Can you really be ‘coached' to pass aptitude tests for entry to medical school?
want to change entry requirements
for studying medicine in Irish universities following concern that many applicants are being coached for tests aimed at determining their aptitude for working in the sector. Tell me more about these tests
Applicants for undergraduate medicine are required to combine their
Leaving Certificate
results with the
Hpat
(Health Professions Admission Test), which was introduced in 2009 to assess skills deemed important for medicine, such as reasoning, problem-solving and interpersonal skills.
While the 2½-hour test was initially envisaged as one that candidates could not study for, there is now an extensive private tuition industry where students can prepare for the assessment.
How much are candidates paying for private tuition?
There are lots of 'preparatory courses' available for students, who can spend up to €800 for a 15-week series of classes and mock exams.
Typically, they are operated by so-called grind schools such as the Institute of Education in Dublin, Hewitt College in Cork and many others; in addition, there is something of a cottage industry among medical students who have done well in the test offering their services.
READ MORE
How widely used is the Hpat?
About 3,000 students take the test each year, which is required to study undergraduate medicine at University of Galway, the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Trinity College Dublin, UCC and UCD. University of Limerick also requires the Hpat for entry to its master's courses in occupational therapy and speech and language therapy.
Can you really be coached to do better in the Hpat?
When it was introduced in 2009, the Australian Council for Educational Research (Acer), which devised the Hpat, said it did 'not endorse any training college and actively discourages candidates attending them. They are a waste of the candidates' (or their parents') money.'
However, there is evidence that suggests they can pay off. A review by five medical faculties three years after its introduction found 40 per cent of successful applicants each year had improved their Hpat score after resitting it and so got a place in an undergraduate medical school. The report found the greatest improvement was in the non-verbal reasoning section.
There have been adjustments to the weighting of components of the test and changes to rules around when candidates can sit the test over the years. Nonetheless, critics say those who can afford expensive preparatory and repeat courses retain a significant advantage.
Is the issue of 'coaching' candidates a concern outside Ireland?
Yes, it is an issue elsewhere. Studies highlight that in countries such as Germany and the UK, private companies offer expensive preparatory courses for similar medical aptitude tests. They, too, are grappling with ethical questions about equal access, as these courses may improve test results and thus increase the likelihood of admission for wealthier candidates.
Interestingly, Australia combines the test with a structured interview process to help identify those suited to the profession.
So, what changes are being planned to the Hpat?
The Hpat is marked out of a total of 300 points, which is added to a candidate's Leaving Cert score. For example, a student who gets 500 points in the Leaving Cert and 200 points in the Hpat gets a combined score of 700 points.
Under revised plans, the Hpat would be reduced to 150 points. This, say sources, means the test would carry the equivalent weight of about one extra subject for entry purposes.
When will changes come into effect?
The planned changes will require sign-off by the academic councils of universities. In theory, this should be simple, says sources. If implemented, they would probably have a two-year lead-in time from when the changes are announced.
Why was the Hpat introduced in the first place?
It was introduced following concerns that medical applicants needed to achieve 'a perfect Leaving Cert', while those with an aptitude for medicine were falling through the cracks.
The system that came in – which is still in place – says that for school leavers to be eligible to compete for entry to undergraduate medicine they must achieve a minimum of 480 points, meet minimum subject entry requirement and complete the Hpat. Hpat scores are added to Leaving Cert points, although Leaving Cert points above 550 are moderated, with one point awarded for every five scored above that level.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
31 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Naas hospital voluntarily paused insourcing amid concerns over use of public funding
Naas General Hospital voluntarily paused the use of an initiative to tackle waiting lists , after concerns were raised about the way in which public funding was used. The National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF), a vehicle set up to reduce waiting lists, provides funding through outsourcing – the use of private facilities – and insourcing – the use of public facilities and staff outside of core working hours. In recent months concerns have been raised about the way in which the use of insourcing has been governed, after a leaked 2022 report from Children's Health Ireland (CHI) highlighted allegations about potential misuse of these funds. Funding for the hospital was temporarily suspended in light of these allegations but has since resumed, while funding for Beaumont Hospital has also been suspended in light of 'potential financial irregularities'. READ MORE Speaking at a meeting of the Oireachtas health committee on Wednesday, Bernard Gloster , chief executive of the Health Service Executive (HSE), confirmed concerns have also been raised about Naas General Hospital. According to Mr Gloster, the regional executive officer received correspondence outlining potential issues at the hospital. 'It's not unusual when the CHI report.. came the way it did that you would start to see sequentially people starting to express concerns. There is a concern about how NTPF funding was used or governed by Naas hospital. [An] internal audit will look at that,' Mr Gloster said. 'Conservatively' the audit will take about three months, he added. Fiona Brady, chief executive of the NTPF, said: 'Naas of their own volition stopped their own insourcing temporarily while they liaised with myself and my executive team and we are happy they will be rectifying this issue immediately.' Mr Gloster said the issue around insourcing is widespread, and not about individual doctors or hospitals. 'Fundamentally it appears to be a systemic issue, albeit very different in every hospital,' Mr Gloster said. He said there are 'mechanisms of governance' but the 'effectiveness of the governance is probably questionable' in relation to insourcing. In Mr Gloster's report to Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill on the topic, published late on Tuesday, he outlines a desire to wind down the use of insourcing by June of next year. The report states that a growth in insourcing without adequate oversight and controls can create conflicts of interest and lead to noncompliance with procurement rules; inequitable use of public funds, risk of abuse, misuse, fraud and low public confidence. Mr Gloster said the risks of insourcing are 'too high for the public', which is why he believes it should be phased out. An 'over-reliance' on the system has developed over time, he said. In the interim, he said there will be new 'protections' in relation to potential conflicts of interests. In recent years, the health service has taken steps to move towards a longer working week, with health unions last week agreeing to work five over seven days – increasing the hours of work outside of a typical Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm. Mr Gloster agreed the existence of insourcing creates an impediment to the extended working week. 'For as long as we have this type of third party insourcing, we will not get to five over seven in the management of waiting lists,' he said. 'Productivity will not be encouraged and risk of conflicts of interest remain.' The health chief was also critical of CHI's decision to to publish an anonymised version of the 2022 report. He expressed confidence in Lucy Nugent, the new chief executive, and the new board members, but said there is a 'way to go to see whether the entity [CHI] is sustainable in the future'.
