What Investors Should Consider When Evaluating Startups In 2025
Investing in startups has always been a mixture of art and science—a delicate balance of data-driven analysis and qualitative judgment. This is especially true for the gaming industry, which is my primary focus.
Identifying high-potential startups has always been challenging for investors, but in 2025, it's a more complex task than ever. The startup landscape is now pulsing with relentless changes and volatility. Seemingly overnight, AI has gained prominence. Meanwhile, I'm finding that attempting to predict consumer behaviors falls short way too often, and the very rhythm of funding has evolved.
As an experienced investor, I review numerous pitches yearly, but only a handful capture my attention, and even fewer secure an investment. While quantitative metrics certainly have their place, my investment decisions ultimately hinge on something more fundamental: the qualitative essence of a startup that signals true potential.
So, what makes me say 'yes' to a startup in 2025? Here's my framework and what I encourage other investors to consider:
Founding Team: Industry Expertise, Vision And Execution
When evaluating a startup, begin with its people. The founding team's DNA is critical for a startup's success, especially in early stages. An investor is not merely buying into a product; they're investing in the individuals behind it, trusting their capability to transform vision into reality.
First, look for deep industry expertise. In games, for example, I look for founders who live and breathe the industry. Have they built games for years? Do they understand the audience and the tools inside and out? A clear understanding of the market, customer needs and competitive landscape lends credibility and enables teams to anticipate shifts proactively.
Second, consider their vision and personal qualities. Founders must show a genuine passion and unwavering drive for their business, signaling their readiness to make tough decisions and persevere through adversity.
Beyond these, compelling visionary leadership is the key to success. But a frequent misstep, especially in the games industry, is overemphasizing creative vision without addressing business fundamentals. I believe founders must be business-oriented.
Nothing proves the points above better than a proven track record. It provides tangible evidence of the team's ability to execute, adapt, navigate challenges and deliver results. Ideas are a foundation, but execution is everything.
Market Size And Product Potential
I seek startups addressing a large, growing total addressable market (TAM) with a clear customer segment. This ensures ample room for scaling and long-term growth.
However, in a competitive market, simply entering a large TAM isn't enough; companies must carve out a defensible niche. This often involves appealing to underserved audiences or offering something truly unique. Products that tackle painful problems in novel or more efficient ways always stand out to me.
So, the product itself should have significant potential and demonstrate a highly specific, differentiated value proposition that will resonate deeply with a defined segment of customers, allowing it to capture significant market share. There are five questions that I've found can help understand if a startup meets this criterion:
• Does it solve a real problem or fill a significant demand?
• Why hasn't anyone done this before?
• Why now?
• What differentiates this product from others?
• What's its edge?
Reasonable answers to these questions, showing a clear path to success, make me say, "Yes." But proof of market fit is still essential. This means looking for early customer interest, initial traction, validation from industry experts and solid market analysis.
Scalability And Sustainable Business Models
A solid business model should demonstrate clear scalability potential. Look for a profitable-looking business model with strong unit economics, capital efficiency and a realistic monetization strategy.
On top of that, there should be an edge—something defensible that competitors can't easily copy. Whether it's proprietary technology, a passionate community or some network effect, a unique advantage justifies why the business can capture market share.
Early traction is critical too. Look for real revenue, engaged users or partnerships that prove demand. In a cautious funding environment, metrics matter more than ever. At the pre-seed stage, founders should validate their business models, build a minimum viable product (MVP) and attract early customers.
In short, I crunch the numbers and ask:
• Can this startup grow big enough and fast enough to justify the investment?
• Is it capable of achieving 10 times growth in five years?
If the answer to both is yes, personally, it's a yes for me.
Realistic Valuations And Favorable Terms
Deal terms are critical to investor returns. An investor needs to be comfortable with both the structure and valuation. While specifics may vary, valuations should generally be reasonable, align with market benchmarks and account for potential risks.
Strategic Exit Planning: Starting With The End In Mind
To me, an exit strategy is not merely a final step but a design principle that influences every funding decision from day one. It dictates the type of intellectual property to develop (ensuring it's attractive to potential acquirers), the market segments to target (identifying consolidation opportunities), the emphasis on scalability and sustainable revenue, and the composition of the leadership team.
By envisioning potential acquirers or initial public offering requirements early, an investor can guide founders to build a company that's inherently more attractive and "exit-ready," significantly increasing the likelihood of a successful and lucrative return on investment. This proactive approach fundamentally de-risks the entire venture.
Investing in startups in 2025 may be riskier than ever, but the core hasn't changed: Great teams, compelling products and solid business plans win out. What has evolved is context. In my view, new markets, shifting user behaviors, hard-to-predict breakthroughs and setbacks in cutting-edge technologies play a bigger role.
The information provided here is not investment, tax or financial advice. You should consult with a licensed professional for advice concerning your specific situation.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
23 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Smiths Detection Announces Acquisition of Med Graphix Inc.
