President Donald Trump has long blamed the emergence of the coronavirus on a laboratory accident in China, while a U.S. intelligence analysis found there was insufficient evidence to prove the theory. Chinese officials have repeatedly dismissed the idea that the pandemic could have started in a lab, saying that the search for its origins should be conducted in other countries. Last September, researchers zeroed in on a short list of animals they think might have spread COVID-19 to humans, including racoon dogs, civet cats and bamboo rats. __ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.