Economist calls for budget ‘prudence', as Central Bank governor suggests rethink is needed
Budget 2026
, while there is a case for postponing recurrent spending and
tax
cuts until there is 'greater clarity' on the negative implications of the
EU-US trade deal
, a prominent economist has said.
Dan O'Brien, the chief economist of the
Institute of International and European Affairs
, made the remarks while responding to comments from the
Central Bank
governor
Gabriel Makhlouf
suggesting the Government should rethink its approach to the October budget.
In its
summer economic statement
last month the Government said a €9.4 billion tax and spending package will form the foundation of the upcoming budget.
However, the Coalition warned at the time it may have to 'recalibrate' its strategy and reduce the size of the overall package if there is a 'deterioration in the
tariff
landscape' over the coming months.
READ MORE
The
European Union
has since struck a trade deal with the
United States
which sees EU goods, including those from Ireland, hit with 15 per cent tariffs by the US.
The Business Post reported on Sunday that Mr Makhlouf said Minister for Finance
Paschal Donohoe
now has 'more certainly' for planning the budget with the level of tariffs on EU goods known.
'Hopefully the summer economic statement is not the budget, and hopefully, by the time he (Mr Donohoe) gets there, he will have reflected again on what the trade situation is telling us,' Mr Makhlouf said.
He added: 'For an economy operating at full employment, we're adding more stimulus to the economy than it needs – and I would look again at what we're planning to do.'
Mr Makhlouf also told the paper: 'I think at the moment there's a risk that we're in the wrong place.'
[
What did the summer economic statement really tell us about Budget 2026?
Opens in new window
]
A spokeswoman for Mr Donohoe declined to comment on Mr Makhlouf's remarks.
During an interview on Newstalk radio on Sunday, Mr O'Brien was asked if he agrees Mr Donohoe needs to rethink the budget.
He said this suggestion is 'largely' correct, as 'we're facing a lot of uncertainty'.
Mr O'Brien added: 'I think the Government needs to manage expectations around this. There's been a lot of giveaways [in recent budgets]. Clearly we had a general election last year.'
He said there has been a 'big uptick in inflation' but this has 'come right back down again' and 'there isn't the justification for Government to be intervening to deal with every problem'.
Mr O'Brien said the implications of the trade situation for the pharmaceutical sector are uncertain, relying on the 'whims of the US president who may just decide he doesn't like the pharmaceutical sector in Europe selling stuff to the US and he may do something more radical'.
He added: 'So there's a lot of uncertainty here, and I think we need a lot of prudence in this budget.'
Asked about potential tax choices in the budget, Mr O'Brien argued there is 'no economic justification' for the Government's intention to reduce the
VAT
rate for the hospitality sector.
'One might strongly make the case that both recurrent spending and tax cuts maybe need to be postponed until we get greater clarity as to the negative implications of the trade deal and the extent to which it effects particularly the pharmaceutical sector and how that feeds into corporation tax revenues,' Mr O'Brien added.
'We just don't know how big a hit that could impose on the public finances if we get a change in pharmaceuticals sales to the US and that results in a reduction in
corporation tax
profits.'
Did the EU have its hands tied before striking a trade deal with the US?
Listen |
23:32
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Intel warned senior Government figures about high energy costs and planning issues
Tech giant Intel has warned a series of senior Government figures about high energy costs and planning issues threatening Ireland's competitiveness. Semiconductor chip manufacturer Intel is a big employer in Ireland with almost 5,000 staff here and its lobbying on these issues is shown in Government records released under the Freedom of Information Act. Maintaining Ireland's attractiveness to multinational companies is a priority for the Coalition amid the economic uncertainty over last week's trade deal with a 15 per cent tariff imposed on EU goods entering the US. The records include a note of a May 1st meeting between Intel representatives and Minister for Enterprise Peter Burke . READ MORE The document says Intel referenced a recent call between chief executive Lip-Bu Tan and Taoiseach Micheál Martin 'where the energy cost issue was discussed' and 'noted the need for Ireland to take demonstrable actions on this issue'. The Government side said forthcoming plans on competitiveness and large energy users 'would chart a pathway forward on this crucial issue'. Intel also raised issues with Ireland's planning permission regime and how 'unpredictability was a major business-planning obstacle'. The company was told by Mr Burke and an official that legislative changes and investment in resourcing An Coimisiún Pleanála 'should aid on that matter'. Mr Tan's call with the Taoiseach took place on April 14th. Intel described it as an 'introductory meeting' in a Register of Lobbying return, which set out how the company's boss 'reaffirmed Intel's steadfast commitment to Ireland' during the conversation. Separate records show Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers took a tour of Intel's Leixlip campus on the same day. 'Intel highlighted a number of areas that have proved challenging when justifying further investment,' a departmental note said, including the 'complexity and length of the planning process' and the 'comparatively high cost of electricity'. Other records show an Intel representative wrote to then-minister for public expenditure Paschal Donohoe in December telling him Ireland's 'competitiveness is currently under threat, particularly in regard to the cost of electricity'. Intel, which has lost market share in recent years, is undergoing a major restructuring internationally and there have been reports that it plans to cut up to 20 per cent of its global workforce. Some 195 mandatory redundancies are expected at Intel's Irish operations Ireland this autumn. The Irish Times understands these expected job losses are linked to Intel's overall restructuring internationally, and not the issues around energy costs and planning it raised with the Government. An Intel statement welcomed the Government's commitment to publishing a competitiveness action plan. 'To sustain growth and remain competitive, it is crucial to prioritise competitiveness, streamline the planning process, and focus on developing long-term sustainable and competitive energy solutions,' it said. 'We appreciate the meaningful steps the Government has taken to address these challenges.' A Department of Enterprise statement said work on the competitiveness action plan has been accelerated and it will be published in the coming weeks. 'Ireland holds a strong global competitive position, currently ranked seventh worldwide,' it said, adding 'we cannot afford complacency.' It also said Silicon Island, the Government's semiconductor strategy 'is a clear signal of Government support for a sector that is economically and strategically vital'. The department said energy prices 'have reduced from their peak in late 2023' but 'they remain too high' and it set out measures being taken to address this. A national energy affordability taskforce has been established 'to identify, assess and implement measures that will enhance energy affordability for households and businesses'. The statement said the Government has 'prioritised implementation' of the Planning and Development Act, which will 'bring greater consistency, clarity and certainty to the planning system'.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Moves to revive referendum on joining EU patent court as business groups contacted on timing
