Mon Medical Center earns A in Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade
The Leapfrog Group is a safety-based nonprofit formed by major employers and health care groups and issues its safety grades twice a year, in spring and fall. Mon Medical Center was the only West Virginia hospital to receive an A in the spring grading.
The Leapfrog Group assigns a letter grade to nearly 3, 000 general hospitals on how well they prevent medical errors, accidents and infections.
David Goldberg, president and CEO of Mon Health System and Davis Health System — Vandalia Health Northern Region, and executive vice president of Vandalia Health, said, "Our mission every day is personalized care. It's every patient, every time, one patient at a time. And that's what this is about. While it ebbs and flows — the letter score — what doesn't ebb and flow is our dedication to being 100 % focused on the need of a patient each and every time."
Mon Medical Center scored an A grade in fall 2019, B in spring 2020, C in fall 2020, A in spring 2021, Bs in fall 2021 and both times in 2022, fell to a C in spring 2023, and B in fall 2023.
This spring, the hospital scored above average for infections, problems with surgery, error prevention and staff training and practices. It achieved the best overall score for infections and staffing.
For safety problems, it scored a hair below the national average score of 1.00, with a 1.07. The best score was 0.53 and the worst was 3.10. It scored above average in three of seven categories in this area.
Goldberg said Leapfrog data runs 12-18 months behind. "We've been on a journey to improve, and we've seen significant reductions in infection rates, falls, hospital-acquired conditions. We've also bolstered so much in our intensive care unit, with dedicated intensivists."
Patient experience scores continue to be in the top 10 % to 25 %, he said, and patient safety scores continue to rank high.
"We're thrilled to be an A, " he said. "But what that really goes to show and what it continues to show is that Mon Health Medical Center continues to lead with quality, safety and service."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dominion Post
12 hours ago
- Dominion Post
Mon Medical Center, WVU Medicine hospitals recognized in U.S. News annual Best Hospital rankings
dbeard@ MORGANTOWN – Vandalia Health Mon Medical Center and four WVU Medicine hospitals received recognition in the U.S. News & World Report's 2025–2026 Best Hospitals rankings. Mon Medical Center was recognized as a High Performing hospital in three areas: pacemaker procedures, treatment of arrhythmia and hip fracture care. High Performing is the highest distinction a hospital can earn as part of U.S. News' Best Hospitals Procedures & Conditions ratings, Vandalia said. 'This national recognition is a reflection of the exceptional expertise and commitment of our care teams,' said David Goldberg, President and CEO of Mon Health System and Davis Health System, Vandalia Health-Northern Region, and Executive Vice President of Vandalia Health. 'Whether treating complex arrhythmias with the latest technology, performing life-changing pacemaker procedures or helping patients recover from hip fractures, our physicians, nurses and support staff deliver care with precision, compassion and excellence. We are proud to provide our patients with advanced, nationally recognized care — close to home.' Krystal Atkinson, chief administrative officer and chief nursing officer of Vandalia Health Mon Medical Center and chief nursing executive of Vandalia Health–Northern Region, said, 'Earning High Performing ratings in both orthopedic and heart care speaks volumes about the skill, collaboration and dedication of our clinical teams. From the bedside to the surgical suite, our teams work together to ensure each patient receives safe, evidence-based care that leads to better outcomes and faster recoveries.' In addition to Mon Medical Center, Vandalia said, Vandalia Health Charleston Area Medical Center was named High Performing for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colon cancer surgery and treatment of pneumonia and prostate conditions. The four WVUM hospitals were recognized as High Performing hospitals for 19 Procedures and Conditions. WVU Medicine J.W. Ruby Memorial Hospital received its sixth-consecutive ranking as the top hospital in West Virginia. It was also named High Performing in three specialties: gastroenterology and GI surgery; orthopedics; and urology. In the Procedures and Conditions category, Ruby Memorial was recognized as High Performing for abdominal aortic aneurysm; aortic valve surgery; back surgery (spinal fusion); colon cancer surgery; diabetes; heart arrhythmia; heart attack; heart bypass surgery; heart failure; hip fracture; hip replacement; kidney failure; leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma; lung cancer surgery; pacemaker implantation; prostate cancer surgery; stroke; transcatheter aortic valve replacement Camden Clark Medical Center in Parkersburg was recognized in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); heart arrhythmia; heart failure; and pneumonia. Thomas Memorial Hospital in South Charleston was recognized for COPD. And United Hospital Center in Bridgeport was recognized for COPD; heart arrhythmia; heart attack; heart failure; hip fracture; leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma; and pneumonia. 