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Children's hospital contractor BAM to deliver €380m university campus project
A consortium led by national children's hospital contractor BAM is to deliver a €380 million university campus project, the Cabinet was told on Tuesday. The project, which will see the construction of five new buildings across multiple university campuses, is being delivered via a public-private partnership (PPP). The Dutch-owned builder has been involved in a long and bitter dispute with the State over cost and time overruns at the children's hospital project, which is now estimated to cost more than €1.5 billion above what was originally envisaged. The contract has been signed by the Invesis consortium, which consists of an investment company owned by BAM and a Dutch pension fund, alongside Bam Building Limited and BAM Facilities Management Ireland. READ MORE The Irish Times previously reported that the contract was awarded to the group despite the bid not meeting value-for-money tests. A previous financial cost/benefit analysis conducted by the State found that economic benefits outweigh the costs of the project, but ministers were told last year that the tender price also exceeded the upper end of a benchmark used in a value-for-money comparison test. These tests are designed to ensure a PPP costs less than using traditional procurement. The Government must give direct approval to contracts which exceed the public sector benchmark. Last December, Government figures argued that the projects would help economic growth regionally, generating €1.60 back for the State for every €1 it spends on the project. A spokeswoman for Minister for Higher and Further Education James Lawless said BAM have a track record in delivering projects as part of public-private partnerships. 'The PPP is very robust contract and as part of a PPP contract there is a significant risk transfer to the contractor,' the spokeswoman said. The risk transfer element means that the company only receive payment if the building is delivered, she said. BAM is building the project but the funding is being provided by a consortium of lenders, who will be the one's to lose out of the project is not delivered. 'Our contract is with the PPP company not the builder,' the spokeswoman said. The project consists of the second phase of a higher education PPP programme and will see new buildings constructed in the Waterford and Carlow campuses of the South East Technical University , and the Letterkenny and Galway campuses of the Technological University of the Shannon .
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
HSE proposes phasing out use of external companies used to cut waiting lists in public hospitals
The HSE has proposed phasing out over the next year, the use of external companies which use public facilities and employees outside normal business hours to tackle hospital waiting lists. However, HSE chief executive Bernard Gloster warned in a report to Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill , that without increases in productivity, ending what is known as insourcing arrangements in public hospitals could result in a significant increase in the use of the private sector. The HSE chief had been asked by the Minister to review on a national basis how dependent the public system had become on insourcing to tackle waiting lists. The report, published on Tuesday night, reveals that close to €100 million had been spent in just over two-and-a-half years on engaging external companies that use HSE -owned facilities and equipment after normal working hours – in many cases employing existing health service staff – to reduce public waiting lists. READ MORE The report reveals 83 serving or former health staff are acting as directors in 148 companies providing what are known as insourcing and outsourcing arrangements to reduce waiting lists. It says 23 such company directors are currently employed by the HSE. Mr Gloster, who drew up the report, is to tell an Oireachtas committee on Wednesday that the report's findings suggest that 'in waiting-list management we have developed an over-reliance on insourcing to supplement core activity'. 'Insourcing by its nature carries risks and having assessed these I have agreed with the Minister and the department [of Health] the need to take a series of steps which firstly reduce those risks and increase safeguards and secondly which removes our dependency on insourcing,' he is expected to say. Mr Gloster will define insourcing as the practice of engaging external companies or third-party providers to deliver services often outside of normal working hours using HSE-owned facilities and equipment. [ Almost €100m spent on companies that use HSE facilities and staff to cut waiting lists after hours Opens in new window ] 'In many cases, these providers may employ or subcontract staff who are already directly employed by the HSE, effectively re-engaging internal staff through a separate commercial arrangement, typically at premium rates,' he is expected to say. 'It is not the use of standard overtime within employment contract arrangements of existing staff, which is a different form of insourcing.' The report proposes ending the use of insourcing by June 30th next year. However, it warns political decisions would need to be taken to allow contracts to be ended. The report warns if productivity did not increase – either through using provisions in the new public patient-only contract for hospital consultants or work practice reforms for other health service personnel, treatment for more patients on waiting lists would have to be outsourced to the private sector. It suggested this could see 18,000 instances of care each month transferred to private hospitals. The HSE was asked by the Minister to examine on a national basis the scale and dependency of the health service on the practice of insourcing after a number of controversies. Last September a HSE internal audit revealed that two companies which received more than €1.5 million between them in contracts awarded by University Hospital Limerick without a competitive procurement process were owned or part-owned by employees at the facility. In May, a leaked unpublished internal report, originally drawn up in 2022 within a hospital run by Children's Health Ireland, said there were 'serious concerns about the prudent and beneficial management' of National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF) funding in relation to a series of clinics run by one consultant. Ms Carroll MacNeill said on Tuesday night that she would like to discuss a plan to reduce dependence on insourcing with the Oireachtas Committee on Health 'so that we can achieve our shared goal of maximising productivity in the public health service, ensuring patients have timely access to the treatments they need'. 'I will be reflecting on some of these steps in the coming weeks and look forward to working together with the committee in the spirit of Sláintecare on this.'
