logo
NHS facing ‘absolutely shocking' £27bn bill for maternity failings in England

NHS facing ‘absolutely shocking' £27bn bill for maternity failings in England

The Guardian12 hours ago
The NHS is facing an 'absolutely shocking' £27bn bill for maternity failings in England, the Guardian can reveal, after a series of hospital scandals triggered a record level of legal claims.
Hundreds of babies and women have died or suffered life-altering conditions as a result of botched care in NHS trusts across the country in recent years, prompting the government to launch a 'rapid' national inquiry.
Analysis of NHS figures shows the potential bill for maternity negligence in England since 2019 has reached £27.4bn – far more than the health service's roughly £18bn budget for newborns in that time.
The number of families taking legal action against the NHS for obstetrics errors rose to a record of nearly 1,400 a year in 2023 – or 115 a week, double the number in 2007, according to figures released under the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act.
Labour MP Paulette Hamilton, the acting chair of the Commons health and social care select committee, said the figures were 'absolutely shocking' and represented a 'devastatingly high number of deaths and injuries of mothers and babies'.
She added: 'The words 'eye-watering' come nowhere near to describing the enormous financial cost of these cases to the NHS, arising from failings within its own provision of care.'
An NHS source said about half of the 1,400 claims a year may not result in compensation payouts, so the amount paid out would be lower. However, compensation only accounts for part of the total 27bn figure, a larger share being legal costs. In the past six years, the NHS has spent £24.6m on legal fees for claims that did not result in damages.
NHS Resolution, the organisation that handles negligence claims for the NHS trusts in England, recorded in its most recent annual report, published on Thursday, that the cost of settling all maternity-related claims was £37.5bn. This amounts to nearly two-thirds of its total £60bn clinical negligence liabilities bill, a sum described by senior MPs as 'jaw-dropping'.
Jeremy Hunt, the former Conservative health secretary, said: 'It should be a matter of national shame that we now spend more on maternity litigation than the total cost of running maternity services.'
Hunt said the NHS was still not doing enough to learn from mistakes and the biggest problem was that clinicians fear being sacked for admitting errors.
Jess Brown-Fuller, the Liberal Democrat hospitals spokesperson, accused the Conservatives of a 'scandalous' neglect of maternity services.
She added: 'The crisis in our maternity services is being laid bare through the trauma that so many families have to deal with. Now these figures are showing just how much damage it is causing to our health service.'
The £27.4bn figure is the estimated value of maternity claims arising out of incidents since April 2019. NHS Resolution said the figure could change as there is an average three-year gap between an incident and a legal claim, the most serious birth injuries resulting in payments made over several years – and sometimes for the duration of the child's life.
The figures have been revealed amid growing alarm about the state of maternity care in NHS hospitals across England. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, last month ordered a national investigation into 'failing' services for women and babies, following a series of scandals in Shrewsbury and Telford, Nottingham, Barrow-in-Furness, Leeds and elsewhere.
Inspections of 131 NHS maternity units across England classed as many as two-thirds as 'inadequate' or 'requires improvement' for safety between 2022 and 2024.
The Care Quality Commission, the healthcare regulator, said issues including staff shortages were 'systemic' and 'widespread', with almost half of the 131 maternity units it reviewed performing below standard.
Hamilton said the state of maternity care in the UK was 'completely unacceptable'.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Previously unreported FoI figures show the NHS paid out £134m in the nine years to March 2023 to the families of nearly 300 women and about 400 babies who died in NHS settings.
However, the biggest settlements were for clinical errors that resulted in severe long-term disabilities, for which the NHS is liable for the lifetime costs of the child's care.
As much as £1.7bn was paid out over failures to respond to abnormal foetal heart rates and £1.55bn for failing to properly monitor second-stage labour between 2006 and 2024. A further £247m was paid out over birth defects owing to clinical negligence.
Natalie Richardson, a medical negligence solicitor for Patient Claim Line, said there had been a 79% increase in the number of birth and pregnancy cases the firm had taken on this year.
Leeds teaching hospitals NHS trust, whose maternity units were last month downgraded to inadequate over safety concerns, paid out nearly £72m in compensation due to 107 obstetrics failings in the nine years to March 2024 – including 13 fatalities and 14 stillbirths.
In the same period, Nottingham University hospitals NHS trust was ordered to pay nearly £60m for 80 clinical damages claims related to pregnancies – including seven deaths.
That trust is at the centre of a vast criminal investigation into suspected corporate manslaughter over the severe harm of potentially more than 2,000 babies and women.
The Department of Health and Social Care said it had inherited 'an unacceptable situation where too many families are suffering from botched care' and the NHS is 'paying billions for its mistakes, rather than fixing them'.
It added: 'We are committed to breaking that cycle and providing mothers and babies with safe, compassionate care once and for all.'
NHS England said it was taking immediate steps to strengthen maternity services, including closer oversight of underperforming trusts. It added: 'We recognise that too many women and families are not receiving the high-quality maternity care they deserve, and we are committed to changing this.'
NHS Resolution said: 'The high cost of compensation arising in maternity comes from a small number of very serious incidents resulting in brain injury to a baby at birth. These incidents are devastating for families and reflect the need to make provision for lifelong and complex care needs.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Remember When by Fiona Phillips review – an unsparing insight into early-onset Alzheimer's
Remember When by Fiona Phillips review – an unsparing insight into early-onset Alzheimer's

