logo
GOP lawmaker torches Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz on Iran conflict: ‘I call them war pimps'

GOP lawmaker torches Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz on Iran conflict: ‘I call them war pimps'

Independent18-06-2025
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) appeared to side with Tucker Carlson in the intra-MAGA conflict over the United States' support of Israel's war with Iran, labeling members of his own party 'war pimps' while saying he doesn't want to 'see American boys and girls going to a faraway land.'
During a Wednesday morning appearance on CNN, the far-right congressman was asked to weigh in on the recent clash between Carlson and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), which featured the former Fox News star chastising the senator for not knowing basic facts about Iran while pushing for regime change and direct American action.
'You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of the government, and you don't know anything about the country!' Carlson shouted at Cruz at one point in the interview.
'There is a bit of a divide in your own party on this,' CNN anchor John Berman said while airing a clip of the Carlson-Cruz exchange. 'It seems like you're saying you don't want U.S. military involvement here. You're agreeing on that. And we saw in this new video, Tucker Carlson – who is someone who in the past has been very supportive of the president – had an interview with Sen. Ted Cruz from Texas.'
After playing footage from the heated discussion, Berman wondered where Burchett came down on this while noting that Carlson has called some Republicans and conservative media figures 'warmongers' while urging President Donald Trump not to militarily attack Iran.
'Yeah, well, I call them war pimps,' Burchett flatly responded before taking aim at Cruz and Sen, Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who has been pushing Trump to go 'all in' on Iran while saying it's 'time to close the chapter' on Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
'You know, Lindsey Graham's a friend of mine. Ted Cruz is a friend of mine,' he continued. 'Look, I got a daughter who just turned 18 last week on the same day as the president did… and I don't want to see her go to war.'
Noting that his parents fought in World War II, which he said was for a 'just cause,' Burchett then argued that he doesn't want to 'see American boys and girls going to a faraway land that many of us can't even find on a map.'
Insisting that 'the Israelis can handle this thing,' the Tennessee lawmaker reiterated that he didn't want the United States to further entangle itself in the escalating conflict.
'We do not need a three-front war in our lifetime,' he added. 'I just don't think that that's the route to go. There'll be room for debate. But I think we ought to let the president do his negotiating skills. That's what I elected him to do.'
Elsewhere in the CNN interview, Burchett also seemed to disagree with Graham and other Republicans who claim that American involvement is necessary because Iran's nuclear capabilities pose a direct threat to the United States.
'They can't get past Greece with their missiles. I think if they had, they would have already launched them. That's pretty evident in their last missile strike,' he stated. 'Again, I think we need to take a deep breath and slow down this thing and let the Israelis do their thing. And that's ultimately what's going to bring them to the negotiating table.'
With the president weighing whether to join Israel's war against Iran, which has included him urging the residents of Tehran to immediately evacuate while demanding 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER,' Carlson has led a growing right-wing insurgency that threatens to splinter the MAGA coalition.
Carlson, who has warned Trump for months about bombing Iran as other right-wing pundits egged the president on, accused the president of being 'complicit' after Israel preemptively struck Iran. Arguing that a war could 'end Trump's presidency' and the 'American empire,' Carlson has also taken aim at his old haunting grounds, calling his former Fox News colleagues 'warmongers' while claiming the network is 'turning up the propaganda hose to full blast' to justify a regime-changing war with Iran.
With Carlson attracting other prominent MAGA isolationists such as Steve Bannon and Marjorie Taylor Greene to his side, Trump finally decided to return fire at his longtime ally and informal adviser. 'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,' Trump blasted on Truth Social on Monday night.
The president even took to mocking Carlson, who was fired from Fox News in 2023, for no longer having a primetime cable news show – revealing once again just how much weight the media-obsessed Trump places on television.
'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying,' Trump seethed at this week's G7. 'Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amnesty International says Israel and aid system use starvation to commit Gaza genocide
Amnesty International says Israel and aid system use starvation to commit Gaza genocide

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Amnesty International says Israel and aid system use starvation to commit Gaza genocide

