"Faced So Much": J&K Students Evacuated From Iran On Journey Back To India
The students, who had been stuck amid the escalating tensions in Iran, were first flown to Armenia, then to Doha, before landing in Delhi. Their safe return was a moment of relief for their families across the country.
However, what was expected to be the final leg of their journey turned into an unexpected ordeal. After arriving in Delhi, many of the students voiced their displeasure over the condition of the buses arranged to transport them home to Jammu and Kashmir.
The students described the buses as being in poor condition, unfit for travel, and unworthy of the long journey they had just endured.
"We've faced so much during the evacuation, but the buses provided for the last part of our journey were in such bad condition that even animals wouldn't travel in them," one student was quoted as saying. "We were thankful for the evacuation, but this final stretch was not what we expected after everything."
The students, who had been waiting at the Delhi airport for hours, were finally offered a Volvo bus around 1 PM, after waiting for over 8 hours. Despite the delays, the students expressed gratitude for the safe evacuation but felt disappointed with the last-minute arrangements.
In response to their complaints, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah took to social media, acknowledging the concerns raised by the students. A post shared by the Chief Minister's Office assured that proper deluxe buses would now be arranged to transport the students home.
"The Chief Minister has taken note of the request of the students evacuated from Iran regarding the quality of buses arranged to transport them from Delhi to J\&K. The Resident Commissioner has been instructed to coordinate with Jammu and Kashmir Road Transport Corporation (JKRTC) to ensure that suitable deluxe buses are arranged," the statement read.
The students, many of whom had been in Iran for their studies, praised the central government's efforts in ensuring their safe evacuation amidst the ongoing conflict. However, they hope the final leg of their journey home will reflect the care and attention that they received during their evacuation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
6 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Parliament debate on Operation Sindoor shows Indian democracy is ‘reeling' away
At 10.32 pm on Monday, Rajasthan MP Hanuman Beniwal rose to speak in the Lok Sabha. Six minutes in, the chair rang a bell to let him know that he was running out of time. This piqued the Jat leader. 'What has happened?' he asked. 'You gave me a chance so late in the night anyway. It is certain that I won't be in the newspapers tomorrow. I will have to make do with social media.' Beniwal's reaction encapsulates how elected representatives seem to increasingly be approaching debates in Parliament. Rather than making substantive interventions, many MPs are choosing to deliver a series of snippets tailored for social media – specifically, video-sharing platforms like YouTube and Instagram. This tendency was on full display during the much anticipated discussion on Operation Sindoor this week. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh set the tone for the debate by sidestepping the contentious issue of India losing aircraft during the strikes. 'We determine if a child has done well in an examination by looking at the results,' Singh argued. 'Only his marks should matter to us. Not how many pencils he broke or how many pens he lost.' The clever metaphor worked well for the mainstream media but not for Congress leader Rahul Gandhi. The leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha cited public comments made by Army personnel to suggest that the government's tactics were to blame for the alleged loss of equipment. In response, Anurag Thakur of the Bharatiya Janata Party asked for Gandhi's position to be rechristened 'Leader of Opposing Bharat' and called his party 'Islamabad National Congress'. News agency ANI deemed these 'fiery' comments reel-worthy. Not to be outdone, Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, while trying to pin responsibility for the security lapses in Pahalgam on the ruling party, decided to name the terror victims one by one for effect. This was the opportunity for theatrics. Each time Vadra uttered a name, BJP MPs screamed 'Hindu!' Those in the Opposition started chanting 'Indian!' in response. The excruciating clash found a sizeable audience online. Those who neither belong to the ruling nor the Opposition alliance, such as the Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi, sought attention in other ways. Owaisi had received flak from his supporters for his enthusiastic participation in the all-party delegations that went overseas after Operation Sindoor. He swung the other way in the Lok Sabha, criticising the government's foreign policy and its military preparedness. But what made waves on social media was his demand that India withdraw from playing a cricket match against Pakistan scheduled in September. 