The Guardian

time27 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Remember When by Fiona Phillips review – an unsparing insight into early-onset Alzheimer's

In 2019, the TV presenter and journalist Fiona Phillips booked a last-minute trip to Vietnam with a friend. Nothing unusual there, you might think. But not only did Phillips not invite her husband or children, she didn't consult them, instead simply informing them that she was leaving the following week. It was an impulsive decision that she hoped would lift her out of a depressive episode that was manifesting in brain fog and anxiety. But for her husband, TV editor Martin Frizell, it was another instance of Phillips behaving oddly, a sign that things 'were not all they should be'. Remember When chronicles, with illuminating candour, the changes that culminated in Phillips's diagnosis of early-onset Alzheimer's in 2022, at the age of 61. Billed as a memoir by Phillips herself, owing to her decline during the three-year writing process, it's really a co-production between her, her ghostwriter Alison Phillips (no relation) and Frizell, who provides fitful interjections. As such, it offers a rare account of the impact of Alzheimer's not just from the person who has it, but from their primary carer too. Frizell initially attributed his wife's symptoms to the menopause, which can also present as low mood and memory loss. Both wondered if she had long Covid, having been infected with the virus during the first lockdown. It's a reflection of the insidiousness of Alzheimer's that neither of them managed to join the dots until comparatively late, even though Phillips's mother and father had developed the disease in their 50s and 60s respectively. She had even made documentaries about her parents' decline, and was an ambassador for Alzheimer's charities. Yet, as this book makes clear, the memory loss that is intrinsic to Alzheimer's makes it unfathomable to the sufferer. How can you pinpoint what is going wrong with your brain when the main symptom is confusion? Among the early signs, Phillips reflects, was a feeling of flatness. She recalls going for a walk on Clapham Common in early summer 2018 and looking at other Londoners enjoying the weather. 'It was like looking through a double-glazed window on to another world of which I had no part. It was a strange sense of disconnection. Of seeing others laughing, enjoying the moment, while increasingly I felt, well, nothing. Just flat.' At this point in the book, Phillips presses pause on the story of her illness to trace her early years growing up in Canterbury and, later, Southampton. Along with her childhood, we get a whistle-stop tour of her career in journalism: after starting out in local radio, she began working for Sky News and later got a job reporting for GMTV from Los Angeles. On her return to the UK in 1997, she succeeded Anthea Turner as co-host alongside Eamonn Holmes, interviewing prime ministers and Hollywood stars. The intention of this determinedly breezy segment is clear: to let us know the fearless and successful person Phillips had been before Alzheimer's did its worst. Yet it is also revealing about the impossible juggle of fronting Britain's leading TV breakfast show and raising a young family, while caring for her parents through their own diagnoses. Her devastation at watching them disappear before her eyes is mirrored in Frizell as he observes his wife's incremental withdrawal from the world. This sadness erupts into anger when he states: 'I wish Fiona had contracted cancer … It's a shocking thing to say, but at least then she might have had a chance at a cure, and certainly would have had a treatment pathway, and an array of support and care packages.' As it is, following diagnosis, the Alzheimer's sufferer and their family are largely 'left to their own devices. There is nothing more that can be done and you are left to cope alone.' By the end of Remember When, Frizell's is the dominant voice, since Phillips no longer has the capacity to articulate her experience. Early in the book she says she doesn't want to become an object of pity, or for her story to be viewed as a tragedy. But there can be no happy ending here, no endnote of hope. Capturing the loneliness and sense of loss that occurs when a loved one is alive but no longer fully present, Frizell simply says: 'I miss her. I miss my wife.' Remember When by Fiona Phillips is published by Macmillan (£22). To support the Guardian, order your copy at Delivery charges may apply.