'This recognition is the direct result of our teams' unwavering commitment to advancing the mission of WVU Medicine: to improve the health of West Virginians and all we serve through excellence in patient care, research, and education,' said Albert Wright, Jr., president and CEO of the WVU Health System. 'It is my privilege to witness the impact of this hard work on a daily basis, and it's gratifying to see our people get the kudos they deserve.' This was U.S. News' 36th annual rankings. U.S. News evaluated more than 4,400 hospitals across 15 adult specialties and 22 procedures and conditions; only one third of them earned an award. And only 152 hospitals ranked in at least one of the specialties. To determine the Best Hospitals, U.S. News said it analyzed each hospital's performance based on objective measures such as risk-adjusted mortality rates, preventable complications and level of nursing care. The Best Hospitals Specialty rankings methodology and Procedures & Conditions ratings methodology measure patient outcomes using data from over 800 million records of patient care.
Yahoo
26-06-2025
- Yahoo
Oxidative stress is one of the 'most important factors' that causes aging — here's what you can do to reduce it
Oxidative stress is one of the primary drivers of aging, but your diet can play a role in tamping it down — or accelerating it. Experts have long linked our diets — particularly those high in fat or carbohydrates — to increased inflammation and oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is an imbalance between free radicals (the bad guys) and antioxidants (the good guys) in the body. It plays a role in several chronic and degenerative conditions, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, in addition to neurological and respiratory diseases. While oxidative stress is a natural process that occurs in all living organisms, we can take steps to reduce its impact and, in turn, lessen the hallmarks of aging. This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Contact a qualified medical professional before engaging in any physical activity, or making any changes to your diet, medication or lifestyle. The North American lifestyle, in general, "is not very healthy and is harmful," Dr. Cory S. Goldberg, a plastic and craniofacial surgeon and former Division Head of Plastic Surgery at Trillium Health Partners, told Yahoo Canada. "We can definitely live better and longer with some basic principles and implementations." Oxidative stress ages you "in an absolute way," he said. "It is probably one of the most important factors that cause aging." Oxidative stress is "probably one of the most important factors that cause aging."Dr. Cory S. Goldberg Anything that raises the number of free radicals in your body, triggering an imbalance, can cause oxidative stress. Pollution, stress, smoking, sun exposure and excessive alcohol consumption all cause oxidative stress, but it's also heavily influenced by diet. "The food we eat is probably the biggest and most important contributing factor to having bad health and bad skin," Goldberg, who is certified in functional medicine, said. "There is a direct relation between your gut bacteria and your skin, and also between your gut bacteria and your brain and your psychological health and emotional well-being," he said. "In fact, a majority, about 90 per cent of your serotonin, is produced in your intestines, not in your brain." Imagine your body is like a power plant or production facility. The power plant produces energy, proteins and the things that make you function. It also creates waste as a byproduct of those processes, Goldberg explains. "Your body is constantly mopping up [that waste]." However, "it takes energy to do that, and if it doesn't get fully mopped up, it harms you quite a lot." Your diet, especially eating foods that are high in antioxidants — berries, kale, pecans, beans and dark chocolate, for example — is crucial because it helps you manage this oxidative stress. "There is no one diet that fits everybody. There's no gospel on diet," Goldberg said. "Principles are usually the best things to follow, and ultimately, what each individual needs differs and what one would need over their lifetime changes." A good place to start is by eliminating or reducing your consumption of ultra-processed foods. Public health experts have long warned about the dangers of ultra-processed foods — manufactured foods that have been highly