logo
Britain's biggest pub company to slash jobs amid debt crunch

Britain's biggest pub company to slash jobs amid debt crunch

Telegraph14-06-2025
Britain's biggest pub company is set to cut a raft of jobs as bosses seek to slim down the debt-laden firm following Rachel Reeves's tax raid.
Stonegate Group, which runs more than 4,000 pubs across the UK including the Slug & Lettuce and Craft Union brands, has been working with restructuring specialists at AlixPartners over recent months, The Telegraph has learnt.
Up to 150 jobs are expected to be cut across the company's head office and central functions. It is understood no decision has yet been made on the exact number of roles under threat.
Jobs in its pubs and bars will not be affected and no pubs will close as a result of the restructuring.
It comes after a difficult period for Stonegate, which is owned by TDR Capital, the private equity house which also controls Asda.
It has lost hundreds of millions of pounds while straining under the weight of a near-£3bn debt pile while higher taxes levied on employers by the Chancellor this year have added to pressures.
Despite a rise in revenues in recent years, it reported pre-tax losses of £257m and £214m in 2023 and 2024 respectively as interest payments on its debts pushed it into the red.
A Stonegate spokesman said the planned cuts were partly due to a shift away from managed pubs – which it owns and operates itself – towards leased and tenanted pubs, which are rented out to and operated by publicans.
The latter have proved more profitable for Stonegate in recent years.
Managed pubs also require more resources and head office staff to oversee, making them less appealing to run at a time when the company is trying to return to profit.
The spokesman said: 'This, combined with rising costs, particularly after the recent Budget, means we must reorganise our support functions to reflect the shape of our business today.
'We recognise that this is a difficult time and we are committed to supporting our colleagues with care and fairness as we consult with the business on the proposed changes.'
Hospitality firms have been lumbered with extra costs after Ms Reeves raised employers' National Insurance contributions and lowered the threshold at which they are paid this year.
Bosses have argued the latter has disproportionately hurt hospitality firms because of the number of lower-paid and part-time workers they employ.
It will be the second round of job cuts at Stonegate in two years following more than 250 redundancies in 2023. Stonegate has also been reviewing rents and agreements with suppliers as part of restructuring efforts.
Last summer, TDR pumped £250m into the company to avoid defaulting on its debts, after the cost of servicing its borrowings rose from £301m to £450m in 2024. This included refinancing.
The refinancing gave Stonegate breathing room, allowing it to push the repayment date for much of its debts to 2029.
At the time, Stonegate said the deal would allow it to invest more in its pubs. The agreement saw one of its lenders, AlbaCore Capital Group, take a stake in the firm.
Domiciled in the Cayman Islands, Stonegate traces its history back to 2010, when TDR bought 333 pubs from Toby Carvery owner Mitchells & Butlers.
Its debts ballooned when it bought rival pub firm Ei Group – formerly Enterprise Inns – in a £3bn deal in 2019. The deal completed just before the pandemic forced the nation's pubs shut for months on end.
After the pandemic, soaring interest rates heaped pressure on firms with large debts.
Stonegate's troubles echo those of TDR-owned Asda, which too has been battling to bring down costs in the wake of its debt-fuelled buyout by the firm and the billionaire Issa brothers in 2021.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No new policies in next year's budget, says Mark Drakeford
No new policies in next year's budget, says Mark Drakeford

BBC News

time22 minutes ago

  • BBC News

No new policies in next year's budget, says Mark Drakeford

Finance Secretary Mark Drakeford will try to avoid political wrangling before next year's Senedd election by writing a "neutral" told Senedd members his final budget before the election will repeat this year's spending will not pay for new policies because that "will be for political parties to put before the Welsh electorate", Drakeford said it showed the "fragility" of Labour, which runs a minority government and has lost support in recent opinion polls. A draft budget for 2026/27 will be published in October, with MSs voting on a final budget in a statement, Drakeford said he did not want to tie the hands of the next parliament by publishing spending plans in the final weeks of a five-year Senedd the cabinet had agreed to plan "a business-as-usual budget", rising in line with he added he was "open to the possibility of working with other political parties who believe a more ambitious budget could be agreed".Taxpayer funding for public services falls if the Senedd cannot pass a budget - something that would have a "catastrophic impact", Drakeford cabinet's decision to restate this year's budget "is designed to maximise the chances that that risk can be avoided", he said."The politically neutral approach I have set out this afternoon is an attempt to secure stability and certainty for our public services and for our constituents," he said. 'Loss of authority' Drakeford said the next government will inherit a £400m fund to spend on what it wants after the Labour one seat short of a majority in the Senedd chamber, Drakeford needed the support of the Senedd's sole Liberal Democrat MP to pass a budget for this financial year. The Conservatives and Plaid Cymru voted against it in polls suggest a hung parliament is likely again after next May's election, with no party winning an outright MS Sam Rowlands said the "roll-over budget" was "an acknowledgement that there is a real risk of Labour not being in government after the next Senedd election"."I believe that's an admission of fragility and loss of authority by the Labour Party here in Wales," he Cymru MS Heledd Fychan said some voluntary groups and charities "are facing perhaps closure, so will be concerned and looking to next year's budget to see if they can survive or not".

