Paris Hilton's nonprofit grants $1M to women-owned businesses
Hilton's 11:11 Media Impact, in partnership with GoFundMe.org, is donating $1 million in grants to 50 women-owned businesses. Each business will receive $25,000 each. The grant will help businesses like childcare centers, neighborhood restaurants, florists, fitness studios, boutiques and more.
Richard Sherman's family robbed at gunpoint
'Last week, I had the incredible honor of meeting some of the inspiring women whose small businesses were devastated by the LA Fires—and are now getting a second chance,' she wrote on Instagram. 'I personally read every application, and I just want every single one of these women to know: I see you, I believe in you, and I'm so honored to support your journey.'
According to L.A. County's Economic Development Corporation more than 1,800 businesses were located in the Eaton and Palisades Fire zones employing thousands and generating nearly $1.5 billion in annual sales.
The recovery grants aim to help those businesses rebound.
'Let's keep showing up for women entrepreneurs—because when women thrive, we all thrive,' she continued in her post.
'Full House' star Dave Coulier says he's cancer free
In the wake of the fires, the heiress also worked with the Pasadena Humane Society to help reunite families with their pets.
Hilton herself lost her Palisades home during the January wildfire.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Travel stock earnings: What to watch for
A number of travel-related stocks will report quarterly results the week of July 21, including Hilton (HLT), Wyndham (WH), and Travel+Leisure (TNL). Jefferies managing director David Katz joins Market Catalysts with Julie Hyman to share what he will be watching for. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. We're navigating how to play the travel sector with the Yahoo Finance investor playbook. Hilton, Windham, travel and leisure. They're among the companies reporting this week. And joining me now with his take on some of those top performers is David Katz, managing director at Jeffries. David, it's good to see you. I want to start sort of high level here on the travel industry and whether we are seeing demand come back in a way that could benefit sort of a wide swath of these travel providers. What do you think? Yeah. I look, I think, I think demand for travel is relatively solid, but, but there's a couple of important threats to it. The most important threat is the inbound international travel. You may remember that, you know, last summer, the, the value of the dollar was high, and it was cheaper to travel abroad. And so the balance of inbound versus outbound was unfavorable for the North American oriented hotel companies. This year was supposed to be an easy comparison in that regard. And with the dollar being down, it, it should have followed through, but it has not so far. And I think part of that is the, you know, the, the frankly unfavorable light in which people are looking at international travelers or looking at at US cities. The number one inbound market into the US is Canada. And you know, they have not been traveling to Florida and Arizona, uh, and the US, uh, as expected. And so, you know, that's I think the biggest threat to what is otherwise some very solid demand generally. And does that mean that sort of domestically, more domestically oriented lodging companies, for example, could potentially do better in this environment? Well, yes. And, and it's one of the reasons why, uh, and I'm sure you'll get to this why we continue to have a buy rating on Wyndham hotels. Uh, they're roughly 70% drive to travelers. Um, and, and that implies more of a domestic orientation to it. Um, you know, people are always going to travel. It's a question of where and how they get there. Uh, and at the moment, you know, yes, there is more domestic inbound travel, uh, then, then outbound internet, you know, or inbound international travel as well. Um, well, Wyndham reports on Wednesday, right? And the stock has down about 14% year to date. So do you foresee them giving some better news in there that could help turn the shares around? Yeah. Uh, I do. Uh, I do. Look, we, we look at let starting high level. We love the Hotel C Corp business model, including Windham and Hilton, and, and, and frankly all of them. Right? They, they don't own real estate. They don't fund CapEx. They earn fees. Uh, their returns on invested capital are fantastic. They return a ton of capital on an annualized basis. And Wyndham is certainly a part of that. They tend to be limited service and economy oriented and pure franchise, right? Great business model. At the moment, if you look at the rev par numbers that are coming across in limited service and economy, they have been somewhat weak. There has been concern about consumers at that end of the economy. And so, you know, we're seeing weekly rev par numbers that have been, you know, down modestly, pretty much for a year plus now. And while the what, what is the key driver of returns and those stocks is really growing their system or net unit growth. And Wyndham is going to grow theirs as much as four and a half percent this year. Uh, there is still this weekly focus of the rev par numbers, that's sort of a bad catalyst. I think they're going to come on and report a very strong quarter, right? Um, you know, they may, um, you know, the rev par numbers not going to be great, but the nug is important and the ancillary fees are very important. And so I, I do think they're going to have a strong quarter. Gotcha. And for those who are not familiar, by the way, revenue, rev par, revenue per available room, unit revenue, in other words, um, is what we're talking about here. Um, Hilton is the other company that's going to be reporting on Wednesday. There too, I know you're focused on that net unit growth. In other words, like how many more rooms are there going to be, right? That's what we're talking about here. Are they also going to be seeing that kind of growth this year? Right. So theirs is actually a little bit better. And I, and I saw your colleague put it up, some stock performance charts, and Hilton's outperformed its peer Marriott considerably, and part of that is the growth profile that they have. Uh, and that growth profile is