processed and often contain additives — and a 2025 study confirmed the association between their consumption and all-cause mortality. The research, which involved more than 240,000 people, found that "every bite" of ultra-processed food can increase your risk of early death. Goldberg said that if someone were to drastically reduce their intake of ultra-processed foods, say from 60 per cent of their caloric intake to 10 per cent of their caloric intake, it would make a "huge difference" in the amount of inflammation in the body. Reducing your consumption of ultra-processed foods would not only decrease the risk of premature death and certain diseases, said Goldberg, but it would also make a significant difference in skin health and the hallmarks of premature aging. "What manifests on the skin is more than just the soft descriptor of 'looks flat' or 'doesn't have a glow,'" Goldberg said. "What's actually manifesting is inflammation. Your skin is responding to the toxins that are being released by the bacteria in your intestine if they are unhealthy bacteria." If you're eating foods that "tend to propagate the unhealthy bacteria," it can cause inflammation and skin disorders. Eczema, skin irritations and inflammation are "absolutely worsened by imbalances of gut bacteria." One of the easiest ways to improve the gut microbiome is by eating more fruits and vegetables and incorporating colour into your diet. Eating the rainbow, Goldberg advised, is a great way to integrate more and varied nutrients into your daily life. Additionally, the plastic surgeon recommended a supplement called GliSODin, which he referred to as "the thing" for managing oxidative stress. GliSODin combines a melon extract (naturally rich in SOD) and a wheat protein (gliadin) to help protect against damage caused by oxidative stress. GliSODin, an antioxidant enzyme, contains superoxide dismutase [SOD], which in biochemistry, people call the "king of enzymes," Goldberg explained. "It is, quite possibly, one of the, if not the most important, enzymes our body produces because it is the thing that allows us to manage this oxidative stress." "There's not a lot of ways to up your SOD," but GliSODin is one of them. "I have all my surgical patients take it," he said. "I did a study on this stuff 10 years ago, measuring skin inflammation with images [...] and after just three months of taking it, there was a statistically significant reduction in skin inflammation." Goldberg, who is a voluntary scientific advisor for the company, said taking the enzyme was a "no-brainer." "It has been shown to have benefits in every organ system," he said. "I think that it should be put in the water." While studies agree there are "therapeutic potentials of superoxide dismutase," other experts warn the enzyme is not easily absorbed into the bloodstream when taken orally and question the benefits of oral supplements.
Forbes
11-06-2025
- Forbes
Trump, Archimedes Hold Lessons For CMS Hospital, Safety Rules
Archimedes theorized he could use a lever to move the earth, while Donald Trump has advised using ... More leverage to seal deals. Medicare should use its leverage to move hospitals to provide better, safer care. (Photo by) As the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services mulls new payment rules for hospitals, its leaders should consult a crucial concept from the book that made Donald Trump famous, then apply it to quality and safety regulations. Also, Archimedes. The concept they have in common is leverage. In The Art of the Deal, then-real-estate-magnate-and-now-president Trump writes, 'Leverage is having something the other guy wants.' It is, he emphasizes, 'the biggest strength you can have.' Since CMS spends over $1 trillion on health care each year, it has the unique leverage of something everyone wants. The agency should apply that leverage in two ways as it finalizes the inpatient prospective payment system draft regulations, whose comment period closed June 10. First, CMS should strengthen requirements that can make care better, safer and more cost-effective. Second, it should move decisively to give patients themselves more direct leverage in the form of actionable information. Approximately one in four hospitalized adults suffers a patient safety problem of some sort, according to the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector General. Assessing the human impact, the Leapfrog Group has estimated that 160,000 Americans died avoidable deaths in 2018 from only the types of medical errors addressed in its voluntary standards. While there's a wide range of estimates of the financial impact of error, hospital-acquired infections alone are estimated to cost up to $45 billion. CMS has already established a timetable for implementing Patient Safety Structural Measures, but those measures' use could be amended or even eliminated due to objections to its impact on payment that some organizations are still