Underscoring ongoing gender disparity, Gov. Mills declares March 25 Equal Pay Day
In order to catch up with the amount of pay the average man made last year, a full-time working woman in the United States would need to toil through March 25.
As a symbolic reminder that 'there's more to do to ensure Maine women receive equal pay for equal work,' Gov. Janet Mills issued a proclamation declaring March 25 National Equal Pay Day in Maine.
The proclamation notes that even though Maine Equal Pay Day is recognized annually on the first Tuesday of April, the national day symbolizes how far into the year women in the U.S. must have worked to earn what men had earned by December 31, 2024.
'Ensuring equal pay and access to good-paying jobs is not just about fairness — it strengthens families, reduces poverty, and drives economic growth,' said Maine Labor Commissioner Laura Fortman in a news release.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the difference between median earnings for men and women in Maine who worked full-time, year-round in 2023 was roughly $8,900. Men earned a median of $61,300, while women earned $52,400. Those gaps are even bigger between white, non-Hispanic or Latino men and American Indian and Alaska Native women ($30,100), and Black or African American women ($25,200).
Asian women experience a smaller gap of $1,600 less than white or Latino men.
'Equal Pay Day highlights the ongoing struggle to appropriately value and support the work of Maine women — and the full Equal Pay Day calendar shows how the burden of the wage gap falls disproportionately on mothers, women of color, disabled women, and the LGBTQ+ community,' said Elinor Higgins, executive director of Maine's Permanent Commission on the Status of Women, a group appointed by the governor that advises the state on policy and social issues related to women and girls.
The governor pointed to recent progress on this front, namely a law passed in 2019 that discourages employers from basing wages on an employee's salary history. Last week, the Legislature's Labor Committee split on a bill (LD 799) that would require employers to annually report gender-based wage gaps to the Bureau of Labor Standards. The Mills administration did not take a formal position on the legislation but raised several questions about implementation and enforcement.
Though Maine's Equal Pay Law requires that employers pay workers an equal amount for work that is comparable in skill, effort, and responsibility, the 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates highlights persistent gaps in legal, health, sales, production and maintenance occupations in Maine.
In December, the Permanent Commission on the Status of Women released its 2024 biennial report, which found that gender disparities persist in part due to disproportionate caregiving responsibilities and insufficient access to services such as affordable, high-quality child and elder care.
'The gender wage gap is not about individuals, it's about systems,' said Destie Hohman Sprague, executive director of the Maine Women's Lobby. ''Women's work' (traditional roles such as care and caregiving) pays less, and women earn less over a lifetime because of their unpaid caregiving roles.'
'Systems are solved with policies, and Maine policymakers have an opportunity to address this gap once by supporting bills that address pay transparency and workforce segregation,' Hohman Sprague continued. 'They also must continue to build the caregiving structures, such as paid family and medical leave, childcare, and direct care, which supports pay equity over the long term.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
6 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
U.S. to End ‘De Minimis' Tariff Loophole for Small Shipments
The U.S. will end the so-called 'de minimis' tariff loophole that allows goods under $800 to enter the country duty-free, the White House said Wednesday. It had already halted the practice for Chinese goods in May. Starting Aug. 29, even small packages received through the international postal network will be subject to 'all effective duties,' the White House said in a fact sheet, arguing that other nations have used the program to smuggle drugs and evade tariffs. Low-value goods will be tariffed under two methods at the outset. Some will be charged an 'ad-valorem' duty that reflects the tariffs on the origin country, while others will receive a 'specific duty' ranging from $80 to $200 an item. The latter method will only be effective for six months, the document said, after which all products will be charged the ad-valorem rate. Merchandise brought back to the U.S. by American travelers will still be duty-free up to $200, as will gifts valued at $100 or less.


Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Massie blindsided Mike Johnson on Trump truce
At Rep. Thomas Massie's request, House Speaker Mike Johnson successfully appealed directly to President Trump for a truce, multiple sources told Axios. But Massie broke the truce just days later, accusing top Republicans of covering up the Jeffrey Epstein files. Why it matters: The personal attacks blindsided the House leaders who'd stepped in to shield the Kentucky Republican from Trump's public rebuke. On July 3, Massie met with multiple members of leadership and asked for help in reconciling his relationship with Trump, who had just launched a super PAC aimed at ousting him. Johnson (R-La.) then spoke with Trump directly and negotiated a peace agreement. All sides agreed to stop the attack ads, according to a source familiar with the matter. That night, Massie flipped his vote on a key procedural measure tied to the "big, beautiful bill," surprising colleagues after months of resistance. He still voted against final passage of the bill. Three days later, Axios first reported the Justice Department had concluded that Epstein "had no client list." In the days that followed, Massie ramped up his criticism of the administration's handling of the Epstein files. The truce was dead: On July 14, a pro-Trump super PAC announced it would spend 800,000 on a new TV ad attacking Massie for "voting with the radical Democrats." On July 15, Massie formally introduced a discharge petition to release the Epstein files. Massie posted on X last week: "@SpeakerJohnson, why are you running cover for an underage sex trafficking ring and pretending this is a partisan issue? MAGA voted for this." Driving the news: Massie has teamed up with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) to force a House vote on declassifying the Epstein files, which is expected to happen when the House returns in September. If 218 members sign on, House leaders will be forced to bring the resolution to the floor. The effort represents a direct challenge to leadership. Johnson has insisted Republicans are working to release all evidence that relates to Epstein, while also ensuring they are "protecting all victims." Zoom out: Massie has attacked Trump over his strikes in Iran, voted twice against the president's sweeping tax cuts and spending bill, and was the only Republican to oppose a stopgap government funding bill in March. Massie publicly has brushed off Trump's attacks, telling Axios in June that Trump will "do some polling and see that he's going to lose and maybe not get [involved] in the race." In a show of recent defiance, Massie launched his first TV ad last week to highlight his call for the release Epstein files. What they're saying: Johnson has struck a harsh but polite tone when it comes to Massie's personal attacks, quipping "bless his heart" after being pressed on whether he'd support Massie's reelection bid.


Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
Republicans Want to Redraw America's Political Map
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Texas Republicans are planning to redraw their congressional districts this year, five years ahead of schedule. As with most other recent examples of norm-breaking behavior in American politics, the reason for this involves Donald J. Trump. Earlier this summer, the president asked Texas Governor Greg Abbott to dabble in a little gerrymandering to produce five more Republican-leaning districts in his state ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In July, Abbott answered the call, summoning state lawmakers back to Austin for a 30-day special session, in part to begin working on a new district map. (The Texas legislature is in session only once every other year.) The state has been holding public hearings about the redistricting plan; this morning, state lawmakers released a proposed new map that could give the GOP 30 of the state's 38 House seats and help pad the party's slim majority. Not much appears to prevent Texas Republicans from doing this. States typically redraw their congressional districts every 10 years, after a new census is conducted. But the Texas GOP has gone off schedule before, way back in 2003, and the Supreme Court later ruled that the Constitution doesn't prohibit mid-decade redistricting. There's been plenty of resistance from Texas voters, who've filled public-hearing rooms in protest, and from high-profile politicians, who've appeared at rallies and raised money to fight the new map. The state's Democrats might consider breaking quorum, like they did in 2021 to block a vote on the issue, but GOP lawmakers probably have the leverage to force them back to the table. So far, things are going according to plan for Texas Republicans. They have the votes, and at least right now, they seem to have the political will. But just as important as whether Texas Republicans follow through with redistricting is how Democrats will respond. A gerrymandering war, in other words, could be on the way. 'We're saying to the Texans, 'You shouldn't be going down this path,'' former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said last week. 