
Japan reluctant to recognize Palestinian statehood
Britain, France and Canada, three of the Group of Seven major industrial countries, have announced plans to recognize Palestine as a state in September, an effort to increase pressure on Israel to end its war in Gaza.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi, the government's top spokesman, did not give a clear answer at a news conference Friday about whether Japan, also a G7 member, would follow suit.
"We will continue to conduct a comprehensive review, including the appropriate timing and methods, with a view to supporting progress for peace," he said.
Hayashi also emphasized Tokyo's aim of achieving a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Japan has taken a neutral position on peace in the Middle East. It has worked to support Palestinians, providing assistance in cooperation with Islamic countries in Southeast Asia such as Indonesia and Malaysia.
While continuing to supply humanitarian aid for Palestinians, Tokyo is expected yo hold off on any decision to formally recognize Palestine as a state.
Japan is seeking to realize a two-state solution through dialogue, and recognizing it as a state could provoke a backlash from Israel. The United States' unwavering support for Israel is also a factor in Japan's position.
A senior Foreign Ministry official said that "each country has its own domestic circumstances" on recognizing Palestinian statehood.
"There's no reason to follow" Britain and others, another senior ministry official said. "Japan has to think about relations with the United States and Israel."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Mainichi
37 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
City in Kyoto Pref. calls for probe into Japan-US military drill held without prior notice
KYOTANGO, Kyoto -- The Kyoto Prefecture city of Kyotango on July 31 called for confirmation of the facts surrounding a joint Japan-U.S. military exercise that went ahead at a U.S. base in the city without prior notification to local officials. The Kinki-Chubu Defense Bureau of the Ministry of Defense admitted that it was also unaware of the joint exercise and stated, "We will investigate the facts and provide a response." The Kyotango Municipal Government raised the issue at a Defense Ministry-hosted liaison conference on safety and security measures related to the Kyogamisaki Communications Site in Kyotango, which is equipped with an X-band radar for detecting and tracking ballistic missiles. One local resident voiced concerns about the failure to notify the city, stating, "Civilian control is being ignored. Japanese and U.S. military organizations are acting independently on the front lines, which is extremely dangerous." Joint Japan-U.S. training exercises have often been held at the Kyoto Prefecture site in the past, but the Ministry of Defense has usually informed the city and local districts about the content of the drills in advance. This time however, even the Kinki-Chubu Defense Bureau, which has jurisdiction over the area, was unaware of the exercise -- an unusual state of affairs. Kyotango Deputy Mayor Kazuyoshi Nakanishi pointed out during the meeting that a post on the communications site's Facebook page on July 16 showcased the joint training between the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force's 7th Infantry Regiment from the Kyoto Prefecture city of Fukuchiyama and the U.S. military. He urged the Defense Ministry to "properly inform the city and local residents about training exercises without fail." In response, the Kinki-Chubu Defense Bureau apologized, stating, "We deeply regret the inconvenience caused. We will ensure that information is provided to the city and local districts in the future." However, it also stated, "We do not have any information that we can explain." The Facebook post stated that U.S. soldiers and SDF members "conducted a comprehensive exercise as a part of a FTX (Field Training Exercise)," which "consisted of various scenarios, which contributes to our bilateral success as a combined military force." One resident near the communications site expressed their concerns, stating, "The most serious issue is that the joint Japan-U.S. exercise was conducted on the front lines without (Japanese) defense authorities being informed. This is a grave situation. Conducting drills without defense authorities' knowledge is unacceptable under civilian control. I want the facts to be thoroughly investigated and publicly released." According to a resident who witnessed the training near the site, the exercise was conducted July 10. (Japanese original by Toshio Shioda, Maizuru Local Bureau)


NHK
an hour ago
- NHK
Ukraine's foreign minister expected to visit Japan seeking cooperation
Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha is expected to visit Japan starting Sunday for talks with his Japanese counterpart and other senior officials. Diplomatic sources in Japan and Ukraine say Sybiha will meet with Japanese Foreign Minister Iwaya Takeshi and others. It is his first visit to Japan since he assumed office as foreign minister. The sources say Sybiha will accompany a Ukrainian delegation to the Ukrainian National Day event to be held at the World Expo in Osaka on Tuesday. The delegation includes First Lady Olena Zelenska and the deputy prime minister. Ukraine's decision to send its foreign minister is apparently aimed at highlighting the importance of relations between the two countries. Ukrainian officials are likely to call on Japan to ramp up its sanctions against Russia and help in Ukraine's reconstruction. The head of Ukraine's presidential office, Andriy Yermak, wrote in a social media post on Friday that he had held a video conference with Okano Masataka, Secretary General of Japan's National Security Secretariat. Yermak noted that Russia is working with North Korea in the development and production of drones. He said that Ukraine and Japan had agreed to launch a regular mechanism for defense consultations.


