Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial LIVE updates: Verdict could come as early as today as judge gives jury firm warning
22:12
Jury told to rest up over weekend
Justice Christopher Beale reminded the jury Erin Patterson didn't have to give evidence.
The defence previously submitted Patterson was 'subjected to a lengthy cross examination' which lasted five days.
'She was careful, pedantic at times, you wouldn't have had the impression that she was trying to charm you, persuade you,' Mr Mandy said of his client's time in the witness box.
'She came through unscathed.'
Justice Beale made the comments on Friday, before sending the jury home early for the weekend.
'Don't let anybody get in your ear over the weekend,' Justice Beale warned.
'Only discuss this case with fellow jurors. Have a media blackout as far as you're concerned.
'You've been doing a great job, keep going.'
The trial will resume at 10.30am.
22:07
Verdict in mushroom murder trial could come as early as today
Justice Christopher Beale commenced his address to the jury - or 'charge' - last week after allowing jurors to prepare for the closing stage of the marathon Erin Patterson murder trial.
On Thursday, Justice Beale indicated that his address will conclude today and then two jurors will be balloted out before the remaining 12 decide Patterson's fate.
This means there is a possibility a verdict in the murder trial, which has garnered worldwide attention, could come as early as today.
Patterson, 50, is accused of murdering her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, after allegedly serving them a beef Wellington lunch made with death cap mushrooms.
Patterson is also accused of attempting to murder Heather's husband, pastor Ian Wilkinson, who survived the lunch after spending several weeks in an intensive care unit.
The court heard Patterson's estranged husband, Simon (pictured), was also invited to the gathering at her home in Leongatha, in Victoria's Gippsland region, but didn't attend.
Witnesses told the jury that Patterson ate her serving from a smaller, differently-coloured plate to those of her guests, who ate off four grey plates.
Patterson told authorities she bought dried mushrooms from an unnamed Asian store in the Monash area of Melbourne, but health inspectors could find no evidence of this.
22:11
Beale gives jury major direction about how to assess Patterson's 'confirmed lies'
Justice Beale said he wanted to 'focus on confirmed lies' which would help the jury 'assess Patterson's credibility' while he gave directions to the jury on how to assess the alleged incriminating conduct.
'You can use the fact she lied to help determine the truthfulness of things she said,' he said.
Justice Beale told the jury if they believed she lied to cover up the crime, they still needed to stake into account all of the evidence observed during the trial.
'It includes, as you know, alleged lies,' Justice Beale said.
'I will concentrate on the alleged lies for a moment because there are two ways you can use them if you find there were lies and there were some admitted lies.
'That is not to say just because you find the accused lied about one matter, you must also find she has been lying about everything else.'
Justice Beale told the jury they needed to consider if Patterson behaved the way she did because she feared she looked guilty.
He then turned to 'alleged credit lies', which he explained assess the credibility of the accused.
Justice Beale said if the jury believed Patterson told lies they could use it against her credibility.
22:09
Jury told how death cap poisoning can affect people differently
Justice Beale is now referring to a German article on death cap mushroom poisonings which was previously mentioned in evidence.
The article included a severity grading of amanita poisoning – the toxic ingredient of a death cap mushroom.
The jury heard Grade 4 is the most serious and often ends up fatal for patients, but Grade 1 says 'patients exhibit gastrointestinal phase with typical delay, but do not develop signs of liver or kidney dysfunction'.
Dr Dimitri Gerostamoulos (pictured) gave evidence about the article, and under cross-examination Mr Mandy asked the expert witness about 'explanations for differences in reactions' to death cap poisoning.
Dr Gerostamoulos said factors that may explain different reactions of individuals who have eaten the same meal include variations in concentration of toxins, how much of the meal was consumed, general health, weight, age and 'toxic tolerances'.
Mr Mandy asked the expert if two adults, with no serious pre-existing health conditions, consumed the same amount and same meal, which contained death cap mushrooms, and one person died, what would he expect the health outcomes to be for the person who did not die?
Dr Dimitri Gerostamoulos said: 'It would be likely that there would be some adverse outcomes for that person who survived.'