Amnesty International issued a report Thursday claiming a controversial Israel i- and U.S.-backed system to distribute aid in Gaza uses starvation tactics against Palestinians to continue to commit genocide in the Gaza Strip during Israel's war with Hamas. The U.K.-based human rights group condemned Israel and the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which the U.S. and Israel have backed to take over aid distribution in Gaza from a network led by the United Nations. Israel's foreign minister denounced the Amnesty report, saying the organization has 'joined forces with Hamas and fully adopted all of its propaganda lies.' Gaza's Health Ministry says more than 500 Palestinians have been killed at or near GHF distribution centers over the past month. The centers are guarded by private security contractors and located near Israeli military positions. Palestinian officials and witnesses have accused Israeli forces of opening fire at crowds of people moving near the sites. The Amnesty report said Israel has 'turned aid-seeking into a booby trap for desperate starved Palestinians' through GHF's militarized hubs. The conditions have created "a deadly mix of hunger and disease pushing the population past breaking point.' 'This devastating daily loss of life as desperate Palestinians try to collect aid is the consequence of their deliberate targeting by Israeli forces and the foreseeable consequence of irresponsible and lethal methods of distribution,' said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty's secretary general. Israel rejects claims The Israeli army says it has fired warning shots to control crowds and only fires at people it says are acting suspiciously. The Foreign Ministry and COGAT, the Israeli defense body in charge of coordinating aid to Gaza, said Israel has facilitated the entry of over 3,000 aid trucks into the Gaza Strip since May 19 and GHF has delivered boxes of food with the equivalent of 56 million meals. Humanitarian organizations say that amount is not nearly enough to meet overwhelming need in Gaza. GHF did not immediately return requests for comment. The World Food Programme says despite the new Israel-backed initiative, food consumption reached a critical low last month, with food diversity reaching its worst level since the conflict began. 'The continued closure of crossings, intensified violence since March, soaring food prices, and extremely limited humanitarian and commercial supplies have severely restricted access to even basic food items,' the WFP said in a June report. GHF hubs are close to Israeli military positions Amnesty's report follows a statement earlier this week from more than 165 major international charities and non-governmental organizations calling for an immediate end to the foundation. They say the new mechanism allows Israel to use food as a weapon, violates humanitarian principles and is ineffective. It's the latest sign of trouble for the GHF, a secretive initiative headed by an evangelical leader who is a close ally of President Donald Trump. Last month, the U.S. government pledged $30 million for the group to continue operation, the first known U.S. donation to the group, whose other funding sources remain opaque. GHF started distributing aid May 26 following a nearly three-month Israeli blockade that pushed Gaza's population of more than 2 million to the brink of famine. Palestinian witnesses have describe scenes of chaos around the distribution sites, and two contractors in the operation have told The Associated Press that colleagues fired live ammunition and stun grenades toward crowds of people. Palestinians often must travel long distances to reach the sites. In a statement Tuesday, GHF rejected criticism of its operations and claimed it has delivered more than 52 million meals to hungry Palestinians. 'Instead of bickering and throwing insults from the sidelines, we would welcome other humanitarian groups to join us and feed the people in Gaza,' GHF said. GHF has called for Israel's military to investigate the allegations from Gaza's Health Ministry, but last month the organization said there has been no violence in or around its centers and its personnel have not opened fire. Israel demanded the alternative plan because it accuses Hamas of siphoning off aid. The U.N. and aid groups deny there is significant diversion. Amnesty's allegations of genocide Amnesty accused Israel last year of committing genocide in the Gaza Strip during its war with Hamas, saying it has sought to deliberately destroy Palestinians by mounting deadly attacks, demolishing vital infrastructure, and preventing the delivery of food, medicine and other aid. Israel, which was founded in the aftermath of the Holocaust, has adamantly rejected genocide allegations against it as an antisemitic 'blood libel.' It is challenging such allegations filed by South Africa at the International Court of Justice and has rejected the International Criminal Court's accusations that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister committed war crimes in Gaza. ___ Dazio reported from Berlin. ___

Trump tariffs' explosive problem: 99% of fireworks made in China
Trump tariffs' explosive problem: 99% of fireworks made in China

Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Times

Trump tariffs' explosive problem: 99% of fireworks made in China

The fireworks industry is fretting that President Trump's tariffs on China will dampen their big blowout next year when Americans celebrate 250 years of independence. Ninety-nine per cent of consumer fireworks and 90 per cent of professional display fireworks come from China. Even the most impressive July 4 displays — on the National Mall in Washington and Macy's show in New York — are reliant on Chinese imports. 'These large signature events — probably 75 to 80 per cent of the product for those shows is manufactured in China,' said Julie Heckman, director of the American Pyrotechnics Association. 'The rest is going to come from Spain, Italy, France and Japan.' Heckman said planned displays in Washington and New York may be 'shortened' in 2026 to cut costs if the 30 per cent tariff remains. She said shows in small American towns could be cancelled altogether, especially if tariffs are returned to the 145 per cent rate imposed by Trump earlier this year. 'If the tariffs increase again to triple digits, small towns aren't going to be able to afford a show,' Heckman said. Fireworks for this year's displays were mostly purchased before Trump's tariffs hit, meaning the shows are largely going ahead as planned. But Lauren Collar, 43, a second-generation firework seller from Missouri, said her family business had to absorb the costs of tariffs this year and predicts shortages in 2026. 'We prepare an order 12 to 18 months in advance,' she said. 'We're uncertain what to do. You could see smaller communities not even shooting fireworks, because they just can't afford it.' Collar said it would take US manufacturers 'a decade' to set up pyrotechnics factories like those in China and even then most of the raw material would be imported and subject to tariffs. 'We're hopeful that the administration will understand our special circumstances and maybe we can get a partial exemption,' she said. Firecrackers were invented in the city of Liuyang, central China, during the Tang dynasty. By stuffing a concoction of charcoal, sulphur and saltpetre into hollowed-out bamboo stalks, Chinese artisans discovered that they could create a satisfying bang. More than 1,200 years later, the province of Hunan still makes fireworks for the rest of the world. For defenders of Trump's protectionist agenda, the simple answer would be to scrap the 1970s health and safety laws that effectively ended small-scale manufacturing in the US, allowing America's firework industry to compete once again with China. But even if these protections were weakened, it is not clear whether Americans would be willing to work in factories adopting Chinese health and safety standards. 'Fireworks are all made by hand. Very little automation is involved,' said Heckman. 'You're dealing with explosive compositions that are highly sensitive to heat, high humidity and friction. It's a very dangerous job.' Fireworks manufacturing is a dangerous business, and accidents are common YANG HUAFENG/CHINA NEWS SERVICE/VCG VIA GETTY IMAGES Earlier this month, nine people were killed in Hunan province by an explosion at a fireworks factory and accidents in China are fairly common. America's pyrotechnicians are hoping Trump's trade war with China will end soon. 'The firework industry is the most patriotic industry in the United States and wants nothing more than to be a significant component of helping America celebrate our 250th anniversary in 2026,' Heckman said. 'But the firework industry needs some relief … in these tariffs to make it happen.'