Yomiuri Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Executive Order Sets No Date to Cut Auto Tariff;U.S., Japan Begin to Diverge on What Agreement Means
Uncertainty has yet to be dispelled over details of an agreed-upon automobile tariff to be imposed on Japan by the United States. An executive order issued Thursday by the White House to impose a 15% tariff on Japan will place a heavy burden on Japanese companies. But the order did not specify an actual date for when the duty on automobiles will be reduced from the current 27.5% to 15%. The Japanese government has boasted of that reduction as the key result of its recent tariff negotiations with the United States. 'It is so disappointing, as we were hoping that [the auto tariff] would be reduced at the same time as the reduction of the 'reciprocal tariff,'' an executive of a leading automaker said after learning that the executive order issued by U.S. President Donald Trump made no mention of an automobile tariff. Since April, a 27.5% tariff has been levied on automobiles. The recent Japan-U.S. agreement is supposed to reduce the tariff to 15%, but when it will be implemented is uncertain. The car tariff squeezes manufacturers' bottom lines. 'It is becoming a burden day by day,' said a senior automaker official. 'We hope the updated tariff rate will be applied as soon as possible.' Economic revitalization minister Ryosei Akazawa said Friday, 'We will urge [the United States] to take steps to fulfill the agreement as soon as possible.' However, the reciprocal tariff and the car tariff are based on different laws. The United Kingdom waited more than a month to see a lower tariff levied on its cars after reaching an agreement with the United States. Many products affected Meanwhile, the reciprocal tariff on most Japanese exports will be set at 15% from Thursday. 'While the hurdle has been lowered [from the initially announced rate], the impact of the tariff remains unclear,' said Hitoshi Suzuki, president of sake brewery Ichinokura Co. in Osaki, Miyagi Prefecture. Riding a Japanese cuisine boom, Ichinokura has built up its exports to the United States, and the tariff hike comes as a significant blow. Sake was subject to nearly zero tariffs at 3 cents per liter, but that will now rise to 15%. Tariffs on fishery products will also increase. A seafood processing company in Mombetsu, Hokkaido, has doubled its scallop exports to the United States since China imposed an import ban on Japanese seafood products in 2023. 'If we pass on the tariff increase through our prices, customers in the United States may hesitate to buy,' the president of the company said. According to the Japanese government, products with original tariff rates of 15% or higher will continue to be subject to the same tariff rates. This was a special measure agreed upon between the European Union and the United States, and Japan had also agreed to the same mechanism. However, this was not explicitly stated in Thursday's executive order. Even Akazawa, who led the negotiations, told reporters Friday, 'We need to examine the details' of the agreements. No joint document made The lack of a joint agreement document has also made the deal unclear. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Fox News on July 23, 'We'll evaluate [Japan's performance] every quarter and if the president's unhappy then we'll boomerang it back to the 25% tariff rate, both on cars and the rest of their products.' Itochu Corp. Executive Vice President Tsuyoshi Hachimura said Friday at a press conference: 'The agreement has not been put into writing, and there is even talk of evaluating [Japan's performance], so nothing has been decided yet. At this stage, it is better not to be too positive.' The government also intends to take domestic measures. 'We will make every effort to mitigate the impact on industry and employment, such as providing financial support,' Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said when he heard opinions from the automobile industry in Tokyo on Thursday. Saisuke Sakai of Mizuho Research & Technologies, Ltd. pointed out uncertainty for companies, saying that the impact on small and medium-sized enterprises would be particularly significant. 'It is necessary for the public and private sectors to work together not only to provide financial support to companies but also to help them shift away from dependence on exports to the United States and develop products with high added value,' Sakai said.