manifested in net unit growth, right? They're guiding 6 to 7% this year. Now, I think when we get into where that's coming from, um, you know, a good portion of it is coming from conversions, meaning existing properties that are either independent and choosing a flag or they're choosing from another flag into Hilton. And you know, Hilton has been a share taker in that regard for, for a while. And I think it's why they get the valuation premium, and it's why they've gotten the stock outperformance. In terms of what you're going to see and hear from them, you know, there again, rev par has not been fantastic, but I think when people look at Hilton and they look at this group, they're much more focused on net unit growth and the ability to sustain that growth profile and then what they do with the fees, returning capital, um, you know, has been just a huge piece for Hilton and its peers over the years. Related Videos Why so many companies are trying to become banks Navitas skyrockets, Dollar Tree upgraded, Sarepta & FDA CoreWeave, Opendoor, Apple: Trending Tickers Block, Pinterest, Etsy, Target: Trending Tickers Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Business Journals
16 hours ago
- Business Journals
Automation in the age of austerity: Why local governments are turning to civic tech
For decades, the relationship between government and technology has been complex, with Silicon Valley historically shying away from public sector contracts, instead favoring growth, scale and lean cycles over procurement red tape. But history tells a different story when government inefficiency becomes too big to ignore. After 9/11, a group of technologists who had built anti-fraud tools for PayPal pivoted to national security, working with federal agencies to streamline data intelligence. That effort became Palantir. While national security and defense contracting is an equally vital and lucrative space in terms of government contracting work, it is far from the only area where the government could be looking for help from the tech world. Now, government technology — once a quiet corner of enterprise SaaS (software as a service) — is returning to the spotlight, particularly with the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI). The drivers? Budget shortfalls, federal layoffs, post-COVID-19 labor shortages and rising public expectations for fast, digital-first service delivery. In Washington, D.C., where local revenues are projected to drop by $1 billion over the next three years, operational efficiency is no longer optional.* One of the most overlooked inefficiencies in modern government operations is returned mail, with over 6 billion mail pieces being returned in the U.S. annually, primarily due to outdated or incomplete addresses.* The consequences of lost mail can range from inconvenient to disastrous: notices like Medicaid or SNAP renewals, tax forms, jury summons and voter materials or critical documents from health care providers and insurers may arrive past billing windows (or not at all). Additionally, private enterprises spend billions on outbound mail that never lands due to outdated addresses. It was this problem — widespread, persistent and largely unsolved — that caught the attention of a pair of D.C.-based entrepreneurs behind a new software venture named Sapphire LLC. After exiting two prior businesses in the private sector, the founders Almustafa El Hillo and Deron Cooper set out to identify high impact but underserved administrative problems in government. Having spent years participating in and watching D.C. government performance hearings and internal oversight sessions, one issue appeared across departments from health care to housing: returned mail. The mail was coming back by the thousands and no one had a modern solution. Enter the first product from Sapphire: a cloud-based platform that automates return mail processing using AI. The product syncs with an organization's existing address book or CRM, reads uploaded envelopes, scans USPS databases for change-of-address data and reaches out to recipients automatically to retrieve updated addresses. It then syncs those corrected addresses back into the organization's system. In short, it replaces hours of manual follow-up with seconds of automated processing. The technology is currently patent pending in the U.S., filed under the provisional title: Systems and Methods for Intelligent Return Mail Processing and Address Management. is one of a growing wave of startups emerging with software that doesn't reinvent the wheel — it simply helps the wheel spin faster. Governments at every level are facing personnel shortages and operational bottlenecks. Currently, agencies, public and private alike, must process each returned envelope manually. The current manual process: open it, review the undeliverable code, attempt outreach and then update records — and that's assuming an updated address is even provided. The labor cost is significant, with estimates ranging from $5 to $20 per envelope — multiply that by the thousands (or millions) of mail pieces some institutions send each month and the inefficiency compounds. How can it be integrated into already existing mailroom practices? Currently, the conventional workflow of processing return mail is an email, text and a voice call — all sent out manually. Sapphire has automated this entire process so that an email, text and voice call can be customized to any organization with the push of a button. Specifically for the voice call, Sapphire is utilizing an emerging AI technology that can detect the tone of someone's voice and tailor its responses to better interact with the recipient of the call. According to its founders, utilizing cuts processing times by more than 80%, making it an invaluable new tool for large organizations and their employees alike, who will not have to spend hours tediously searching for updated addresses. While the process itself is being automated, a human will still provide oversight to make sure nothing slips through the cracks. While automation often leads to questions around job displacement, solutions like are tools that empower teams to be more efficient and are being met with increasing interest. This is especially true in cities like Washington, D.C., where operational budgets are shrinking and the cost of inefficiency is growing. Sapphire recently began putting pilot programs in motion, with initial testing beginning with government agencies and university mailrooms, two of the many environments where return mail presents a daily operational challenge. Many Business Processing Outsourcing (BPO) firms, from call centers to helpdesks, could benefit from Sapphire's software, which it has developed with It is the first in what could become a suite of products that automate large-scale workflows. In the coming weeks, Sapphire will conduct demos of the product with interested organizations before officially launching it in the next one to two months. If you would like to schedule a demo or learn more about Sapphire and you can contact them on their website. Discover how is helping government agencies and businesses cut costs and boost efficiency with AI-powered automation. Learn more or request a demo at