'You want to go down this path? We'll go down together.' The governors (and wannabe presidential contenders) Gavin Newsom of California and J. B. Pritzker of Illinois both suggested that they will consider redrawing their own state's districts to favor—or further favor —Democrats. Similar efforts are being considered in New York and Maryland too. Many experts—and Democrats themselves —have long argued that partisan gerrymandering is undemocratic and unfair. Their embrace of a gerrymandering tit for tat would reflect a new mindset that many Democrats have adopted in the second Trump era: that they should be just as politically ruthless as Republicans—and when the GOP goes low, the Democrats should meet them there. But two questions complicate this approach. The first is a logistical one: Can Democrats even do what they're threatening to? 'It's a state-by-state determination,' the election-law expert David Becker told me. Some states, such as California and New York, have independent redistricting commissions, which means that any attempt at partisan gerrymandering would require turning that power back over to politicians—a complicated and slow process. Other states, such as Illinois and Maryland, have laws allowing for a little more flexibility when redrawing maps. The other, more pressing question for Democrats is whether they should. They certainly may feel inclined to match the GOP's aggressive tactics, but extreme partisan gerrymandering carries a certain amount of risk, one that Texas Republicans would be undertaking, Becker said. To maximize Republican wins in more districts overall, they might have to reduce their margins in others, making some of those new districts vulnerable in a potential blue-wave election. All this partisan maneuvering is arguably a race to the bottom. Imagine a future in which every two years, states redraw their congressional maps: Voters would find themselves in a new district several times each decade, unable to get to know the people who are supposed to represent them. 'This would do incredible damage to faith in institutions' and add to the cynicism that so many Americans already feel about politics, Dan Vicuña, a senior policy director at Common Cause, told me. 'There appears to be a temptation to meet attacks on democracy with more attacks on democracy,' Vicuña added. It's up to Democrats to decide if they'll resist the urge. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: To see how America unraveled, go back five years. Emil Bove is a sign of the times. The dangerous logic of CTE self-diagnosis Today's News Former Vice President Kamala Harris announced that she will not run for California governor in 2026, choosing to instead focus on supporting Democrats nationwide after her 2024 presidential loss. Harris didn't confirm any specific future plans. An 8.8-magnitude earthquake struck off Russia's Far East region yesterday, triggering tsunami waves that reached Hawaii, California, and Washington. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem confirmed this morning that the threat of a major tsunami had 'passed completely,' with no significant damage reported. The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady, despite pressure from President Donald Trump to lower rates, and warned about slowing growth. Officials have signaled potential cuts later this year, as inflation remains somewhat elevated and economic uncertainty increases. A Love Letter to Music Listings By Gabriel Kahane About a year and a half ago, I was scheduled to play a concert in Vermont when word came that the gig would be canceled because of an approaching nor'easter. I checked out of the hotel early, lobbed my suitcase into the rental car, and hightailed it to New York as menacing clouds darkened the rearview mirror. Brooklyn had been home for the better part of two decades, but after a move to the Pacific Northwest, I was returning as a tourist, and the show's cancellation augured a rare free evening in the city. There was just one problem: How was I going to figure out what to do with my night on the town? This used to be easy. More From The Atlantic Read. ' Preamble to the West,' a poem by Iris Jamahl Dunkle: 'Can't lick the witch wind that carries rumors / over shining aurora-lit prairies: / horror of what comes to light at the dawn / of the mind.' Take a look. These photos capture Guédelon Castle, in France, where builders use 13th-century techniques to re-create medieval craftsmanship. Play our daily crossword. P.S. Lots of you responded to last week's newsletter about finding simple moments of joy in your daily life, and I've loved reading your answers. I'll share two of my favorites here, as a bit of a prelude to a forthcoming, small-delights-focused issue of the Daily. Eric wrote in to say that he was inspired by the 2023 movie Perfect Days (which I need to watch!) and is now trying to incorporate a simple, daily gesture into his life: 'When I walk out my door to go to work, I try to remember to just stop, stand, look at my neighborhood and the sky, and smile—it may take only 10 seconds, but it begins the public version of my life on the right foot.' Another idea I liked, from Sarah, is buying one new thing at the grocery store every time you visit: 'It's a mini flavor adventure every trip, whether it turns out I'd buy that thing again or not.'