Vatican leak undermines Pope Francis and inflames debate over Latin Mass
Vatican leak undermines Pope Francis and inflames debate over Latin Mass

The Independent

time35 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Vatican leak undermines Pope Francis and inflames debate over Latin Mass

The debate surrounding the traditional Latin Mass within the Catholic Church has intensified significantly in the early days of Pope Leo XIV 's pontificate. It follows the alleged leak of Vatican documents that appear to contradict the rationale behind his predecessor Pope Francis 's restrictions on the ancient liturgy. These documents reportedly indicate that a majority of Catholic bishops who participated in a 2020 Vatican survey expressed general satisfaction with the Latin Mass. Crucially, they warned that imposing restrictions would "do more harm than good". The texts, originating from the Vatican's doctrine office, were posted online on Tuesday by Vatican reporter Diane Montagna, who has closely followed the Latin Mass dispute. Neither the Vatican spokesman nor the prefect of the doctrine office immediately responded to requests for comment or confirmation of the documents' authenticity on Wednesday. If verified, the leaked information could place considerable pressure on Pope Leo to address the liturgical divisions that became particularly pronounced during Pope Francis's 12-year papacy, especially within the United States. Leo has consistently stated that his primary aim is to foster unity and reconciliation within the Church, and many conservatives and traditionalists view the Latin Mass controversy as an urgent matter requiring resolution. In one of his most controversial acts, Francis in 2021 reversed Pope Benedict XVI 's signature liturgical legacy and restricted access for ordinary Catholics to the old Latin Mass. The ancient liturgy was celebrated around the world before the modernising reforms of the 1960s Second Vatican Council, which allowed Mass to be celebrated in the vernacular, with the priest facing the pews. Francis said he was cracking down on the spread of the old liturgy because Benedict's decision in 2007 to relax restrictions had become a source of division in the church. Francis said at the time that he was responding to 'the wishes expressed' by bishops around the world who had responded to the Vatican survey, as well as the Vatican doctrine office's own opinion. 'The responses reveal a situation that preoccupies and saddens me, and persuades me of the need to intervene,' Francis wrote at the time. Benedict's relaxation had been "exploited to widen the gaps, reinforce the divergences, and encourage disagreements that injure the church, block her path, and expose her to the peril of division', he said. The documents posted online, however, paint a different picture. They suggest that the majority of bishops who responded to the Vatican survey had a generally favourable view of Benedict's reform and warned that suppressing or weakening it would lead traditionalist Catholics to leave the church and join schismatic groups. They warned any changes 'would seriously damage the life of the church, as it would recreate the tensions that the document had helped to resolve'. The documents include a five-page 'overall assessment' of the survey findings, written by the Vatican's doctrine office, as well as a seven-page compilation of quotes from individual bishops or bishops' conferences. The documents contain some negative and neutral opinions, and say some bishops considered Benedict's reform 'inappropriate, disturbing', dangerous and worthy of suppression. But the Vatican's own assessment said the majority of bishops who responded expressed satisfaction. It cited the rise in religious vocations in traditionalist communities and said young Catholics in particular were drawn to the 'sacredness, seriousness and solemnity of the liturgy'. It is not clear what other evidence, anecdotes or documentation informed Francis's decision to reverse Benedict. But from the very start, Francis was frequently critical of traditionalist Catholics, whom he accused of being navel-gazing retrogrades out of touch with the evangelising mission of the church in the 21st century. The new documents have comforted traditionalists who felt attacked and abandoned by Francis. 'The new revelations confirms that Pope Francis restricted the Traditional Mass at the request of only a minority of bishops, and against the advice of the dicastery in charge of the subject,' Joseph Shaw, of the Latin Mass Society of England and Wales, said. 'The majority view of the bishops, that restricting the TLM would cause more harm than good, has sadly been proved correct.' In an email, he said Leo should address the issue 'urgently'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store