Justice Beale reminded the jury in Victoria last year that there was an incident where two people consumed the same meal containing death cap mushrooms where one person died while the other one was 'significantly ill' for a period and ended up in the ICU.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Melbourne childcare sexual abuse charges: what we know so far and what affected families should do
A Melbourne childcare worker has been charged with allegedly sexually abusing infants and children in his care, sparking a massive police investigation and government response. Here's what we know so far and what affected families should do. Victoria police on Tuesday announced Point Cook resident Joshua Brown, 26, had been charged with more than 70 offences relating to eight children aged between five months and two years old. The charges include: attempted sexual penetration of a child under 12; sexual assault of a child under 16; sexual activity in the presence of a child under 16; producing child abuse material for use through a carriage service; using a carriage service to transmit child abuse material; possessing child abuse material for use through a carriage service; recklessly contaminating goods to cause alarm or anxiety; using a carriage service to offend and using a carriage service to cause child abuse material to be transmitted to himself. Acting police commander Janet Stevenson told reporters the charges were laid due to a 'proactive investigation', rather than resulting from a complaint, with the alleged abuse uncovered after the discovery of child abuse material. This meant police had to identify and track down alleged victims and their families, who were notified last week, she said. Stevenson said Brown had not been known to police before the investigation. He has been in custody since his arrest on 12 May and will next appear at Melbourne magistrates court on 15 September. Police fought for a suppression order to be lifted to ensure Brown's identity was made public. Police allege there are eight victims at this stage in their investigation, all of whom attended the same childcare centre in Melbourne's western suburbs. Police said they were also aware of allegations of offending at a second childcare centre in Melbourne's northern suburbs, which is being 'investigated as a priority'. Brown worked at 20 childcare centres between January 2017 and May 2025, police said, with the state government setting up a website listing the centres and the known employment dates. They believe all alleged offending occurred within Victoria and there is no evidence to suggest any other staff member at any centre was involved. The health department and Victoria police have contacted about 2,600 families whose children attended the childcare centres where Brown was employed. They are recommending about 1,200 of the children get screened for infectious diseases, which families can arrange for free. Victoria's chief health officer, Dr Christian McGrath, said the testing was being done as a 'precaution' to ensure the health and wellbeing of the children. He refused to reveal which diseases the children may have been exposed to, citing the investigation and patient privacy, but said infections could be treated with antibiotics and there was no broader public health risk. Test results would be turned around within days or weeks, McGrath added. 'We are organising direct referrals to centres around Melbourne to organise that testing and coordinating with the laboratories to ensure that the turn around of the testing time as quick as possible,' he said. Affected families should receive either a text, email or letter from the health department or be contacted by police with more information. According to the government's website, if you have not heard from either the department or police 'it is likely that you or your child have not been identified as someone needing further public health information in relation to this matter'. But the website acknowledges there may be some families 'that we don't have the most up-to-date information for, or they have moved homes'. They have asked families to check the list of centres on the website and to contact the dedicated advice line on 1800 791 241 – open seven days a week, 8am to 9pm weekdays and 8am to 5pm weekends – if they believe their child was at one of the centres at the time of Brown's employment. Some families will be eligible for a payment of $5,000 to help with alternative care arrangements, loss of earnings and other practical needs during this time. The health department will be able to tell families if they are eligible. Wrap-around supports will also be offered. Staff at the childcare centres have been told testing is not recommended for them but they can speak to their GP if they have concerns about their health. They have also been told to contact the advice line for support. The Victorian premier, Jacinta Allan, said the government will 'take every action within our power to keep Victorian children safe'. This will include taking on any advice provided by the police and the early childhood regulator investigating the case. The minister for children, Lizzie Blandthorn, said childcare was regulated by the federal government, which, along with the states and territories, had agreed last month to new child safety measures which will come into effect on 1 September. These measures include mandatory 24-hour reporting of any allegations, complaints or incidents of physical or sexual abuse – down from the current seven-day window – and stricter rules around technology use in childcare centres. This includes centres being required to have clear policies on taking photos and videos of children, parent consent, CCTV practice and using service-issued, rather than personal, devices. Child safety will then be explicitly embedded into the national quality standard from 1 January 2026. Blandthorn, however, said the pace of reform was 'moving too slow'. She said she would like to see a national system of registration for childcare workers fast-tracked and that Victoria would implement its own regardless. The state opposition leader, Brad Battin, said the Coalition was ready to work with government to pass legislation to ensure 'the strongest possible safeguards are in place'. The federal government has been contacted for comment.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Bryan Kohberger pleads guilty to Idaho killings in bid to avoid death penalty