Buzz Feed
a day ago
- Buzz Feed
Worst TV Sitcom Characters Of All Time
We all have those TV characters we absolutely love! For example, I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who doesn't absolutely love Sophia, Dorothy, Blanche, and Rose on The Golden Girls. But just as memorable are the ones who drive us completely up the wall. Whether they're annoying sidekicks, overly dramatic main characters, or just plain unlikeable, some sitcom figures manage to be very, very divisive. Recently, redditor Final_Target_4274 wanted to know about the divisive sitcom characters when they asked: "Who is the worst sitcom character of all time?" Well, people had OPINIONS! Below are the top and most often repeated sitcom characters that people just can not stand: "Urkel on Family Matters. Dude was annoying, yet became popular, and then took over the whole fucking show. Kimmy Gibbler was similarly annoying, but never became the focal point." —Efficient-Hornet8666 "Kimmy Gibbler on Full House. Her neediness was only surpassed by her inability to take a hint. Her awkwardness made me feel second-hand embarrassment." —MerriweatherJones "Rachel Green on Friends. She is a real bitch and is actually one of the worst characters in any TV show." —LordCoke-16"Rachel is actually the most appalling. She is such a difficult character to like. Any person who likes to portray her as a victim, I immediately think less of."—Odd_Firefighter_8193 "Whoever Idris Elba was on The Office." —Marshiznit"Charles Miner and he's aware of the effect he has on women."—Vikingaling "Beverly Hofstadter on The Big Bang Theory must enter this chat. NOTE: I adore the actress, and I think the character is brilliant. But Beverly is objectively awful across every category. Truly nailed it." —SkatingNerd4Life "Seven on Married... with Children." —VStarlingBooks"Unwatchable episodes!"—mayfare15 "I don't know if it counts, but I dislike Gene Belcher of Bob's Burgers. I dunno what rubs me wrong, maybe just the general grossness of his jokes? Or his personality. He's the weakest link." —nazieatmyass "Randy on Season 8 of That '70s Show. and it's not even close." —Flat-Artichoke4289"Randy is totally inoffensive. He's a lightning rod for hate because of the circumstances of his arrival. A shame it really put the brakes on Josh Meyers' career because I thought he was great on MadTV."—Luchalma89 "Jim from According to Jim." —FrequentLunch2711"Today, I coincidentally looked up how long this terrible show was on, and it somehow was on for eight seasons. I've never found Jim Belushi to be funny at any point in his career, including this garbage show."—PHX480 "I really liked Cheers, but I couldn't bear Diane. An awful character that I felt was really badly portrayed. I understand that many people loved her, which baffles me! Maybe her character didn't 'travel' outside the USA!" —Automatic-Scale-7572 "Nellie from The Office." —johndhall1130"Nellie was annoying because of the storyline. It was frustrating that she just claimed Andy's job, just because he had one day off to sort out things with Erin. That's not how jobs work."—Sean_13 "Frank Grimes from The Simpsons." —Plane-Tie6392"Good ole Grimey…"—Madduxfan31-97 "Doug Heffernan on King of Queens. He acts like a perpetual teenager. He expects Carrie to do everything around the house despite having a demanding job of her own." —rachel_ct "Bernadette from The Big Bang Theory. Her character changes from one episode to another. She does a 180 within the same episode. Strong personality traits yet completely undefined as a character." —blackrain1709 "Principal Belding on Saved by the Bell. He was obsessed with Zack and even followed him from elementary school to high school." —szatrob "Phoebe was the worst character on Friends. I enjoy Lisa Kudrow outside of that role. Just hate Phoebe as a character. She was a terrible friend; she almost cost all of them their jobs." —Mr-Mortgages "Raymond on Everybody Loves Raymond." —Noshitsweregiven69"Fucking Ray Barone. I remember seeing a few odd episodes growing up and laughing... tried to watch from the beginning as an adult a couple of years back and that show was fucking garbage. Like, I could not even get through the first season, but it did make a lot of people's careers, so there's that, I guess."—Global_Intern_9248 "The neighbor/ carpenter guy on Schitt's Creek. I can't stand him." —SurrrenderDorothy "Gina Linetti on Brooklyn Nine-Nine is just an awful person who the rest of the cast gaslit the audience into thinking was awesome." —JustSomeBloke5353 "The wife, Jill, from Home Improvement. She just lacked any kind of joy and was a vortex in the home that would suck up any happiness her sons or husband brought." —Scambuster666 "Sheldon Cooper on The Big Bang Theory." —Away_Ad_5390"THANK YOU! What an obnoxious character — and completely unrealistic that he would have any friends at all given the way he treated literally everyone who knew him like total crap."—phm522 "Tom Haverford on Parks and Rec. The character, to me, was just a bad person who had no redeeming qualities." —skipper_jonas_grumby "I'm sure this is unpopular, but Michael Scott. I can't fucking stand him, and every time I try to watch the show, I give up after half a season. Still haven't made it past season 5, and I don't plan to ever finish it." —Goldfishyyy You can read the original thread on Reddit.