Zero-hours contacts will be illegal in two years
Zero-hours contacts will be illegal in two years

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Zero-hours contacts will be illegal in two years

The government's landmark Employment Rights Bill, described by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer as a significant upgrade to workers' rights, will be implemented through a phased rollout extending until 2027. Key provisions, such as a ban on exploitative zero-hours contracts and 'day-one' protections against unfair dismissal, are scheduled to come into full effect in 2027. Immediate changes upon the Bill's royal assent include the repeal of Conservative-era industrial action restrictions and new protections for striking workers. Further reforms, including enhanced sick pay, 'day-one' paternity leave, and measures to end 'fire and rehire' practices, are slated for April and October 2026. The phased approach aims to give businesses ample time to prepare, a move welcomed by business groups, while union leaders urge earlier adoption of the changes and the Conservative opposition criticises the delay.

Macquarie digs deeper for redemption at Southern Water. There was no alternative
Macquarie digs deeper for redemption at Southern Water. There was no alternative

The Guardian

time30 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Macquarie digs deeper for redemption at Southern Water. There was no alternative

Many took the view in 2021 that Macquarie should have been run out of town, rather than be allowed to own another English water company. The giant Australian financial outfit's former outing, remember, was at Thames Water from 2006 to 2017, which was when the absurd games of financial leverage began at the UK's biggest water company. The then-chair of Ofwat later told MPs he asked himself the question 'What do we do here, with that reputation?' when Macquarie made the best financial offer to rescue Southern Water. The deal was done eventually with Ofwat's blessing. Macquarie-managed funds injected £1bn to take control and its infrastructure boss declared in an open letter that the firm would be 'a responsible long-term steward of Southern Water and believes it can help the company deliver the transformation it requires'. Part of that statement – the bit about being in it for the long term – is clearly true. Macquarie is now rescuing Southern for a third time, in effect. An extra £550m was injected in 2023. Now its consortium (of which it and its managed funds are about 90%) is putting in up to £1.2bn in equity to recapitalise Southern's operating company. The process is convoluted since only £655m is binding; a further £245m is intended to follow by the end of the year and the balance of £300m depends of the outcome of Southern's appeal to try to secure bigger bill increases than the 53% allowed by Ofwat. But, in the shoes of the regulator or a fearful secretary of state, Steve Reed, you'd be breathing a sigh of relief. Their nightmare was the thought that the current refinancing crisis at Thames would spill over to Southern, the next most stressed operator. Instead, Southern should now have sufficient capital to get it through the current five-year regulatory period. Unlike at Thames, the fisticuffs with bondholders took place behind closed doors. Lenders are taking a write-down from £865m to £415m across the complicated holding company group structure in what is a mini debt-for-equity swap to supplement the new capital. Macquarie's approach to transparency didn't extend to giving a leverage ratio for the regulated entity in recapitalised form – a critical metric – but the ratio is obviously lower than it was before the deal. Yet the Australian attempt at watery redemption is not quite the upbeat tale of emerging success presented in Tuesday's announcement. The claimed 'good progress' with Southern's transformation plan requires a large helping of context. Yes, pollution incidents may be down by 40%, but the top executives are still on Reed's banned list for bonuses on account of spills. Meanwhile, the company got a two-star rating in the Environment Agency's last assessment report – better than the one star Macquarie inherited, but still equal bottom-of-the-table. Ofwat's separate performance scorecard noted that in 2023-24 Southern 'reported the largest percentage net underperformance payment for a fourth consecutive year.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Those regulatory reports are almost a year old, so maybe the next annual crop will provide evidence of the 'momentum' behind the turnaround. Until then, however, Macquarie has merely demonstrated it can cough up capital when there is no realistic alternative. On-the-ground operational delivery is what counts. There is a long way to go. If the exercise is costing more than Macquarie expected in 2021, sympathy may be limited.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store