'Does this government have the courage to tell the grieving families that they should watch the cricket match with Pakistan because their loss has been avenged?' Owaisi asked. The focus on military and foreign policy matters did not stop regional politicians from signalling to their own audiences. In keeping with the thrust of the Bhasha Andolan launched on July 27 by Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee, her MPs spoke in Bangla. To counter them, Bengal leaders of the BJP demonstrated their own proficiency in the language. It is not as if everything that happened in Parliament this week bordered on the frivolous. Representatives from Jammu and Kashmir as well as Punjab – two regions that bore the brunt of the recent fighting between India and Pakistan – made critical interventions. Their speeches fell through the cracks. The MP from Amritsar, for example, flagged the 'politicisation' of the armed forces. He was referring to controversial claims about protecting the Golden Temple during Operation Sindoor made by a senior Army officer. His turn to speak came after midnight though. Perhaps the most important speech of the monsoon session was delivered by Mian Altaf Ahmad of the J&K National Conference. His constituency includes Pahalgam, Poonch and Rajouri – places which accounted for the bulk of casualties before and during Operation Sindoor. Ahmad prayed that the region does not experience conflict again. But he also pleaded with the home minister to provide bulletproof ambulances and bunkers in the area before future wars. 'We have to make arrangements so that the next time something like this happens, decent, innocent people don't get caught in the crossfire,' he hoped. Not quite the stuff that flies on Instagram reels or YouTube shorts. Here is a summary of last week's top stories. Trump and New Delhi. United States President Donald Trump said that he does not care about 'what India does with Russia' and that 'they can take their dead economies down together, for all I care'. The comment came a day after he announced on Wednesday that Washington will impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from India from August 1. He also said that India will have to pay a 'penalty' for buying military equipment and oil from Russia amid the war on Ukraine. However, on Thursday, Trump said that his administration is still negotiating final tariff rates with New Delhi. He also announced that the US would help develop Pakistan's 'massive' oil reserves. 'Who knows, maybe they'll be selling oil to India some day!' the US president said on social media. Malegaon blast case. A court in Mumbai has acquitted Bharatiya Janata Party leader Pragya Singh Thakur, Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit and five others in the 2008 Malegaon blast case. The court held that the prosecution had failed to establish their guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Six persons were killed and around 100 were injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in Malegaon in northern Maharashtra on September 29, 2008. The court said there was no evidence that Thakur owned or was in possession of the vehicle. The court directed the Maharashtra government to pay Rs 2 lakh as compensation to the families of those who died in the blast and Rs 50,000 to those who were injured. Crimes against women. Former Janata Dal (Secular) MP Prajwal Revanna has been convicted in a rape case. The judge held that Revanna was guilty of raping a 48-year-old worker employed at the Revanna family's farmhouse and recording the assault. The quantum of punishment is likely to be announced on Saturday. This is the first verdict in four cases that have been filed against Revanna, the grandson of former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda. Three women have filed sexual assault cases against Revanna. The fourth case involves charges of sexual harassment, stalking and criminal intimidation under the Indian Penal Code. He was suspended from the Janata Dal (Secular) in April 2024 after videos of alleged sexual assaults on several women, allegedly recorded by Revanna himself, surfaced. He was arrested on May 31, 2024. Johanna Deeksha writes about . Pahalgam terrorists killed. Union Home Minister Amit Shah told Parliament that three terrorists involved in the Pahalgam terror attack were killed on Monday in a security operation codenamed Operation Mahadev. The Army had said on Monday that it had killed three suspected militants in the Lidwas meadows of Srinagar's Dara area. Shah claimed on Tuesday that the men, identified as Suleiman Shah, Afghan and Jibran, were members of the Lashkar-e-Taiba terror group. They were identified as having been involved in the Pahalgam attack by those who had provided them shelter, said the minister. Also on Scroll this week
Hans India
6 minutes ago
- Hans India
Parliament must condemn Trump blabber
US President Donald Trump has launched a scathing attack on India, calling its economy "dead" and imposing a 25 pr cent tariff on its imports, effective from August 1. Trump expressed displeasure with India's purchase of oil and defence equipment from Russia, stating that India has "always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia" and is Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China. He said that maybe India will buy oil from Pakistan someday, which further strained the already tense relationship between the two neighbours. The Indian Parliament should condemn Trump's statement in one voice, as his remarks have sparked concern and added fuel to the escalating tensions between the US and India. Ganti Venkata Sudhir, Secunderabad Modi's foreign policy dealt Trump blow US President Donald Trump's announcement to impose a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods has dealt a severe blow to the Indian economy. Citing India's trade ties with Russia and high tariffs as reasons, this decision is set to disrupt Indian exports, particularly in critical sectors like pharmaceuticals and textiles. The move has sparked widespread criticism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's foreign policy, which has failed to avert the crisis. Despite Modi's much-touted close relationship with Trump, the lack of progress in securing a favourable trade agreement highlights a perceived leadership shortfall. Urgent measures are needed to safeguard India's economic interests. Srinivaas Goud Muddam, Hyderabad
Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US penalty risk on Russian oil may add USD 9-11 billion to India's import bill