There have been tentative moves to revive the delayed referendum on Ireland's participation in the European Union's Unified Patent Court (UPC), with the Government seeking views of business groups on the timing of a rescheduled vote. The referendum on Ireland joining the 18 other EU member states that have signed up to the UPC system was originally pencilled in for June 2024 on the same day as the local and European elections. However, the holding of the UPC referendum was thrown into doubt amid the fallout from the defeat of the family and care referendums three months earlier. Soon afterwards the then-government announced it would be deferring the vote. Peter Burke , then minister for enterprise, said at the time: 'While the government continues to believe that joining the UPC is essential and that the referendum should be pursued, it is clear to me that more time is needed for public discourse and engagement on the matter to help inform the debate.' READ MORE The UPC is designed to provide a one-stop shop court for litigation on patents. The court's decisions will be binding on participating EU member states. Ireland joining in the UPC has been long called for by business groups and sectors such as the pharmaceutical industry. The Department of Enterprise has contacted business organisations and government departments about the referendum. Records released under the Freedom of Information Act include a letter from senior Department of Enterprise official John Newham to the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland (AmCham). The March 28th letter set out how the legislation on the UPC referendum was pending committee and final stages in the Seanad. Mr Newham, the assistant secretary general, wrote that 'once the legislative process has been concluded an order setting a date for the referendum will issue'. He wrote that the timing of any further advancement of the Bill would be subject to a decision by Government and it would decide a referendum date 'in due course'. He noted the last government 'had concluded that a broader public conversation' on the UPC 'was essential before a referendum was held' and he sought feedback 'in order to assess if sufficient engagement is being held on the matter'. Mr Newham asked for information on 'any initiatives undertaken or planned to assist public understanding of this critical issue'. He also sought 'views on the appropriate timing of a referendum'. Enterprise Ireland , IDA Ireland and Research Ireland were among government agencies contacted by the department as it sought feedback on public awareness of the UPC referendum. The Department of Enterprise confirmed that other organisations contacted included Chambers Ireland , Ibec , the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and BioPharmaChem Ireland, all of which, like AmCham sent responses. AmCham, which represents US companies in Ireland, responded on April 30th, saying: 'It is of the utmost importance that an informed discussion occurs to generate public engagement with the topic.' It said it would work with its members to advance discussion and consideration of the UPC. AmCham said a member survey from 2024 showed that 41 per cent of respondents supported Ireland joining the UPC and 58 per cent were neutral on the matter. The organisation said it would be holding a webinar 'outlining the impact for Ireland, with key expert and member perspectives' and it would also be developing a fact sheet on the UPC for dissemination among members. In response to queries AmCham told The Irish Times: 'While we continue to work with members on this topic, a webinar has not taken place.' It said that the timing of the referendum was 'a matter for Government'. A Department of Enterprise statement said: 'While the Government remains committed to holding the referendum, the timing remains under consideration at this juncture.'
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on funding for nature: not an optional extra
Two developments, one national and one at EU level, have caused legitimate alarm and anger among environmental NGOs. They regard them both as 'gutting' commitments to green measures at the very moment when we should be supporting the development of coherent nature recovery plans under the flagship Nature Restoration Law. It is understandable that such measures slip down the priority list, given the multiple challenges our societies are facing. But this is not acceptable. The existential threats of climate change and biodiversity collapses remain. So it is disturbing that the European Commission's proposal for its next budget indicates that the EU Life Programme – the dedicated fund for environment, nature and climate action – is likely to be repealed. Life's proven return on investment can be seen in many Irish rural communities, exemplified by the Burren Programme. 'It would gut one of the EU's most effective tools just when we need it most,' according to the European Environmental Bureau, which represents 190 member organisations and 30 million individual supporters. It should be listened to. READ MORE Meanwhile, the Environmental Pillar, the national platform for environmental charities, uses similar language to describe the Government's revised National Development Plan: 'the gutting of nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund to finance transport, energy and water infrastructure projects in the National Development Plan is very alarming' the group says, as it undermines guarantees on nature restoration. It certainly seems to make nonsense of the current consultations on developing and implementing the National Nature Restoration Plan with farmers, fishers and environmentalists. Funding for this plan is naturally a key concern for all involved, and if it is not ring-fenced it will inevitably shift to areas of more immediate concern. We cannot continue to consider the health of our natural landscape and climate as an optional extra in planning; if it does not inform the core of our thinking, everything else is undermined.