EDGEWOOD, Md.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Smiths Detection today announces its acquisition of New Jersey-based Med Graphix Inc. ('MGI'), enhancing the company's sustainable service offering by extending the lifecycle of critical components through repair, refurbishment, and reuse. MGI has been a long-standing service partner and third-party depot supplier for Smiths Detection. This deal marks a significant milestone in a partnership that has spanned more than two decades. MGI has been a trusted supplier of component-level repair, refurbishment, harvesting, and decommissioning services for Smiths Detection equipment. Their technical expertise and extensive experience have played a vital role in service delivery, inventory optimization, and cost reduction for several key Smiths Detection customers. Integration planning began in March 2025 and will continue through the end of the year to ensure a seamless transition for both customers and employees. Effective 1 August 2025, MGI will be a fully integrated part of the Smiths Detection family. Jerome de Chassey, President of Smiths Detection, said: 'This acquisition reinforces our commitment to service excellence and operational resilience. Bringing MGI in-house allows us to leverage their expertise while strengthening our global service infrastructure. It's a natural evolution of our long-standing partnership.' With this strategic investment, Smiths Detection further enhances its ability to deliver critical services and support to make the world a safer place.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Painting lines on soccer and football fields? That's a job robots can do now
Shaun Ilten had a problem. The senior director of turf and grounds for the Galaxy and Dignity Health Sports Park had 26 full-size practice fields, two game fields and a warm-up pitch to line ahead of last winter's Coachella Valley soccer tournament. And he had less than five days to do it. Since it takes three people nearly two hours to lay out and paint boundary lines on just one field, the math said Ilten wasn't going to make it. 'It's just not possible to do it all by hand,' he said. So he decided to skip the hand part and give the task to a couple of robots, who were able to square out and paint each field in about a quarter the time human hands would have needed. Without the robots, the largest preseason professional soccer event in the U.S. would have necessarily been a lot smaller. 'There would just be no way that it would be humanly possible,' Ilten said. What made it possible was Turf Tank, a GPS-linked machine about the size of large beach cooler that can paint athletic fields of any size for any sport. It was the brainchild of Jason Aldridge, an Atlanta-based entrepreneur with a long history of using technology to innovate workplaces, from restaurants and telecommunications to shipping and sports. The idea of using technology and robotics to relieve groundskeepers of the drudgery of striping athletic fields came to Aldridge about nine years ago, while he was watching business-reality TV show 'Shark Tank' with his son. It was, he said, an ancient ritual that needed a modern solution. 'Even back to the Olympics in ancient Greece, they used to line the lanes to run the sprints,' he said. Months later he partnered with Denmark developers, who four years earlier had designed a prototype robot based on a similar concept, and in 2017, he said, he sold his first two Turf Tanks to the Sozo Sports Complex in Yakima, Wash., and the Commonwealth Soccer Club in Lexington, Ky. Since then Turf Tank has grown into a company with more than 200 employees, tens of millions of dollars in annual sales and 5,000 clients, among them San Diego FC, the Galaxy, LAFC, Angel City, eight NFL teams and hundreds of colleges, including Pepperdine, California, UC Santa Barbara and Loyola Marymount. Turf Tank also drew the stylized on-field logo for last month's MLB All-Star Game in Atlanta. Two other Danish companies — Traqnology and TinyMobileRobots, whose robots have marked more than 2 million fields worldwide, the company says — offer similar services, as does the Swiss company Swozi and Singapore's FJDynamics. But Turf Tank claims to be the dominant force in the U.S. market. The Turf Tank robots, which weight up to 132 pounds and can hold 5.3 gallons of paint, are controlled by a computer tablet and guided by GPS technology linked to a portable base station, which acts as a reference point. All a user has to do is enter the dimensions of the field — the length of the sidelines, the width of the field — into a tablet and the robot does the rest in as little as 24 minutes. Still the concept of autonomous robots was a tough sell for people who are used to doing things by hand and not on a keyboard. Although it sounded like a good idea, most groundskeepers had to be convinced of the accuracy and reliability of the robots. Aldridge tried to sell the University of Alabama on the technology for Bryant-Denny Stadium on a scorching July day. The Turf Tank drew the horizontal and vertical lines without issue but the grounds crew director was certain it couldn't match the precision and accuracy needed to paint hash marks down the center of the football field. So Aldridge took him to lunch and when they returned there was 160 perfect hash marks, each four inches wide, two feet long and 60 feet from the sidelines. The University of Alabama, Aldridge said, now has three robots, two for athletics and one for intramural fields. Ilten also had more doubt than conviction at first. 'I was skeptical when they first reached out to me, just because of how it works. It's all GPS. If something gets in its way, is it going to go rogue?' he said. 'But they brought it out, did a demo and I measured the lines after it was done and they were within a centimeter.' That was 2019 and Ilten now has three robots at Dignity Health Sports Park which he uses to line the main stadium field for football, rugby and lacrosse and the surrounding practice fields for soccer. (For Galaxy games he prefers to mark the pitch the old-fashioned way, with a wheel-to-wheeler roller, which allows him to use a thicker and brighter paint.) 'It just makes everything a little bit more efficient,' said Ilten, who manages a staff of 20. 'Instead of having two or three guys take an hour and half to line a field, I can send one guy out and it takes 35-40 minutes.' But the bulk of Turf Tank's customers don't come from pro or major college teams. The time-saving the robots bring can be life-changing for high school groundskeepers and local park directors, who often must line multiple fields in a day. 'It was a pain point,' said Aldridge, 48. 'They go to school to learn how to grow grass. Painting a field has kind of been that part of the job that wasn't what they really wanted to do, but it was a huge necessity. 'It's like the icing on the cake, right? Building a beautiful field, that's kind of where our robots come in.' ⚽ You have read the latest installment of On Soccer with Kevin Baxter. The weekly column takes you behind the scenes and shines a spotlight on unique stories. Listen to Baxter on this week's episode of the 'Corner of the Galaxy' podcast.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Lemonade: Q2 Earnings Snapshot
NEW YORK (AP) — NEW YORK (AP) — Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) on Tuesday reported a loss of $43.9 million in its second quarter. The New York-based company said it had a loss of 60 cents per share. The results topped Wall Street expectations. The average estimate of five analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research was for a loss of 81 cents per share. The company posted revenue of $164.1 million in the period, also beating Street forecasts. Four analysts surveyed by Zacks expected $162.4 million. For the current quarter ending in September, Lemonade said it expects revenue in the range of $183 million to $186 million. The company expects full-year revenue in the range of $710 million to $715 million. _____