surfacing even in this current rule-making cycle. At first glance, the requirements seem rudimentary. For instance, hospitals must merely 'attest' to elementary actions such as addressing safety topics at governing board meetings and showing a 'leadership commitment to eliminating preventable harm.' Reporting begins this year, though results won't be public until next fall. Hospitals that don't submit data can have their Medicare pay reduced, albeit not until Oct. 1, 2027. Do the feds really need leverage to prompt such basic actions? Unfortunately, a survey by the hospitals' own trade group, the American Hospital Association, found that only 50 percent of hospital boards had quality as one of their priorities. Even more worrisome, 52% of respondent to the 2022 AHRQ Survey of Patient Safety Culture survey said 'hospital management seems interested in patient safety only after an adverse event happens.' CMS should also demand more, and more useful, hospital transparency. The agency is proposing a couple of steps. It wants inpatient quality data on its Compare website to include data on Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, once a small slice of Medicare but now 54% of all those enrolled. The agency also wants to require cancer hospitals, previously exempt from reporting, to now publicly report quality measures. Comments submitted by Patients for Patient Safety US praised that proposal as a way to 'better support patient and family decision-making about where to seek intensive cancer care.' (Disclosure: I'm a PFPS US member.) But CMS can get patients an even better deal. The Leapfrog Group's comments to CMS called out meaningless transparency (my adjective, not theirs) in which the Compare website data is statistically adjusted so that 90% of hospitals seem no different than the national average. This, the group wrote, 'sends a dangerous message to consumers [that] all hospitals are the same,' even though 'the difference can mean life or death.' In my own comments, I urged CMS to stop displaying data in a complex manner that confuses consumers. I advocated switching instead to a 'radical' transparency based on Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, a framing that resonates emotionally. An actionable framework I developed with Johns Hopkins associate professor Matt Austin mapped common hospital quality measures into three Maslow categories, with a 'drill down' possible via the web for more detail. Those categories were: 'Will I be safe?' (for Maslow, that correlates with the basic need for survival and safety from harm); 'Will I be heard?' (in Maslow's hierarchy, the need for esteem and respect from others); and 'Will I be able to lead my best life?' (self-actualization). Meanwhile, Leapfrog urged CMS to improve data usefulness by reporting results from federal programs using the actual name of the brick-and-mortar hospital, not its CMS Certification Number. I've urged something similar in regard to Medicare Advantage star ratings,, which aren't part of the current regulatory draft. Right now, star ratings of health plan quality aren't based on what a local plan does, which most consumers would assume, but on the CMS plan contract number, which at times applies to plans located across the entire country. Leapfrog also advocated eliminating the exemption from public reporting that, in addition to cancer hospitals, applies to critical access hospitals, pediatric hospitals, hospitals in U.S. territories and other facilities. Every patient, Leapfrog wrote, deserves 'the same safety, quality and resource use information.' Separately, Patients for Patient Safety urged CMS to fix a 'foundational flaw' undermining accurate patient safety data by providing patients with what amounts to a powerful lever. Current error reporting relies on hospitals self-reproting; that has resulted in only about 5% of harm being reported, according to research cited by Patients for Patient Safety . Patients 'notice things others miss,' Patients for Patient Safety pointed out, yet 'we are systematically excluded from harm reporting systems.' The group called for CMS to empower patients and families to directly report harm. As I noted in a previous Forbes column, two goals CMS administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz immediately set out when he took office were 'empowering the American people' to better manage their health and holding providers 'accountable for health outcomes.' The quality and safety rules supported by activists represent a golden opportunity to take giant steps in that direction. Finally, there's Archimdes. The ancient Greek mathematician famously said of leverage, 'Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.' By comparison, CMS has only to use the powerful leverage of its quality and safety regulations to move the American health care system. As President Trump described leverage in his book, 'Don't do deals without it.'