India's annual oil import bill could rise by USD 9-11 billion if the country is compelled to move away from Russian crude in response to US threats of additional tariffs or penalties on Indian exports, analysts said. India, the world's third-largest oil consumer and importer, has reaped significant benefits by swiftly substituting market-priced oil with discounted Russian crude following Western sanctions on Moscow after its invasion of Ukraine in February oil, which accounted for less than 0.2 per cent of India's imports before the war, now makes up 35-40 per cent of the country's crude intake, helping reduce overall energy import costs, keep retail fuel prices in check, and contain inflation. The influx of discounted Russian crude also enabled India to refine the oil and export petroleum products, including to countries that have imposed sanctions on direct imports from Russia. The twin strategy of Indian oil companies is posting record profits. This is, however, now under threat after US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian oil and weapons. The 25 per cent tariff has since been notified but the penalty is yet to be specified. Coming within days of the European Union banning imports of refined products derived from Russian-origin crude, this presents a double whammy for Indian refiners. Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst (Refining & Modeling) at global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler termed this as "a squeeze from both ends". EU sanctions - effective from January 2026 - may force Indian refiners to segment crude intake on one side, and on the other, the US tariff threat raises the possibility of secondary sanctions that would directly hit the shipping, insurance, and financing lifelines underpinning India's Russian oil trade. "Together, these measures sharply curtail India's crude procurement flexibility, raise compliance risk, and introduce significant cost uncertainty," he said. Last fiscal, India spent over USD 137 billion on import of crude oil, which is refined into fuels like petrol and diesel. For refiners like Reliance Industries Ltd and Nayara Energy - who collectively account for a bulk (more than 50 per cent in 2025) of the 1.7-2.0 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian crude imports into India - the challenge is acute. While Nayara is backed by Russian oil giant Rosneft and has been sanctioned by the EU last month, Reliance has been a big fuel exporter to Europe. As one of the world's largest diesel exporters - and with total refined product exports to Europe averaging around 200,000 bpd in 2024 and 185,000 bpd so far in 2025 - Reliance has extensively utilised discounted Russian crude to boost refining margins over the past two years, according to Kpler. "The introduction of strict origin-tracking requirements now compels Reliance to either curtail its intake of Russian feedstock, potentially affecting cost competitiveness, or reroute Russian-linked products to non-EU markets," Ritolia said. However, Reliance's dual-refinery structure - a domestic-focused unit and an export-oriented complex - offers strategic flexibility. It can allocate non-Russian crude to its export-oriented refinery and continue meeting EU compliance standards, while processing Russian barrels at the domestic unit for other markets. Although redirecting diesel exports to Southeast Asia, Africa, or Latin America is operationally feasible, such a shift would involve narrower margins, longer voyage times, and increased demand variability, making it commercially less optimal, he said. Kpler data shows a notable decline in India's Russian crude imports in July (1.8 million bpd versus 2.1 million bpd in June), aligning with seasonal refinery maintenance and weaker monsoon-driven demand. However, the drop is more pronounced among state-run refiners, likely reflecting heightened compliance sensitivity amid mounting geopolitical risk. Private refiners, who account for over 50 per cent of Russian crude intake, have also begun reducing exposure, with fresh procurement diversification underway this week as concerns over US sanctions intensify. Ritolia said replacing Russian crude isn't plug-and-play. The Middle East is the logical fallback, but has constraints - contractual lock-in, pricing rigidity, and a mismatch in crude quality that affects product yield and refinery configuration. "The risk here is not just supply but profitability. Refiners will face higher feedstock costs, and in the case of complex units optimized for (Russian) Urals-like blends, even margins will be under pressure," he said. On the future course, Kpler believes India's complex private refiners - backed by robust trading arms and flexible configurations - are expected to pivot toward non-Russian barrels from the Middle East, West Africa, Latin America, or even the US, where economics permits. This shift, while operationally feasible, will be gradual and strategically aligned with evolving regulatory frameworks, contract structures, and margin dynamics. However, replacing Russian barrels in full is no easy feat - logistically daunting, economically painful, and geopolitically fraught. Supply substitution may be feasible on paper, but remains fraught in practice. "Financially, the implications are massive. Assuming a USD 5 per barrel discount lost across 1.8 million bpd, India could see its import bill swell by USD 9-11 billion annually. If global flat prices rise further due to reduced Russian availability, the cost could be higher," it said. This would increase fiscal strain, particularly if the government steps in to stabilize retail fuel prices. The cascading impact on inflation, currency, and monetary policy would be difficult to ignore.