Patients sought for new NHS trial for brain cancer after man sees tumour vanish
Patients sought for new NHS trial for brain cancer after man sees tumour vanish

Rhyl Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Patients sought for new NHS trial for brain cancer after man sees tumour vanish

The NHS study will recruit 16 people over an 18-month period and has been set up in memory of Baroness Margaret McDonagh, who died of the disease. People diagnosed with deadly glioblastoma will receive immunotherapy with the drug ipilimumab before undergoing standard treatment, when their immune system is at its strongest. The trial, from University College London Hospital's National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, follows a previous one on the same drug which closed because of lack of recruitment. One patient from that trial, Ben Trotman, is still showing no signs of glioblastoma following the treatment – well over two years since he got the drug in a world first. Most people with glioblastoma die within 12-18 months. Mr Trotman was diagnosed with glioblastoma in October 2022, when he was 40. Now aged 43 and two years and eight months on from having the treatment, his scans are clear and there are no signs of tumour. Consultant medical oncologist, Dr Paul Mulholland, who is leading the new trial and treated Mr Trotman, said: 'It is very unusual to have a clear scan with glioblastoma, especially when he didn't have the follow-up surgery that had been planned to remove all of the tumour that was initially visible on scans. 'We hope that the immunotherapy and follow-up treatment Ben has had will hold his tumour at bay – and it has so far, which we are delighted to see.' Mr Trotman got married to Emily two months after the immunotherapy treatment and in April, his daughter Mabel was born. Mrs Trotman said: 'Getting this diagnosis was the most traumatic experience. We were grappling with the fact that Ben had gone from being apparently perfectly healthy to having months to live. 'Had we not met Dr Mulholland, that would have been it for us. We felt we had a lucky break in an otherwise devastating situation.' Mr Trotman went on to have the current standard treatment of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. He has quarterly scans, which continue to be clear. Mr Trotman said: 'We obviously don't know what the future holds but having had the immunotherapy treatment and getting these encouraging scan results has given Emily and I a bit of hope. 'We are focused on rebuilding the life we thought we had lost and enjoying being parents.' Dame Siobhain McDonagh MP led a fundraising campaign to raise more than £1 million to cover the costs of the new trial. Her sister, Baroness McDonagh, died from glioblastoma in 2023. Dame Siobhain said: 'My beloved sister Margaret was appalled to discover that there had been no advances in brain cancer treatment for decades when she was diagnosed with glioblastoma. 'Changing this was Margaret's final campaign and one that I have continued in her memory. 'I am so grateful to the many people who knew and respected Margaret who have come together and helped to raise funds and campaign for this new trial that we are calling Margaret's Trial.' Dr Paul Mulholland said: 'When I met Margaret she said to me 'what can I do to support you to cure this disease?'. 'I am incredibly grateful to her and to Siobhain whose campaigning and fundraising in her sister's memory has led to this new clinical trial opening for patients with this most aggressive form of brain cancer that has such a poor prognosis, with most patients surviving just nine months after diagnosis. 'The crucial element of this trial is that patients will have their immune system boosted by the drug before they have any other treatment, when they are fit and well enough to tolerate the immunotherapy. 'We're taking everything we have learned from previous trials into this new study and we are already planning follow-on trials. 'My aim is to find a cure for glioblastoma.' The National Brain Appeal is currently funding two posts in support of Dr Mulholland's research. Treatment will take place at the NIHR UCLH's Clinical Research Facility and at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery. Patients interested in the new Win-Glio trial should discuss it with their consultant.