Former student Bryan Kohberger has agreed to plead guilty to stabbing to death four Idaho college students in 2022, a move that would spare him the death penalty under a deal with prosecutors. Kohberger, 30, was pursuing a doctoral degree in criminal justice at Washington State University in Pullman, Washington, about 8 miles (13 km) across the border from Moscow, Idaho, where the four victims attended the University of Idaho. In a case that drew national attention, Kohberger previously pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder charges. The three young women, who had been room-mates, and a young man, who was the boyfriend of one of the women, were fatally stabbed in an off-campus house where the women lived on November 13, 2022. Shanon Gray, an attorney representing the family of Kaylee Goncalves, one of the victims, confirmed that prosecutors informed the families of the deal by email and letter earlier in the day, and that his clients were upset about it. 'We are beyond furious at the State of Idaho,' Goncalves' family wrote in a Facebook post. 'They have failed us. Please give us some time. This was very unexpected.' Citing a letter from prosecutors to victims' families, ABC News said Kohberger agreed to four consecutive life sentences and has waived his right to appeal. The letter said prosecutors expect Kohberger to be sentenced in late July if he enters the guilty plea as planned at a hearing on Wednesday. 'This resolution is our sincere attempt to seek justice for your family,' the letter said, according to ABC News. 'This agreement ensures that the defendant will be convicted, will spend the rest of his life in prison and will not be able to put you and the other families through the uncertainty of decades of post-conviction appeals.' Kohberger's trial was expected to start on August 18. His attorney and the Idaho attorney general's office did not immediately comment. A court administrator had no information to release. The crime stunned the small college town of Moscow. Kohberger was arrested weeks later in Pennsylvania, where he was visiting his family, and flown to Idaho to face charges. The victims - Ethan Chapin, 20, of Conway, Washington; Xana Kernodle, 20, of Avondale, Arizona; Madison Mogen, 21, of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho; and Kaylee Goncalves, 21, of Rathdrum, Idaho - all suffered multiple stab wounds.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Tech firms suggested placing trackers under offenders' skin at meeting with justice secretary
Tracking devices inserted under offenders' skin, robots assigned to contain prisoners and driverless vehicles used to transport them were among the measures proposed by technology companies to ministers who are gathering ideas to tackle the crisis in the UK justice system. The proposals were made at a meeting of more than two dozen tech companies in London last month, chaired by the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, minutes seen by the Guardian show. Amid an acute shortage of prison places and probation officers under severe strain, ministers told the companies they wanted ideas for using wearable technologies, behaviour monitoring and geolocation to create a 'prison outside of prison'. Those present included representatives of Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Palantir, which works closely with the US military and has contracts with the NHS. IBM and the private prison operator Serco also attended alongside tagging and biometric companies, according to a response to a freedom of information request. Mahmood told the tech companies she wants 'deeper collaboration between government and tech to solve the prison capacity crisis, reduce reoffending and make communities safer'. She invited them to 'scale and improve' the existing use of tagging 'not just for monitoring but to drive rehabilitation and reduce crime'. The prisons minister, James Timpson, called for a 'tech-led approach to justice'. The initiative is the latest sign of the Labour government's embrace of the technology industry to help deliver efficiency savings in creaking public services from schools to hospitals. In January, Keir Starmer declared that AI was a way 'to transform our public services' and spoke about 'totally rewiring government'. The push by the Ministry of Justice follows last month's review of sentencing by the former justice secretary David Gauke, which called for fewer short prison sentences and the greater use of AI as well as possible wider use of facial recognition technology in public to help cut the overcrowded prison population by almost 10,000. At the meeting last month, which was hosted by the industry lobby group Tech UK, ministers asked the tech companies what a 'digital, data and technology-enabled justice system' could look like in 2050. Responses included: 'Real-time behaviour monitoring and subcutaneous tracking' to support the health, and 'behaviour management' of people under the control of the criminal justice system; artificial intelligence advisers to support offenders' rehabilitation; and robotics 'used to manage prisoner movement and containment' including 'self-driving vehicles [to] transport prisoners'. Human rights campaigners called the ideas 'alarmingly dystopian' and warned that the meeting suggested the government may be 'getting too close to the tech giants'. A second meeting with tech companies is scheduled for Tuesday, with Lord Timpson due to hear 20-minute pitches for new ideas at what officials are calling an 'innovation den'. A government source stressed the ideas raised so far were hypothetical talking points to bring about conversations about the future of offender management to better protect the public. The justice secretary has previously said she is 'not squeamish' about using technology such as 'gait recognition', a type of biometric monitoring of humans' unique movement patterns, which some believe could help prevent violence in jails before it happens. An MoJ spokesperson said: 'As the public would rightly expect, we continue to explore technology that will help us cut crime, effectively monitor offenders and keep the public safe.' Donald Campbell, the director of advocacy at Foxglove, a non-profit organisation campaigning for fairer use of technology which obtained the FoI response, called the suggestions 'alarmingly dystopian'. 'It is chilling to know that justice ministers have sat with the tech sector to discuss using robots to manage prisoners, implanting devices under people's skin to track their behaviour, or using computers to 'predict' what they will do in future,' he said. Other suggestions from the tech companies included using high-powered quantum computers to 'analyse past data to predict future behaviours and create diversion paths' and to automate sentencing calculations in the overstretched probation service. But there were also fears raised about the consequences of relying too much on technology. One response recorded in minutes was that: 'If misapplied, these technologies could lead to dystopian outcomes that are difficult to reverse.' Campbell said: 'The idea that tech companies can produce tools to 'predict' crime has been discredited time and again – it is disappointing to see that they are continuing to push it – and that the MoJ is so willing to listen.' Tech UK, which hosted the meeting, said it was part of efforts to create a fairer, better and more effective justice system. A spokesperson said: 'It is essential that the future of justice is shaped with transparency, accountability, and public trust at its core.' Google, Amazon, Microsoft, IBM and Palantir did not respond to requests for comment. Serco said: 'We will not be commenting on this activity'.