Almost half of people do not think 10-year plan will boost GP access
Almost half of people do not think 10-year plan will boost GP access

Rhyl Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Almost half of people do not think 10-year plan will boost GP access

More than four in 10 also believe the 10-year plan will make no difference or will not improve waiting times in A&E. However, there is huge support for some of the ideas included in the blueprint, with the overwhelming majority backing the creation of neighbourhood health centres, the expansion of the NHS app and more mental health support in schools and colleges. The 10-year health plan was unveiled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer earlier this month, and set out a series of shifts to bring care much closer to people's homes, reducing the reliance on hospitals and A&E. Key reforms include an enhanced NHS app, giving patients more control over their care, new neighbourhood health centres open six days a week and at least 12 hours a day, and new laws on food and alcohol to prevent ill health. A survey of 1,023 adults in Britain, conducted by Ipsos for the PA news agency, asked people how they think the plan will impact access to healthcare, such as getting a GP appointment, A&E waiting times and waiting times for routine hospital treatment. Some 35% said the plan will have no impact on getting a GP appointment, while 14% believe it will make things harder. This compares with the 29% of people who said they think it will make getting an appointment easier. More than a third (37%) said it will make no difference to waiting times in emergency departments, while almost one in 10 (9%), said they believe it could worsen waiting times, compared with 30% who said it will improve them. Meanwhile, 31% said the plan will have no impact on waiting times for hospital treatment, 11% believe the plan will worsen waiting times and 34% said they think the measures will help. However, a number of proposals outlined in the plan were strongly backed by the public. Some 84% said they supported the creation of a single patient record, while 78% backed the creation of neighbourhood health centres, 73% support the expansion of the NHS app and 72% are in favour of more mental health support in schools and colleges. However, more than a quarter (27%) of people do not support making hospitals fully AI enabled, compared with 44% who would back the move. Almost one in five (18%) said they would not support so-called 'patient power payments', which would allow patients to hold back some of the payment for their care if they are not satisfied, while 42% would support the measure. Some proposals aimed at helping people to lead healthier lives were also strongly supported. A ban on the sale of high-caffeine energy drinks was backed by 78% of people, while 69% back plans to restrict junk food advertising. However, almost one in five (18%) tended to disagree with measures that could see alcoholic drinks labelled with nutritional information, although 57% backed the move. One in four people think the measures included in the plan will make no difference to patients, the poll found. Almost one in 10 (9%) said they think the changes will make things worse, while 35% believe it will improve the health service. A similar proportion, 23%, said the 10-year health plan will make no difference to NHS staff, while 13% said it could make things worse and 33% believe it will have a positive effect. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'We're getting on with the job of delivering for patients, with NHS waiting lists falling by 260,000 since July 2024, delivering more than 4.6 million additional appointments since the general election and recruiting over 1,900 extra GPs to fix the front door of the NHS. 'Backed by an additional £29 billion, our 10-year health plan will seize the opportunities provided by new technology, medicines and innovation to deliver better care for all patients, no matter where they live or how much they earn, and better value for taxpayers. 'It is no surprise the plan is popular with patients, it was the result of the biggest conversation with staff, patients and the public since the formation of the NHS, with more than a quarter of a million contributions.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store